I Am DB

December 4, 2009

Holiday Movies and the Long, Slow Walk to Oscar Night

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 3:41 pm

 

While having lunch with some friends recently, the topic turned – as it inevitably does when I’m involved – to movies. Specifically, the Academy Awards and what upcoming movies did I think might get nominated. They told me I should write something up on the subject so that less movie-obsessed people – that is, most people I know – would have some idea of what might be worth seeing over the next several weeks. So despite the fact that such previews are readily available in legitimate locations like Entertainment Weekly, The New York Times and The USA Today, and despite the fact that most of what I know about these yet-to-be-released movies comes from those very sources – I took up the call.

So here is a rundown, by release date, of what movies on the way are generating awards talk. I recognize that most of you will maybe see a few of these in the theater at most, but what the hell? Maybe I can get you to see the right ones (starting with Precious).

Note that some of these dates may be limited releases, perhaps just in NY or LA. They could be opening wider in later weeks, spilling into January.

NOVEMBER 20
BROKEN EMBRACES – For you foreign film lovers, Spain’s two-time Academy Award winning filmmaker Pedro Almodovar is back and once again collaborating with his muse, Penelope Cruz. Almodovar’s films can always be counted on for their vivid color palettes, strong female characters and fanciful plot developments. His last collaboration with Cruz, 2006’s Volver, earned her a Best Actress nomination. Too soon to say if she’ll get another, but the potential is certainly there.

THE TWILIGHT SAGA: NEW MOON – Looks like your standard story of boy meets girl, boy turns out to be vampire, boy has to go away, girl is sad, girl meets other boy, other boy turns out to be werewolf, vampire boy comes back, girl is torn between vampire boy and werewolf boy. Been there, done that, right? The soundtrack has made news for it’s collection of hip artists like Death Cab for Cutie, The Killers, Muse and Radiohead’s Thom Yorke. If any of the songs were written specifically for the movie, maybe one of them will make the Best Original Song shortlist. Beyond that, don’t look for any Oscar recognition; this film’s reward will come in the form of heaping piles of cash money (it’s opening weekend gross was $140 million).

THE MESSENGER – Ben Foster and Woody Harrelson play soldiers tasked with the difficult responsibility of visiting military families to inform them that a loved one has been killed in action. I haven’t seen most of Foster’s work, but his ass-kicking performance in 3:10 to Yuma definitely left me eager for more, and I’m always happy to see Harrelson, especially after his recent ass-kicking performance in Zombieland (which is an ass-kicking movie all-around. It won’t win any Oscars, but seriously, if you haven’t seen that movie yet, put it at the top of your list. One of my favorites of the year.).

Reviews of The Messenger have been positive so far, with particular praise being directed toward Foster, Harrelson and Samantha Morton. Will the movie earn enough attention for nominations? It may be too small for Foster to compete in a tight Best Actor field, but Harrelson and Morton might have shots in the Supporting categories, and the Screenplay is a possibility as well.

NOVEMBER 25
THE ROAD – Viggo Mortensen stars in this adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s sparse, Pulitzer Prize winning novel that follows a father and son as they try to survive in a harsh, post-apocalyptic landscape. The look of the film seems to capture something beautiful in ashen desolation, so some technical nominations for things like Art Direction and Cinematography might be in store. If the movie delivers emotionally – and from what I’ve heard, it does – some major-category nominations could be in the cards as well. My gut tells me Viggo is looking at his second shot in the Best Actor race.

ME AND ORSON WELLES – This film, from Dazed and Confused/Before Sunrise/Before Sunset/School of Rock director Richard Linklater, was completed quite a while ago and has been sitting on the shelf awaiting a release date. Not always a good sign, but the film has played at a couple of festivals in that time and received decent reviews. Zac Efron will try to prove his dramatic chops in the role of an actor who finds himself part of Orson Welles’ theatre company in the 1930’s. Claire Danes co-stars, and I recently read something about actor Christian McKay, who plays Welles, being a strong shot at a Best Supporting Actor nomination. The Supporting Actor race is looking surprisingly light on heavyweight contenders this year – it’s usually one of the most competitive categories – but I feel like if McKay had such a good shot, I would have heard about him sooner; I pay attention to this stuff year-round. Still, I’m hardly an insider, so we’ll see…

FANTASTIC MR. FOX – Wes Anderson is one of the most unique voices in American film today, so I can’t wait to see how he applies his trademark style to this stop-motion animated adaptation of the book by Roald Dahl, author of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and James and the Giant Peach. George Clooney and Meryl Streep provide voices, along with Anderson regulars Bill Murray, Owen Wilson and Jason Schwartzman. Reviews have been great and while I have yet to see all of the competition, I feel like if any movie can beat Up for the Best Animated Feature award, this is the one. Should be a blast no matter what.

NOVEMBER 27
THE PRIVATE LIVES OF PIPPA LEE – The great Robin Wright Penn…oooh, make that just Robin Wright again….stars in this drama from writer/director Rebecca Miller (daughter of Arthur, wife of Daniel Day-Lewis). I don’t really know the plot details, but Wright is so underrated and so damn beautiful that I’ll just be happy to see her in a lead role that is likely to have some depth and let her show her stuff. The strong supporting cast includes Alan Arkin, Julianne Moore, Keanu Reeves, and Winona Ryder. The movie will have to hit hard for Wright to be a viable Best Actress candidate, and I’m not sure it can break through. Then again, she’s never been nominated…and don’t discount the power of sympathy; she is coming off a public divorce…

DECEMBER 4
BROTHERS – There’s been surprisingly little advance word on this film from Jim Sheridan, the acclaimed director of My Left Foot, In the Name of the Father and In America. A remake of a 2004 Danish film, it stars Natalie Portman as a woman who learns that her husband (Tobey Maguire) has been killed in Afghanistan. His brother (Jake Gyllenhaal) tries to help her and her young kids cope, and…well, I don’t know how far it goes but let’s just say the coping gets intimate. Which might not be so bad if the husband wasn’t possibly still alive. I’ve heard nothing yet about how the film is, but despite a dramatic story and the impressive line-up of talent, it has been largely ignored by award speculators. If it turns out to be good, maybe that will change.

EVERYBODY’S FINE – Robert DeNiro stars as a widower who sets out to visit his three grown children when they all cancel their annual visits home. Drew Barrymore, Sam Rockwell and Kate Beckinsale play the kids. DeNiro is being talked about as a possible Best Actor nominee, but having seen the trailer, I’m hardly sold. The movie looks like a slice of holiday, “family is important” warmth, but too slight to land even the likes of DeNiro in a sure-to-be competitive Best Actor race. Maybe he’ll eek out a Golden Globe nomination, but the movie will have to be pretty impressive for the raging bull to enter the Oscar ring.

THE LAST STATION – I got to see an advance screening of this drama about War and Peace author Leo Tolstoy and the battle over the rights to his work. His wife, played by Helen Mirren, feels that he must sell the rights to ensure the financial security of his family; his close friend and collaborator, played by Paul Giamatti, feels that Tolstoy’s work – which was the basis of a full-on movement and way of life – was the birthright of all Russian people. Christopher Plummer plays the aging author, and James McAvoy is an eager young follower who is appointed his executive secretary and finds himself caught in the middle of the struggle. If it all sounds terribly dull, it isn’t. There’s a lot of humor in the film, and all the performers create genuine sparks in their interactions. It’s also the story of an enduring, passionate marriage, and Helen Mirren could well wind up with a Best Actress nomination for her part in that complicated dynamic.

DECEMBER 11
THE LOVELY BONES – As far as the Oscars go, there are three big mysteries as we enter the home stretch; three hugely anticipated movies that are considered major Oscar magnets based on their pedigrees, but which no one has actually seen yet. All the buzz is based purely on expectations. This is the first of the three, and personally one of my two most anticipated films of the season.   After the Lord of the Rings trilogy and King Kong, director Peter Jackson scales it down and adapts the best-selling novel about a raped and murdered 13 year-old girl who watches from the afterlife as her family deals with her death and her killer covers his tracks and prepares to strike again. Jackson seems the ideal choice to make something beautiful, moving, funny and powerful from this premise. If the film lives up to the hype, expect nominations far and wide – from the top races like Picture Director, Screenplay and Acting (Stanley Tucci as the killer and Saoirse Ronan – already a past nominee for Atonement – as his young victim are being called the likeliest bets) to technical categories like Cinematography and Visual Effects.

INVICTUS – This is the second of the three. Directed by Clint Eastwood, the film finds Morgan Freeman playing Nelson Mandela and Matt Damon as a South African rugby captain who helped Mandela bring their racially divided country together. I don’t know much about this true story, but you’ve got Clint Eastwood directing Morgan Freeman as Mandela, with Matt Damon along for the ride. That’s a winning set-up if ever I heard of one. I’d like to believe that this role will provide Freeman with an easy Best Actor nomination. Picture, Director, Screenplay and a Supporting Actor nod for Damon could follow suit if the movie wins raves.

A SINGLE MAN – Fashion designer Tom Ford makes his directorial debut with a drama about a gay man in the 60’s mourning the sudden death of his longtime partner. The film made a big splash in September at the Toronto Film Festival, where Colin Firth and Julianne Moore instantly became heavy favorites to earn nominations for Actor and Supporting Actress, respectively. I got to see an advance screening of this recently, and I liked it overall. It feels like a European film to me – a comment I make fully acknowledging that I don’t really know what I’m talking about. I enjoyed Firth’s performance, and though Moore’s part was small, she was good. The film’s cinematography could also break into the Oscar race if the voters are feeling arty.

THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG – It’s been a while since Disney has made a traditional, 2-D, hand-drawn feature, so hopes are high for this New Orleans-set, Cajun take on the classic fairy tale. It will be fighting a tough battle for one of the Best Animated Feature slots, and given Disney’s track record with music nominations, the songs and score will likely demand attention.

UP IN THE AIR – This is already one of the frontrunners on the awards circuit. Jason Reitman’s follow-up to Juno has met universally glowing reviews from critics and festival audiences, all of whom are praising it as a smart Hollywood crowd-pleaser with genuine depth, humor and emotional heft. Expect nominations for Picture, Actor (George Clooney), and most likely Director, Adapted Screenplay and one or two Supporting Actresses. The film opens in limited release a week earlier and goes wider on Christmas.

DECEMBER 16
CRAZY HEART – This is a really late entry into the field. Fox Searchlight just announced about two weeks ago that they’d be releasing the film this year on the strength of a lead performance by Jeff Bridges that is being called (by who I don’t know) one of his best. Now all the Oscar-pundits are calling him a shoo-in nominee. I’m willing to go along with it. Bridges has never won an Oscar, and the fact that he’s well liked and admired within the industry means people will pay attention. Fox Searchlight knows how to sell movies to the Academy (see Little Miss Sunshine, Juno and Slumdog Millionaire). Plot? Don’t really know. Bridges plays a hard-livin’ country singer, and that’s about all I’ve heard. Maggie Gyllenhaal, Colin Farrell and Robert Duvall co-star.

DECEMBER 18
AVATAR – Welcome back, James Cameron. You’ve been missed. The director’s first narrative feature in 12 years – 12 years! – combines motion capture technology with what is said to be amazing 3-D visuals to create what is undoubtedly the most widely anticipated film of the year. Will it deliver? My hopes are high.   While I’m excited for the film as a sci-fi action epic of the kind that Cameron has always excelled in creating, I’m less certain about it’s Oscar prospects. Some film writers have been talking up the film as an obvious Best Picture nominee, but I’m not sure why. Yes, Cameron’s last film was Titanic, winner of 11 Oscars. And yes, this year’s expansion of Best Picture to ten nominees instead of the traditional five would allow for a film like this to break in. But I think people are making assumptions based on Titanic‘s success. This film is not Titanic. That was an epic romance, wrapped in a period piece, smothered in DiCaprio and Winslet. Avatar doesn’t have the same obvious Oscar appeal. I’m not saying Best Picture and Director nominations aren’t in the cards. I’m just saying let’s not count our alien eggs before they hatch. But Oscars or not, I can’t wait to behold this in all of its 3-D IMAX glory.

THE YOUNG VICTORIA – Emily Blunt stars as Queen Victoria, and uhh, there you have it. I don’t know anything about Victoria, but this will surely be a lush looking period piece, which places it in the running for Art Direction and Costume Design nominations. It’s the kind of role that could put Blunt into the Best Actress race, but I’d consider her a long shot at this point.

DECEMBER 25
THE IMAGINARIUM OF DR. PARNASSUS – Heath Ledger’s final film looks like the trippiest trip of the year, which makes sense given that it’s directed by Terry Gilliam. A fantasy involving a mysterious circus troupe, the wild visuals will be ripe contenders for Art Direction and Costume Design Oscars. Ledger died during production, and was replaced by Johnny Depp, Colin Farrell and Jude Law, all of whom will play different incarnations of his character. Should be fun.

IT’S COMPLICATED – Meryl Streep and Alec Baldwin play a divorced couple who rekindle the passion even as she is getting flirty with her new architect, played by Steve Martin. That’s a great trio of actors working together in what will surely be a crowd pleasing comedy for the mature crowd. Director Nancy Meyers’ previous film, Something’s Gotta Give, scored Diane Keaton a Best Actress nomination. This time around, I think the leading lady’s Oscar hopes will be dashed by a formidable opponent: herself. Streep’s nomination is much more likely to come for Julie & Julia.

NINE – Here is the third of the as-yet-unseen Oscar season mysteries I mentioned earlier. It’s also the answer to your prayers if, like me, you’ve been wondering how long you’d have to wait for a cinematic collaboration between Dame Judi Dench and Black Eyed Peas’ Fergie. My friends, your wait is over. Nine (not to be confused with District 9 or the animated film 9) is the new film from Chicago director Rob Marshall, and is based on the stage musical which in turn is based on Fellini’s classic film 8 1/2. Daniel Day-Lewis plays an Italian director suffering artistic and personal crises while juggling the relationships with various women in his life, played by Dench, Sophia Loren, Marion Cotillard, Nicole Kidman, Kate Hudson, Penelope Cruz…and Fergie.   Whether the film is good or bad, Marshall’s visual flair all but guarantees it will load up on technical nominations – Cinematography, Art Direction, Costume Design, Editing, and a Sound nomination are highly likely. And if it turns out to be as good a movie as Chicago, then you’re also looking at potential for Picture, Director and at at least a couple of those performers. It’s the best bet to lead the field with the most nominations of the year.

DECEMBER 30
THE LOSS OF A TEARDROP DIAMOND – This drama based on a previously unproduced screenplay be Tennessee Williams is getting a limited, Oscar qualifying release in the hopes that actress Bryce Dallas Howard could earn a nomination. But with a movie this small, getting a release this late in the year, I put her chances at slim to none unless the performance turns out to be a work of complete brilliance.

So that’s what the rest of the year looks like in terms of releases with Oscar potential. Even this late in the game, it’s possible that another small film will find its way into the market, but probably nothing that will alter the playing field too significantly.

Now here are some thoughts on films from earlier in the year, including the most recent releases, that have Oscar buzz. Some of these are generating talk purely because of the X-factor created by a ten-slot Best Picture race. Otherwise we wouldn’t be talking about them…

STAR TREK – A lot of people are wondering if in the brave new world of ten Best Picture nominees, a well-crafted, well-reviewed, smart and exciting piece of popular entertainment like Star Trek could get nominated. Anything is possible, but I’m not betting on it. True that last year, The Dark Knight – a massive summer blockbuster – was widely expected to score nominations for Picture, Director and Screenplay, and those expectations fizzled…to much disappointment. But if trying to equate Star Trek to one of last summer’s big hits, I’d look to Iron Man rather than The Dark Knight. Iron Man and Star Trek are typical examples of popcorn movies at their best, but I’m not sure they belong in a Best Picture race at the Oscars. When you think about the blockbusters that have been nominated in the recent past, such as Ghost, The Fugitive, The Sixth Sense, the Lord of the Rings films, they all feel more “serious” than Trek or Iron Man, even if they were commercial crowd-pleasers. So, Trek? Maybe some technical nominations, but I’ll be surprised if it cracks the Best Picture line-up.

THE HANGOVER – Much like Star Trek being considered a Best Picture possibility, this year’s breakout comedy hit is being seen as a possible atypical nominee in a ten-picture race. But like Star Trek, I’d be really surprised to see it happen. Funny as it is, the movie is just not the kind of well-crafted piece that Academy members usually nominate, nor does it have the kind of emotional resonance that led many members to tout The 40 Year-Old Virgin back in 2005 (that film earned no nominations, despite many voters saying they supported it). Zach Galifianakis has also been called a longshot Best Supporting Actor contender. I’d call it a reeeeeeaaaaaaaalllllllly long shot. Galifianakis is damn funny in the movie, but an Oscar nomination? C’mon…

UP – Now’s here’s a hit movie that could benefit from the new system. Along with The Dark Knight, Pixar’s Wall-E was the other movie last year that many people felt deserved a place in the Best Picture race. But having the Best Animated Feature category allowed people to recognize Wall-E without taking a coveted Best Picture slot. With ten nominations, it is much more likely for an adored animated film to earn a place, and Up is certainly a worthy contender. The film’s opening 10-15 minutes alone constitute some the best filmmaking I’ve seen all year…or in several years, for that matter. Whatever happens in the Best Picture race, Up will be the one to beat for Best Animated Feature, and nominations for Original Screenplay and Original Score are good bets too.

THE HURT LOCKER – Director Kathryn Bigelow’s powerful, intense drama about an army bomb squad in Iraq has maintained its momentum and is considered a likely nominee for Best Picture, Director (Bigelow would be only the fourth woman ever nominated) and Original Screenplay. Nominations for Film Editing and Sound are also strong possibilities. There is also talk around the three main actors – Jeremy Renner in the Lead race and Anthony Mackie and Brian Geraghty in the Supporting. I’m not sure any of them will make the cut. Renner’s work may be too subtle and internalized. I’d give Geraghty and edge over Mackie, but I’d be surprised by either of them.

IN THE LOOP – I would love to see this movie get a Screenplay nomination. It’s a smart, tight and totally hilarious movie about botched diplomatic relations between the United States and Britain in the days leading up to a war in the Middle East. As long as you aren’t a prude when it comes to profanity, do yourself a favor and put this one in your Netflix queue.

JULIE & JULIA – Meryl Streep is a lock for her sixteenth nomination. Stanley Tucci is a likely Best Supporting Actor contender, but whether it will be for this film or for The Lovely Bones remains to be seen.

INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS – The movie has one sure bet nominee in Christoph Waltz, whose charismatic work as a verbose, cunning SS colonel will land him in the Best Supporting Actor category. Melanie Laurent, as a movie theater proprietor with a personal agenda, could make the Supporting Actress race. Beyond that, I’m not sure if the movie is seen as Best Picture material. It’s certainly bravura filmmaking from Tarantino, but I don’t think he’ll make it into the Best Director race. He has a better chance at an Original Screenplay nomination.

DISTRICT 9 – It’s a longshot, but this high-energy, low-tech sci-fi movie was well received by audiences and critics. Normally it would be out of the running, but a movie like this could get nominated with ten slots. Original Screenplay is another possibility.

THE INFORMANT! – Steven Soderbergh’s dry comedy about an inept corporate whistleblower earned solid reviews and high praise for Matt Damon. Despite consistently terrific performances, Damon has not been nominated since Good Will Hunting. A couple of months ago it looked like this film might change that, but I don’t think it has held the attention necessary to carry Damon along. A Golden Globe nomination is more likely, and that could remind voters of the work, but at this point my guess is that it won’t happen. Damon still has a shot, however, thanks to his as-yet-unseen supporting performance in Invictus.

A SERIOUS MAN – Another critical hit for the Coen Brothers, but don’t look for this one to have the kind of impact of No Country for Old Men. A Picture nomination could be in the cards but its best bet is in the Original Screenplay race.

BRIGHT STAR – Abbie Cornish’s rave reviews for this period love story about poet John Keats have put her on the shortlist for a Best Actress nomination, but despite the movie’s positive reviews, Cornish may need attention throughout the awards season to sustain her until the Oscar nominations are announced in February. She’ll probably have it. Paul Schneider’s supporting performance is being called a possibility, and the costumes may be honored as well.

AN EDUCATION – British newcomer Carey Mulligan has earned comparisons to Audrey Hepburn for her luminous performance as an intelligent, confident schoolgirl in the 60’s who gets swept into a romance with a dashing thirtysomething played by Peter Sarsgaard. It’s a charming movie well-told on all levels, and Mulligan is widely expected to earn a Best Actress nomination. Some are calling Alfred Molina a lock for Best Supporting Actor as Mulligan’s father. I think “lock” is extreme, but he’s surely in the running. Novelist Nick Hornby adapted the screenplay, though there may be too much high-profile competition in that category for him to earn a spot. A Best Picture nomination will depend on how the movie fares during the awards season. The American Film Institute, Broadcast Film Critics Association and Golden Globes all honor ten movies vs. five, and if An Education is recognized by a couple of those groups, it’s chances will look good.

WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE – One of my favorite movies of the year, this emotionally rich adaptation of the classic book fleshes out the story and the characters in amazing, unexpected ways. I don’t know if it will earn the Oscar attention it deserves, but I’d personally love to see nominations for Picture, Director and Adapted Screenplay.

PRECIOUS – If you plan to avoid this movie because the story of an illiterate, pregnant black teenager in Harlem with a horribly abusive mother sounds like a downer, you’ll be missing one of the best movies of the year. Yes, it is hard to watch at times, but the characters are so real and fascinating and the story so strong that it grabs hold early on and doesn’t let go. You won’t leave feeling depressed; you’ll leave feeling moved and amazed. Expect nominations across the major categories – Picture, Actress (newcomer Gabourey Sibide) and Supporting Actress (Mo’Nique) for sure; Director and Adapted Screenplay most likely. Though a completely different kind of film, the effect Precious is having on viewers makes it this year’s Slumdog Millionaire. Don’t miss it.

 

And there you have it. Now as some of you may know, the awards landscape begins to take shape in early December, when national and regional film critic organizations start naming their choices for the best of the year. In January, the various guilds (Screen Actors Guild, Director’s Guild of America, Writer’s Guild of America, American Society of Cinematographers, etc.) will begin naming their nominees, and those are particularly important in the prediction game because those organizations actually have membership crossover with the Academy. So in a few weeks, this wide speculation you’ve seen in this message will start to get a little more focused.   Until then…the balcony is open. Go see some movies!

November 18, 2009

LOST: The Slumbering Polar Bear Stirs

Filed under: Lost,TV — DB @ 4:03 pm

[Post updated August 2010 to replace outdated links]

Namaste, Lost fans. While I wish I were writing today because the final season of the show were upon us, I’m afraid we’re still a few months off. But we are close enough to detect echoes and whispers in the ether. It’s been a long hibernation, and now we’re ever so slowly nearing the waking hour. True Blood and Harry Potter helped my geekhood over the summer, and perhaps some of you have relied on Fringe or Flashforward for your trippy sci-fi fix.

Me, well, I skipped those shows for now and instead went back to the beginning of Lost. To refresh myself on all the mysteries and clues leading up to the final season, I’m re-watching the whole series. Ahh, nostalgia. The first time Sawyer calls Kate “Freckles.” Sun not speaking English. Boone not being dead. The first appearance of Ben, caught in Rousseau’s net and instantly elevating the show with his manipulative games. Sun’s pregnancy test revealing the show’s first mention of the name Widmore. And of course, the mysteries that are still unsolved. The two corpses in the caves. Whispers and apparitions in the jungle (Kate’s horse, Walt, etc.). Rose saying on the first night that there’s something familiar about the sound made by the “Monster” (a detail I had not remembered and now wonder about).

TITLE TEASE
So as Season Six looms a little closer on the horizon, what do we know? Well, we know that the season was originally slated for 17 episodes, but now we’re getting 18, allowing for a two hour season premiere. That opening salvo, which will take place in the aftermath of the explosion that closed out Season Five, is titled LA X. An allusion to Los Angeles International Airport, of course, where Oceanic 815 was supposed to land…and still may if Faraday’s plan – seized on by Jack – comes to pass. But the space before the X implies something more. X as in 10? X as in marks the spot? X as in incorrect, wrong, bad? X as in the Los Angeles-based punk band fronted by Viggo Mortensen’s X-wife?

The following two episodes are titled What Kate Does (a play on Season Two’s What Kate Did, in which we learned why she was wanted by the law); and The Substitute, an episode that is said to be Locke-centric.

Matthew Fox gave an interview last summer in which he said the beginning of the season would be “very surprising — and probably fairly confusing, initially, to the audience.”  Thanks for the warning, Matt. Because everything has been so crystal clear up to this point…

THE DEPARTED
A lot of the speculation for the final season focuses on what familiar faces from days past will be making a return. Given the potential for an alternate timeline in which the plane lands safely in Los Angeles, we could be seeing a number of old friends again. Here’s who we know will be back, though nothing has been said about when, how often or in what context (flashbacks, alternate realities, “real time,” etc.): Faraday. Juliet. Boone. Helen (Locke’s lady love). It’s expected that we’ll see Shannon, Charlie and Dr. Arzt (Season One’s victim of sweaty dynamite at the Black Rock), but they haven’t been confirmed to appear.

And other actors have indicated they’re eager and willing to return. Despite the stories that he was displeased with his character arc and asked to be released from the show, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje has publicly stated he’s ready and willing to pull duty as Mr. Eko. And Michelle Rodriguez showed up for an Ana Lucia cameo last season, so I’m sure she’d be up for doing it again. I’ve heard that Cynthia Watros and Mira Furlan – Libby and Rousseau, respectively – have turned down offers to return, which is a bummer… but I’ll believe it when I don’t see them.

The big question marks for me remain Michael and Walt. For my money, finding out the whole scoop about Walt – his powers, what the Others wanted with him, etc. – is something the show must significantly address. Malcolm David Kelly is obviously too old now to play Walt in a plane-lands-at-LAX-in-2004 timeline, but once we get back to what’s happening in 2007…don’t let me down, guys.

And Michael? If any of you have been to an AMC movie theater recently, you might have seen that their normally annoying First Look reel that precedes the movie has been playing a short feature promoting Season Six. No new footage or anything like that, just lots of clips and newer interviews with Damon and Carlton. But toward the end of it, the narrator says something along the lines of “we’ll finally learn the fate of all the Flight 815 passengers.” This is said over a montage of character close-ups from seasons past, including Charlie and Michael. Does that mean that we can expect to see those two again, or is it just deceptive editing? The show owes it to Michael – and to all of us – to bring him back and make up for the way they blew it with his return in Season Four. Harold Perrineau didn’t seem too happy with the way Michael was brought back and then dispatched so clumsily, but it sounds like he’d still be willing to return if they asked him. I hope we’ll see him again. I’m re-watching those last few episodes of Season Two now – when he killed Ana Lucia and Libby and brought Jack, Kate, Hurley and Sawyer to the Others…and man, Perrineau was great.

Another hint that I don’t know what to make of is the poster for the final season that was produced over the summer for Comic-Con. Take a look at the full version, and then close-ups, split into two parts: here’s the first half and here’s the second. It’s cool to see pretty much the entire series worth of regular players lined up like that, but are we to read into it that all those characters will appear in Season Six? And once again…where’s Walt? I do like that Locke appears with his back toward us…setting him apart from everyone else – fitting considering that Locke doesn’t seem to be Locke anymore. It’s got a nice Abbey Road, Paul-is-Dead touch to it. According to ABC, this is not the official poster for the final season. When that artwork is revealed, it will sport the tagline “Destiny Found.”

Oh, and speaking of unofficial posters, you gotta check out this series of seriously cool posters that were created by graphic artist Lost fans (click on any of them for larger versions and a complete explanation of how they came to be). They’re all sold out unfortunately, but there are still three yet to be released.

CHECKING IN
With all the anticipation over who will be back from the dead for the final season, it would be easy to overlook who’ll be back from the living. But it appears that three previously recurring characters will be onboard for full time duty as regulars. Nestor Carbonell, Jeff Fahey and Zuleikha Robinson will join up full time as Richard Alpert, Frank Lapidus and Ilana, respectively. And though this is old, old news, it’s still excites me to know that Claire will be back full time. Where the %@$ has that chick been?

BACK TO SLEEP
I will end this brief update – probably the briefest e-mail about Lost I’ve ever sent – with links to two recent articles. The first is an interview with Elizabeth Mitchell, Damon and Carlton as they talk about all things Juliet. The second is an interesting article about a Lost spin-off that is in the works.

Oh, and I have to add – it was great to see Michael Emerson – aka Ben – win an Emmy award for Best Supporting Actor in a Drama Series. He was robbed last year, so it was nice to see him get it for Season Five.

Tonight’s Episode: Live Together, Die Alone (Season Two’s finale. Damn, I better pick up the pace if I want to be caught up by late January…)

October 22, 2009

A Few Words About The Daily Show

Filed under: The Daily Show,TV — DB @ 4:16 pm

I watch The Daily Show and The Colbert Report religiously, and to me they comprise a perfect hour of television that helps make the shit we’re forcefed in this world everyday a little easier to swallow. I know some people who watch only The Daily Show, not caring for Colbert’s abrasive style. I know others who watch only Colbert, feeling it’s just plain funnier than The Daily Show.

I will admit that on most nights, the per minute laugh-out-loud ratio is higher on The Colbert Report than The Daily Show, but here’s why the latter is so vital to my survival. There is simply no one else who highlights the idiocy, hypocrisy and insanity of politics and media more perfectly than Jon Stewart. Aside from the fact that, with the possible exception of The News Hour with Jim Lehrer, Stewart and his writing staff present more truth than any other TV news program out there, Stewart’s delivery is second to none. He expresses my frustration and exasperation more eloquently and humorously than I could ever do myself, and I sleep a little better at night knowing that he’s there, calling out the politically powerful on their never-ending bullshit…even if his voice is lost in the din and doesn’t change anything.

Last week saw our hero of the people on a roll, as he expertly covered the inanity and failings of 24 hour news (CNN specifically)…

Vodpod videos no longer available.

x

…hypocritical, pro-rape Republicans…

Vodpod videos no longer available.

x

…the news media’s incessant attempts to simultaneously confuse and scare the shit out of Americans…

Vodpod videos no longer available.

x

…and the amazing ability of so many politicians to talk so much yet say so little (you’ll have to skip ahead a bit to the Baucus bill/Olympia Snowe segment).

Vodpod videos no longer available.

x

Alas, Jon is on vacation this week, so I’m sleeping a little less soundly and breathing a little less easily. I especially wish he were on the air so I could potentially see him tear into this douchebag. Seriously? Senator Alexander is suggesting that Obama is moving toward a Nixon-like enemies list? The examples he cited don’t even make sense in that context. Moreover, after eight years of the George W. Bush administration – with its blowhard “if you’re not with us you’re against us” rhetoric, politically motivated U.S. attorney firings and alleged refusal to award a presidential medal of freedom to Ted Kennedy because he was a liberal – a Republican can actually say with a straight face that Obama seems to be moving in an “enemies list” direction? Please come back quickly, Jon. I need your sharp wit to combat offenses like this one.

While we wait for the return of the king, I encourage you to watch the embedded clips. They’re funny cause they’re true. I love ya Jon, and I’m not afraid to say it. Keep fuckin’ that chicken.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

September 18, 2009

The Trouble with Emmy

Filed under: Emmys,TV — DB @ 1:56 pm

I watch a lot of television. The list of shows of which I’ve been a regular viewer this decade is extensive.

Lost. The Sopranos. Arrested Development. ER. Big Love. Friends. The Simpsons. Rome. Frasier. Ally McBeal. The West Wing. Scrubs. Eastbound and Down. Will and Grace. The X-Files. The Office. True Blood. The Practice. Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip. My Name is Earl. Entourage. 30 Rock. Californication. Extras. Parks and Recreation. Tell Me You Love Me.

I also dated but broke up with Desperate Housewives, Boston Legal, Mad Men, The Tudors and Everybody Hates Chris. And with the advent of a new TV season, I’m about to pick up HBO’s Bored to Death, I’m flirting with Glee and Modern Family and I’m weighing a few others as well.

And that’s just series. Other programs that regularly compete for my time include The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, Real Time With Bill Maher, Saturday Night Live, Inside the Actor’s Studio…I’d say I’m a couch potato, but I’m fortunate enough to have a metabolism that keeps me skinny. Call me a couch french fry.

With all those shows to fit into my schedule over the years, I’ve had to pass up watching many others that I would like to see, have heard great things about, but for now remain relegated to a list of “eventually on DVD…”

Six Feet Under. 24. The Shield. The Wire. Weeds. Rescue Me. Curb Your Enthusiasm. Breaking Bad. Friday Night Lights. Fringe. Sex and the City. The United States of Tara. Alias. Damages. Firefly. Dexter. Nip/Tuck. Deadwood. Battlestar Gallactica. The Riches. Nurse Jackie. It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia. Brotherhood. Buffy the Vampire Slayer. In Treatment. House. Party Down.

There are probably more I’m not thinking of. And there are many others that receive acclaim, that are loved by people I respect, which might be of interest if there wasn’t already so much vying for my attention.

The Big Bang Theory. How I Met Your Mother. Medium. The New Adventures of Old Christine. The Closer. Burn Notice.

With all the shows I watch, naturally I have my opinions about who and what deserves to be nominated when the Emmys roll around (and the Golden Globes and Screen Actor’s Guild Awards). While there are bound to be pleasing nominations, it is inevitable that some of the best work on television is shockingly overlooked. How could this show not be singled out? How could that performance be ignored? Every year, those of us who pay attention to these things – from professional TV journalists and critics to wannabes like myself – bemoan the flawed system and champion our forgotten favorites. But here’s the problem, and it surprises me that I’ve never come across it explicitly stated, though I’m sure others must have said it before me: it is pretty much impossible to improve the system. With the sheer volume of television programming on the air, there is simply no way to effectively evaluate all the offerings.

I haven’t been able to find an exact explanation online of the procedure by which a series is nominated for Best Comedy and Drama, but I’ve learned it works something like this: a show’s producers choose eight episodes from the season and submit those for consideration. Four panels of judges, newly appointed every year, each watch two episodes of the submitted series. So one panel of judges watches two episodes of Lost, two of Friday Night Lights, two of True Blood, two of The Tudors, etc. A different panel watches two different episodes of Lost, Friday Night Lights, True Blood, The Tudors, etc. And so on and so on. (I assume that some panels just watch dramas while others watch just comedies.)

How many judges per panel? How do they actually determine which series make their cut? Are they scoring the shows on a provided set of criteria, or is it purely personal preference? How are all four panels’ scores combined to determine the final nominees? I don’t know the answers. But I do know that watching just a couple of episodes of each show – out of sequence, with no continuity or frame of reference – is no way to determine the best programs on television.

For acting awards, the process is equally ineffective. Actors have to choose one episode from the season which they feel is their best showcase, and submit that episode to the academy for consideration in the appropriate category (do they want to try for a nomination as a lead or supporting actor?). For each category, there is a committee whose members will watch all the submissions and select the nominees.

But how can you fairly judge an actor’s work based on a single episode? Sure, sometimes there are individual installments that have standout performances – the kind you watch and know, “That’s the show they’ll submit to the Emmys.” Take “Whitecaps,” the season four finale of The Sopranos, in which Carmela throws Tony out of the house. The explosive and emotional performances by Edie Falco and James Gandolfini made it the obvious choice for submission (and they each won the prize that year). This season, Lost’s Terry O’Quinn – who has been nominated multiple times and won an award two years ago – had an excellent showcase in “The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham.” It may be the best work he’s done yet as John Locke (which is saying something). One need only look at the episode to know it was the type of single-hour stunner that the current Emmy system could reward (though he was, surprisingly, overlooked this year).

But I’d wager that in most cases, performers don’t necessarily have one showcase episode to dazzle the committee. Their performances might be slow burners, and only as they move through a complete season, perhaps building on seasons past, can the power of their work be understood. Big Love is a show that leaps to mind here. Although the series finally got a Best Drama nomination this year – well deserved, as it was the best season yet – still not a single acting nomination has been bestowed. Jeanne Tripplehorn, Ginnifer Goodwin and especially Chloe Sevigny are doing some of the most interesting and complex work that I’m seeing on television, but there’s no way that one episode can do justice to their accomplishments. I’m certain that Sevigny’s performance could not have been ignored this year had the nominating committee seen her full body of work for the season. Anyone who watches Big Love knows what sensational work all three of these actresses are doing week after week. For none of them to have been nominated yet is a joke.

Looking at Lost again, Josh Holloway enjoyed an amazing season as Sawyer. The writers provided him a fantastic arc that let him play a range of emotions both volatile and subtle. He most likely submitted his character-centric episode “LaFleur” to the Emmy committee, and while he is terrific in that installment, the impact of Holloway’s work demands the entire season be seen, right through his powerhouse moments with Matthew Fox and Elizabeth Mitchell in the season finale. But with only one episode to judge him on, the nominating committee could not see Sawyer’s full journey and how beautifully Holloway played it.

So the only system that can fairly judge and reward television series is one in which seasons are being viewed in their entirety. But how is that possible? Who could have time to watch every complete season of every show that qualifies for nominations in a given category? It would take a group of people dedicated to watching every single episode of every single eligible dramatic show, another group watching every single eligible comedy, and probably additional groups for miniseries, TV movies, late night, reality…

It would be a full-time job…which I would be happy to have. And the day that someone is willing to pay for it, believe me, my resume is updated and ready. But it’s not going to happen. And as long as it doesn’t happen, the Emmys will never be truly satisfying, because they will never be capable of recognizing all the great work being done on television. And maybe a more important point is that there is simply too much good television for every show its deserved nominations anyway.

I’m not here to offer solutions or say how to fix the problem. (I guess I just did, actually, but having acknowledged that my suggestion is impossible – or rather, completely impractical – I have nothing more to give.) I guess my point is to say what no one else I read ever seems to say, which is that the television landscape is too vast and too rich to be properly honored by any system seeking to pull out five or six “best” in different categories. So despite the absence of Josh Holloway and Chloe Sevigny, of Californication’s David Duchovny and True Blood’s Nelsan Ellis, I’ll try to take my own advice when I watch the Emmys on Sunday night: enjoy the victories for your personal faves, try not to be too upset when your picks lose, and don’t be exasperated by what wasn’t included to begin with. There’s a better place to channel that energy and frustration: the Oscars. It’s much easier to bitch about them.

2009 EMMY NOMINEES (Main Series Categories):

BEST COMEDY
Entourage
Family Guy
Flight of the Conchords
How I Met Your Mother
The Office
30 Rock
Weeds

BEST ACTOR IN A COMEDY
Alec Baldwin, 30 Rock
Steve Carell, The Office
Jemaine Clement, Flight of th Conchords
Jim Parsons, The Big Bang Theory
Tony Shalhoub, Monk
Charlie Sheen, Two and a Half Men

BEST ACTRESS IN A COMEDY

Christina Applegate, Samantha Who?
Toni Collette, United States of Tara
Julia Louis-Dreyfus, The New Adventures of Old Christine
Tina Fey, 30 Rock
Mary-Louise Parker, Weeds
Sarah Silverman, The Sarah Silverman Program

SUPPORTING ACTOR IN A COMEDY
Jon Cryer, Two and a Half Men
Kevin Dillon, Entourage
Neil Patrick Harris, How I Met Your Mother
Jack McBrayer, 30 Rock
Tracy Morgan, 30 Rock
Rainn Wilson, The Office

SUPPORTING ACTRESS IN A COMEDY
Kristin Chenoweth, Pushing Daisies
Jane Krakowski, 30 Rock
Elizabeth Perkins, Weeds
Amy Poehler, Saturday Night Live
Kristin Wiig, Saturday Night Live
Vanessa Williams, Ugly Betty

GUEST ACTOR IN A COMEDY
Alan Alda, 30 Rock
Beau Bridges, Desperate Housewives
Jon Hamm, 30 Rock
Steve Martin, 30 Rock
Justin Timberlake, Saturday Night Live (already awarded)

GUEST ACTRESS IN A COMEDY
Jennifer Aniston, 30 Rock
Christine Baranski, The Big Bang Theory
Tina Fey, Saturday Night Live (already awarded)

Gena Rowlands, Monk
Elaine Stritch, 30 Rock
Betty White, My Name Is Earl

BEST DRAMA
Big Love
Breaking Bad
Damages
Dexter
House
Lost
Mad Men

BEST ACTOR IN A DRAMA
Simon Baker, The Mentalist
Gabriel Byrne, In Treatment
Bryan Cranston, Breaking Bad
Michael C. Hall, Dexter
Jon Hamm, Mad Men
Hugh Laurie, House

BEST ACTRESS IN A DRAMA
Glenn Close, Damages
Sally Field, Brothers & Sisters
Mariska Hargitay, Law & Order: SVU
Holly Hunter, Saving Grace
Elisabeth Moss, Mad Men
Kyra Sedgwick, The Closer

SUPPORTING ACTOR IN A DRAMA
Christian Clemenson, Boston Legal
Michael Emerson, Lost
William Hurt, Damages
Aaron Paul, Breaking Bad
William Shatner, Boston Legal
John Slattery, Mad Men

SUPPORTING ACTRESS IN A DRAMA
Rose Byrne, Damages
Hope Davis, In Treatment
Cherry Jones, 24
Sandra Oh, Grey’s Anatomy
Dianne Wiest, In Treatment
Chandra Wilson, Grey’s Anatomy

GUEST ACTOR IN A DRAMA
Edward Asner, CSI: NY
Ted Danson, Damages
Ernest Borgnine, ER
Michael J. Fox, Rescue Me (already awarded)

Jimmy Smits, Dexter

GUEST ACTRESS IN A DRAMA
Brenda Blethyn, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
Carol Burnett, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
Ellen Burstyn, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit (already awarded)

Sharon Lawrence, Grey’s Anatomy
CCH Pounder, The No. 1 Ladies’ Detective Agency

September 9, 2009

The Next Meryl Streep? She’s Already Here.

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 10:39 pm

 

After more than thirty years acting in films, Meryl Streep might be more popular than ever and has become a staple of the summer movie season. Where once reigned Arnold, Tom and Harrison now rules a fifteen-time Academy Award nominee whose career was built not on light summer fare, but on weighty dramas. Oh, she can still act the hell out of those too, have no doubt (pun intended). But Streep has become as sure-fire a summer success story as Will Smith. 2006 – The Devil Wears Prada. 2008 – Mamma Mia. 2009 – Julie & Julia.

With her talent and popularity, Streep is the inspiration to every young actress who came up after her, and so naturally people are always surveying the landscape looking for her successor. The Seattle Times recently published this article, positing a handful of up-and-coming actresses as Streep’s heir. The author’s suggestions are fine, but her question comes years too late. The next Meryl Streep has already been found, and we’ve been marveling at her for over a decade. Her name is Cate Blanchett.

Like Streep before her, Blanchett has a gift for deep immersion into her characters and an ear for any accent on the globe. Even more so than Streep, she also has an ability to physically transform. At the Oscars a few years back, when Blanchett was a double-nominee for I’m Not There and Elizabeth: The Golden Age, host Jon Stewart praised her range by pointing out that she played the pit bull who chased Josh Brolin across a stream in No Country for Old Men, and that he himself at that moment was being played by Cate Blanchett. Both statements could have been true. She can move effortlessly between comedy and drama, and she never backs away from a challenge (see her take on Bob Dylan in the aforementioned I’m Not There). In 2001 alone, Blanchett was onscreen as a frustrated housewife on the run in the comedy Bandits, a white-trash, idealized dream girl in The Shipping News, a Scottish resistance fighter in Charlotte Gray and the ethereal elf queen in The Lord of The Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring. Three different genres. Four different dialects. Four different physicalities. One remarkable actress.

Blanchett’s similarities to Streep extend outside of what each is capable of as a performer. Both are beautiful, but not by traditional standards. Neither was ever the fantasy-girl knockout; their beauty is more classic, more elegant. Both always come across in interviews as genuine and down to earth. Both keep a distance from the Hollywood scene, preferring to focus on their family when not engaged in the actual work of making movies. Both have demonstrated excellent taste in material throughout their careers.  A quick glance at their filmographies shows that disappointments are few and far between, at least in terms of performances. Even if they’re in a movie that’s only so-so, how often do they fail to deliver? Not very. And both have made a frequent habit of returning to theater and performing on stage.

Leading roles, supporting roles, comedic roles, dramatic roles, glamorous, gritty, German, Russian, American, playing men, playing multiple characters in the same film…Blanchett has proven there’s pretty much nothing she can’t do, and Streep did it all first (well, they haven’t both done all the same accents, but each has mastered whatever vocal alterations they’ve undertaken). Blanchett may not be on track to break Streep’s record of Oscar nominations (if anyone is poised to do that one day, it’s Kate Winslet), but in terms of this discussion, such statistics don’t matter. The facts are on film, and they’re irrefutable. And just because Blanchett has proven a worthy successor, Streep is not going anywhere (a fact assured by her continued box office success). There is plenty of room for both her and Blanchett to shine on….perhaps alongside each other sometime soon, if we’re really lucky.

While we can always be on the lookout for the next exciting ingénues, and some of them might even earn comparisons to Streep in due time, the position of Next Meryl Streep has been filled. The question now is, who’s the next Cate Blanchett?

 

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.