I Am DB

March 23, 2010

LOST S6E8: Recon

Filed under: Lost,TV — DB @ 2:30 pm

AN OFFICER AND A GEN…WELL, MAYBE NOT SUCH A GENTLEMAN
When Sawyer was seated across from Hurley on Sideways-815 and overheard him talking about his lottery winnings, he advised him that people might try to take advantage of him for his money. And he looked like he might be one of those people. But in light of what we learn in this episode, Sawyer was probably just looking out for him. For after seeing him in familiar sleep-with-hot-broad-then-let-her-“accidentally”-see-a-suitcase-full-of-money mode (the pitch and drop, as she calls it), we learn that this time Sawyer is an undercover cop with the LAPD. And to boot, Miles is his partner. I smell a CHiPs update!

So in SidewaysLand, Sawyer is the mostly honorable Detective James Ford. I say mostly because he does have a bit of bloodlust – he’s still seeking the Sawyer who he blames for his parents’ deaths. I wonder if the Anthony Cooper he’s after is still Locke’s father. We know from Locke’s sideways-flash that he has a better relationship with his father now, so perhaps his father is not a con man in this reality. Maybe the Anthony Cooper sought by Sawyer is a different one.

Or maybe not. Either way, Sawyer hides the list when Miles returns to the desk. But Miles hears him say something about Anthony Cooper and inquires, so Sawyer makes something up to cover it. Miles senses something is off and tells Sawyer that as partners, they can talk about anything. He also reminds Sawyer about the blind date he set up for him that night. He describes the girl as a friend of his who works at the museum with his dad – which is a cool premise, since he and Charlotte – who turns out to be the girl in question – probably played together as kids on the island. Now they’re off (along with Dr. Chang) and still friends.

Sawyer meets Charlotte for dinner that night, and the date goes well enough that they wind up back at his place. I’m not gonna lie – it was kinda weird seeing Sawyer and Charlotte hooking up. I really wanted to see Faraday bust into the room all George McFly and say, “Hey you, get your damn hands off her!” But no such luck.

When Sawyer leaves the room and Charlotte pulls open a drawer to find a T-shirt, she accidentally finds a folder labeled “Sawyer.” A photo of young James and his parents falls out, and when she opens the folder to replace it, she finds a newspaper clipping with the same picture and a headline about a child surviving the death of his parents. There’s a lot of other material in there as well, and when Sawyer walks in and finds her looking at it, he flies off the handle and kicks her out of the apartment.

The next day, we’re treated to an unexpected sight at Sawyer’s police station: Charlie’s brother Liam is in the lobby. When Sawyer passes by, Liam stops him and asks about his brother, who was arrested at the airport on a drug charge. Sawyer says that’s not his department and moves on. He finds Miles, who brings him into the locker room and chews him out for lying about going to Palm Springs the previous weekend when he was actually in Australia – a fact Miles confirmed by running Sawyer’s credit card. Sawyer thinks Miles has crossed a line, saying the reason for his trip down under is none of his partner’s business. Miles reacts by ending the partnership. I’ve gotta side with Sawyer on this. I understand that police partners needs to trust each other, but does that mean opening up every detail of their private lives? Even a cop is allowed to have some personal secrets, right?

I find it hilarious, if not a bit easy, that what melts Sawyer’s cold exterior on this subject is an episode of Little House on the Prairie, which he watches that night alone in his apartment as he eats dinner. It’s also a nice reference to earlier events. In Season Three’s episode Tricia Tanaka Is Dead, Sawyer mentioned watching a lot of Little House when he was a kid, prompting Kate to tease him. So Michael Landon shows Sawyer the error of his ways, moving him to go to Charlotte’s apartment with a sunflower and a six-pack to apologize. She’s not having it, and you can’t blame her. Next he tries Miles, pulling up outside of their station. In the car, he hands Miles the Sawyer folder and tells him what happened to his family, admitting that he’s been tracking this guy ever since he left the academy (he was in Australia following a lead, which turned up the name Anthony Cooper) and that when he finds him, he intends to kill him. He says he kept it to himself because he knew Miles would try to talk him out of it, which Miles says is absolutely right. Sawyer responds, “Fair enough,” suggesting that maybe he’s prepared to let the vendetta go…but just then a car smashes into theirs. The driver, already being pursued by a black and white, flees on foot. Sawyer and Miles follow in their car and cut the runner off. Sawyer grabs them and pins them against a fence, pulling off a sweatshirt hood to reveal Kate. He recognizes her from the plane, and I think she knows him too. She’s itchin’ to run, but he’s got her. Where’s this gonna go?

BABIES, BEARS AND BOATS
On the island, Sawyer and Jin are minding the store at Claire’s hut while Man in Locke runs his errand at The Temple. When Jin wakes up and learns that only he and Sawyer are there, he urgently says they have to leave. Sawyer surprises Jin by saying he’s with Locke. “That is not Locke,” Jin says, making me wish I knew what transpired after Man in Locke walked into Claire’s hut and Jin first saw him. What has Man in Locke told Jin?  Not an important question at all, just one I’d enjoy seeing an answer to. Jin says he has to find Sun, and Sawyer promises, “If she’s here, you got my word: we ain’t leavin’ without her.”

The Temple party arrives, but they aren’t staying long. Man in Locke says they have to keep moving, but that he’ll make himself available for questions soon. Cindy wants to know what happened to the people who stayed at The Temple. He says the Black Smoke killed them, which upsets the little boy Zack. He clutches his familiar teddy bear, and Man in Locke crouches down to reassure him that he’s safe and protected.

In Claire’s hut, Kate sees the freaky faux-baby and asks what it is. “It’s all I had,” Claire says coldly. She’s acting strange toward Kate – shooting furtive, scheming glances one minute and then smiling at her the next, even holding her hand when Locke talks about what the Smoke Monster did at The Temple. But Kate can see something is not right.

After some more walking, Man in Locke tells the group they’re going to make camp in a clearing and could be there for a few days. This doesn’t sit well with an antsy Sawyer. He questions Man in Locke, who takes him aside. When Sawyer asks him how he saved those people from the Smoke Monster, Locke admits that he is the Smoke Monster. Sawyer asks if he killed those people at The Temple…which is a fair question, though I might have first asked, “You wanna explain to me how it is that you transform into an enormous cloud of black smoke?” To each his own, I suppose. Locke tells Sawyer that he gave them all a chance to leave peacefully, but many refused “because they’re convinced that they’re protecting the island from me, when in fact all I want to do is leave. So it’s either kill or be killed. And I don’t want to be killed.”

He takes Sawyer to a nearby patch of beach with an outrigger canoe and says he wants him to go to Hydra Island and scope it out. He thinks some of other Ajira passengers intend to do them harm. He’s not worried about anything happening to Sawyer, who he calls “the best liar I ever met.” He tells Sawyer to make up whatever story he needs to in order to gain their trust and learn what he can, then to come report back. Turns out his plan is to get them all on the Ajira plane and leave the island. It seems sort of mundane that this guy who can turn into a giant billow of smoke needs a plane to get off the island, but I’ll let that alone. Eager to leave once and for all, Sawyer accepts the mission and sets off.

PROBLEM CHILD
Kate sits down on a log next to Sayid, who looks sad and distant. She asks if he believes Locke can get them off island (he says yes) and then asks if he’s alright (he says no). Claire suddenly grabs her from behind, throws her down, climbs on top of her and tries to stab her throat. Kate tries to fight her off and looks to Sayid for help, but he just sits there watching impassively. Man in Locke runs over and throws Claire off. She is freaking out, screaming that Kate took Aaron. “Claire you had disappeared,” Locke says. “Kate couldn’t find you; she did what she had to do.” Claire keeps struggling and screaming, and Locke slaps her hard across the face, stunning her…and Kate (but not Sayid, who shows no emotion or change in expression as he watches the scene with total detachment). “This is completely inappropriate,” Locke says. “Now go over there. I’ll deal with you in a minute.” Locke asks if Kate is alright. In tears, she says no. Locke goes to Claire and sits down next to her. Later, he finds Kate sitting alone against a tree.

L: I’m sorry Kate.
K: Excuse me?
L: I have to take responsibility for Claire’s behavior. I was the one who told her that the Others had her baby.
K: Why would you tell her that?
L: Have you ever had an enemy? Someone that you needed to hate? Very powerful, isn’t it? Claire was devastated without Aaron. She needed something to…something to keep her going, so I gave her something to hate. And then when you told her the truth, all those feelings, all that anger that she’d been holding onto for so long, it had to go somewhere.
K: That’s very insightful. Coming from a dead man.
L: Well nobody’s perfect. I’m sorry that this happened. And I’m sure if you give her time, everything will be alright. I promised before that I would keep everyone safe. And that means you too, Kate.
K: Where did Sawyer go?

In answer to her question, he brings her to the beach from earlier…

This Man in Locke fellow is a real enigma. What are we to make of him? He told Claire that The Others had Aaron in order to give her an enemy to hate, but isn’t he also responsible for separating Claire and Aaron in the first place? When Locke went into Jacob’s cabin and found Christian Shephard and Claire, he asked her where the baby was. Christian said Aaron was “where he’s supposed to be, and that’s not here.” (He also told Locke it would be best if he didn’t tell anyone that he saw Claire.) So the whole situation was orchestrated by the Man in Black, right? Was it because he needed Claire for some reason? Or was it that he needed Aaron to not be there? Does Aaron pose some threat? We recently saw Locke promise to reunite Claire with her son, but after expressing his “crazy mother” concerns to Kate, what are his intentions for the Littletons?

Furthering the Man in Locke puzzle is that he seems…he seems pretty decent and compassionate, by and large. Sure, there’s the occasional slap across the face of a hysterical woman or black smoke rampage through enemy territory, but when it comes to his people, he seems genuinely concerned. He offered friendly reassurance to Zack, he appears sympathetic to Kate, he admits to Sawyer that he smokes, he seems up front and open about his plans….is it all just a grand performance?  Remember that when he spoke to Ben in the statue, telling him about what the real Locke was thinking when Ben killed him, he says that Locke was the only one of the Flight 815 castaways “who realized how pitiful the life he left behind actually was.” That doesn’t sound like someone who has much regard for people who are trying to get back to those pitiful lives. So if we are to believe Jacob’s followers that the Man in Black is an enemy who wants to destroy everyone on the island, then what is he playing at with his followers?

And what of this story he tells Kate about his mother? Is all of that made up? It seems awfully modern-day-therapy for a dude who’s been on the island for probably 100+ years. Yet as he talks, he does seem to be touching some raw nerves. The way he says “problems that could have been avoided had things been different” sounds heavy with meaning and feeling. Is he really the product of a difficult childhood? And if so, how has that shaped his agenda and actions?

As Kate heads back to the camp after her talk with Man in Locke, Claire approaches her and apologizes, saying she knows Kate only did what she did because she cares about her. She thanks her for taking care of Aaron and breaks down crying, throwing her arms around Kate, who tentatively returns the embrace. I was afraid Claire might grab for the rifle slung over Kate’s shoulder or try something else, but this outpouring of emotion was what it was. What happens to Claire now? Will she stay loyal to Man in Locke when shit starts to go down? What will happen when she finds out about her connection to Jack?

SPY GAME
Sawyer arrives on Hydra Island and takes a nostalgic walk around the cages where he and Kate had been held prisoner. He finds the plane, which looks intact if not a bit bruised. You gotta hand it to Lapidus – the guy is good. Sawyer continues to look around, but all is eerily quiet. He finally comes upon a circular pile of fresh dead bodies, and then sees someone running away nearby. He gives chase, tackling his quarry and pulling his gun on what turns out to be a scared woman who tells him she’s the only one left. But her story is vague. She says they were waiting after the crash to be rescued, and while she was out gathering firewood, she heard screaming and came back to find them all dead.

Sawyer tells her he’s with a group of people on the other island. She asks a lot of questions, and Sawyer knows something is up. When he holds her at gunpoint again and tells her he knows she’s lying, she whistles and some not-very-tough-looking guys with rifles pop up out of the brush. Sawyer puts his gun down and lowers to his knees. “Take me to your leader,” he says, unfazed.

The woman – Zoe – and her armed companions escort Sawyer to a docked submarine. On their way, he sees people setting up smaller versions of the pylons that surrounded New Otherton, protecting them from the Smoke Monster and other unfriendly forces. Zoe leads Sawyer onto the sub and down a hall where he notices a padlocked door. She knocks on a door and presents Sawyer to the Bossman.

When Sawyer tells Widmore he can kill Locke, Widmore smiles but doesn’t confirm that that’s even what he wants to do. I interpreted it as the smile of a man who’s amused because he’s dealing with someone who thinks he knows what he’s doing but doesn’t. What if Widmore is there to help the Man in Black get off the island? If Widmore is the ferryman come to help Man in Black escape, Sawyer might be the mark in a con bigger than he’s ever been involved in before and possibly beyond his ability to navigate.

A SIMPLE PLAN
Sawyer arrives back on the main island, and Man in Locke eagerly helps him pull the canoe ashore.

L: How did it go?
S: You didn’t really send me over there to find passengers from that plane, did you?
L: No.
S: Well in case you’re interested, they’re all dead.
L: Well that’s terrible. What happened?
S: I don’t know.
L: Well what do you know, James?
S: I know there’s a man over there on that island that ain’t gonna let us get on that plane without a fight. Came over on a sub. Name’s Widmore.
L: Charles Widmore?
S: Well I guess y’all know each other. He ain’t alone. Counted at least six armed compadres with him, not to mention whatever crew’s on that sub. There’s a locked room on there, somethin’ they’re hidin.’ And they’re settin’ up pylons, like the ones in New Otherton. You know…the ones that keep out that smoke thing?
L: And what did you tell them about me?
S: I told ‘em I’d tell you the coast was clear and bring you back with me, walk you right into their trap. That way they can kill you. Which means they’ll be caught with their pants down when we change our plan of attack.
L: I appreciate your loyalty, James.
S: You said you were gonna get me off this island. Deal’s a deal.

Man in Locke (or should I blame Terry O’Quinn?) is maddeningly inscrutable; it is impossible to interpret his reaction when he hears that Widmore is there. He seems surprised by it, but who knows?  When Sawyer talks about changing their plan of attack, Man in Locke smiles. Just like Widmore did. Again, I see it as a smile indicating he could barely hide how amused he was by Sawyer’s interpretation of what’s really happening. Also, why was Sawyer so suspicious about the sub’s locked door? I haven’t been on many submarines in my day – I think the last one was the 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea ride at DisneyWorld in 1987 – but I would think it’s not uncommon to have locked doors. Hell, I’ve got a padlocked storage unit in the carport at my apartment, and I can assure you there is nothing dangerous or illegal in there.

Seriously. There is absolutely nothing dangerous or illegal in my locked storage unit. Nothing.

Anyway, let me go over this, just to keep it straight in my head. Man in Locke said to Richard at the end of last season, when their group was on the way to see Jacob, that after that visit they were “gonna need to deal with the rest of the passengers on the Ajira flight that brought me here.” When Richard asked what he meant by “deal with them,” Locke replied, “You know what I mean.” The sinister implication there supports the notion that Man in Locke thinks there are people on the flight who mean him harm. And so sending Sawyer to Hydra Island for recon makes sense. But upon Sawyer’s return, he admits that he didn’t really send him there to seek out Ajira passengers. So why did he send him there? If Widmore is indeed there to help him, could the mission have been to find out if Widmore was in place yet? Why not just tell Sawyer that? Given all the activity around the sub, my guess is that even if Widmore is there to help get them off the island, he’s there for more than just that. If Man in Locke is going to betray his followers, then perhaps Widmore and Company are going to help him with that as well, in which case Locke would keep Sawyer in the dark.

But what do we make of the pylons? Do those suggest that Widmore and his people are trying to protect themselves from the Man in Locke? Or are they meant to protect others from getting to them? The New Otherton pylons have a high-pitch frequency that can be fatal, so they aren’t just protection from Smokey. Maybe they’re there to keep the sub safe from Team Jacob. And what about Widmore’s claim that he didn’t kill the people Sawyer found piled up outside, who I assume are the Ajira passengers? Do we believe him? If Widmore isn’t there to help the Man in Black, does that mean he’s on Jacob’s side? Does that make him a good guy after all? Something doesn’t add up.

Actually, many things don’t add up, but I can’t even comprehend them all. My head aches.

Sawyer sits with Kate and tells her about Widmore and the armed team setting up camp on other island. She doesn’t react to hearing Widmore’s name, but she certainly knows who he is and that the freighter was his, having been on Penny’s rescue boat when the Oceanic Six constructed the lie. Sawyer tells her that Widmore is there for Locke, but no one has confirmed that. It’s all Sawyer’s assumptions and suspicions.

K: So what are you gonna do?
S: I’m gonna let them fight it out. And while they got their hands full with each other, you and me are gettin’ the hell off this island.
K: Even if we could get on that plane, who’s gonna fly it?
S: We ain’t takin’ the plane, Freckles. We’re takin’ the sub.

This wouldn’t be the first time Sawyer pitted two power players against each other. He got his hands on all the guns from the hatch after duping both Locke and Jack. Can he do it again? And more importantly, are the two power players in this game even on opposite teams?

LOOSE ENDS/FOOD FOR THOUGHT
-It didn’t occur to me, but I’ve read some comments online questioning why Sawyer let Kate escape from the airport security guards in the season premiere if he’s a cop. Did his desire to help out a pretty woman temporarily disable his moral compass?

-After this episode, I was thinking about some of the significant choices that characters have made in the sideways reality and how they align with or differ from the kinds of choices we’ve known them to make in the past. Sawyer tells Charlotte that he got to a point where he was going to become a criminal or a cop, and he chose cop…but he still wants to kill the real Sawyer. Ben shows the capability for blackmail when he tries to oust his principal, but ultimately chooses to abandon his plan in favor of assisting Alex with her future goals. Kate takes the time to go back and help Claire, but she’s still trying to elude capture by the law. Sayid initially chooses to respect Nadia’s request not to go after those responsible for attacking his brother, but when they come for him, he kills them rather than showing mercy. Not sure what I’m getting at, other than most of them seem to make better choices in SidewaysLand than they did before, even though they come right up to the line between right and wrong. I really can’t wait to see how SidewaysLand reconciles with the island timeline and what all of these alternadventures mean.

-Reader David Z. reminded me that at one point last season, while the island was still flashing through time, Locke, Sawyer, Juliet, Charlotte, Faraday and Miles took one of the outrigger canoes and tried to get around the island to The Orchid station, but while en route they came under gunfire from another outrigger in the distance. As they fired back, another flash came and saved them… placing them in the middle of a raging storm that forced them back to shore. We never found out who those people were that fired on them. Seeing Widmore’s camp on Hydra Island made David – and now me – wonder if we might find out the answer to that mystery this season.

-I’m sure no one cares about this or even noticed but me, but there were some really odd visual touches to this episode. There were a handful of shots – mainly of Sawyer – that were in really soft focus and poorly lit. They looked like they’d come from a bad pan-and-scan version of an 80’s action B-movie. Anyone else notice this? I checked the credits, and the episode was directed and photographed by two Lost regulars, so I don’t know what to make of it. But it really stood out to me.

-Amazon has the complete series DVD set available for pre-order, and I thought this picture was pretty cool even though I’m sure it’s not he final cover art. But I like the image of the island hidden under a sheet with a Dharma insignia.

LINE OF THE NIGHT
Alas, no standouts in this episode – kind of surprising for a Sawyer-centric outing.

Tonight’s Episode: Ab Aeterno

March 16, 2010

LOST S6E7: Dr. Linus

Filed under: Lost — DB @ 3:28 pm

I read recently that Damon and Carlton see this season playing out in a traditional three-act structure. The first act centered on events at The Temple. This episode began Act II, which will focus on the ongoing gathering and actions of the two camps: Team Jacob and Team Smokey. And Act III we can safely assume will amount to the showdown…and an avalanche of answers.

Among the many things I liked about this flippin’ great episode, with its multiple Napoleon Dynamite references (well, not exactly) was that we got to spend some quality time with characters who’ve been only briefly seen during the last few episodes – namely Ilana and Richard (still not enough Lapidus, but I’ll take what I can get…). Before we get to the titular Dr. Linus, let’s pick up with Jack and Hurley on their way back from an emotional visit to the lighthouse.

FIRESIDE CHAT
Jack is anxious to get back to The Temple, and though Hurley tries to stall based on Jacob’s warning about someone “bad” heading there, Jack sees though his efforts. As they debate which way is the route back, Richard emerges from the jungle and points them in a third direction, saying The Temple is that way.

J: Where did you come from?
R: You wouldn’t believe me if I told you.
J: Try me.
R: Not yet.

Having left them with that mystery, he walks off toward The Temple and sure enough, they follow. As they walk, Hurley grills Richard on why he looks the same as he did 30 years ago. He throws out time traveling, cyborg and vampire as possible explanations, but Richard says no to all of them.  I was curious about this exchange, because if my memory serves, I don’t think Hurley and Richard have ever met before. I can’t think of a time when they came across each other in the normal island timeline, nor can I recall them meeting in the Great Dharma Debacle of 1977. If any of you remember differently, let me know…but I’m pretty sure I’m right. Overlooking that possible error in continuity, Richard’s only answer to Hurley is that Jacob gave him a gift. This piques Jack’s interest, and he asks what Richard knows about Jacob. All Richard says is that he knows Jacob is dead.

When they come out into a clearing, they have arrived not at The Temple, but the Black Rock. He admits to lying about leading them to The Temple, informing them that everyone there is dead. Jack asks with alarm if that includes their friends, naming Kate and Sayid specifically. Richard says they weren’t there and maybe got out alive. When Hurley admits to Jack that Jacob hinted at this, Richard looks stunned. “You spoke to Jacob?” He shakes his head, more frustrated. “Well whatever he said, don’t beleive him.” He walks toward the shipwreck, saying there’s something he needs to do. When Jack asks what, he answers, “Die.”

Richard enters the galley, looking around as if recalling a haunted past. He touches a pair of shackles, suggesting that the Man in Locke’s recent remark, “It’s good to see you out of those chains” may indeed mean that Richard was a “guest” on the Black Rock’s final voyage.

Richard, you trickster! You lied about The Temple and where you’d been just to arouse their curiosity so they would follow you and play Kevorkian. I like that even though Richard admits he’s not a cyborg, he does share a common trait with Schwarzenegger’s T-800, as revealed at the end of Terminator 2: Judgment Day: he can’t self-terminate. The scene continues…

“I’m not.” The last time Jack expressed such certainty was when he dropped Jughead down into the chasm at The Swan, believing it would negate the crash of Flight 815. As far as he knows – as far as any of us know for sure – that was a failure. So given his track record, I’d agree with Richard that he’s taking a pretty big risk. Still, I love that he is so confident in his logic. I also love that Jack really has come to accept what Locke told him all along: that he – that all of them – were brought to the island for a reason. The tables have turned again, and Jack is the Man of Faith trying to convince someone who has lost theirs that there is a higher power guiding them. Jack has become a man of both science and faith.

One other comment here is that when Jack tells Richard about the lighthouse and Jacob wanting him to see the mirror, Richard asks why. Richard has already admitted that he wasn’t in on Jacob’s plan, but did anyone else get the sense that he didn’t even know about lighthouse and the mirror? That surprises me. The lighthouse seems like a major tool of Jacob’s modus operandi, and it’s hard to imagine Richard hasn’t had some idea of what it does and how/why Jacob is using it. But maybe not.

It was nice to finally get some teases into the mystery of Richard Alpert, voted by fans in an Entertainment Weekly poll last year as the number one mystery they wanted solved. We dangled our toes in the water here, but I’ve heard that next week’s episode will be the deep dive into Richard’s full backstory.

I BELIEVE THE CHILDREN ARE THE FUTURE
And from dynamite to Napoleon: turning away from the island and toward the man of the hour, our trip into SidewaysLand gave us a deeper glimpse into the life of Benjamin Linus, European History Teacher. We first see him talking to his class about the French emperor’s exile to the island of Elba, where he was frustrated not by his isolation so much as his loss of power. It’s a direct parallel to Ben’s own arc, as we’ve seen ever since he woke up on Hydra Island with a resurrected John Locke sitting at his bedside.

Ben clearly cares about his job and his efforts to help the students with potential, so much so that when he’s grousing in the lunchroom about how the school principal is disconnected from the classroom experience and the importance of reaching the kids, substitute teacher John Locke suggests that Ben be the principal instead. I love that it’s Locke who makes the suggestion, setting Ben on the path to a moral conflict. Oh, and let me also say how much I love that in this timeline, Ben and Arzt are disgruntled pals. Add them to my growing list of Lost spin-off sitcom duos…

Here in SidewaysLand, Ben is living with and caring for his ailing father Roger, who requires an oxygen tank to breathe. (Roger Linus is once again played by Jon Gries, or as he’s known in certain circles, Uncle Rico.) They appear to have a much better relationship here, and Roger regrets that Ben feels dissatisfied.

 

R: This isn’t the life I wanted for you, Ben. I wanted so much more.
B: I know.
R: That’s why I signed up for that damn Dharma Initiative and took you to the island and…they were decent people. Smarter than I’ll ever be. Imagine how different our lives would have been if we’d stayed.
B: Yes, we’d have both lived happily ever after.
R: No, I’m serious Ben! Who knows what you would have become?

Whoh. That’s the first time that anyone in SidewaysLand has referenced the island, which was sitting on the ocean floor when Flight 815 flew over it. Sure, the submerged island had the Dharma houses, swing set, etc. but we didn’t know for sure that those structures were associated with the Initiative. Now we can assume that they are.  So how long were Ben and Roger there? Why did they leave? How did the Island sink? It couldn’t have been as a result of the Swan explosion, right? If the island sank when the bomb detonated, Roger and Young Ben would have sunk with it. Was Ethan still born on the island, to Horace and Amy? Do Ethan and Ben know each other in SidewaysLand? What about Dogen? Was he ever there?
Ben’s doorbell rings and he opens it to find Alex, looking much sleeker and less disheveled than she ever did on the island. She asks about that day’s cancellation of the History Club, and says she was counting on some tutoring before her next test. Ben arranges to meet with her at the library the next morning. When they do, they discuss the East India Trading Company (an illustration of a pirate ship is deliberately shown to us in their textbook). Alex struggles under the stress of scoring a good grade, getting into college and succeeding in life. The pressure we put on these high school kids…

Ben remarks that Alex is one of his brightest students and that he doesn’t have any concerns about her future prospects. Although for such a supposedly bright girl, she seems to be struggling with some pretty basic stuff. I mean…tutoring in history? Math, science, even English I can understand…but history? You read the text, memorize the facts…and you’re done. What’s to tutor? Regardless, Alex has her sights set on Yale, but needs a recommendation from an alumnus to have a shot at getting in. The only one she knows of is the school’s Principal Reynolds, the bureaucrat whose job Ben has come to covet. He sees an opportunity when Alex offhandedly refers to Reynolds as a “pervert” and tells him that once after school, she heard Reynolds and the school nurse engaged in some Sex Ed of their own while she recuperated from a stomach ache in the next room.

Ben goes to Arzt and asks if he can tap into another staff member’s school e-mail account. When he tells him why, Arzt says, “You’re makin’ a play! You’re going after the Big Job, aren’t you?” He rhymes off a list of things he wants if Ben comes to power – new equipment, a cush parking space, etc. Arzt says Ben had him fooled with the sweater-vest. “You’re a real killer,” he laughs.

Ben soon goes to Principal Reynolds (played by the great William Atherton) and shows him print-outs of illicit e-mails he’s exchanged with the nurse during a six month period. In exchange for not exposing Reynolds to the school board and his wife, Ben comes up with a scenario for Reynolds to resign and name Ben as successor. But then Reynolds shows Ben an e-mail. It’s from Alex, requesting a letter of recommendation to Yale. Reynolds gives Ben a choice: follow through with his power grab and watch Reynolds “torch” Alex’s future, or back off and allow Alex to get what she wants. It appears at first that Ben sticks to his plot, but then we realize that he made the right choice and nixed his scheme. Somehow he manages to keep his own job and not get his ass tossed on the street by Reynolds (I guess Reynolds has to be careful in case Ben reveals what he knows at some later date). So it all works out in the end – even for Arzt, to whom Ben offers his parking space.

So Ben Linus, with a little love and respect in his life, turns out to be a nice guy who cares about his family, friends and students. How sweet. But what of Island Ben?

TO SERVE AND PROTECT
After fleeing from Creepy Sayid, Ben re-joins Ilana, Lapidus, Sun and Miles as they make their way from The Temple. He suggests that they go back to the 815ers beachfront property, and with no other logical alternative for the time being, Ilana agrees. As they travel there, Ben tells Miles that the thing at The Temple is what killed Ilana’s friends at the statue. But Ilana is suspicious when Ben doesn’t include Jacob in the list of victims…rather like Buttercup doubting Prince Humperdinck’s dispatch of the four fastest ships in his armada. She asks Miles to confirm that he can talk to the dead, to which he says he can only pick up on how people died and what their last thoughts were. She gives him the sack of Jacob’s ashes and asks him to do his thing. Reader Lorelei D. thought she recalled Miles telling someone in his flashback last season that what he does works best when there’s a body. My recollection is that while Miles did say that, he never said that he absolutely had to have a body in order to commune with the dead. So while this was probably a continuity error, it still plays. And whether consistent or not, it certainly works this time, as Miles tells Ilana that Ben stabbed Jacob. Ben looks incredulous, while Ilana stares daggers at him. “Jacob was the closest thing I ever had to father,” she says.

Wow, really? This is a reminder of how much we have yet to learn about Ilana. The only slice of backstory we have on her is that Jacob came to see her in some kind of hospital that looked like it was probably in a third world country. Her face was heavily bandaged, and Jacob came and sat down at her bedside. She said she was very happy to see him, and he told her that he needed her help. Next thing we know chronologically, she’s pretending to hit on Sayid at a Los Angeles bar, later claiming to be in the employ of one of Sayid’s Widmore-web murder victims, but even that’s a ruse to get him on Ajira 316. So when will we know what Ilana’s story is? Some have wondered if she, like Richard, has been around for an unnaturally long time. I hadn’t thought about that, but when Jacob visits her he’s wearing gloves. It didn’t show whether or not he touched her, but in light of what Richard said about Jacob’s touch, it might be worth noting.

As the group tries to make the wrecked beach site habitable, Sun approaches a still-upset Ilana.

S: How long are we going to stay here?
I:  I told you, I don’t know yet.
S: I need to find my husband!
I:  Trust me, if anyone wants to find him it’s me. But I don’t know where to look.
S: Why do you want to find Jin?
I:  Because, your last name is Kwon. So is his. And I don’t know whether I’m supposed to protect you, him or both of you.
S: Protect us, what are you talking about?
I:  You’re candidates. To replace Jacob.
S: Replace him? To do what?
I:  If you’re the one selected, I imagine you’ll find out.
S: Wait…you said candidates. How many are there?
I:  Six. There are only six left.

So who are the six? Definitely Hurley (8), Sawyer (15), Jack (23) and at least one Kwon (42). Although she doesn’t have one of the numbers assigned to her, Kate’s name was not crossed out yet on the lighthouse dial, so can we assume she’s still in the running? Sayid’s name wasn’t crossed out in the cave, but surely Ilana has now ruled him out since Ben told her that he killed Dogen and Lennon and chose to go with Locke. So if Kate and both Sun and Jin are candidates, that’s the six. But what if only one Kwon is under consideration? Who might be the missing link? And if Ilana doesn’t know whether she’s meant to protect Sun and Jin or just one of them, how can she even be sure how many candidates are left?

As Ben sifts through items in one of the tents, he passes over a copy of The Chosen, by Chaim Potok, a book that I’m pretty sure every teenage Jew is required by international law to read. Does the title offer some foreshadowing for Ben? When Lapidus comes by and tells Ben to help him gather firewood, Ben finds a bottle of Oceanic Airlines water and says he can remember the plane breaking in half overhead like it was yesterday. Frank says he sounds nostalgic. “Maybe I am,” Ben says. Frank says he was supposed to be flying 815 but he overslept that day (Wow, that’s the reason? I think somebody owes Mrs. Captain Seth Norris a big fat apology).

He wonders how different his life would have been if his alarm had gone off. “How different would it have been,” Ben asks? “The island still got you in the end, didn’t it?”

GRAVE MATTER
Right about that time, Ilana shoves her rifle in Ben’s face and marches him around the bend to the castaway’s cemetery, where she puts a makeshift clamp on his leg, ties it to a tree and forces him to dig his own grave. That’s never fun. Under her watchful eye, he doesn’t have much choice. When Miles walks by later on, Ben asks him if he’s still interested in the $3.2 million he tried to extort not so long ago. He says that if Miles lets him loose, he can get off the island, where he has “a vast network of people and resources that will get you that money.”

(This goes back to my question from last year about what seemed like a whole group of off-island Others like Jill the butcher, who helped Ben out in his efforts to reassemble the Oceanic Six.. Are these people like some kind of Illuminati? I doubt we’ll learn more about them, but that will always be one of the minor mysteries that rattle around in the recesses of my brain.)

Miles says he doesn’t need the money, since they’re standing steps away from a couple named Nikki and Paulo who were buried alive with $8 million in diamonds. Ha! So Damon and Carlton found a way to make Nikki and Paulo relevant after all! Ben says that Ilana is going to kill him for killing Jacob, who didn’t care about dying anyway. But Miles corrects him. “No, he cared. Right up until the second the knife went through his heart, he was hoping he was wrong about you. I guess he wasn’t.”

As Ben nearly completes digging, he hears the Smoke Monster – who must be quieter than usual, as the noise doesn’t attract Ilana, who’s maybe a half-yard away. Staying out of her sight, Man in Locke asks what Ben is doing. Ben fills him in on what’s about to go down, describing Ilana as Jacob’s bodyguard. Man in Locke used the same term back at the statue, when Bram and his companions came into the chamber. I thought he was being facetious, but now I wonder if that’s what it boils down to. Are Ilana and her people essentially Jacob’s Secret Service?

Man in Locke explains that despite Ben’s assumptions, he doesn’t want him dead. He even went back to the statue to find him. He says that he’s gathering a group of people to leave island for good. “But once we’re gone, someone’s gonna need to be in charge of the island.” But why is that? He told Sawyer that the island didn’t need protecting. Maybe we can mince words and say that being in charge of the island doesn’t equal protecting it, but to me the concepts seem interchangeable.

“Me?” Ben asks? Man in Locke says he can’t think of anyone better. With a little Jedi Mind Trick, he undoes Ben’s leg brace and says he and his group will be on Hydra Island. Ben says Ilana will follow him, but Man in Locke tells him there’s a rifle leaning against a tree stump in a clearing 200 yards away. If he runs, he can get drop on her.

“See you soon, Ben” he says and walks away. Why does he leave? Why not just kill Ilana? Is it that he wants Ben to act for himself? To make the choice to come with him?

Ben looks toward Ilana. She looks back at him. And then he runs. She pursues him, but he makes it to the clearing in time and aims the rifle at her. She puts hers down, and for a moment they just stand there until finally a look of heartbreak and defeat settles on her face, as if she wants to die. The exchange that follows is a powerful one.

Emotional stuff. I just might have gotten a little misty-eyed. Hey, wouldn’t be the first time Lost has moved me to tears. When he says Locke is the only one that will have him? Wow. If they gave Emmy’s for single line readings, Michael Emerson would be a frontrunner for that one. Ben is usually lying about something, but this is one of the cases where he appears to be telling the truth. The raw honestly is something I don’t think even Ben could fake. But the way he talks about choosing the island over Alex seemed inaccurate. Was it really a choice so much as a leap of faith? When Keamy held Alex at gunpoint, Ben seemed to think he was bluffing. He called the bluff and lost, uttering in disbelief, “He changed the rules.” “He” meaning Widmore. Ben didn’t think Alex would be killed, at least according to how it was presented to us. Just something to chew on…

So Ilana walks away and leaves Ben to make his choice. And just as he did in SidewaysLand, just as I’ve said he would all along when the time came, Benjamin Linus makes the right decision. He always claimed, cryptically, that he was one of the good guys. Now he might actually be living up to it.

Unless of course Jacob is the bad guy, Man in Black is the good guy and the whole world is wild at heart and weird on top. Cue Chris Isaak…

DOWN PERISCOPE
Ben walks up to Sun and asks if he can help her as she hangs a tarp over a tent. The look of “are you for real?” surprise on her face is comical, and Frank and Miles also look surprised to see that he and Ilana have made peace. Everyone takes refuge in solitude. Frank sits by a newly lit fire. Ilana clutches the sack of ashes. Miles sit alone admiring a small diamond between his fingers. Looks like he did partially dig up Nikki and Paulo. Damn, they couldn’t have smelled too good. I wonder how things will play out for Miles. He’s always been motivated by greed, but what role does he have to play? Is there a redemption arc for him? Will his greed be his undoing, or is it the reward he’ll get for the difficult life he’s endured?

As they each have their moment, Jack, Hurley and Richard come around the corner, making for a beach reunion scene that recalls the old days – Michael and Jin returning after the raft incident, Jack returning after his stint with The Others…it’s nice that the writers have been able to tell the story at this season’s level of required intricacy, dealing with all there is to deal with, while still invoking the simple pleasures of earlier seasons. As the two groups reconnect, Jack looks toward Ben, who stands meekly off to the side. I actually feel bad for him.

But then we get the feeling they are all being watched from afar. A periscope pops out of water and spies them. We see a submarine below the surface, and the officer inside says, “Sir, there are people on the beach. Should we stop?”

And there, seated next to him and looking at a laptop, is Charles Widmore. “No,” he says. “Proceed as planned.”

Huh?!? How did Widmore finally get back to the island? We know he was keeping tabs on the whereabouts of the Oceanic Six. Is that why he helped Locke find them all? Did he have them followed to The Lamp Post, Eloise Hawking’s holy Dharma station? He was in Los Angeles last time we saw him, outside the hospital where Desmond was recovering from a gunshot wound inflicted by Ben.  He spoke to Eloise, who slapped him when he said that Faraday was his son too, so I don’t think she was inviting him back to the hatch for tea and a shag. Yet I’ve long wondered how he could have spent 20 years desperately trying to find the island again when his ex-special ladyfriend, whose whereabouts he’s always known, held the keys to the kingdom. So what is he doing there? What plan is he proceeding with?

LOOSE ENDS/FOOD FOR THOUGHT
-Only one comment here this time. Many fans have speculated that the final scene of Lost will echo the opening scene of Season Five’s finale, in which we first met Jacob and the Man in Black. The assumption is that the roles will of course be re-cast, with Locke as the Man in Black and…who as Jacob? Some think Jack. Some think Ben. And maybe those opinions have changed in light of some of the things we’ve learned so far this season. I’m still thinking that Ben is not going to survive whatever is coming. He seems to have chosen the right side, but if there is redemption to be had for Ben, I believe it will involve a noble sacrifice. Not that it couldn’t work out that he remains eternally stuck on the island, playing out the Jacob/Man in Black drama; I suppose there might be a poetic justice to that. And what about Jack? To have Jack and Locke transfer their dichotomy as Man of Science/Man of Faith to Man of Free Will/Man of Fate offers some poetic justice of its own. But if Jack survives, isn’t he owed a chance at a happy life back home? I think so. But maybe Jack is a tragic hero, destined to remain on the Island forever. And perhaps his path toward staying would somehow clear the way for everyone else who’s still alive to leave once and for all – allowing him to fulfill his longtime promise to get everyone off the island. Remember that when he and Ben were off-island, attempting to reunite the Oceanic Six for a return trip, Ben told him to pack a suitcase, saying “If there’s anything in this life you want, pack it in there. Because you’re never coming back.” Not that Ben knew at the time what would happen once they got back to the island. I think he had a very different plan. Another thing to remember about Jack, even though it’s ancient history: the creators of the show originally intended for him to die three-quarters of the way through the very first episode. Maybe they want to come full circle and finish that thought.

Anyway, this whole tangent is based on the idea of the final scene being a take on the Jacob/Man in Black beach scene, so it doesn’t really matter. But it’s fun to speculate…

-A friend of mine sent me this today. This artist applies Simpsons style to all kinds of other pop culture material. I recommend checking out his blog for a larger picture of this and to see his other work. Fun stuff…

LINE OF THE NIGHT
“If you change your mind I’ll be like a mile away.” – Hurley

Tonight’s Episode: Recon

March 14, 2010

Oscars 2009: What Went Down

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 4:49 pm
Tags: , ,

Complete List of Winners

It’s been a week since Oscar night, and I’ve finally had a chance to put my thoughts down in writing…just in time for nobody to give a shit anymore. But so be it. I need to get it out of my system. As usual, I needed to watch the whole thing again during the week so I could pick up on all the stuff I missed entirely or just didn’t take in fully amidst the commotion and distractions of an Oscar party. I know the idea of watching the entire three-and-a-half hour show a second time right away probably seems like torture to most of you, but I like going through it and hearing all the speeches and whatnot. Yes, my movie and Oscar geekhood runs that deep…deeper than the Tree of Souls that Avatar‘s Na’vi worship and revere. So with that, a final dip into the 2009 Oscar pool…

BEST PICTURE
All season long it shaped up as an Avatar vs. Hurt Locker showdown. In the end, the Iraq drama took the big two prizes, proving that when it comes to winning Best Picture, nobody cares about how much a movie made at the box office. It irritated me that in the first few days after the show, articles kept popping up trying to explain why Avatar lost, as if it had been universally deemed the heavy favorite and suffered a stunning upset. Why do people feel a need to justify the loss? This wasn’t a Crash/Brokeback Mountain scenario. I’ll tell you right now why Avatar lost: because The Hurt Locker won. Why didn’t I see articles last year asking why Frost/Nixon or Benjamin Button lost to Slumdog Millionaire? Everyone has a theory about Avatar, and I’ll bet if you asked enough Academy members who didn’t place the movie high in their list, each theory would be heard. There’s no big mystery here, so stop trying to prolong the drama. The majority of Academy members felt The Hurt Locker was a better movie than Avatar. The end.

THE ACTING AWARDS
The opening of the show, with the lead acting nominees paraded out onstage and forced to stand there like beauty pageant contestants while the announcer said their names, was awkward and unnecessary. And why were only the lead actors singled out?

The presentation of Best Actor and Best Actress borrowed from last year’s show by having someone directly address each of the nominees. It’s still a good idea, but it didn’t work nearly as well this time. Last year, a former winner in each category spoke to a current nominee. This year, friends and co-stars of each nominee did the talking. So far so good, except that whereas last year’s presentations were short and sweet, this year’s rambled on as the speakers tried to cover not just the performances, but what wonderful people the nominees all are. Again, nice idea…but it went on too long. Producers Adam Shankman and Bill Mechanic said they took the idea from what Robert DeNiro said last year about Sean Penn. In that instance, the former winner was also speaking to a personal friend. But DeNiro’s speech covered Penn the man and his  performance more succinctly than the speeches this time. The highlight was Tim Robbins’ salute to Morgan Freeman, and it was nice to see Michelle Pfeiffer there for Jeff Bridges 20 years after The Fabulous Baker Boys, but overall the execution was not great. One improvement was that clips of the nominated work was shown, which I always think is an important part of the acting awards. And seriously, what was with the bitchslap to the supporting acting nominees this year? They didn’t get included in the opening (yeah, I said the idea was stupid, but I didn’t like seeing the supporting actors given second-class treatment), they didn’t get the friend/co-star tribute…the supporting actors got treated with the lack of respect that actors are supposed to reserve for the winners in the technical categories!
x
As for the winners themselves? No surprises in Waltz, Mo’Nique or Bridges. I know some have criticized Mo’Nique’s speech, but I thought hers was one of the best of the night, beginning with her thanking the Academy for “showing that it can be about the performance and not the politics.” After all the flak she took for not campaigning, not showing up at every press or promotional event, etc. I cheered her for calling out all the idiots who thought she should be denied for not playing the game. By the way, does her husband ever smile? I’ve seen her win four different awards, and each time he sits there blankfaced, not looking moved, happy, proud or anything. Your wife just won an Oscar, dude. Look alive! (Okay, a Google Image search has revealed lots of pictures of him smiling. Apparently he just doesn’t do it when she wins anything.)
And then there’s Sandra Bullock. Her win will go down in Oscar history as one of the Academy’s more ill-advised selections (see Roberto Benigni), but as I have made my feelings clear, I’ll finish the season on a positive note. Over the years, there’s been a pattern in which winners who I didn’t think deserved their gold managed to soften the blow by giving great acceptance speeches (I’m thinking Michael Caine for The Cider House Rules, Russell Crowe for Gladiator and Adrien Brody for The Pianist). Bullock, at least, continued that tradition. She was funny, humble and classy – it was an A+ speech all the way (her moment comes at about the 8:25 mark). And if there’s an upside to her win, maybe it’s that she will now have access to better material – and will make better choices – that match the talent I do think she has, even if it wasn’t on display in The Blind Side to the degree that should merit an Academy Award nomination and win.

Also, in the spirit of really praising Bullock, I have to say that her showing up at the Golden Razzies ceremony the night before the Oscars to personally pick up her Worst Actress prize for All About Steve was pretty damn cool, and further showed why people love her so much. She really is about as down to earth as a movie star can be. Her Razzie speech is definitely worth checking out (skip ahead to the 1:26 point for her entrance).

THE WRITING AWARDS
The biggest surprise of the night was the Best Adapted Screenplay win for Precious, which made Geoffrey Fletcher the first African-American to win a writing Oscar. I loved Precious, so I can’t complain about this win, but I think Up in the Air deserved that prize. I was disappointed to see it go home empty-handed. But Jason Reitman seemed to be enjoying himself all night, and hey: the guy is 32 years old and is coming off his second Best Picture/Best Director nomination in three years. He’ll be back.

The Hurt Locker‘s win for Original Screenplay was a mild surprise. While everything starts with the script obviously, I think that Hurt Locker‘s biggest strengths came in other areas, whereas Inglourious Basterds was, in my mind, a stronger achievement in screenwriting. Still, Tarantino’s got one writing Oscar on the shelf, and Waltz’s Supporting Actor win kept Basterds from going 0 for 8.

THE SPEECHES
-Costume design winner Sandy Powell didn’t come off so well, beginning her speech by saying in a rather blasé way that this was her third win. Here’s a hint to future award winners: don’t get up on stage and highlight that you’ve won the award before. It doesn’t exactly endear you to anyone, particularly your fellow nominees watching from their seats. Powell went on to try and pay tribute to the talented, hardworking costume designers on low-budget and contemporary films who don’t get the award recognition they deserve because these categories favor period pieces. It was a nice sentiment, but she somehow made it come off like an insult. Let’s hope she does a little better if and when she wins Oscar #4.

-One of the things that happens when I go back through and watch the show a second time is I can hear all the speeches that get drowned out by the din at the party. Sometimes those speeches have some of the funniest or most touching tributes of the ceremony, like Hurt Locker screenwriter Mark Boal thanking his father, who died a month ago. Or one of Avatar‘s art directors, who said that fifteen years ago he was diagnosed with a fatal condition that he obviously beat. I liked that Avatar‘s visual effects winner Joe Letteri thanked the actors for trusting the VFX artists with their performances. “I know that couldn’t have been easy,” he said. Original Score winner Michael Giacchino eschewed reading a list of names and instead spoke about the importance of supporting children’s creativity, thanking his parents for doing so with him. Nice moments, all.

-And then there was the WTF moment of the night, which came when Documentary Short winner Roger Ross Williams was interrupted by a crazy lady who turned out to be his fellow recipient, Elinor Burkett. There have been numerous accounts of the personal drama that was playing out in front of the world at that moment, but this short article from Salon is the most complete one I’ve seen. Obviously Williams and Burkett each have a different take on what happened – both in the making of their film and on the Kodak stage – but from what the video shows (the clip is embedded in the article) they both could have handled the situation a little more professionally. Still, it made for a great Oscar moment!

THE HOSTS
Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin did well, but I feel like they could have done more. The monologue was funny, but the entire thing consisted of acknowledging members of the audience and having fun with them. Nothing wrong with that; it’s always a component of the host’s monologue. But this year it wasn’t a component; it was all they did. Still, it generated some great jokes. The best of the night may have been when Martin said, “In Inglourious Basterds, Christoph Waltz plays a Nazi obsessed with finding Jews.” Then, spreading his arms wide to indicate the entire room, “Well Christoph? The motherload!”

It would have been great to see these two guys do more bits. The Paranormal Activity moment was funny, and I liked that they parodied that movie at the Oscars, but think about how much funnier it could have been. As it was, the camera caught the two hosts moving into awkward positions in their sleep, with Martin eventually getting up, standing over Baldwin and punching him in the head. But why not have Martin wake up in the middle of the night and start marching across the room playing a trombone? Then he gets back into bed and a little while later Baldwin gets up and starts trying to assemble an IKEA bookcase. They could have aired snippets all throughout the show, with each gag becoming progressively more elaborate.

That’s pretty much how it went for the whole show. They were good, they were funny, but I can’t help thinking there were a lot of missed opportunities.

THE SHOW
Good show or bad, I always love the Oscars. That said, I think Shankman and Mechanic’s production was lacking in a lot of areas, especially after the great show put on last year.

-The ongoing belief that Oscar ceremonies must have dance numbers resulted in a decent by time-wasting opening number featuring Neil Patrick Harris. It’s hard not to like him, so he saved the number. Unfortunately, the second dance-a-thon of the evening fared less well. Pairing up dancers and excerpts from the nominated film scores wasn’t a first, but the mix was awkward. The dancers were talented, but the numbers just didn’t fit with the music. To be fair, it’s a challenge trying to do a meaningful dance to The Hurt Locker‘s score. But it was a challenge that, in terms of the choreography, they were unable to meet.

-There were also some odd things happening with the set. It looked good enough at the beginning and end of the show, but there were head-scratching sections in the middle where the backdrop was a big rack of miscellaneous lampshades. I thought I was looking at the back wall of a Pottery Barn. When that disappeared, it was replaced by what looked like a giant empty, bookcase. Or maybe it was a honeycomb. All I know is that it was bizarre and ugly. Not sure what the designers were thinking…

-The tribute to horror films was a good idea, but as it was the only such piece in the show, it felt out of place and didn’t connect to anything else that was going on. Introducing the clip, Kristen Stewart said, “It’s been 37 years since horror had a place on this show, when The Exorcist picked up two Academy Awards.” That’s great…except the montage that followed began with footage from Jaws, which was nominated for Best Picture and won three Oscars two years after The Exorcist. The reel went on to include plenty of horror films that have earned Oscars since The Exorcist, including Aliens, Misery, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, The Silence of the Lambs (which won Picture, Director, Actor, Actress and Adapted Screenplay) and The Sixth Sense, which won nothing but garnered six nominations. And in what universe are Beetlejuice and Edward Scissorhands considered horror films?

-The “37 years” bit was just one piece of misinformation delivered throughout the night. Some may have just been bad teleprompter reading, but I suspect they were the result of sloppy writing. Alec Baldwin introduced Robert Downey Jr. as an Oscar winning actor, but in fact Downey has never won the award. Samuel L. Jackson said that Up was only the second film to be nominated for Best Picture and Best Animated Film…but that’s not really true, since there was no Best Animated Film category when Beauty and the Beast was nominated for Best Picture. And when Charlize Theron introduced Best Picture nominee Precious, she said that it had earned four nominations when it actually earned six. Note to the Academy: You need to get your friggin’ facts straight, and I’m happy to offer my services next year to make sure you do.

-The John Hughes tribute fared much better than the Horror presentation, and was a wonderful gesture on the part of the Academy given that while Hughes’ films had a strong impact on a generation of filmgoers, they were never the kind of movies embraced by the Academy. For them to single him out for special tribute was damn cool, and the montage did his career justice, working in footage not just from the teen angst films that we immediately associate with Hughes, but also comedy gems like Planes, Trains and Automobiles, Mr. Mom and Vacation. Having so many of his stars there added to the presentation, even if Jon Cryer, Anthony Michael Hall, Ally Sheedy, Judd Nelson and Macaulay Culkin got trotted out only to say one sentence each.

-For the second year in a row, the In Memoriam montage was accompanied by a live song performance rather than a piece of canned score, and it was once again a nice way to go. There was plenty of talk afterwards about the omission of Farrah Fawcett, which Academy executive director Bruce Davis attributed to her career consisting primarily of television, rather than feature films. I actually think it’s a fair point, until people rightly point out that Michael Jackson was included. Davis’ justification for that is pretty weak in my opinion, and his last comment is flat out insulting.

-It jumped out at me that presenters were all saying, “And the winner is” instead of the more traditional, “And the Oscar goes to.” Shankman told Entertainment Weekly, “I always thought it was overly polite. I wanted a sense of tension in the show. We thought of [the Oscars] as the most well-dressed reality competition show in the world.” Well, it didn’t add any tension, and Shankman’s status as a reality show judge doesn’t make this Dancing with the Stars. It also struck me that in nearly every category, presenters read the names of the nominees awfully quickly, barely giving the audience time to applaud. Tom Hanks came out to present Best Picture and didn’t even read the list of films one last time. I know I’m in the minority, but I’d rather let the nominees savor their brief moment than sit through a pointless dance number. Sorry Doogie.

-The Best Animated Feature introduction was clever, as newly created animation featured each film’s main character talking about what winning an Oscar would mean to them.

-Oh, and while the explanation of the two sound awards was a nice, helpful touch, using The Dark Knight as the example doesn’t make up for not nominating it for Best Picture last year.

-This year’s ceremony turned out to be the highest rated in five years, since The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King swept the accolades. Avatar‘s presence was probably the biggest factor, and the expanded Best Picture category – which also allowed for hits like District 9 and The Blind Side – probably helped. I’d guess the pairing of Martin and Baldwin was a draw as well. If 2010 sees a box office phenomenon make the Best Picture list, then perhaps we’ll be able to draw more likely conclusions. But the ceremony itself hardly re-wrote the book or did anything likely to excite new viewers. Even with the removal of song performances and honorary awards, the show still clocked in at three-and-a-half hours. So while Shankman and Mechanic are surely taking pride in the ratings boost, I think they should be thanking James Cameron and the Academy before they pat themselves on the back.

-Finally, I was pretty shocked that there wasn’t a single mention of the earthquakes in Chile or Haiti. Usually the liberal Hollywood crowd is all about calling attention to those kinds of disasters, but nary a word was heard or a ribbon displayed.

THE PRESENTERS
-Best in Show, Part I: Tina Fey and Robert Downey, Jr. They made for one of the night’s high points as Fey the Writer and Downey Jr. the Actor offered dueling perspectives on the importance of the screenplay. Fey scores two years in a row!

-Best in Show, Part II: Ben Stiller. Some people seem to think this gag was a misfire, but those people need their sense of humor checked. Stiller’s suit-wearing Na’vi made for yet another of his classic Oscar moments, which have included dressing as a bearded, rambling Joaquin Phoenix and a Lord of the Rings dwarf. I especially enjoyed the portion of his alien speech that was actually a Passover prayer in Hebrew.

-Poor Taylor Lautner, of Twilight and countless girls’ fantasy lives, looked out of his element in that room and was stiff as a board introducing the horror tribute. And his co-presenter Kristen Stewart proved once again that she doesn’t perform nearly as well on live stage as she does on film. These two were not the best representation of young Hollywood…though maybe they were the most accurate. At least Zac Efron showed some charisma when he came out later on.

But do Taylor Lautner and Miley Cyrus really belong at the Oscars? Mechanic told The Los Angeles Times, “The younger side of the audience has been drifting for years, so we’re more conscious of trying to build a youth element into the show.” Oh brother. First of all, I think I can tell you why the youth audience has been drifting for years: because most kids couldn’t give a shit about the Academy Awards. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think No Country For Old Men, Million Dollar Baby, The Last Emperor and The English Patient are big draws for the 12-17 demographic, and you’re kidding yourself if you think hordes of them are going to tune into the telecast waiting around for some tween star’s minute-and-a-half in the spotlight. Even in the years when a popular film like Titanic, Lord of the Rings or Avatar is nominated, the youth crowd is still unlikely to be a significant part of the audience. Plus, the awards begin at 8:30 on the east coast, so a big chunk of the youth audience you’re courting could very well be in bed. So please, future producers: stop trying to win teenage viewers by throwing pretty faces with no real accomplishments onto Oscar’s stage. If you want to spotlight younger actors, try some like Dakota Fanning or Saoirse Ronan, who’ve actually done some real work (and to be fair, Kristen Stewart, Amanda Seyfried and arguably Zac Efron do fit that bill). But putting Cyrus and Lautner on the Oscars is just cheap pandering.

– I would like to suggest to the Academy that next time you invite Jennifer Lopez to be  presenter, go out on a limb and let her present in a category that doesn’t have anything to do with music. I’ll bet she can handle it.

-Sean Penn is one of our best actors, but he often finds it difficult to string together a coherent thought. A few nights before the Oscars, he was on Real Time with Bill Maher talking about his humanitarian work, and I’m pretty sure half of what he said didn’t really make any sense. His comments on Oscar night seemed headed for the same place, although upon second viewing I think he was trying to apologize to his ex-wife Robin Wright for not thanking her when he won last year, while also chiding the Academy for not nominating her this year for The Private Lives of Pippa Lee. Sean, you might be best sticking to the script.

-I liked that most of the Best Picture clips were presented by people who had an association with the filmmaker – Keanu Reeves, for example, saluting The Hurt Locker, which was helmed by his Point Break director Kathryn Bigelow (that’s right, the director of Point Break won an Oscar!), or Jeff “The Dude” Bridges introducing the Coen Brothers’ A Serious Man, etc. And it was kind of cool to have them do it on a raised platform in the middle of the auditorium, rather than on the main stage.

THE DRESSES
Being a fan of beautiful women, I’m as interested in the parade of dresses as any Sex and the City fan. I was largely underwhelmed by this year’s crop, but that’s not to say the ladies themselves weren’t looking good, so a shout-out to this year’s MVP’s: Penelope Cruz, Cameron Diaz, Tina Fey, Carey Mulligan, Zoe Saldana, Charlize Theron, Kristen Stewart, Demi Moore (still hot), Michelle Pfeiffer (also still hot, and really needing to make more movies), George Clooney’s date and of course, God love her, Kate Winslet.

THE HONORARY AWARDS
The switch to 10 Best Picture nominees was not the only big change the Academy instituted this year. In the past, honorary Oscars for lifetime achievement and such have been given out during the ceremony like any other, but this year a special, private ceremony was held to recognize those artists. I’m disappointed about this, since I enjoy seeing these presentations as much as any other, and I like that they get the high profile recognition that comes with appearing in the broadcast. On the other hand though, rather than having to be be squeezed into a 5-10 minute slot amidst the three-hour telecast, they can be feted more intimately and more time can be devoted to celebrating their careers. This year’s honorees were Lauren Bacall; Roger Corman, the king of low-budget B-movies, who launched the careers of Jack Nicholson, Ron Howard, Francis Ford Coppola, James Cameron and many others; and Gordon Willis, whose extraordinary cinematography was seen in such films as The Godfather trilogy, All The President’s Men and each of Woody Allen’s movies from Annie Hall to The Purple Rose of Cairo. The Irving G. Thalberg Award, which is given to producers with a lasting body of work, was presented to John Calley, whose credits include The Cincinnati Kid, Postcards from the Edge, The Remains of the Day and Closer. If you’re like me and like to see these presentations, click here for video clips, photos and more.

THE INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS
As usual, the Oscars tend to cast a shadow over the other award show that always takes place the same weekend, The Independent Spirit Awards. It’s always a fun show – certainly more casual and looser than the Oscars, and always good for some quality laughs. One of the things I always like about the Spirit Awards is that there’s a palpable sense of community. At the Oscars, the camera often catches stars in the front row looking bored or not bothering to applaud while the winner in a “lesser” category is heading to the stage or delivering a speech. The stars are just as big at the Spirit Awards, but the atmosphere feels much more embracing. Winners aren’t played off stage after 45 seconds, but are allowed to say what they want, as long as it takes. Once again I’m sure I’m in the minority here, but I like that.

Precious was the big winner, taking Best Feature, Director, Actress, Supporting Actress and First Screenplay. Jeff Bridges also won, and as he finished his speech, he held the award up to his wife and told her it was really gonna tie the room together. Nice, Dude. Very nice.

Ben Stiller was on hand as well, and once again was a highlight of the ceremony as he presented Best Feature…

And so another award season comes to and end. Though later than I would have hoped, I’m putting together a list of the movies I’m most looking forward to this year, so we’ll see how many of them show up in next year’s Oscar race. Now then…I think I have a Lost write-up to go work on. Farewell, sweet Kate.

March 9, 2010

LOST S6E6: Sundown

Filed under: Lost — DB @ 3:08 pm

Last week, I mentioned that the current season was following a pattern from Season One in terms of the order of the character-centric episodes, suggesting that the sixth hour of the season would focus on Sun. Even the title invoked her name, but they fooled us by shining the spotlight on Sayid.

FAMILY GUY
Sayid arrives at a house in L.A. where he shares a warm greeting with Nadia, but when two little kids come running down the hall cheering “Uncle Sayid,” we know things between these two have gone differently in Sideways Land. Still, I thought I saw some sexual tension between the two, despite her being married to Sayid’s brother Omer. Later, at the dinner table, Sayid refers to his job as “translating gas contracts for oil companies” around the world. So…what kind of lethal, violent, highly dangerous work do you think that’s a euphemism for?

When Omer steps away, Nadia asks Sayid if he got the letters she sent him. He says yes, just as his niece runs in saying she found a picture of Nadia in Sayid’s bag. (I did! I did see some sexual tension!)

The way Sayid grabs Omer’s arm when the latter wakes him up in the middle of the night suggests that he’s accustomed to doing more than translating contracts, though maybe he really is a legit businessman now, with only his past experiences in the war to haunt him. Omer explains that he’s in trouble with some people he borrowed money from, claiming that despite having paid them back they are demanding ongoing payments. He asks Sayid to get these people off his back. Sayid knows what his brother is asking and says he will not commit violence because of Omer’s bad business decision. When Omer tells him it’s to protect Nadia and the family, Sayid says, “I’m sorry. I’m not that man anymore.” The scene reminded me of a flashback to Sayid’s childhood, when his father demanded that Omer kill a chicken, which he couldn’t bring himself to do. Sayid walked up and did it without blinking. It seems they’re still playing out a similar behavioral pattern – Omer the weak looking to Sayid the strong to do help him with what he can’t do for himself. Enabler…

The next day, Omer is hospitalized in an apparent mugging. As Sayid and Nadia walk down the hospital corridor to find him, we see Jack walking their way and briefly noticing them. It’s probably too quick for either to recognize that they interacted on Flight 815 to save Charlie’s life, but I did wonder if Jack had a flicker of recognition. When Omer’s doctor mentions the possibility of a mugging, Sayid knows better. He starts to leave, but Nadia knows what his intentions are and begs him not to do whatever he’s thinking. Sayid agrees; he makes a choice and stays true to his word. That night, she asks why he didn’t want to be with her and pushed her toward his brother despite his obvious feelings for her. “For the last 12 years I’ve been trying to wash my hands of all the horrible things I’ve done,” he tells her. “I can’t be with you. Because I don’t deserve you.” Trying to wash his hands for the last 12 years? Maybe he really does translate gas contracts now. How incredibly boring.

The following afternoon, Sayid leaves to pick the kids up from school when a dark minivan pulls up. Out steps a familiar face: Omar, Keamy’s right hand lackey from the freighter, and another nameless goon. Omar suggests Sayid get in, lest they all go pick up the kids together. Sayid complies, and they bring him to a restaurant kitchen. What is it about Sayid and bad luck involving restaurant kitchens? We already saw him held captive in one by the husband of a woman who believed he had tortured her during the war. Now he’s brought here and introduced to Keamy himself.

Keamy, while enjoying a plate of eggs, says that Omer (not to be confused with Omar) owes him money and that somebody is going to pay him. But before he knows it, Sayid has Omar’s gun, Omar and the other goon are dead and Keamy’s on the defensive. He tells Sayid that Omer’s debt is forgiven and they can just forget about this, but Sayid says he can’t. He reverts to old habits and shoots Keamy. Then he hears a noise coming from a nearby room – a muffled voice and a banging. He goes to investigate and finds…Jin(!?) sitting with his hands tied behind his back and a cut above his eye. How the hell did he get here? Last we saw of Jin in Sideways Land, he was stuck in customs at the airport. (According to Lostpedia, his Korean exclamations to Sayid translate as, “Don’t kill me! Please! Let me live!”)

Seeing Jin here – tied up in Keamy’s kitchen – got me thinking. In the original timeline, Keamy was onboard the freighter in the employ of Charles Widmore. His dealings with Omer Jarrah might be his own thing, but the fact that he is holding Jin prisoner? Back during Season Four, I brought up the idea that Charles Widmore and Sun’s father, Mr. Paik, were probably business associates to some degree, and likely traveled in the same circles. That idea was confirmed later when Sun introduced herself to Widmore as Paik’s daughter and Widmore inquired after him, even remarking that he still owed Paik a dinner from their last golf game. So knowing that Jin is still in Los Angeles to deliver a watch as a business gift from Mr. Paik, I wonder if being in Keamy’s hands means he’s really in Widmore’s hands. And if so, why? And where is Sun?

By the way, great to see Keamy again. He’s a true son of a bitch, played to hilt by Kevin Durand.

FIGHT CLUB
On the island, in the wake of Jack’s revelation that he almost inadvertently poisoned him, Sayid storms into Dogen’s study and demands answers, starting with an explanation of the machine they hooked him up to for his torture.

D: For every man there is a scale. On one side of the scale there is good. On the other side, evil. This machine tells us how the scale is balanced. Yours tipped the wrong way.
S: That’s why you tried to poison me?
D: Yes. I think it would be best if you were dead.
S: You think you know me but you don’t. I’m a good man. So if you’re trying to kill me…

And then Dogen springs, launching the two into a knockaround that finds them crashing all over the room. They’re throwing plant pots, using clubs and brooms, and just as Dogen has Sayid pinned on the desk with a knife to his throat, that baseball we’ve seen him play with rolls off the table and hits the floor. This stops him in his tracks. My theory (debunked later in the show, of course) was that the baseball featured an original Babe Ruth autograph, and Dogen was afraid of getting blood on it. Why not?

“Go,” he tells Sayid. “Leave this place. Never come back.” He lets Sayid up, and Sayid looks frightened at how close he came to dying. Not a look we see on his face too often. To no one’s surprise, Dogen doesn’t tell us how that machine works, or why Sayid has become the way he’s become…and of course Sayid doesn’t ask. Why? Because characters on Lost don’t ask the obvious questions.

Just across the pond, at the ash line that surrounds The Temple, we find the Man in Locke and Claire. She seems reluctant to do what he’s asking, wondering why it can’t be Sawyer (where is he?) or Jin (where is he?) or even him. “If I could do it myself, I wouldn’t be asking you, Claire.” She says that if she goes in there, he has to do what he said he would; she wants her son back. “I always do what I say,” he says. And curiously, at least to me, Claire expresses unease with the fact that he’s going to hurt The Temple’s inhabitants. “Only the ones who won’t listen,” he says.

THE MESSENGERS
Sayid prepares to leave, telling Miles he finds it odd that these people want him dead even though they’re the ones who saved his life. Miles replies that in fact, they didn’t. He says they tried to save him, but it didn’t work and he was dead for two hours. “Whatever brought you back, it wasn’t them.”

So how did this work? If Sayid’s resurrection had nothing to do with the spring, and if there is a Man in Black-related darkness growing in him, how did that happen? How was Sayid “claimed?” Does it mean Claire died too? If so, when? Was it when her house exploded in New Otherton? She came back around from that a lot sooner than Sayid came back after “dying.” Why can’t the Man in Black take control of anyone who dies on the island? (I’m assuming he can’t, given how many people have died that we haven’t seen running around alive again, doing his bidding.) What is it that allowed him access to Sayid, and possibly Claire and Christian Shephard, who was already a few days dead before he got to the island?

As Miles and Sayid are talking, Claire suddenly enters the courtyard, surprising Dogen and Lennon…and Sayid and Miles, though not nearly to the extent that it should. Claire approaches Dogen.

C: He wants to see you
D: [Starts to say something in Japanese.]
C: Speak English.
D: Who wants to see me?
C: You know who.
D: If he wants to see me, then tell him to come him.
C: No, he wants you to go to him. He’s waiting outside beyond the outer wall.
D: I’m not a fool. If I step outside this temple, he’ll kill me.
C: Then maybe you should send somebody he won’t kill.

She turns to go.

D: Stop her! [In Japanese] Put the girl into the hole until this is resolved. Then bring Shephard and Reyes to my room immediately.
L: That’s gonna be a little difficult. We can’t find them.
D: [In Japanese] Look. Harder!

He looks at Sayid.

D: Come with me.
S: I thought you wanted me to leave.
D: Things have changed.

Why does Dogen want Jack and Hurley? Had they been there, what would he have said to them? Sayid follows Dogen back into his study, where he asks what Claire was talking about.

D: She’s a confused girl, under the influence of an angry man.
S: What man?
D: For years, he has been trapped. But now Jacob’s gone. He’s free. This man will not stop until he has destroyed every living thing on this island. He is evil incarnate.
S: And you want me to speak with him?
D: No. I want you to kill him. He will come to you as someone you know. Someone who has died. As soon as you see him, plunge this deep into his chest. If you allow him to speak it is already too late.
S: Since I’ve been here I’ve been drowned, beaten and tortured at your hands. Why would I ever do anything for you?
D: You said that there is still good in your soul. Then prove it.

We’ve heard this line before, about someone wanting to kill every living thing on the island. It’s what Ben and Locke kept saying about the freighter crew. Is the re-introduction of that phrase supposed to tie the Man in Black to Charles Widmore? Also, is there some special significance to the dagger that Dogen tells Sayid to use? He pulls it from a well-concealed hiding place, so something tells me it’s not just some ornate knife he ordered off TV at 2:00 in the morning because it could cut through tin cans. Also, the idea of evil incarnate certainly furthers many fans’ theories about the religious nature of the Jacob/Man in Black dynamic – i.e. God and Satan, a parallel which reader Nic A. commented on in the previous write-up. This will come up again shortly.

On his way out of The Temple, Sayid encounters Kate returning. I guess she’s coming back to ask about Claire, based on her conversation with Jack. She walks over to Miles, who smiles at her and says, as only Miles can, “Sawyer sent you packing, huh?” Then he tells her about Claire’s return. Sayid continues away from The Temple…

(I love Sayid’s look, as Man in Locke pulls the knife out of his chest, that goes from uncertainty to “Oh shit, now what?”)

So is Man in Locke’s offer a lie – the temptation of the devil – or can he really deliver on that promise? Does it have something to with the sideways reality? Is Sayid walking into a Pet Sematary scenario? Sometimes dead is better, Sayid…

Whatever occurs next between them we don’t see. Sayid returns to The Temple, and just outside the door Dogen asks him what happened. Sayid strides past him and makes an announcement to all those in earshot. “There is a man in the jungle, about a mile south of us, by the outer wall. He sent me back here to give you a message. He wants you to know that Jacob is dead. And because he’s gone, none of you have to stay here anymore. You’re free. The man that I met is leaving the island forever, and those of you who want to go with him should leave The Temple and join him. You have until sundown to decide.”

Cindy the stewar…sorry, flight attendant…asks, “What happens at sundown if we stay?”

“You die,” Said replies. Dogen doesn’t look happy.

So first of all, did Sayid strike some kind of official deal with the dev…I mean with the Man in Locke, or is he going on faith? He claimed to be a good man, yet the message he will soon deliver to Dogen is not one of words, but of violence. Also, I ask again, who are these people at The Temple? They look like a bunch of peasants and shirpas. Are all the Others who had been with Man in Locke at Jacob’s statue here too now? Have these people all felt like they had to stay at The Temple, or even on the island itself, all this time? What has kept them here? What were they doing for Jacob? Cindy would be the ideal vessel to explore this, since we saw her as a survivor of Flight 815 who was then taken by The Others and apparently threw her lot in with them. But something tells me we may never know.

ENEMY AT THE GATES
As The Temple is gripped in panic, Lennon sees Kate and wants to know when she got back and where Jack and Hurley are. But she demands to see Claire first, so he takes her to a wide pit in the ground, where Claire sits in a corner singing “Catch a Falling Star” (Aaron’s theme song apparently, based on its ongoing use in the show). Last week, I wrote that Claire’s animal-skull baby was very Buffalo Bill/Silence of the Lambs. Well now Claire looks like one of Bill’s victims, sitting down at the bottom of a dirty hole in the ground. When Kate leans in to talk to her, I was waiting for her to lower a basket and say…

Claire is happy to see Kate, and tells her that the Others have Aaron. Kate thinks she’s putting Claire at ease when she smiles, almost cries, and tells her the truth. “Claire, they don’t have Aaron. I took him. I took him off the island. You were gone and we couldn’t find you so I raised him. And he is the most beautiful, amazing little boy. But I came back here to rescue you so that you could be with him, so that you guys could be together again.”

The expression on Claire’s face when Kate says she took him is pretty sinister, and the words “I raised him” really send her to a bad place. That phrase has been of particular significance around Aaron, going back to Season One when psychic Richard Malkin used it repeatedly, telling Claire that she had to raise Aaron herself. Is that why Claire feels what she does toward Kate? Why she told Jin she would kill Kate if she’d taken Aaron off the island? Has she gained some insight into why raising Aaron herself is so crucial? Or is there another reason…beyond a mother’s obvious desire to be with her child?

“I’m not the one that needs to be rescued, Kate,” Claire says, suddenly smiling. What does that smile hide? How does the Man in Locke intend to keep his promise of reuniting her with Aaron anyway? And what does that plan mean for Kate? The conversation is cut short when Lennon tells Kate her time is up and drags her off, leaving Claire calling up, “He’s coming, Kate. He’s coming and they can’t stop him.”

Is there any chance Kate can convince her that she had no choice but to take Aaron off the island? Claire disappeared, she left Aaron behind, the island vanished, the chopper crashed…surely she can make the case! And will we ever find out what exactly happened when Christian Shephard came to Claire in the jungle and lured her away from Sawyer and Miles…and Aaron? When Locke found the two of them in the cabin and asked where the baby was, Christian said that Aaron was exactly where he was supposed to be. And Claire looked super chill, like she’d just smoked some primo island grass. I really want to hear her version of what happened since that time.

As people flee The Temple, Lennon tries to assure them all that their enemy can not get in and that they’re safe. Cindy says that with Jacob dead, she can’t take that chance. She goes, with the kids. Miles asks Sayid if they’re leaving, but Sayid says he has to return the knife first. He finds Dogen sitting on the steps of the spring. “You let him talk to you,” Dogen says.

“I stabbed him in the chest like you told me to. Then I let him talk to me.” He drops the knife on the ground. “That’s twice you’ve tried to have someone kill me. You had the opportunity to do it yourself. Why didn’t you?”

Dogen tells Sayid he was once a successful businessman at a bank in Osaka. One Friday night after receiving a promotion, his associates took him out to celebrate and he had too much to drink. Afterwards he went to pick up his 12 year-old son from baseball practice and they got into a car accident which his son did not survive. “And then in the hospital,” he says, “a man came to me. A man I had never met. He told me that he could save my son’s life but I would have to come here, to this island, where I would have a new job. And I could never see my boy again.”

S: Who was this man?
D: His name was Jacob.
S: Jacob drives a hard bargain.
D: The man outside, I take it he offered you a similar bargain.
S: Yes.
D: It is sundown. Will you choose to stay or go?
S: I’d like to stay.

Sayid suddenly grabs Dogen and leaps into the water with him, holding him down the way Dogen’s men held him down in their effort to revive him. But this isn’t about revival. Sayonara, Dogen. Sayid walks out of the spring as Lennon comes in and sees what he’s done. He runs into the water hoping to save Dogen, but it’s too late. “Do you realize what you just did? He was the only thing keeping it out! Idiot! You just let it in!” Then we hear the howl of Smokey, just as Sayid grabs the knife, slices Lennon’s throat and tosses him in the water. “I know,” he replies.

I wonder if Dogen knew for sure that his son was saved, or if he had to take Jacob’s word. Why would Jacob do this? It’s an act that again seems to handily reinforce the idea of Jacob representing that Judeo-Christian God, both benevolent and punishing. Yet the Man in Locke has made a similar offer to Sayid, so what’s to say that Jacob isn’t just as much the tempter that his nemesis is? And we aren’t sure exactly what Dogen’s job on the island was. Why/how was he the only thing keeping the Man in Black out? Why doesn’t the ash matter all of a sudden? What power did he have? How long has he been there? How long has Lennon been there? Does the fact that they’re both dead mean I’m never going to get answers to any of these damn questions?

With Dogen doing the dead man’s float, the Smoke Monster gains admittance to The Temple. He makes the most of it, blowing here, there and everywhere, grabbing people and doing his pissed off Smokey thing. Kate and Miles run for it, but get separated when Kate goes for Claire. Miles runs down a hallway and through an open door which he tries to hold closed as something pushes at it. It bursts open and in comes Ilana, immediately asking where Shephard, Reyes and Ford are. Does she know who Miles is? How? He says he’s the only one left, and that Kate went to get Claire. Lapidus, Sun and Ben follow her in and Ilana asks about Jarrah. Miles says he was at the spring, so Ben goes to get him despite Ilana calling for him to stay. As they run, Miles asks Sun where her husband is. She is relieved to know Jin was there and alive, but distressed that once again she’s missed him. Where is Jin? He wants to get back to The Temple…or he did when there was something there to get back to. Is the Man in Locke keeping him from that goal?

Ilana goes down the hall Hurley used to get outside and finds the familiar symbol on the wall. She pushes it and a door slides open. They all step through and it closes behind them just as Smokey turns the corner and comes blowing past. At the spring, Ben finds Sayid sitting on the steps in eerie calm. Ben says he knows a way out and that there’s still time. Sayid looks at him, a creepy smile of contentment and amusement on his face and says, “Not for me.” Ben observes the floating bodies and the knife, still dripping blood, and backs away almost comically slowly.

I think the “infection” Dogen spoke of to Jack has finally reached Sayid’s heart, cause the dude on steps ain’t the Sayid I know. Is redemption still possible for the tortured torturer, or has he made a final, fateful choice? Why has he embraced his dark side so easily? Ben once told Sayid that like it or not, he’s a killer; it’s in his nature. Sayid always wants to believe that’s not true of himself, but he admitted it when he picked up Jin’s gun and shot Young Ben in the chest. In the sideways timeline, he initially respected Nadia’s wishes to not exact revenge for Omer’s attack, but when Keamy draws him in, Sayid strikes. And now he’s done it again. Or has he? Was the choice to give in to the Man in Locke’s temptation and murder Dogen really a choice, or was he overpowered by a force stronger than he could contend with? Does this turn mean that like Locke of old, Sayid as we know him is dead?

But wait, there’s more! Kate finds the pit and kicks a rope ladder down so Claire can climb up, but she won’t go. Claire says they’re safer there. Just then, Smokey turns into the room. Kate flings herself onto the dangling ladder just in time and watches as Smokey flies by above her. Then in an unsettling final sequence that plays out in slow motion, Sayid walks into the courtyard, strewn with dead bodies. Claire follows, then Kate, who is now kind of stuck with them. She stops and picks up a rifle from one of the bodies. The darkness and carnage is juxtaposed with Claire (I think it’s Claire) singing “Catch a Falling Star” on the soundtrack, like that ominous, “One, two, Freddy’s coming for you” nursery rhyme from A Nightmare on Elm Street. Outside the Temple door, the Man in Locke and those who accepted his offer wait to receive Sayid and Claire, who walk out looking satisfied, each smiling as if reporting to their master after a job well done. They look like The Keymaster and The Gatekeeper returning to Gozer for duty.

Kate emerges and looks confused to see Locke. He doesn’t say anything; just looks at her for a moment before turning and leading everyone away. It’s pretty much the same look he gave Jin when he found him in Claire’s hut.

And with that, we leave The Temple behind for what is shaping up as the final island showdown between the disciples of dark and light.

LOOSE ENDS/FOOD FOR THOUGHT
-I know some people were annoyed about new characters being introduced so late in the game, but I liked Dogen and Lennon and am sorry to see them go. On the other hand, it is sort of nice to have the Temple business over with. Despite the adventures outside its walls – Kate’s search for Sawyer, Jack and Hurley’s trip to the lighthouse, Jin’s run-in with Crazy Cat Lady – the location was still starting to feel like a hindrance. We need to get things moving. Will we see Dogen and Lennon again in the sideways reality? Can we at least add them to the list of Lost characters who deserve a spin-off sitcom? (Hurley and Sayid, Hurley and Miles, Locke and Ben, Smokey and the polar bear…)

-I was just thinking that I still don’t know who Jacob meant when he said to the Man in Locke with his dying breath, ‘They’re coming.” We haven’t seen any obvious payoff of that yet…

-As you probably know, the Oscars were Sunday night, and it happened to be a great year for the Lost family. The show’s excellent composer Michael Giacchino took home the Best Original Score award for Up (in Lighthouse I was admiring anew his excellent theme for Jacob. His contributions are such an underrated part of the show.) In addition, The Hurt Locker, which features Evangeline Lilly in a small role, took six awards including Best Picture; and Best Documentary went to The Cove, earning an Oscar for its producer Fisher Stevens, the actor who played (and from what I’ve heard will be seen again as) the freighter’s communications officer George Minkowski. Further proof that Lost is everywhere….in case anyone was trying to disprove it.

LINE OF THE NIGHT
“She just strolled in here a couple hours ago, acting all weird. Still hot, though.” – Miles

Tonight’s Episode: Dr. Linus

March 5, 2010

For Your Consideration: My Absurdly Long Oscar Predictions Opus – 2009

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 3:29 pm

 

Complete List of Nominees

Some years, you can go into the Oscar race feeling pretty confident that your predictions are largely safe bets, save for a few toss-of-the-coin categories like last year’s Penn vs. Rourke Best Actor race.

This is not one of those years. And don’t listen to anyone who claims otherwise (sorry Ebert).

Instead, we’re facing a year with a small batch of heavy favorites and a whole lot of races, down through the below-the-line categories, that could go a few different ways. So I’m not feeling as confident in my predictions this year as I often have in the past, but I am really looking forward to Sunday night and seeing how this topsy-turvy Oscar season comes to an end. I’m happy to sacrifice bragging rights for some genuine suspense…and I’m not really a bragger anyway. So here’s where my head is at as the big day rapidly approaches.

WARNING: My fondness for talking (and writing) about movies can lead to a lot of rambling, sometimes more than the category in question really justifies. My Best Picture commentary really goes off on some tangents, but I couldn’t keep it all in! Anyway, I tried to keep it shorter as I worked my way down the list, but proceed at your own risk.

ANOTHER WARNING: This is just some advice. If you’re planning to Tivo the show, be sure to set whatever is on after the Oscars to record as well, because you can bet that the show will run over the three-hour time that your DVR has allotted for it.

Now then….

BEST PICTURE/DIRECTOR
To those who’ve been paying attention since last November-ish (i.e. mega movie awards nerds like me), this year’s Best Picture race has been the most schizophrenic in recent history. Heading into December, I would have said that Up in the Air was going to be the movie to beat. A serious film that still has lots of laughs, plus effervescent performances and a sharp script that nailed the zeitgeist. But as the critics awards actually started to roll out, The Hurt Locker turned out to be the dominant film. Then came mid-December and the release of Avatar, which left everyone slack-jawed, Academy members far and wide included (or so it was reported). When the Golden Globes anointed Avatar, it officially became the frontrunner. Until the guilds came around, that is, and suddenly The Hurt Locker was back on top with wins from the producers, directors, writers, and editors.

And still there are many who think that with the new voting system, this isn’t just an AvatarHurt Locker race. To go along with the switch from five to ten Best Picture nominees, the Academy is also switching to the preferential ballot system for its top category. This is the system by which they’ve always determined the nominees, but the actual winners were voted by straight up popularity: the movie with the most votes wins.

Not anymore.

If you want to understand this game-changing element, read this article wherein the preferential system is clearly and thoroughly explained through a fantasy scenario that has Inglourious Basterds winning Best Picture.

Let’s start with Director though, because that race seems to have become more certain. At this point, I’d be surprised if Kathryn Bigelow doesn’t take it. Even her fellow nominees James Cameron and Quentin Tarantino have said they’re voting for her. She would be the first woman to ever win Best Director. She’s only the fourth to be nominated, and the only one who has come this close, thanks to wins from nearly every major critics group, plus the Director’s Guild and the British Academy.  And The Hurt Locker is a superbly directed movie.

But will it win Best Picture? This could definitely be one of those years when the two top prizes are split. The irony there, if we stick with the Hurt Locker vs. Avatar scenario, is that it would probably make more sense for the split to go the other way. I think more people look at The Hurt Locker as a better film overall than Avatar, but even those who take shots at Avatar‘s story have to admit that Cameron is a true visionary and a brilliant craftsman. Whether you’re bothered by his dialogue or not, there’s no arguing that the man can direct the shit out of a movie. Nonetheless, the opportunity to help Bigelow make history seems to be the overriding feeling, and it’s not like The Hurt Locker is undeserving of a directing Oscar.

So what about Avatar? Despite the staggering box office, I know many people were underwhelmed and disappointed in the story and can’t believe that the Academy would give the film its top honor. But think about this: most movie fans of my age group, if not beyond it as well, look at 1977 and still can’t believe that Annie Hall beat Star Wars for Best Picture. Star Wars, after all, defined a generation. Its box office success was unprecedented, its affect on culture was unparalleled, and its impact on visual effects was revolutionary. Star Wars changed movies forever. Yet it was a simple story, one whose detractors – and yes, it had plenty of them – dismissed as childish as they sneered at the dialogue and wrote it off as silly, faux-spiritual hokum. Those “serious” filmgoers and Academy Award watchers probably didn’t think Star Wars deserved it either. But I’ll bet that a lot of the people who decry Avatar as a Best Picture winner do think that Star Wars should have won. I’m not saying that Avatar is as good as Star Wars or that it will spawn the same degree of undying fervor, but its impact is similar…maybe not as much on the culture, but for better or worse it is seen as changing movies forever. Like it or not, Avatar is the movie of the year. Not necessarily the best movie of the year, but the one that more than any other defines 2009. Is it crazy to argue that the Best Picture Oscar should recognize exactly that?

Still, I really don’t know which way this is gonna go. For every article I find that says the preferential ballot system will favor Avatar, there’s another claiming it will help The Hurt Locker while yet another claims that Inglourious Bastards will actually be the beneficiary. And the stream of idiotic arguments for or against a given movie’s chances are laughable, as everyone spins whatever numbers or stats they want in order to bolster their film’s chances. Some say The Hurt Locker won’t win because it grossed so little money theatrically. Seriously? It’s not going to win because it only made $12 million? Who the fuck cares? Okay, fine – maybe producers and studio executives think that way. But does anybody really think that a composer, makeup artist or cinematographer is going to not vote for a movie because of how little money it made? That’s what they’ll ask themselves when they fill out their ballot? It’s absurd. The Hurt Locker will apparently be the lowest grossing Best Picture winner if it wins. So? No fantasy film had ever won Best Picture until The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King. And come to think of it, I don’t think any science-fiction film has ever won it either, so there’s Avatar‘s chance to make history. There’s a first time for everything. (Hear that, gay cowboys? Your day will come!)

Or then there’s Harvey Weinstein, who is convinced that Inglourious Basterds has Best Picture in the bag, citing the film’s win of Best Ensemble at the Screen Actors Guild awards as one of his chief reasons (actors being the largest branch of the Academy). Harvey, there are 1,205 actors in the Academy. There are nearly 120,000 in SAG, and they all get to vote. Do the math. Not to mention that every year, people try to draw a connection between the SAG Ensemble prize and Best Picture despite the fact that they’ve only matched up six times out of 14.

There are also the run of recent stories about various acts of dirty campaigning (The Hurt Locker incident being the most prominent), or accusations against the nominees ranging from anti-Semitism (shots ludicrously thrown at Basterds, An Education and A Serious Man) to story inaccuracies (real soldiers suddenly attacking The Hurt Locker months after its release). I hear that helium balloon vendors are incensed over Up‘s reckless suggestion that their product could allow a house to be safely navigated through the air. Unfortunately, this kind of behavior mars every Oscar season, even if the sordid depth of the shenanigans are not highly publicized. Really, when you hear how much manipulation and politicking goes on behind the scenes by studios and producers to win Oscars, it paints the whole thing in such a tawdry, disheartening light. There are so many reasons that the Oscars often have little to do with recognizing and celebrating the best in film, and yet despite being fully aware of that, I eat it up like candy. I can’t help it. Years later, fans like me – and some of you – are still muttering about the snubbed performer or the movie that should have won this or that award. But I suppose it’s all part of the fun.

God, have I stalled long enough? Okay, here goes. I’m practically throwing a dart here,  but I’m going with The Hurt Locker. It seems like a less polarizing film than Avatar, and so I’m thinking that with the preferential ballot system, people who choose another film as their favorite still might have Hurt Locker high on their list, which could help it in subsequent rounds of voting. But I can honestly say that I’ve never had such a hard time trying to predict a winner in any category about which I’m reasonably well informed, ever. I have absolutely no idea what’s going to happen.

Personal Choices: Picture – Precious;  Director – James Cameron (but I’ll be really happy for Bigelow)

BEST ACTOR
Morgan Freeman should have been a force to be reckoned with as Nelson Mandela, but unfortunately the film didn’t meet expectations and the role gave him little to work with. George Clooney, though he dominated the field of critics awards, doesn’t really have a chance either. Colin Firth picked up the BAFTA award, but he had a home field advantage. While he and his work in A Single Man are widely admired, this just isn’t his year. I’d say Jeremy Renner has a shot for an Adrien Brody-style upset, but Brody wasn’t going up against a heavy favorite who had never won before. Renner is.

This is a category where sentiment will rule the day. The industry hath deemed it time for Jeff Bridges to win an Oscar, and win an Oscar he shall. Does he deserve it? Sure. Bridges has long topped my list of actors overdue for an Oscar (a spot he shares with Ed Harris and Sigourney Weaver, so get crackin’ Academy…), and he does great work in Crazy Heart. Is it the best of his career? I wouldn’t say so. Is it even the best of the year? Debatable. But it’s good, and he’s universally respected and appreciated in the business. His time has come.

The possible irony here is that Bridges is about to re-team with the Coen Brothers, who directed him in The Big Lebowski (a film that, in hindsight, should totally have earned him a nod), for a remake of True Grit. John Wayne won a Best Actor Oscar for the original in 1969, and with the Coens at the helm, Bridges may well be back in the race next year.

As for my own pick, if I strip away all the external factors and just judge the performance alone (which is always how it should be and always how we want it to be but rarely how it is…even for purists like me), the nominee whose work left the strongest impression is Firth. But I’ll be thrilled to see Bridges finally win.

Personal Choice: Colin Firth

BEST ACTRESS
Way back in the fall, long before the race had fully taken shape, it already seemed like we were headed for a two-woman showdown: Meryl Streep and Carey Mulligan. At the time my feeling was that a Streep-Mulligan race was no race at all; the Academy was not going to overlook Meryl Streep again in favor of some fresh-faced ingénue with her whole career ahead of her. I actually thought that if anyone could beat Streep, it was Gabourey Sidibe. True, like Mulligan, she’s a new face at the start of her career, but she had a role and a movie that stirred people deep inside – much more so, I guessed, then Mulligan, whose performance was admired and engaging but not nearly as moving.

But then something happened. The film community collectively put their heads up their asses and somehow moved Sandra Bullock to the front of the queue for her entertaining-but-hardly-award-caliber work in The Blind Side. I talked about this when I commented on the nominees, so I won’t dwell again on how she even wound up in the race. But I will dwell on how she has turned into the frontrunner, because it continues to baffle me.

Bullock is extremely likable, and word on the street is that everyone who has worked with her, cast and crew, adores her. I like her too, but she has hardly given us a career full of great films and performances, so any argument that it’s “her time” is complete bullshit. It’s Jeff Bridges’ time. He’s someone who has been around for years, done consistently excellent work, been nominated multiple times but never won and this year found himself a role that perfectly suited his stage in life and his career. If this were the aforementioned Sigourney Weaver, or Julianne Moore or Laura Linney, then there might be some credence to the argument that “she’s due.” But we’re talking about Sandra Bullock, whose filmography has a smattering of good movies and a lot that are mediocre to bad. I could see likability factoring into things if the performance really dazzled, but I just can’t see how enough people could be more impressed by her performance than those of her fellow nominees.

I readily admit that numerous factors other than quality of performance enter into Oscar voting and that all kinds of political factors are taken into account, from how much a nominee works the campaign circuit to how good their speeches are throughout the season. Bullock has worked the circuit, and her speeches have been funny, humble and all around terrific. But despite all signs pointing her way for the win (including The Blind Side‘s shocking Best Picture nomination, which suggests reasonably broad support), I just can’t go there. My mind can’t wrap around it and my fingers can’t type it. While it may cost me in the pool, I’m holding onto the idea that enough Academy members pulled their heads out of their asses in time to actually watch these performances side by side and recognize that while Bullock does a good job, she doesn’t hold a candle to her competition.

Meryl Streep, on the other hand, is still defying expectations and proving why she is widely regarded as the greatest actress alive. There’s nothing this woman can’t do. She is a force of nature. Julia Child is such a recognizable and distinct personality that any actress would be daunted trying to portray her. Streep not only does it, but deepens our understanding and appreciation of someone we knew only as a TV personality. It may not be the biggest stretch of her career, but this was hardly an easy or throwaway performance. The film marks her 16th nomination, and her 12th since the last time she won. She’s due…and there’s nobody else but Meryl Streep who could already have two Oscars and still be called overdue.

I also want to throw this out there: Streep and Bullock tied at the Critics Choice Awards; they both won Golden Globes (Bullock for Drama, Streep for Musical/Comedy); and although Bullock took the SAG, that group tends to spread the wealth around rather than awarding people multiple times, and Streep won last year for Doubt. I’m just saying. So despite the prevalent opinion – and probably the accurate one – I’m predicting Meryl for the win.

That said, if Gabourey Sidibe pulls an upset, I’ll be on my feet cheering.

Personal Choice: Streep or Sidibe

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Sorry guys. You did good work, but this category is owned by Inglourious Basterds‘ Christoph Waltz, who will become the third performer in a row – after Heath Ledger and Javier Bardem – to win Supporting Actor by giving us an antagonist for the ages.

Personal Choice: Christoph Waltz

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Anybody who thought that Mo’Nique’s behavior during the awards season was controversial – oh my God, she didn’t run around kissing Academy members’ asses! – has been silenced by her moving, grateful acceptance speeches at the Critics Choice Awards, Golden Globes and Screen Actors Guild awards (where her graciousness extended to acknowledging some of the actors from Precious who were not included in the film’s nominated ensemble cast). With all respect to her fellow nominees, especially the ladies of Up in the Air, Mo’Nique can not be stopped. Nor should she be.

Personal Choice: Mo’Nique

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
While Oscar voters sometimes want to keep the Best Picture space relatively serious, the writing awards are where they’re more likely to vote for something fun. Movies like Little Miss Sunshine, Juno, Fargo and Ghost have all triumphed here rather than in Best Picture, so I think Inglourious Basterds stands its best chance at a major non-acting award here. Some will point to The Hurt Locker‘s Writer’s Guild Award win as a sign in its favor, but keep in mind that Basterds was ineligible for a WGA nomination, clearing the way for The Hurt Locker. Not that Locker isn’t a good script and couldn’t pull through, but I think all the support for Inglourious Basterds – Christoph Waltz aside –  will be channeled here to Quentin Tarantino, giving him his second screenwriting Oscar.

Personal Choice: Inglourious Basterds

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
Up in the Air has earned gushing love for its writing and Jason Reitman has cemented his status as one of our finest young filmmakers. This category is full of great work, but Up in the Air is too smart, too “of the moment” and too appreciated to go home empty handed. I would be shocked if anything else wins. It’s kinda lame though that this dude Sheldon Turner gets to pretty much ride Reitman’s coattails to an Academy Award win, but what can you do?

Personal Choice: Up in the Air (with In the Loop nipping at its tail). Seriously, have you not seen In the Loop yet? WTF are you waiting for?

 

BEST ANIMATED FILM
It was such a good year for animated features that even this category could have had close to 10 worthy nominees. Fantastic Mr. Fox could pull an upset, but it’s hard to imagine that Up isn’t going to bring another Oscar to the halls of Pixar.

Personal Choice: Up…but I’d have no complaints about Mr. Fox

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
The black and white imagery of The White Ribbon took the prize from the American Society of Cinematographers and won some notable critics awards as well, but I don’t think enough Academy members have seen it. And nice as it is to see Harry Potter here, Colin Creevey stands a better chance of killing Voldemort than this movie does of winning. Basterds will have a lot of support, but I think it will fall by the wayside. It could go either way with Hurt Locker and Avatar, and while I don’t necessarily think most voters understand the technical challenges involved in shooting Avatar, I think they understand enough – and admire the film’s prettiness enough – that I’m giving it the edge.

Personal Choice: Avatar

BEST FILM EDITING
I think Academy members tend to vote for editing they can notice or at least intuit, so I’m ruling out Precious and Basterds, finely edited though they may be. Even more so than its cinematography, The Hurt Locker‘s editing creates its powerful tension and helps the movie hold the viewer in a vice-grip. In Avatar‘s favor, it is the rare action movie that is edited so cleanly that even during the rapid cuts of big battle sequences you never lose your bearing or feel like you’re watching a blur. And District 9 actually bridges that gap as an action movie that is also dramatically intense.

I have a number of friends who are editors, and I have to think they’re laughing their asses off at my ignorant commentary. Hey, I admit I don’t really understand what makes editing great and that I too tend to be wowed by editing that I notice…even though any editor will tell you that the best editing is invisible. So knowing full well that I really know nothing, my gut tells me this one goes to The Hurt Locker.

Personal Choice: The Hurt Locker

BEST ART DIRECTION
This category often favors period pieces and historical recreations, which bodes decently for Sherlock Holmes and even better for The Young Victoria. But if there’s anything that can trump something from a history book, it’s something imagined and fantastical. So while Victoria could be crowned, I think the floating mountains, celestial skyscape and lush, eye-popping botany of Avatar‘s Pandora will take the gold.

Personal Choice: Avatar

BEST COSTUME DESIGN
Period frocks do even better with Oscar than period sets. Both Coco Before Chanel and Bright Star fit that bill (and I wouldn’t count out the latter), but The Young Victoria is the higher profile of the period films, and also required a greater number of costumes to dress all those royals at court. I expect it will rule the day.

Personal Choice: Bright Star

BEST ORIGINAL SONG
It’s not the strongest category this year, but then again, how often is this really a strong category? You usually find one or two good songs each year, and a few others – often cheesy ballads – that fill space. Perhaps that’s why this year, Oscar producers decided not to include performances of the nominated songs during the show.

The Princess and the Frog has two nominees and there was a time when a song from a Disney animated musical would have this sewn up, but while the movie is a welcome return to form for Disney animation, the songs by Randy Newman don’t live up to the Alan Menken/Howard Ashman tunes that scored wins for The Little Mermaid and Beauty and the Beast.

No one has heard of the movie Paris 36, let alone it’s nominated song, so we can safely discount that one. And the number from Nine? Ehh.

This year, justice will be served as the one great song in the category takes the prize:  “The Weary Kind,” from Crazy Heart, by T-Bone Burnett and Ryan Bingham. Since you won’t hear the song on the show, check out the video or just let the mp3 play in the background. I love the underlying percussion that enters in the second verse. It’s unobtrusive, yet gives the song an added depth. Whatever that means.

If you’re interested in hearing the competition, here are links to Quicktime mp3’s via In Contention:

“Almost There” (Princess and the Frog)
“Down in New Orleans” (Princess and the Frog)
“Loin de Paname” (Paris 36)
“Take It All” (Nine)

Personal Choice: The Weary Kind

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
I suppose it’s possible that James Horner could get caught up in an Avatar sweep, but I think Michael Giacchino’s whimsical score for Up will float to the top.

Personal Choice: Up

BEST MAKEUP
There are three nominees. One is Il Divo. Ever heard of it? Neither has anyone in the Academy. One is The Young Victoria. I still can’t figure out how this got nominated. Even the artist admits there isn’t much in the way of makeup. Seriously. In a Variety article about the set design, costumes and makeup for the film, this is all hair and makeup artist Jenny Shircore could say:

But it’s especially in her dewy, makeup-free skin that Victoria’s youth shines through — although this is as much of an illusion as anything, Shircore reveals. “Emily did wear quite a lot of makeup, but that’s the skill of doing it, really, to make her look lovely.” The trick, she says, is “not to powder it into oblivion so that you get a dry, matte look. You’ve got to allow a little bit of sheen to come through.”

That leaves Star Trek, which features some fine makeup work, sure. Oscar worthy? In this weak field, I guess so.

Personal Choice: Can I still say The Road? Okay, then Star Trek.

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
Star Trek and District 9 both feature excellent work, but when James Cameron movies are nominated for Best Visual Effects, they win Best Visual Effects. And how can this one not? It changed the rules. One of the night’s surest bets.

Personal Choice: Avatar

BEST SOUND MIXING/SOUND EDITING
As usual, I have no idea how to make a well-thought out prediction in these categories because not only do I not understand either of them, but that obviously means I don’t understand how they differ from each other. So as always, my guess is pretty blind. I’m picking Avatar for both, but who knows? The Hurt Locker could easily get one of them.

Personal Choice: None. As in, I don’t have a personal choice. Not “none” as in none of them deserve win. That would just make me a dick.

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
Now we’re getting into the categories where I haven’t seen any or all of the nominees and can only go by what I hear, so I’m looking to professional journalists who’ve all been covering the Oscars for years to guide my choices.

The two highest profile films are A Prophet and The White Ribbon. From what I’ve heard, the former is the preferred choice, but few think it will win and neither do I. It’s a violent movie, and the thing to remember about this category is that only Academy members who have attended screenings of all five nominees can vote. That means the deciding members are likely older and retired, and they don’t like violence. My concern around The White Ribbon is that it almost seems too obvious. Being one of the most recognized and critically acclaimed of the bunch would appear to give it an edge, but this category seldom follows traditional logic. So while Ribbon may well be the victor, I’m going with what many in the field are predicting: El Secreto de Sos Ojos, or The Secret in Their Eyes.

BEST DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
The most well-known of the nominees are Food, Inc. and The Cove. The latter has collected the majority of pre-Oscar prizes and seems to be the favorite, so I’ll follow the pack.

BEST DOCUMENTARY SHORT
These documentary categories are often so hard to pick because each one tells a story more devastating and heartbreaking than the last. It almost comes down to which one moves people the most. It looks like the majority of pundits are predicting The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant. I’ll probably make up my mind at the last minute, but both Music By Prudence and China’s Unnatural Disaster: The Tears of Sichuan Province also sound like they could be winners.

BEST ANIMATED SHORT
Oscar history favors the Wallace and Gromit short A Matter of Loaf and Death. Wallace and Gromit have earned their creator Nick Park four Academy Awards (three for short animation, one for feature length). The only time he lost was in 1990 for A Grand Day Out. That year’s winner? Nick Park for Creature Comforts.

BEST LIVE ACTION SHORT
My friend Brantley recently saw these five films and posted a brief write-up on his blog, if you’re interested in seeing what they’re all about. The Door is the most widely expected to win. But every now and then this race favors something quirky and funny over something doomy and gloomy, so Instead of Abracadabra might pull it out of the hat.

And there it is. It will be fun to see how Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin handle co-hosting chores, and after last year’s really well-produced show, I’m curious to see how this year will go. Adam Shankman’s involvement has worried me from the beginning, but I read some interviews with him that led me to give him the benefit of the doubt. We’ll see. Enjoy the show, and we’ll meet back here one last time for a post-mortem…as soon as I can write it.

Is anyone still reading this, or have I pulled a Ted Striker?

« Previous PageNext Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.