I Am DB

June 18, 2012

Bringing Out the Dead

Filed under: Music,Real Life — DB @ 4:27 pm

Maybe because fear and anxiety about death are so hard-wired into the human brain, we find ourselves fascinated by the concept of life after death. If so, it might explain our culture’s obsession with vampires and zombies (not that the latter really constitutes life after death, but that’s irrelevant for now). The last several years have found us particularly attached to these creatures. True Blood, The Vampire Diaries, Twilight (books and films) and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (book and imminent film) have sucked in scores of enthusiasts, while Zombieland, Left 4 Dead, The Walking Dead (comics and TV show) and Pride and Prejudice and Zombies have frenetically dashed or raggedly ambled their way into our hearts…and intestines. These movies, TV shows, video games and books that I mention barely scratch the surface of the surface of the offerings available to sate our cravings for bloodsuckers and brain-munchers.

Lately though, things seem to be taking a turn for the bizarre. Vampires remain safely confined to fiction, but a recent slate of disturbing incidents make a compelling argument that we are at the beginning of a zombie plague. In response to the rise of these occurrences, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement denying the advent of a zombie apocalypse…though what they actually say is that they aren’t aware of any “virus or condition that would reanimate the dead (or one that would present zombie-like symptoms).” Just cause they aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean it can’t be real. But for now, I’m going to accept the CDC’s declaration that these chilling acts are unrelated, and not indicative of the impending end of days.

There is, however, one upsetting example of the dead rising from the grave that has been gaining a lot of attention recently as well, and unfortunately this one is all too real. I’m talking about the holographic resurrection of deceased entertainers.

It started in April at the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival, when Tupac Shakur took the stage in hologram form and sang with Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg. You might remember Tupac from his hit songs including “Keep Ya Head Up,” “Me Against the World” and “Dear Mama,” or from films such as Poetic Justice, or from his September 1996 death after being shot in Las Vegas. Yes, the man died 16 years ago, but the world couldn’t let go. Songs and albums continued to be released years after his demise, and now the hologram has kicked things up to a new level of creepy. Dr. Dre oversaw the resurrection, which was constructed by the visual effects company Digital Domain and staged at the concert by AV Concepts. It was the first time that such an effect was accomplished without using old or repurposed footage. This was a newly created, original performance by Tupac. How his vocals were achieved remains a mystery.

It’s not like we haven’t seen forms of this before. Fred Astaire was brought back to dance with a vacuum cleaner in a Dirt Devil commercial, John Wayne was worked into an ad for Coors Beer, Natalie Cole sang a duet of “Unforgettable” with her late father Nat King Cole, and Celine Dion sang with Elvis Presley on a 2007 episode of American Idol.  But in each of these cases, previously existing footage (or recordings, in the case of Cole) was used. Tupac’s performance was brand new. And it has kicked off an alarming trend. Setting their sights higher than just projecting old footage, CORE Media Group – which owns the branding rights to Elvis – is partnering with Digital Domain to bring him back for newly created performances. Apparently they envision Elvis returning for new concerts, TV shows and movies. In addition, holographic versions of Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison and Marilyn Monroe might be on the way, and Michael Jackson’s siblings seem to like the idea of bringing Michael back for a big tour.

Yeah, I’ll bet they do. Cause the world is clamoring to see just Tito, Jermaine and the others in concert again.

Haven’t we already seen what happens when Michael Jackson returns from the dead?

Sure, it’s all smooth moves and funky choreography until he chases you into a spooky house with all his friends and eats your innards.

We may be in the 21st century, but old-fashioned hucksterism is alive and well. The fact that these efforts amount to insensitive cash grabs are the least troubling thing about them. The responsible parties can talk all they want about bringing thrilling new experiences to audiences and how magical it will be, but the magic they’re espousing is of the dark variety, and anyone who’s played around with voodoo or horcruxes can tell you that dark magic doesn’t end well. The artists in question have no say in how their likenesses are being used, but even more crucial is that they aren’t responsible for their own performances. When Elvis, or Tupac, or Hendrix were alive and performing in concerts, they were engaging with their audiences, feeding off real energy and giving it back in return. If Presley thrust his hips, it wasn’t because a computer program told him to do it. He did it because he decided, “I’m going to thrust my hips now. And then I’m going to walk over here and bend down and sing directly to this girl in the blue T-shirt, and now I’m going to cross over to the other side of the stage and fall on my knees and sing to the rafters.” He decided to do those things in the moment, because he was feeling the song and the vibe in the room. Hendrix didn’t smash his guitar, light it on fire or play it behind his head because he was being manipulated by a puppet master. He did those things because he was Jimi fucking Hendrix and that’s what he wanted to do.

Those experiences can not be replicated. A hologram has no soul. It’s a cheat. Tupac’s Coachella stint can be viewed in isolation as “a moment,” but in the end it was just an impressive lightshow. You can’t take a gimmick and turn it into an industry. Or hey, maybe you can…Hollywood seems to be doing it with 3D. But a gimmick is a gimmick, and it doesn’t provide or replace an authentic experience. Tupac, Elvis, Hendrix, Morrison, Marilyn, Janis, Michael, Whitney…they’re dead. They all died too young, with more to contribute to their art, but they’re dead, and for any of us who loved any of them, their deaths became part of our relationship with them. The mourning and the memories became as important a part of the way we relate to them as the concert we saw them perform during their lifetime. And if we never got to see them perform, a hologram will give us no more truthful an experience than we would get from an impersonator. It will just cost a lot more money. And where does this digital-age grave robbery stop? Will performers like Astaire and Wayne be brought back to “act” in movies again? Will politicians resurrect late party champions like Reagan or Kennedy to speak at their conventions and endorse a current candidate? It’s not hard to imagine this getting quickly out of hand.

Look, I’ve got nothing against a good hologram. But let’s use them appropriately. Here are some acceptable uses for holograms:

1. Intergalactic government agent/construction worker killing his enemies


2. Imprisoned princess recording plea for help

3. Humanoid alien communicating with dead parents


4. Starship crew members escaping the rigors of space exploration and hostile encounters with Ferengi by enjoying a little R&R in simulated 19th century London


5. Actors participating in theme park rides based on their movies


6. Backup band for glam rocker Jem


7. Whatever Bill Murray wants (as long as he’s still alive and directly responsible for the usage)

Elvis, Tupac, Marilyn…the legacies of these stars have endured for years after their deaths. There is no lack of interest in their work or awareness of their lives, and that seems to be going just fine. This line doesn’t need to be crossed. Bringing someone back in hologram form and placing them into whatever venue some promoter or greedy estate manager decides is not only a shallow act of self-interest, but completely disrespectful to the artist. Death is a natural part of one’s life, and carrying the memory of the dead is a natural part of life for those left behind, whether it’s the deceased’s intimates or legions of admirers. So I’m hoping that soon enough, all his Tupac-inspired enthusiasm for rock star holograms will die down and that logic and sense will prevail.

But it probably won’t. This is show business, after all.

June 10, 2012

Tweet Dreams (Are Made of This)

Filed under: Real Life — DB @ 11:51 am

And who am I to disagree?

I’m just one little man, no longer able to fend off the crushing weight of that cultural force known as Twitter. Goddamn, I hate when I have to give in to something I’ve tried so hard to resist. But give in I must. And I feel like a sell-out.

I actually created a Twitter account several months ago. As my job hunt continues, and as I keep looking at postings for writing and communications positions, one thing that pops up over and over again is that employers want workers who are familiar with/comfortable with/adept with/experienced with social media. Sometimes they leave it at that, and sometimes they specifically mention Facebook and Twitter. Never mind that half these places have absolutely no need for Twitter feeds or Facebook pages. But hey, all the cool kids are playing with these tools, so every shithead wants in on the action, whether or not there’s any action to be had. So okay, fine, if I want to get these jobs, I need to be good with the social media, and that means sucking it up and climbing aboard the Twitter train. I created an account. I signed up to follow Stephen Colbert, Conan O’Brien, Eddie Izzard, Simon Pegg, Kevin Smith, Steve Martin…a few other people. Then I pretty much never logged in.

Twitter has always seemed like a stupid idea to me. As if texting wasn’t doing enough damage to both human interaction and the human ability to spell, now we had a whole platform built around the idea of delivering 140-character blips? Overlooking the character limit for a moment, my first thought was, “Why tweet when you could text?” I’m still not sure I know the answer to that. I think it might have something to do with hashtags and building or contributing to a community of commenters around a certain topic…but I’m not yet sure if I fully “get” hashtags, so I have no idea if I’m on the right track. I hear the word “hashtag” and I get a craving for some pan-fried potato shreddings. Or I think of John Travolta extolling the virtues of Amsterdam to Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction.

They should call ‘em hash bars instead of hashtags. I’d dig that the most.

Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah…Twitter is stupid. I did eventually see one outlet for it that I approved of, and that was comedy. Twitter has been good for comedy.  Maybe I’m not remembering accurately, but I feel like Conan jumped on it pretty quickly and started having fun with it early on. And many other comic personalities have made good use of it. As my above list of followees indicates, I initially utilized it as a delivery system for their witty observations. Beyond that…meh.

There are some political protesters in the Middle East who might disagree with me, as Twitter and other social media tools are credited with playing a significant role in the Arab Spring uprisings. And if these platforms indeed helped in their movement, then praise be to Allah, Mark Zuckerberg and whoever founded Twitter. I don’t deny that people have found ways to make good use of it. Last year, a friend in L.A. was able to score tickets to an anniversary screening of Raiders of the Lost Ark (followed by a Q&A with Steven Spielberg and Harrison Ford!) by responding to a Los Angeles Times entertainment reporter’s Twitter feed. So hey, that’s value. I’m still just not sure how Twitter enables things that texting doesn’t. Please feel free to educate me in the comments.

Hopefully I’ll find out soon enough one way or another, because the whole point of this already-overlong post is to announce – with all the lack of fanfare merited – that I’m now on Twitter. As in, I’m actually going to start tweeting. Not just because a working knowledge of the tool could be an asset in my job search, but because admittedly, it could be a nice complement to the blog and perhaps gain me additional readers. If I have something to say that doesn’t justify an entire post, I can tweet it. If I want to follow-up on something mentioned in an earlier post, I can tweet it. If I want to send a creepy, stalker-ish message to Natalie Portman, I can tweet it. And maybe this will finally be the way to highlight the constant flow of brilliant segments from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report that I haven’t been posting on the blog itself.

I don’t expect I’ll be doing it too often, and I’m not about to implore people to follow my Twitter feed the way I pathetically begged for blog subscribers. But if you want to follow me, I’ll be there. Strangely, at the time of this writing I already have eleven followers. Which makes no sense to me since I’ve yet to send a single tweet, meaning these eleven people (one of whom, it should be said, I’ve never heard of) presumably looked me up to see if I had an account and then just signed up. Anyway…the username DB was already taken…as were most reasonable variations I could think of, and even some pretty unreasonable variations. So despite the risk of misrepresenting myself as having an advanced degree, I went with #DoctorDB.

By the time you read this post, I will likely have sent my first tweet. And I will likely feel a little dirty about it. I’ll be in the shower.

May 8, 2012

When Colbert Met Sendak…

Seeing as you’re online reading this right now, you’ve probably already learned elsewhere on the internet that Maurice Sendak, author of Where the Wild Things Are and many other classic, award-winning books, passed away today. The New York Times published a thorough obituary online about Sendak’s life and work, and other news outlets have picked up the story as well. But there is an element to this that strikes me as cosmically eerie, and which wasn’t mentioned in any of the three pieces I read this morning about Sendak’s death. Two of those articles touch on the fact that a few months ago, Stephen Colbert traveled to Sendak’s home to interview him. Their chat aired in two parts on consecutive nights, and before I get to the cosmic eerieness, you should watch their hilarious interaction.

Though it probably seemed like a gag at the time, Colbert really did find a publisher for I Am a Pole (And So Can You!)…and the book, bearing Sendak’s endorsement, became available today. I almost published a post yesterday about its impending release, mainly as an excuse to share the interview and make sure people knew that a new example of Colbert’s genius was about to hit. I ended up not doing it, though I thought I might post the interview in the future, whenever Sendak passed away. Then I saw the news online today – the release day of the book – that Sendak was gone. Maybe I’m alone here, but I find that pretty damn cosmically eerie. So…enjoy the interview, pull out your copy of Where the Wild Things Are and maybe even pick up Colbert’s story. It’s also available in audiobook form, read by Tom Hanks. Seriously. The proceeds are going to a charity that helps military veterans readjust to society, and besides, what better way to honor the departed author than by purchasing a book he so tepidly recommended?

Thanks for the stories, Mr. Sendak.

April 20, 2012

Go Sox!

Filed under: Real Life — DB @ 12:41 pm

I’m not much of a sports fan, but I grew up about 25 minutes outside Boston, so of course it’s in my blood to root for the Red Sox and loathe the Yankees. Tonight, the rivals meet up for the first time this season. In honor of the event, I share with you this commercial for New Era from last year, part of a series in which New York fan Alec Baldwin and Boston fan John Krasinski taunt and torment each other. They were all funny, but this was by far my favorite.

I also read this morning, courtesy of The Huffington Post, that today marks the 100th anniversary of the first game ever played at Fenway Park. They use the opportunity to offer five Fenway-centric clips from the movies.

I have this really hazy memory of being a little kid – like, pre-school age – and going to Fenway with my dad, who knew somebody that worked there. It was a weekday, pretty quiet, but if my recollection is accurate, we did walk through the clubhouse and see some of the players in uniform. But it meant nothing to me. In fact, the highlight of the visit was that my dad’s friend gave me a Baby Ruth. I’m pretty sure my older brother, who was in school, was furious that he had missed this and that it had been wasted on me when I didn’t even care about the team.

Anyway…Happy Anniversary Fenway, and let’s go Sox!

April 4, 2012

Survival of the Financially Fittest

Filed under: Real Life,The Daily Show,TV — DB @ 5:13 pm

On my About this Blog page, I touched on the frequency with which I would be posting clips from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, but since actually going live in mid-January, I haven’t posted a single one. I have a backlog of historical clips from both shows that I could easily toss up here every few days just for fun, but once I started to accrue a few subscribers, I felt guilty about filling their Inbox too frequently. We’ll see how that plays out over the long haul, but right now it’s time for a dose of Daily Show. Jon Stewart did a segment last week that I wanted to share…mainly because of one line that caught my attention. Here’s the piece, which covers the Supreme Court’s review of President Obama’s health care law. (For some reason it’s been chopped into two clips.)

The comment Stewart makes in the second half of the segment that rings so true is this: “Although you do have to wonder how it is that the party that creationists call home is so Darwinian.”

The line comes and goes so fast that it almost gets buried within the bit, so I want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves, because it’s such a brilliant statement: smart, funny and so incisive. Read it again. Take a moment to appreciate the simple construction of a great joke. Like many types of comedy, political comedy – when it works – does so because of the truth behind the gag.

“…the party that creationists call home is so Darwinian.” The hypocrisy Stewart gets at there is of course typical of conservatives and Republicans, who regularly contradict one of the basic principles of their own ideology. All politicians swim in the pool of hypocrisy, but this particular example seems specific to conservatives. It’s the same hypocrisy by which the party that supposedly stands for small government and individual liberty is the party that’s always up in everyone’s face – and every woman’s uterus – about what they can and can’t do in their private lives. The GOP’s own web page states, “The Republican Party, like our nation’s founders, believes that government must be limited so that it never becomes powerful enough to infringe on the rights of individuals.” Yet they’re constantly trying to infringe on individual liberties and regulate people’s personal lives. They’re the ones trying to keep homosexuals out of the military. They’re the ones fighting tooth and nail to ban same-sex marriage. They’re the ones who want to determine how women’s bodies can be treated. They’re the ones who want all Americans, regardless of their faith, to be governed according to the principles of the Christian bible.

So conservatives want a government big and involved enough to make sure that gays and lesbians can’t marry, but not one so big that it takes care of sick people who may not be able to afford health insurance. Good to see they have their priorities straight. Now when it comes to the law, I don’t pretend to understand anything more complex than the State of Alabama vs. William Gambini and Stanley Rothenstein as seen in My Cousin Vinny, so I can’t comment on the legality of the health care regulation. But Justice Scalia’s  comment in that clip about not obligating yourself to a system that provides for everyone seems to be how a lot of conservatives and Republicans feel. It just surprises me that the party which would probably claim Jesus as its own is the same party that now equates compassion with socialism.

I guess I’m a fool for still being surprised by such attitudes and contradictions. As always, my thanks to Jon Stewart for easing the pain.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Theme: Customized Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: