I Am DB

March 4, 2009

LOST S5E7: The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham

Filed under: Lost,TV — DB @ 3:19 pm

MYSTERY GUEST
We begin with our new characters, Caesar and Ilana. The former is looking around in a cluttered office. What’s he looking for? Is he familiar with this place, or did he just find it? He seems to be looking for something specific. He finds a folder with a Dharma logo on the front. There are maps, and a sheet covered in geometric sketches – circles and lines, along which are written the following: space time, real time, imaginary time and imaginary space. He also finds a shotgun, which he tucks in his bag just as Ilana enters…and which he keeps hidden from her.

She says they found a man standing in the water, wearing a suit. She says no one recognizes him from the plane; in fact, she is positive he was not onboard, and says with certainty that he was not among those who disappeared in the white light. They’re outside at this point, walking along a broad gravel road, and the plane rests right alongside them, apparently in one piece (from what we can see of it). I guess that means it never got to Guam.  They arrive on the beach, where several people are gathered around a fire. The mystery man sits, concealed by a shroud. Caesar introduces himself, and John Locke removes his hood and reciprocates.

It would appear that the theory I included last week from Entertainment Weekly‘s Doc Jensen was correct: Ajira Airways Flight 316 landed on the island that houses Dharma Initiative’s Hydra station, where polar bears once toiled and where Jack, Kate and Sawyer were kept prisoner. Locke stands in the surf the next morning, staring out at the big island. When Ilana approaches, Locke asks if she has a passenger list, but she says he’ll have to ask Caesar. Locke also points toward two outrigger canoes on the beach, which Ilana says were already there. She says there was a third, but the pilot and a woman took it during the night, without telling anybody. (This makes me happy, because it means we’ll be seeing Lapidus again soon!) But who is the woman that Ilana references? Something tells me it’s not Sun…

Ilana wants to know who Locke is and how he got there. She’s friendly, but firm. He doesn’t know how to answer her, but wagers a guess that he’s dressed in the clothes he was supposed to be buried in. (This is probably way too observant, but the shirt Locke is wearing in these scenes does not look like the white shirt he was buried in. Significant? I doubt it.) He says the last thing he remembers is dying.

BENEATH THE SHELTERING SKY
We revisit Locke’s final moments on the island, turning the wheel under Christian Shephard’s watchful eye, and the next thing he knows, he’s laying on the desert floor. Just like Ben before him, he has materialized in Tunisia, and promptly vomits. But something is different this time. There are poles strung all around, with wires and surveillance cameras pointed toward him. Is he in the same exact spot where Ben appeared earlier?  If so, the poles and cameras are a new addition. Or is he in a different spot? (Ben turned the wheel in late December 2004/early January 2005, but it was October 2005 when he arrived in the desert and checked into a hotel. So what accounts for the difference in time from island departure to desert arrival? And how do those who instruct Locke to leave the island know what time he’ll end up in?)

Locke’s leg is still badly injured and he can’t move. Come nighttime, he’s still lying there, shivering, when a group of Arabs speeds over in a pick-up truck, throws him in back and brings him to a village hospital. Doctors chattering in a foreign language rush to treat him. He’s disoriented…but not so much that he doesn’t notice the familiar figure of Matthew Abaddon peering at him from behind a thin curtain!!

Locke wakes up the next morning to find Charles Widmore sitting by his bed. Widmore introduces himself, seeing as he was 17 when they last met. He asks Locke how long it’s been for him since that encounter on the island, when John walked into the Others’ camp looking for Richard Alpert. Four days, Locke answers. Widmore says the cameras in the desert are his.

Widmore: I was afraid Benjamin might fool you into leaving the island, as he did with me. I was their leader.

Locke: The Others?

Widmore: They’re not The Others to me, they’re my people. We protected the island, peacefully, for more than three decades. And then I was exiled, by him. Just as you were.

Is this true? Because in Widmore’s younger days, when we met him previously, Richard seemed to be in charge of the Others. So did Widmore succeed him? And if so, was that transfer of power peaceful? Because Richard remains on the island during Widmore’s alleged rule, yet when he meets young Ben, his hair is long and he looks more ragged than when we met him in the 1950’s. Has he been cast out of his own group by Widmore?

Locke says he wasn’t exiled; that he left on his own and Ben is already gone. Widmore first asks why he’d do that, but quickly surmises that he’s trying to bring his people back. He says that three years have passed for the Oceanic Six, and that they haven’t spoken a word of truth about where they were or what happened to them. Locke says he has to bring them back, and Widmore says he’ll do everything he can to help, “because there’s a war coming, John. And if you’re not back on the island when that happens, the wrong side is going to win.” Widmore’s behavior with Locke is the most benevolent we’ve ever seen from him, but a dark undercurrent reveals itself when Ben is mentioned.

When Locke’s compound fracture is healed enough for him to begin his mission, Widmore gives him the Jeremy Bentham passport, funds, a cell phone for reaching him anytime and folders with info on the whereabouts of the Oceanic Six.

Locke: You’ve been watching them?

Widmore: I’m deeply invested in the future of the island, John, so yes I’ve been watching them. I wouldn’t mention I’m involved in this. I can’t imagine what they think of me, having listened to Benjamin’s lies.

Locke: How do I know that you’re not the one who’s lying?

Widmore: I haven’t tried to kill you. Can you say the same for him? You still don’t trust me.

Locke: You sent a team of killers and a boatload of C4 to the island. That doesn’t exactly scream trust.

Widmore: I needed Linus removed, so it could be your time. The island needs you, John. It has for a long time.

Locke: What makes you think I’m so special?

Widmore: Because you are.

Couple of things about this exchange before we move on. Widmore says he’s been watching the Oceanic Six because he is invested in the future of the island. So he obviously knows that they need to go back there. But how does their return serve his interests?

Also, Widmore’s response to Locke’s remark about the freighter is hardly sufficient. Did he really intend to have Keamy kill everyone on the island? It was Ben who kept insisting that; unfortunately we never know if we can believe Ben. Was the C4 truly just supposed to be insurance that Ben wouldn’t try anything, only to have him call their bluff? Would the island really have been torched? If Widmore’s goal is to get back there, how does destroying the place achieve that? Keamy told Captain Gault on the freighter that, according to “the secondary protocol” The Orchid was the one place Ben would go if he thought the island was to be torched. But was this idea of destroying the island just a ruse to tempt Ben to go to there? When Faraday realized that the mercenaries were going to apprehend Ben at The Orchid, he realized this meant danger for everyone on the island. Was that because he assumed that the truth behind the secondary protocol was that the island would be destroyed, when in fact it was always meant to be an empty threat?

I’m losing my thread here. The main points are that a) Widmore’s interests would not seem to be served by destroying the island, and b) the excuse he gives to Locke about sending the freighter full of mercenaries and C4 leaves an awful lot of unanswered questions.

Getting back to the scene, Locke tells Widmore that Richard said he’d have to die in order to bring the others back to the island. “I don’t know why he said that,” Widmore says, “but I’m not going to let that happen.”

A car pulls up and Widmore introduces its driver to Locke: Matthew Abaddon. There’s a moment between them, but neither acknowledges their past meeting…not even when Abaddon echoes that occurrence by setting up a wheelchair for Locke to sit in. Widmore says Abaddon is there to transport Locke wherever he needs to go, and to protect him from those who mean to do him harm.

SIX VISITS
Locke travels to Santo Domingo in the Dominican Republic, where Sayid is doing humanitarian work with a Peace Corps-like group called Build Our World. Sayid says he has no intention of returning with Locke. “For two years I was manipulated into thinking I was protecting everyone on the island,” he says, adding that he did so in service of Ben. “So who is manipulating you, John?” he asks.  He also questions why Locke really wants to go back. “Is it just because you’ve got nowhere else to go?”

After parting with Sayid, Locke travels to New York. While parked outside of a prep school, he asks Abaddon to look up his old flame Helen. Then the school begins to empty, and out comes Walt, who sees Locke and crosses the street. Locke remarks that Walt doesn’t look surprised to see him. Walt says he’s been having dreams about John, wearing a suit, on the island, surrounded by people trying to hurt him. So I’m guessing it’s only a matter of time before we see that prophecy fulfilled.

After a brief exchange of pleasantries, including Locke reporting that to his knowledge, Michael is on a freighter near the island, Walt goes on his way. Locke says to Abaddon that the boy has been through enough.

The meeting between Walt and Locke made me wonder why such a big deal had been made a while back about Locke traveling under the name Jeremy Bentham. It occurs to me now that the only reason this name was used repeatedly in last season’s finale was so the characters could talk about him without revealing until the end of the episode that it was Locke in the coffin. In that episode, Walt goes to see Hurley in the mental institution, and says that “Jeremy Bentham” had visited him. But during their interaction on the street, Locke never refers to himself by the name Bentham or tells Walt to call him that. In that episode, everybody kept using the name Bentham: Kate, Jack, Sayid, Hurley – they were all so committed to it. I can understand that the writers evoked the name so pointedly last year in order to maintain the surprise of Bentham’s identity, but seeing as that’s how they played it, a bigger deal should have been made in this episode of Locke being careful by asking everyone to use that name if referring to him. Now it’s just hanging out there as sloppy continuity, and if you’ve been reading these messages for a while, you probably know that stuff like that bugs me.

But I digress. Next stop is Santa Rosa, where Locke visits Hurley just feet away from the place where the big dude once conversed with a deceased Charlie. (Awwww, Charlieeeeee!!!) Hurley assumes Locke is an apparition as well, but he quickly realizes the truth. He doesn’t see how Locke is going to get everyone to go back to the island, and then he becomes distressed when he sees Abaddon hanging out by the car, watching them. Locke says they’re together, which alarms Hurley even more given his own earlier encounter with Abaddon. He freaks out and retreats inside.

Back in car, Abaddon points out that Locke is zero for three. Locke asks Abaddon what he does for Mr. Widmore. And then it comes: “You’re not really going to pretend you don’t remember that I was an orderly in the hospital right after your accident? That I was the one who told you to go on a walkabout? The same walkabout that put you on the plane that crashed on that island? I help people get to where they need to get to, John. That’s what I do for Mr. Widmore.”

Okay, at this point we have to stop again. Last year, before the two part season finale aired, I sent out one of these messages that was not tied to a specific episode, in which I threw out some shaky theories I was working on. Part of those theories have since been debunked, but some pieces are still in play. If Abaddon encouraged Locke to go on his walkabout, that means even at that point in time, Widmore knew about Locke and wanted to get him to the island. Which is one of those strange time travel conundrums – at that time, Locke had not yet been to the island, and therefore had not met 17 year-old Widmore. Unless the time travel rules on Lost don’t work that way. They must not work that way, because Widmore must have known that Locke would wind up on Flight 815, and that Flight 815 would crash on the island. So Abaddon merely had to plant the walkabout seed in Locke’s head, and then destiny would take care of the rest…right down to Locke’s trip being timed correctly so that he’d be on Flight 815. Maybe?

This also makes it feel likely that Ben was being truthful when he told Locke, way back in Season Two while he was captive in the hatch, that he – Locke – was the reason Ben was crossing the island. When he got caught in Rousseau’s net – the first time we met him and he was claiming to be Henry Gale, a balloon traveler from Minnesota – he was actually coming to find Locke. But why exactly? Because he somehow knew that Widmore wanted him, prompting him to try and beat Widmore to it? Or maybe because Richard Alpert had already been trying to recruit Locke to the island? Again, it must not matter that Locke hadn’t yet told Richard where and when he’d be born. GRRRRRRRR, TIME TRAVEL!!!!! MESSING WITH MY MIND!!!!!

Abaddon’s explanation that he gets people where they need to go also finally clarifies that Widmore was ultimately responsible for putting Naomi, Faraday, Charlotte, Miles and Lapidus together and sending them to the island. We know how Faraday and Widmore are connected, and we know how Charlotte and the island are connected (though not what Widmore has to do with her). So what about Naomi, Miles and Lapidus? Why did Widmore want them?

Abaddon’s explanation does not explain why he tried to have Hurley moved to another facility. Was he trying to entice him back to the island without using Locke?

Alright, so back to Locke’s faltering quest. He moves on to Los Angeles, visiting Kate at her house. This is a short but terrific scene, well written and beautifully acted by Terry O’Quinn and Evangeline Lilly. In fact, this whole episode is excellent in its writing, directing and acting. This was some of Terry O’Quinn’s best work ever as Locke, and that’s saying something. He might be looking at another Emmy nomination for this one. And in this scene, he does some outstanding, subtle work – his reaction to Kate’s biting remarks, his openness in telling her about Helen and the anger that drove her away…great stuff. She rejects his proposal, of course, and with each successive person refusing him, you feel worse for him.

That feeling isn’t helped when Abaddon takes Locke to Helen – at a cemetery. He informs Locke that she died of a brain aneurysm. Locke muses that she loved him and that they could have been together, but Abaddon says it wouldn’t have changed anything. “Helen’s where she’s supposed to be. Sad as it is, her path led here. Your path, no matter what you did or what you do, your path leads back to the island.” If that’s true, why does he need the Oceanic Six at all? Won’t he wind up back on the island through some stroke of circumstance? Locke must feel the same, remarking, “You say that like it’s all inevitable.”

Locke gets back in the car, but as Abaddon closes the trunk on the wheelchair, he is suddenly gunned down by an unseen attacker. Locke, still injured, maneuvers into the front and speeds off, leaving a dead and chillingly wide-eyed Abaddon on the road. But he doesn’t really have control of the car, and in the panic of his flight, he gets into a major crash. He wakes up in the hospital…with Jack sitting bedside, staring at him. It’s a brilliant reveal, and the look on Jack’s face couldn’t be more perfect. He immediately asks what Locke is doing there.

Locke knows that convincing Jack to return is the key to getting the others. He explains the accident was caused because someone was trying to kill him; someone who doesn’t want him to succeed, because he’s important. Jack can’t stomach it. “Have you ever stopped to think that these delusions that you’re special aren’t real? That maybe there’s nothing important about you at all? Maybe you are just a lonely old man that crashed on an island. That’s it.”

As he’s about to walk out, Locke plays his last card.

Locke: Your father says hello.

Jack: What?

Locke: The man who told me to move the island, the man who told me how to bring you all back, he said to tell his son hello. It couldn’t have been Sayid’s father and it wasn’t Hurley’s. That leaves you. He said his name was Christian.

Jack: My father is dead.

Locke: He didn’t look dead to me.

Jack can’t listen to anymore, and despite Locke’s cries that he is supposed to help, Jack storms out, yelling to Locke, “It’s over!”

And so it is. Over. The look of disappointment, anger and frustration on Locke’s face is heartbreaking. Despite blowing up submarines and satellites, killing people, lying…you just want to give the poor guy a hug. And it’s about to get worse.

SUICIDE IS PAINLESS
Next we see Locke in a cheap hotel room, writing his suicide note to Jack. As he prepares a power cord so he can hang himself, I wondered: has he really given up, or is he testing himself, as he has in the past? Testing his destiny, this idea that he’s going back to the island and he has to die…

He slips the noose around his neck and is just about to step off the table when there’s a knock on door and Ben bursts in. Locke seems bewildered.  Ben explains that he had a man watching Sayid, and was informed when Locke showed up. He says he’s been watching all of them, making sure they’re safe, just as he’s doing now. He admits to killing Abaddon, claiming it was only a matter of time before Abaddon killed Locke. Ben explains that Abaddon works for Widmore and is extremely dangerous.

When Locke, still with the noose around his neck, says that Widmore saved him, Ben pushes back that Widmore is just using him to try and get back to the island. “Charles Widmore is the reason I moved the island. So that he could never find it again; to keep him away, so that you could lead. You can’t do this. If anything happens to you…John, you have no idea how important you are.”

Both Widmore and Ben are telling Locke that he is meant to lead, that the island needs him, that he’s is special and important…and once again you just feel such pity for Locke and the way he’s being manipulated and pulled in both directions by people who seem to undermine him at the same time that they build him up. Locke says he’s a failure, not a leader; that he couldn’t convince Jack or any of them to go back with him. But Ben says Jack bought a ticket to Sydney: flying at night, returning the next morning. Apparently Locke’s description of Christian motivated Jack’s desire to return to the island…contrary to what he told Kate on the night they met in a parking lot next to the airport. At that meeting, Jack told her that he believed what “Bentham” had said because it was the only way to keep Kate and Aaron safe. But Locke never said anything about Kate, so Jack was either lying to her in the hope she would agree to come, or once again the writing is inconsistent.

“John you can’t die,” Ben pleads. “You’ve got too much work to do. We’ve got to get you back to that island so you can do it.” Locke agrees to come down, and sits on the table crying. I’m tellin’ ya, the whole thing done broke my heart. He’s a wreck. Ben seems to be genuinely concerned for him, talking him through what the next steps might be in trying to get the others back to the island.

And then it happens. Locke says that Jin is alive, but that he did not want Sun to come back to the island; that he wanted Locke to say his body washed up on the beach, and that he gave Locke his wedding ring for proof. As soon as John starts talking about this, Ben’s expression changes. A lightbulb goes off, an opportunity presents itself….something happens. Ben is now playing along with Locke, who adds that he knows what to do once they have everyone together: they need to find a woman named Eloise Hawking. The look on Ben’s face seems to say, “If you know about Eloise then you know too much.” Locke can’t see this look, but can tell from Ben’s voice that he recognizes the name, and asks if he knows her. Ben says he does…then grabs the power chord and chokes Locke with all his strength. The struggle is brief. Locke is dead.

The last time Ben tried to kill Locke, it didn’t work. He would later tell Hurley, “I should have realized at the time that it was pointless, but I really wasn’t thinking clearly.” So does he think it will be different this time? After he stages Locke’s body to look like he did hang himself, tidies up to remove evidence that he’d been there, takes Jin’s ring and gives a last look around, he says, “I’ll miss you, John. I really will.” The tone of his voice doesn’t suggest that he expects to see Locke again. Yet why does he want to bring Locke back to the island? Will he be surprised to see him apparently resurrected?

DEAD ALIVE
Back on the island, Locke goes into the room where we saw Caesar at the beginning. Caesar is there again, sitting and reading from a Dharma file. Locke asks for a passenger list, but Caesar says the pilot took it. He then asks if Locke can shed any light on the mystery of several passengers on their plane disappearing into thin air when they flew through that blinding white light. He describes the passenger across from him – clearly Hurley – and a slight smile appears on Locke’s face. Locke realizes how he might have got there (though why did he end up on the small island, while Jack, Kate and Hurley are on the main island? And where are Sun and Sayid?) Caesar says all the passengers are accounted for, except for those who disappeared or got hurt. He brings Locke into a room of injured, and there, unconscious, bruised even worse than before, is Ben.

That should be interesting.

FOOD FOR THOUGHT
-This episode left me completely befuddled about who to trust in the Widmore/Linus battle. I’ve always come down on Ben’s side, but for the first time that choice seems less obvious. I don’t know if I believe Ben about Widmore’s intentions toward Locke; I don’t believe that Abaddon would have tried to kill him; but I do believe Ben was sincere in not wanting Locke to kill himself and in believing that he is vital to whatever Ben wants to happen on the island.

But I don’t know how to reconcile that with his sudden decision to kill Locke. I suggested in a recent write-up that Ben seems to be doing all the things that Locke was supposed to do: Ben moves the island instead of Locke, and Ben tries to reconvene the Oceanic Six and get them to return to the island. But that is something we witness him doing after he’s killed Locke, and given the look that comes over him when Locke starts talking about Jin, it seems that the decision to try reuniting them himself may have been born in that moment. It’s like learning about Jin and the ring provides him a way to convince them all himself, without Locke. Does he think that if he gets the Six back to the island, then whatever powerful destiny awaits Locke could instead become his?

-Let me tell you what Locke needs to do to Benjamin Linus. Sit him up in a chair, tie him down with his arms and hands flat out in front of him, palms flat, fingers spread. Then start asking him questions. If he thinks Ben’s lying, cut off a finger. Ask again. If he lies or tries to change the subject by offering “answers”…cut off a finger. Hell Locke, cut it off even if you think he’s telling the truth. And then cut off his hands at the wrists. And maybe an arm at the elbow or shoulder. Just start goddamn mutilating the son of a bitch. Maybe it will finally get some truth out of him, and even if not, I’ll bet it would feel great to just hack off some of that asshole’s appendages.

But that’s just me.

-I was definitely disappointed by the fate of Abaddon. He’s such a great, intriguing character. I hoped he would have a bigger role to play in the ultimate gameplan, and in fact I expected lots of him in Season Six. I wonder if that had been the original intention, and if they had to alter their plans because the actor, Lance Reddick, is now a regular cast member on Fringe, and therefore wouldn’t be available to shoot Lost more regularly. Either way, his demise sucks. I hope we will at least see him in more flashbacks.

-My old friend and current reader Dimitris S. and I were e-mailing last week and he offered a smart take on potential future developments that I admit had not occurred to me. Sorry to call you out, D, but I wanted to share your insight: “My undeveloped theory on this all getting religious was triggered by Widmore’s admission that he was ‘exiled’ from the island despite once being the leader of its inhabitants.  This conjured up thoughts of fallen angels, which naturally made me think that the ‘war is coming’ phrase meant the apocalypse.”

Maybe some of you had picked up on that too, but I hadn’t…possibly because I’m a Jew. The only apocalypse I really know is the one in which Martin Sheen motors upriver to assassinate Marlon Brando. Anyway, this theory scores points with me. And makes me wonder further if I’m right about the show having to curtail its Abaddon intentions; among the several approximate translations of “Abaddon” is “Satan.”

-While I’m sharing others’ theories, there are two brief thoughts from Doc Jensen that I wanted to include this week. The first involves Walt, and a cool theory about how he has appeared on the island even after leaving it: “The kid’s got The Shining times 10, and he can use his scary=psychic powers to astral project himself to the Island — most likely unknowingly, perhaps only in his dreams.” Who knows what the truth is, but I like the sound of that.

The second theory involves the fate of Locke’s ex, Helen: “Locke was told that Helen had died. Brain aneurysm. Or so Abaddon said. Do you believe him? Consider: What if Team Widmore faked that grave and fabricated that story to keep Locke on task and make sure he had no possible motivation for wanting to back out and not go back to the Island? Regardless, like some time traveling Scrooge confronted with an awful future, Locke grieved and owned his stuff: ‘She loved me. If I had just…’ Locke left the thought hang, then finished: ‘We could have been together.’ I’d like to think they could still be.”

If Widmore is the one who faked the wreckage of Flight 815, surely he could conjure up a solitary headstone. I think Helen probably is dead, but again, I like the idea that it’s just a Widmore ruse.

-The man Sayid killed outside of Hurley’s mental hospital – was it one of Widmore’s men, or one of Ben’s? What about the guys with the tranquilizer guns? Who are they working for?

-When Richard told Locke he’d have to die in order to bring the others back, did he already know how Locke would die? That it would be at Ben’s hands? That he would come back to life?

-Oh yeah – what the hell is up with Locke coming back to life??!!??

Tonight’s Episode: LaFleur

March 2, 2009

Oscar 2008: What Went Down

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 7:58 am
Tags: , ,

So another Oscar night has come and gone, and as I won $60 and saw most of my personal preferences emerge victorious, I was happy. But what of the show itself? Behold my musings.

Okay, I know its been a week and you probably don’t care anymore, but this is how long it took me to get some comments together, and by the Power of Grayskull, I will be heard! Or at the very least, I will send this to people, thus giving me the illusion that I am being heard. So then…

I thought it was a pretty great show, overall. The new producers did a nice job and brought some real inventiveness to a familiar formula.

THE LOOK
The production design was great. It was a nice move, shifting the orchestra onto the stage and bringing the proscenium right out to the audience with that small, round extension and having the nominees and presenters arranged in a semi-circle. It looked good, and made it appear more intimate for the nominees.

I also liked the way the stage changed to reflect the awards being given, from the soundstage look of the pre-production awards (Art Direction, Costume Design, Makeup) to the camera equipment signaling Best Cinematography to the multiple, Matrix-y screens decorating the post-production awards/Will Smith Show (Visual Effects, the two Sound awards and Editing). And on a related note, I liked he idea of the awards being presented in the order of when in the process they happen. It gave a nice flow to the presentation.

THE OPENING
Hugh Jackman wasted little time before moving into a song, which was a clever jab at the Academy’s claim of toning down the excess to reflect the struggling economy. It was a fun number using boards of card and chalk, and while the song itself wasn’t as memorable as some of Billy Crystal’s numbers, the low-budget gimmick was creative and made the bit work. And kudos to Anne Hathaway for a great cameo.

THE WRITING AWARDS
This segment kicked off with a great intro, as the screen presented a script describing the arrival of Steve Martin and Tina Fey. It was a pleasant surprise to see Fey there; I think of her as a TV actress, but I guess with the success of Baby Mama she now has legit movie cred. She and Steve Martin were aces, and Milk winner Dustin Lance Black gave a moving speech.

Next year, I want Mel Brooks and Gene Wilder to present these awards. I already have the whole bit worked out, and I’ve got 11 months to get it to the Academy!

THE ANIMATION AWARDS
First off, I gotta ask: did the movie Space Chimps actually get some play at the Academy Awards? Seriously?

These were presented by Jack Black and Jennifer Aniston, and l must address the entertainment media fucktards who insist on creating drama that doesn’t exist. It is true that twice during Black and Aniston’s banter, the cameras cut to Angelina Jolie. The next day, everyone was talking about it. Ooooh, it’s shocking because Jen used to be married to Brad!  Ohhhh, it’s controversial because now he’s married to Angie. Awkward!

Let me explain this to you like the soft-headed infants that you are. Jack Black made two jokes referencing his voice work in Dreamworks’ animated films. After these two jokes, the camera cut to Angelina Jolie…because she did voice work in the same movies. Do you get it? Did that even occur to you? No, of course not. Why would your job actually depend on knowing something about the fucking industry you’re “covering?”

But wait, there’s more! While I’m addressing the buffoons of the entertainment media, can I point out this article, suggesting that Mickey Rourke is now going to drift back into obscurity because he didn’t win the Oscar? What friggin’ planet are these people on? Rourke is fielding offers left and right, including a major role in Iron Man 2 (though Marvel appears to be skimping on the budget, which could cost them Rourke and several other good actors). Everybody in town wants a piece of Rourke, and he seems determined to make good on his comeback and the industry’s renewed faith in him. So to the writers of these articles: step away from the keyboard until you have a clue about the field you’re reporting on. Just because you’re covering show business doesn’t mean you have to be utterly vapid and uninformed.

Douchenozzles.

THE DOCUMENTARY AWARDS
I love that Bill Maher was there to present these, partly because of the irony stemming from how much contempt he likely has for most of the people in that room (well, for most of the actors, anyway), and partly because Bill Maher has balls. His balls got him fired from his show on ABC some years ago (no, he didn’t actually show them on TV, although that might have gone over better than the comment that did cost him the job), but he made a welcome return to the network on Oscar night.

Maher couldn’t resist shamelessly plugging his own, non-nominated documentary Religulous, nor the chance afforded by that reference to quickly and sharply express his opinion about God and religion. Even through the TV you could feel the discomfort that drifted around the Kodak at that moment, but I applaud him for saying it. I also thought he paid respectful tribute to the work of documentary filmmakers, and the producers made a nice move this year by spotlighting the documentarians on camera in the audience when their names were being read. We had already glimpsed them in the Documentary 2008 tribute reel that preceded the award, but acknowledging them in the room was a nice gesture that should be done more often.

Oh and friend of the blog Grantland G. is right – Man on Wire‘s Philippe Petit balancing the Oscar on his chin was an instant classic that will be part of all future Oscar highlight reels – like Jack Palance doing one-armed-push-ups, the streaker behind David Niven, etc. Also, tell me when he walked up on stage and glanced upwards around the room that he wasn’t asking himself what feat of high-wiring he could do in that theater. Maybe at next year’s ceremony…

THE MUSIC
The Baz Luhrmann movie musical tribute number was a mixed bag. It was well staged, infused with old fashioned movie musical pizazz. But the medley-style, blending all the various songs together, didn’t work that well for me; the presence of Zac Efron, Vanessa Hudgens, Amanda Seyfried and Dominic Cooper seemed like an unnecessary afterthought distracting from Jackman and Beyonce; and let’s face it – Oscar musical numbers are inherently kinda hokey. Yes, Jackman helped by framing it as a “the musical is back” celebration, which gave it some relevance and kept it from being taken too seriously. But when you look back at some of the big production numbers from Oscars past – I’m looking at you, 1970’s and 80’s – they’re pretty cheesy, and this one was sort of in the same vein. It wasn’t a disaster by any stretch, so I’m okay with it, but let’s hope the musical isn’t that back.

The Best Song nominees presentation was decent. The Slumdog songs don’t work as well out of the movie, but they made for an energetic sequence. And all respect to John Legend, but it was too bad Peter Gabriel declined to perform his tune from Wall-E, as his voice does particular justice to that song. The blending of “Down to Earth” and “Jai Ho” wasn’t ideal, but they made it work well enough. If only this segment had been as good as, say, oh, I dunno…Bruce Springsteen’s halftime show at the Super Bowl.

Maybe if they had nominated him, it could have been. Morons.

One musical number I did like was Queen Latifah’s live performance to the In Memoriam reel. I thought that was a nice change from the usual instrumental presentation. I also liked how several screens, large and small, hung down and displayed the work of the individuals. But on the downside, the desire to showcase the staging often made it difficult for the TV viewer to read the name of the deceased. Still, it was a nice tribute overall, and it ended the only way it should have: with a rousing round of applause for Paul Newman.

I still can’t believe he’s gone.

THE ACTING AWARDS
The presentation of Best Supporting Actress at the beginning of the show kicked off one of the best surprises of the night: the presence of five former winners coming together to anoint their next companion. These were well staged, and while I wish clips had still been shown (they’re the best way to hook uninformed viewers into performances and films they might not have seen) the personalization of a former winner directly addressing a nominee was really nice. It seemed to make the experience more special for all the nominees, and for the winners it did give the sense of joining the ranks of a pretty cool club.

But where were last year’s male winners, Javier Bardem and Daniel Day-Lewis? Joel Grey even mentioned Javier in his remarks to Josh Brolin. Great to see Joel Grey there, but wouldn’t that bit have been better coming from Javier himself? Also, Christopher Walken addressing Michael Shannon – how perfect was that? If Hollywood has any brains, there’s a screenwriter out there right now devising a movie in which these two play a creepy father-and-son duo. As for Kevin Kline, I love any and all reminders that he won an Oscar for A Fish Called Wanda, so I was glad to see him there.

I was really glad that Heath Ledger’s family was there to accept his award. He’s won a bunch leading up to this, and his director or co-stars have accepted for him. But this is the Oscars, and it was great to see his family there to honor him. I wish the camera had cut to the audience a bit more to give us a read of the room during their touching acceptance. Good on ya, Heath. You deserved it.

Kate Winslet’s dad whistling (and looking eerily like Inauguration Day Dick Cheney) was a good moment, as was her whole speech. She’s taken some flack throughout the awards season for being too emotional, but each time she’s taken the stage she has been grateful and effusive toward the people she’s worked with and loves. I appreciated her tributes to her early supporters Peter Jackson and Emma Thompson, to The Reader‘s late producers Anthony Minghella and Sydney Pollack, and to her fellow nominees. She should have thanked Nicole Kidman too, for getting pregnant and having to drop out of the film.

THE COMEDY
As a host, Jackman did well. He’s a great showman and he’s got a good sense of humor, but I did miss the presence of a comedian and the run of jokes they would typically employ to help keep the show moving. There were funny bits throughout – like Judd Apatow’s hilarious Comedy 2008 tribute with Seth Rogen and James Franco reprising their Pineapple Express roles, or Natalie Portman’s presentation with a Joaquin Phoenix-ized Ben Stiller – but it would have been nice to have a comedian’s touch guiding the ship. Oh, and Portman had one of the best jokes of the night when she described Ben Stiller as looking like a “Hasidic meth addict.”

THE BEAUTIFUL WOMEN
Just because I’m a guy doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate Oscar gowns. I like seeing what the ladies are wearing as much as anybody, to appreciate both the craftsmanship of a beautiful dress and the craftsmanship of the woman inside it. So I’d like to give a shout-out to the hottest stars of Oscar night: Penelope Cruz, Natalie Portman, Angelina Jolie, Marion Cotillard, Freida Pinto (who gets the gold star for the season, having looked gorgeous in every dress at every event she’s been to), Angelina Jolie and of course, Kate Winslet.

Ladies, I salute you, and to paraphrase my favorite TV weatherman Brick Tamland, I cordially invite you to the afterparty in my pants.

THE INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS
Just a few quick comments on the other awards show of Oscar weekend, the always entertaining Independent Spirit Awards:

-Penelope Cruz – Another win, another opportunity to look super hot, this time in a casual, simple brown dress. What a stunner she is…

-Robin Wright Penn – This woman deserves a shout-out, because she’s totally underappreciated – for her acting and her beauty. She presented an award, and reminded me how awesome she is.

-Mickey Rourke – He won the Best Actor award, and took full advantage of IFC’s uncensored ceremony, dropping F-bombs left and right and showing his gratitude in a long, hilarious speech. Way to go, Mickey.

-Christian Bale and Joaquin Phoenix – This one must speak for itself. Check it out, but not in the office…

THE END
And so the 2008 awards season draws to a close. In the interest of trying to follow all the advice I’ve been getting lately about starting a blog, stand by for a taste of what I’m looking forward to in ’09.

Thanks for reading…

February 25, 2009

LOST S5E6: 316

Filed under: Lost,TV — DB @ 4:27 pm

DEJA VU
We wake up with Jack in the jungle, in a shot that recreates the very first scene of Lost ever, right down to the music. But we quickly see that this time is different. Jack’s hair is longer. There is no Vincent the dog watching him. And he looks just the slightest bit excited and hopeful. Unlike the last time, when he ran out of the jungle, this time he runs further in (and I wondered if there was any significance to him dropping the torn note from his hand).

He finds Hurley and Kate in a lagoon, and Kate is surprisingly unharmed – not even bruised – despite laying across a few big rocks in the water. How did she manage to land there without getting hurt? When Jack wakes her up, he says they’re back on the island.

MS. HAWKING’S A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME
46 hours earlier, Jack, Sun, Ben and Desmond are meeting Eloise Hawking. She leads them into the basement of the church, where we saw her emerge a few episodes ago from a hatch-like room. Turns out it looks like a hatch because it basically is a hatch, complete with Dharma insignia on the door. The station, as she explains a moment later, is called The Lamp Post.

As they all observe the room with its huge map of the earth on the floor and a massive pendulum swinging over it, she tells them that this is how they – the Dharma Initiative – found the island. Ben claims he didn’t know about this place, but Ms. Hawking casually tells Jack that Ben’s probably lying. Jack notices a picture of the island taped to a chalkboard. Printed at the bottom is “9/23/54 – U.S. Army – Op 264 – Top Secret.” Ms. Hawking begins to explain, and as it’s a lot to take in – and pretty important stuff – I’m including it all:

“The room we’re standing in was constructed years ago over a unique pocket of electromagnetic energy. That energy connects to similar pockets all over the world. The people who built this room, however, were only interested in one.”

“The island,” says Sun.

“Yes,” Eloise continues, “the island. They’d gathered proof that it existed; they knew it was out there somewhere but they just couldn’t find it. Then a very clever fellow built this pendulum, on the theoretical notion that they should stop looking for where the island was supposed to be and start looking for where it was going to be.”

“What do you mean ‘where it was going to be?’” Jack asks.

“Well this fellow presumed, and correctly as it turned out, that the island was always moving. Why do you think you were never rescued? Now, while the movements of the island seem random, this man and his team created a series of equations which tell us, with a high degree of probability, where it is going to be at a certain point in time. Windows, as it were, that while open, provide a route back. Unfortunately these windows don’t stay open for very long. Yours closes in 36 hours.”

This is a long bit of exposition, but in the hands of the great Fionnula Flanagan, every word drips with intrigue. So my questions, which I’m sure will be answered somewhere down the line:

-She said the Dharma Initiative had gathered proof that the island existed. Why were they looking for it in the first place? How did they know to look for it? And how long ago was this?

-Who was this clever fellow that built the pendulum, and who was his team that helped him develop the equations? Why do I suspect – though I have no idea yet how it would make sense – that Daniel might be the clever fellow? It’s gotta be someone we already know; why else keep the name so deliberately secret?

-What is the connection between this church and the Dharma Initiative? Why is The Lamp Post there?

On a side note, I was especially jazzed by the notion of these “windows,” having just completed reading Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy, in which parallel universes exist and can be accessed through small windows that can only be seen under unique circumstances. Those windows are in space, not time…but still. Cool stuff.

Back to the scene at hand. Desmond looks amusingly skeptical during Ms. Hawking’s speech, and he can’t believe they all want to go back to the island. For his part, he tells Ms. Hawking that he’s there to deliver a message from Faraday, her son. (Why don’t Jack or Sun react at all to learning that this woman is Faraday’s mother? She doesn’t even react much to Desmond’s news. She almost looks as though she expects this and has to put up with hearing it.) He’s about to leave, but she says the island is not done with him yet…which is too much for him.

“This woman cost me four years of my life,” he explodes, “four years that I’ll never get back, because you told me that I was supposed to go the island. That it was my bloody purpose.” He approaches Jack and says, “You listen to me brother and you listen carefully. These people, they’re just using us. They’re playing some kind of game and we are just the pieces. Whatever she tells you to do, ignore it.”

It does often seem like they are all pawns in a game…but who are the ultimate players?

“You say the island’s not done with me?” Desmond says to Ms. Hawking. “Well I’m done with the island.” And out he goes. Again, there’s little reaction from anyone to what he had to say…like the fact that he went to the island because of Ms. Hawking. That’s one thing I’ll say has bugged me about this show over the years – characters often fail to react appropriately to the revelations and circumstances they witness. Who would stand there in that room and listen to Desmond’s rant and not say, “Wait a second...what happened?” In a way, this is the same thing as my big beef with last season – the complete lack of mourning Claire did for Charlie, aside from the moment she first learned he was dead. It’s just bad writing…and all the more noticeable when everything else is written so well.

Ms. Hawking hands Jack a binder with pages of flight information, presumably related to all of these pockets of energy around the globe. She says their window will be open in a little over a day. In order to catch it, they must be on Ajira Airways, flight 316, bound for Guam. All of them.

Ajira Airways. Well, now we know how that water bottle got to the island. This is probably nothing, but I was struck by the fact that only half of the flight number is composed of one of Hurley’s numbers. Their original flight, 815, used two of the numbers, and almost every time a number is used on the show, it combines others from the infamous 4 8 15 16 23 42 sequence. Yet this one is 316. I couldn’t help wondering if this suggests a shift in the fate of the 815 survivors, as if their history is about to be altered in a significant way. It’s probably nothing, but this is how Lost has conditioned my brain to work.

Some of the particulars of Ms. Hawking’s language are important to note. “If you have any hope of the island bringing you back, then it must be that flight.” This suggests again that the island itself holds the power. And the words “it must be that flight” hearken directly back to Season One’s episode Raised By Another, in which a psychic tells Claire that she has to go to Los Angeles to give her baby up for adoption, and that she has to be on Flight 815. His words were nearly identical: “It has to be this flight.” Kinda makes me wonder if the psychic, Richard Malkin, is part of this society of people who know about the windows and the pockets of energy and the island. Maybe he’s too marginal a character for that…but the coincidence is striking. And Malkin did show up in another flashback later on – when Mr. Eko was a priest sent to investigate the miracle of a girl who survived drowning. The girl was Malkin’s daughter, and he confessed to Mr. Eko that he was a fraud who bilked people out of their money. But later developments in that episode suggest that he might have some real ability after all. Anyway…another random Lost connection? Or something more?

On another note related to Ms. Hawking’s revelations, remember the Season Two episode S.O.S., a flashback for Rose and Bernard? When he learns she has cancer, he takes her to Australia to see a healer named Issac of Uluru, who says to her, “There are certain places with great energy. Spots on the earth. Like the one we’re above now. Perhaps this energy is geological; magnetic. Or perhaps it’s something else. And when possible, I harness this energy and give it to others.” After a brief psychic examination, he says he can’t help her. “It’s not that you can’t be healed. Like I said, there’s different energies. This isn’t the right place for you.”

Lots of digressions, I know – but I love the way the show is drawing on its history as it enters these final seasons.

Another thing Ms. Hawking tells them is that they need to recreate the circumstances of the original flight as best they can, meaning (among other things) as many of same people have to be on it as it is possible for them to arrange. Which begs the obvious question: where is Walt in all of this? Why isn’t his presence required…at least on the flight, if not on the island? I was convinced all during the episode that he was going to show up. I was waiting for it in the airport, I was waiting for it on the plane…waiting…waiting…I just can’t believe that his still-mostly-unexplored-“specialness” is not going to come back into play. Maybe, like Claire, his full-time return is being saved for Season Six.

Jack asks what will happen if they can’t get anyone else onto the plane. Ms. Hawking says, “All I can tell you is the result would be…unpredictable.” I hope the show will explore at some point the significance of them all needing to return together, and not just leave it hanging. I also was left wondering why this window was their only opportunity to return. Given the many flights listed in the binder, surely it would be possible to reach the island again sooner than later. How much time passes between the openings of a given location’s windows?

PRIVATE SESSION
Ms. Hawking leads Jack into her office. (When she opens the door and turns on the light, we briefly glimpse the back of a Virgin Mary statue on her desk – just like the heroin-filled ones from the island.)

She hands Jack an envelope with his name on it: John Locke’s suicide note. Jack didn’t realize Locke had taken his own life. Ms. Hawking said that obituaries don’t usually mention it when people hang themselves. There’s a minor inconsistency here. Last season, when Sayid busted Hurley out of mental hospital and informed him of Bentham’s death, he said, “They said it was suicide.”  Who said it was suicide? How did Sayid learn of the death? Not by reading the obituary apparently, because Ms. Hawking says it wasn’t mentioned. And Jack would have known if it was mentioned, considering what effect the obituary had on him when he first read it.

Ms. Hawking tells Jack that as part of the need to recreate the circumstances of the flight, Locke must serve as a proxy for Jack’s father. Jack must take something that belonged to his father and give it to Locke…an idea Jack dismisses as ridiculous. “Oh stop thinking how ridiculous it is,” she chides him, “and start asking yourself whether or not you believe it’s going to work. That’s why it’s called a leap of faith, Jack.” (Nearly the exact words Locke said to him in Season Two when he first asked Jack to push the button in the hatch.)

THE APOSTLE
When Jack emerges from his meeting with Ms. Hawking, Sun is gone. Ben is in the sanctuary, and asks Jack what Ms. Hawking said to him. Jack says it doesn’t matter and asks in return, “Who is she? Why is she helping us, how does she know all this?” Uhh…those are all great questions, Jack. Why didn’t you ask her, when you were just in there??? Idiot.

Ben, of course, ignores his question and launches instead into a story about a painting on the wall. “Thomas the Apostle,” he says. “When Jesus wanted to return to Judea, knowing that he would probably be murdered there, Thomas said to the others, ‘Let us also go that we might die with him.’ But Thomas was not remembered for this bravery. His claim to fame came later when he refused to acknowledge the resurrection. He just couldn’t wrap his mind around it. The story goes, he needed to touch Jesus’ wounds to be convinced.”

“Was he?” Jack asks.

“Of course he was. We’re all convinced sooner or later, Jack.”

I sense more foreshadowing at play here; foreshadowing that positions Jack as Thomas and either his father or Locke -or both – as the resurrected. Jack looks one more time at the painting of Thomas touching Jesus’ wound.

Tonight’s episode deals with what happens to Locke when he leaves the island (and it promises to feature some major revelations). What I wonder – and I don’t know that we’ll get the answer tonight – is will this episode be the last we see of Locke alive, other than perhaps flashbacks? Or will he come back to some semblance of life upon returning to the island? He seems crucial to the island’s future (and it’s hard to imagine the show without him), so I have to think that he’s not done yet. But maybe this act of sacrifice – the specifics of which we’re about to learn – is his final duty to the island. Perhaps like Moses, who led the Jews to the Promised Land but was forbidden by God from entering himself, Locke’s final purpose is to lead his one-time comrades back, without the hope of being able to stay. It would be a truly bold, intriguing stroke to remove him (largely, at least) from the story at this point—not unlike what J.K. Rowling did in the sixth Harry Potter book to a certain character who I won’t mention (but c’mon, anyone who doesn’t already know who I’m talking about doesn’t deserve to be shielded from the spoiler in the first place. Seriously, the book is like four years old).

Anyway… seeing Locke to his end-point halfway through this season and then moving the show forward in the wake of his sacrifice would be quite a development. But I don’t think we’re done with him yet…

The final – and crucial – note of the church sequence is Ben leaving, and saying to Jack, “I made a promise to an old friend of mine. Just a loose end that needs tying up.”

Oh shit…he’s going after Penny.

UNEXPECTED VISITS
There’s an odd, mid-episode interlude with Jack’s grandfather, and I didn’t know what to make of it. If the only purpose of the scene was so Jack could get his father’s shoes, why bother? It seems like a waste of time. Jack must have something of his father’s already that he could have used. Why this diversion? Was it planting the seed for something yet to come? In an episode that seems to make heavy use of foreshadowing, perhaps this was another sign? The fact that Ray Shephard is trying to escape, has a packed bag, an interest in magic…I dunno. The whole thing was weird.

So was the next visit, but for entirely different reasons. This time, Jack is the visitee, not the visitor. When he arrives home at night, he discovers Kate curled up, dressed, on his bed. She looks a mess – tired, out of it. A day must have passed since she took Aaron and left Jack and the rest at the pier. She asks if he’s still going back to the island, and when he says yes, she says she’s going with him.

Jack: Kate, what happened? Where’s Aaron?
Kate: Don’t ask questions. If you want me to go with you, you’ll never ask me that question again. You will never ask me about Aaron, do you understand Jack?

He easily, quickly says yes; she says thank you; she kisses him…and I’m thinking, what?!? A little boy, your nephew, just dropped out of the picture, and you’re going to roll over and not ask any questions? What do you think, she left him with his grandma? You don’t wanna know where he is? You don’t care what happened to this three-year-old child?!? Dude…I don’t care how much you love Kate and want her to come with you. Unless you lied to her face and are planning to ask her where he is the moment the plane is in the air, then that is seven shades of fucked up.

YEAH, CAN I GET A 1/2 POUND OF SMOKED HAM, A 1/4 POUND OF MUENSTER AND THE DEAD GUY IN THE BACK?
The next morning, just after Kate leaves, Jack takes a phone call from Ben. He’s on a pay phone at a pier; his face is badly bruised and streaked with blood; his hair is wet and matted, and he’s soaked all over. He says he’s been sidetracked and asks Jack to pick up Locke’s body. Seems obvious Ben went after Penny. My hope is that when he got there and prepared to go in for the kill, he saw little Charlie, which caught him off guard long enough for Desmond to arrive, kick the shit out of him, throw him overboard and sail away at Ludicrous Speed.  That’s what I hope. Ms. Hawking said the island isn’t done with Desmond. I sure hope the Irishman doesn’t return to the island to avenge Penny. I’m still not over Claire and Charlie being ripped apart. I can’t handle the demise of Penny and Desmond’s relationship.

Jack goes to the butcher shop, where we see Ben’s friend Jill again. Her appearance is brief, so it looks like we’re going to be left for a while with the question of who she is, who her associates are (Ben had asked her about people named Jeffrey and Gabriel), and what the deal is with this network of off-island helpers who seem very much in the know. Alone with the coffin, Jack opens it up and replaces Locke’s own shoes with his father’s. “Wherever you are John, you must be laughin’ your ass off that I’m actually doing this. Because this, this is even crazier than you were.” So apparently Jack is now back to thinking that Locke is crazy. ‘Cause we know from a past conversation with Kate that after Locke got off the island and came to see Jack, he believed what Locke told him. But that was in his boozing, pill-popping phase.

Jack puts Locke’s suicide note back in coffin. “I’ve already heard everything you had to say John. You wanted me to go back, I’m going’ back.” He closes the coffin and adds, “Rest in peace.”

I suspect there will be no peace just yet.

FLIGHTPLAN
At the Ajira Airways ticket counter, Jack arranges to have Locke’s body transported to Guam for burial. As he walks away, the man in line behind him says, “My condolences. I’m sorry you lost your friend.”

This is Caesar.

Jack sees Kate arrive, but she doesn’t stop for him. Sun arrives and greets him, much to his pleasure. “If there’s even a chance that Jin is alive, I have to be on that plane,” she says. Which is great, Sun…but what’d you tell your mother, who is home in Korea with your daughter? Do you have any concerns about how you’re going to get off the island this time? Do you expect to be able to return? Cause Ben told Jack to pack a bag with anything he wanted in this life; he’d never be coming back. Was that just because of what Jack must do to fulfill his own destiny? Or is this a one-way ticket for all involved? Why didn’t anyone ask Ms. Hawking about that?

And speaking of Ji Yeon, this would be a good time to bring up a fine point from reader Kathy W., who was irked that Sun’s daughter wasn’t required to return to the island too. After all, Sun was pregnant with her when she left. Shouldn’t the kid be right in the thick of the mystery? A fair point…

Jack and Sun are stunned to see Sayid across the terminal, being led by a woman to a security checkpoint. She flashes a badge and they go through.

This is Ilana.

Although I didn’t know how Sayid came to be there, my initial reaction to this appearance was that he was trying to recreate the day of Flight 815, when he was detained by airport security because Shannon, at her bitchy best, reported than some Arab guy had asked her to watch his bag while he went to the gift shop.

We next see Hurley, obviously out of jail and sitting in the terminal, reading a comic book. He was reading a comic on Flight 815 too. This time, he carries a guitar case. Is that supposed to represent the guitar case Charlie was traveling with?

Jack approaches Hurley, clearly happy to see him, but surprised. He asks how Hurley knew to be here. “All that matters is that I’m here, right?” answers Hurley, who seems uncomfortable to see Jack.

As Jack boards the plane, Sayid sees him and leans forward, looking as if he wants to say something. But then he glances at Ilana seated next to him and thinks better of it. She notices his movements, notices Jack, but then faces front.

Jack is happy to see everybody, but Kate, Sayid and Hurley all seem on edge. Something is going unsaid. None of them seem to acknowledge that they know each other. Caesar is there, seated across from Hurley. And just as the doors are about to close, Ben arrives. Sayid sees him, and this time his face registers…what is that look? Relief? Surprise? Whatever it is, he seems unable to do anything in his present situation. Is he handcuffed? I can’t tell, but if so, that would be another recreation of Flight 815, when Kate was handcuffed by the federal marshal.

Unlike Sayid, Hurley’s reaction to Ben’s arrival is vocal.

Hurley: Wait! What’s he doing here? No no, he can’t come!

Jack: If you wanna get back, this is how it’s gonna have to be.

Hurley: No one told me he was gonna be here!

Ben: Who told you to be here, Hugo?

Jack tells the concerned flight attendant that everything is fine, looking to Hurley. “Right?” Like an irritated teenager telling his parents what they want to hear, Hurley says, “Yes, Jack, I’ll be fine.”

The flight attendant hands Jack an envelope, telling him it was discovered when customs checked his cargo. It’s Locke’s note, and as she hands it to him, Caesar is framed directly in the background, watching. Coincidence? Not a chance.

Ben takes his seat across from Jack, and when Jack asks what’s going to happen to everyone else on the plane, Ben responds – in that way only Ben can – “Who cares?”

After they reach cruising altitude, Jack sits down next to Kate and marvels at the coincidence that Sayid and Hurley are there, and that they are all back together. Does he really think they just happened to be on this flight? Does it not occur to him that they were somehow notified, which might then lead him to wonder how they were convinced to come? Kate’s buzzkill response is, “We’re on the same plane, Jack. It doesn’t make us together.” Just then, the captain introduces himself over the intercom…and the hits just keep on coming: it’s grizzly chopper pilot extraordinaire, Frank Lapidus.

Jack asks the flight attendant if he can speak to the captain, and moments later he is greeting a clean-shaven Frank, who says he picked up the Ajira gig eight months earlier and has flown this route many times. He asks why Jack is going to Guam, but then looks into the cabin and sees Sayid. And Kate. And Sun. And Hurley. “Wait a second…we’re not going to Guam are we?”

Some time later, Jack is back in his seat, and Ben is reading Joyce’s Ulysses. Jack asks Ben how he can read. “My mother taught me,” he answers drolly. Of course, seeing as his mother died in childbirth, I don’t think she taught him much of anything. Even in his sarcasm he can’t be honest! (But now that I think about, as a boy on the island, Ben met his dead mother in the jungle once. Maybe they got together occasionally after that for poltergeisty home schooling.)

Jack asks if Ben knew Locke killed himself. Ben says no, but doesn’t seem to react with surprise or emotion at all, making me think he did know. Jack wonders if he (himself, not Ben) is to blame for Locke’s suicide, and Ben assures him that he’s not – for what that’s worth coming from Ben. Ben moves to another row further up to give Jack privacy while opening the letter. The note is brief. It reads, “Dear Jack, I wish you had believed me.” It is signed “JL.” Then the plane starts to shake. It grows worse, and soon we hear the same noise that accompanies the flashes on the island. We see the white light….

DEJA VU REDUX
…and we’re back where the episode started…which was already back where the whole series started. Jack in the jungle, getting up, dropping a torn piece of Locke’s note from his hand as he runs toward Hurley’s cries for help. In the lagoon, Jack wakes up Kate, and together with Hurley, they wonder why none of them remember crashing. There is no sign of Sun, Sayid, or Ben (or Locke). As they prepare to split up and look for the others, they hear a noise. A Dharma van drives up on the ridge overhead. The driver emerges, rifle pointed down at the new arrivals. It’s Jin. In a Dharma uniform.

Whoa.

 

FOOD FOR THOUGHT
-Now that our friends are back on the island, how long before we learn more about Eloise Hawking? And speaking of which, remember when Desmond was living in a monastery making wine with the monks? The head monk had a photograph on his desk, and in that photograph was himself…and Ms. Hawking. Does that monk, and his church, have a connection to the Dharma Initiative, like Eloise and her church? And just what is her connection to the Dharma Initiative? If she is indeed one and the same as Ellie from the Jughead episode, how did she go from being an Other with Richard to a Dharma dame? And as for Desmond, was his fate already in motion even then? Remember, as he was preparing to leave the monastery and resume his normal life, he helped a visitor load several boxes of the monastery’s wine into her car. That visitor was Penny, who told the monk that her father had sent a check for the wine in advance. The monk said to thank her father for his generous donation.

So to sum up: Ellie was an Other with Charles Widmore; Ellie might be Ms. Eloise Hawking; Ms. Hawking operates out of a church; Ms. Hawking is pictured in a photograph with a monk in England; Charles Widmore supports this monk’s monastery. Are we seeing the pieces of a network reveal themselves?

-You may be wondering why I brought up Caesar and Ilana before we even know them by name. In my first message of the season, I mentioned that we’d be meeting two new people who are said to factor into the overall arc of the show in a big way. Well, we just met them. According to Damon and Carlton, they will be recurring characters this season with the likelihood of becoming regulars next year. So I highlight them now because we haven’t only seen their faces for the first time; I believe we’ve seen their influence as well. Sayid is obviously in some form of Ilana’s custody, and I have little doubt that she and Caesar are somehow responsible for Kate and Hurley being there as well…which means they are responsible for Aaron’s current whereabouts. Are they also responsible for Lapidus flying this particular plane? We saw in the preview for tonight’s episode that Ilana talks to Locke at some point after his return. And Caesar definitely knows something about Locke’s suicide note. Who are these two, and who are they working for?

-It appears that the plane did not crash, but rather that it got caught up in one of the flashes. Did the plane continue toward Guam, with only those who are supposed to be on the island staying behind? We’ve gotta figure that Caesar and Ilana will be on the island. What about Lapidus? I hope so. That guy rules.

Entertainment Weekly’s Doc Jensen suggested another possibility regarding the fate of Flight 316, which I liked…though I’m not sure I believe it: “Remember back in Season 3, when the Others made Kate and Sawyer do hard labor on Hydra Station Island? According to Lost lore, the thing that they were helping to build…was an airplane runway. So…what if instead of getting magically downloaded out of the sky by The Island like Jack, Kate and Hurley, Ben’s Ajira contingent merely landed safely on that runway? What if the very reason that Ben wanted to build that runway was because somehow (Jacob? Time loop? Precognitive powers?), he knew that one day he would need it?!”

-I’m less curious about why Jin is in a Dharma uniform – I can pretty much make an educated guess about that one – as I am about how he happened to be on that ridge at that moment, almost as if he expected somebody to be in the lagoon below. What was he doing there?

-Did it bother anyone else that no Ajira flight crew asked Hurley to stow that huge guitar case? He just had it sitting in the seat next to him!  That’s so not regulation…

Also from the EW.com files, Doc Jensen was answering reader mail, and addressed a question about Locke continually getting wounded in the leg after the island restored his ability to walk again. Here is his answer:

“It’s interesting to note that Locke loses his legs whenever he gets put on a new path — and, perhaps, sometimes as a karmic scolding for deviating from the path he’s supposed to be on. Locke succumbed to the temptation of chasing after his cruel, criminal father — and he got tossed out a window. Locke got caught up in the Hatch’s weird drama — and he got his legs crushed under the Blast Door. What happened right before Alpert gave him his mission to bring the Oceanic 6 back to the Island? That’s right: shot in the leg by Ethan. Every time Locke’s hero’s journey gets rebooted, he’s delivered back to a square one: Busted legs. But then he takes the leap of faith, and he’s healed anew.”

I would add to that list Locke’s legs failing him when he and Boone discovered the cargo plane in the tree canopy…but I can’t remember the specifics of that event, so I’m not sure if it fits Doc Jensen’s theory. Anyway, kinda neat.

LINE OF THE NIGHT
“You tell me, Jack, you’re the one that got to stay after school with Ms. Hawking.” – Ben

Tonight’s Episode: The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham

February 20, 2009

My Absurdly Long Oscar Predictions Opus: 2008 (Year of the Slumdog)

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 2:25 pm

Actually, I think it’s shorter than usual this year…

Greetings Slumdogs. We’re days away from the 81st Annual Academy Awards, and while many of this year’s categories seem like safe bets, there are still a few big ones that are up in the air. If you’re interested, here are my predictions (mostly in line with the general consensus out there, but like I said…most of this year’s categories feel like safe bets) and personal picks.

BEST PICTURE/BEST DIRECTOR
The absence of The Dark Knight still haunts, burns and infuriates me. But I’m not going to go off on that tangent again. The nominees are what they are, so with that, a note to the producers and directors of Benjamin Button, Milk, The Reader and Frost/Nixon: Relax. Enjoy the show. Have a good time. Let go of your nerves. Your films are excellent and you’ve done terrific work. You’re not going to win.

Slumdog Millionaire, and its director Danny Boyle, are miles out in front. If it doesn’t win Best Picture, no one will talk about Shakespeare In Love beating Saving Private Ryan ever again. (Though they will still talk about Ordinary People beating Raging Bull. That will never die.)

Personal Choice: Slumdog Millionaire/Danny Boyle

BEST ACTOR
The moment that will have the most viewers on the edge of their seat this year will be the breath taken between the presenter of this award (last year’s Best Actress winner Marion Cotillard, presumably) saying “And the Oscar goes to” and actually reading the winner’s name. Brad Pitt, you can keep your seat. Same for you Richard Jenkins, though we are so happy to have you here with us. Frank Langella, you’re welcome to shift a bit, but don’t expect to move more than that. Only Sean Penn and Mickey Rourke should be prepared to get up.

As much as I love the awards frenzy – and you know I love it – the absurdity of it and the lack of sense it makes is exemplified in this year’s Best Actor race. How do you make a call between these performances? Each has classic characteristics that traditionally appeal to Oscar voters. On one hand, you have Rourke, whose real-life rough road made him uniquely suited to this role. He brought true pain and life experience to his character, whose path in many ways mirrors his own. On the other hand, you have Penn, who disappears into the skin of a character so different from the persona we know him to have publicly. It’s transformative work, not overtly drawn from personal experience, but rather from pure understanding of his craft.

Both performances rely, to an extent, on the audience’s awareness of the actors’ histories. Both performances are moving and shine a new light on the actors. Both have won multiple awards throughout the season. The Academy loves a great comeback, and Rourke’s is one for the ages. He’s been gracious and humorous in previous acceptance speeches, and has been incredibly open in speaking about his past mistakes. Penn is Hollywood royalty; everybody in the industry worships him, and his prior speeches this year have seen him humble and appreciative (yes, speeches matter. They shouldn’t…but they do). And in a year when Prop. 8 was high on Hollywood’s radar, politics will inevitably come into play for many voters who choose Penn.

So how do you choose? It’s almost impossible. I’m giving the slightest edge to Sean Penn due to the transformation and political aspects. But it’s pretty much a coin toss, and I’ll be really happy for either one of them (and a little bummed out for the other).

BEST ACTRESS
This one is a little easier to call, though it’s not a lock. Momentum is favoring Kate Winslet, who has yet to win after six nominations. Will controversy over The Reader hurt her chances? Will people be more inclined to break the record of losses for Meryl Streep, who hasn’t won since 1982 despite nearly a dozen nominations?

I think it’s Winslet’s year.

Personal Choice: Surprisingly, I’m not sure. I mean, yeah, I want Kate Winslet to win…because a) she’s seriously overdue, b) I’m deeply in love with her and c) she gets repeatedly, gloriously naked in The Reader. But while it is a great performance – one of two greats she gave this year – I can’t say I really think she deserves it for this one. If I’m truly honest with myself, I’d probably pick Anne Hathaway. I think she gave the boldest, most effective, most memorable performance of the bunch…save for Melissa Leo, who I haven’t seen yet. But Frozen River arrived from Netflix on Wednesday, so I’ll be watching it tonight for sure.

And speaking of which, an Oscar blog that I read regularly posted this interesting message from a source with ties to the Academy offering thoughts on why Melissa Leo has a good chance of surprising everyone with a win. I still don’t think she’ll get there, but this provides some insight into how voters sometimes think…and how warped and political the whole campaigning process can be. Seriously, if there’s any truth to #4 – and if that practice is widespread – the Oscars have even less credibility than I thought. Not that that makes me love them any less.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
One more time, lemme just say: I’m so glad Robert Downey, Jr. made the list. And he’s my second choice. But let’s face it: if Heath Ledger doesn’t win, it will be the shock of the century. The biggest question about this category is who will accept for the late actor. As Christopher Nolan already accepted the Critic’s Choice Award and the Golden Globe on Ledger’s behalf, it would be nice to see a family member. Speaking of which, here’s an interesting article about what will happen to Ledger’s Oscar:

Personal Choice: Heath Ledger

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Of the major categories, this is the most wide open of the night. It’s anyone’s game, really. Well, almost anyone. I think Taraji P. Henson will have to settle for the nomination. Beyond that, any of the other four have a legitimate shot. A lot of people out there love Amy Adams like they love their own daughter, but I suspect more votes will go to her co-star Viola Davis for a brief but powerful turn. Marisa Tomei’s work in The Wrestler is widely admired, but I have a hard time seeing it as a winner. The frontrunner is Penelope Cruz, who was sensational in Vicky Cristina Barcelona. A great part and a great performance. I think she’ll take it…but I’m watching out for Viola Davis.

Personal Choice: Penelope Cruz

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Some people are expecting Wall-E to succeed here, but as clever a script as it is, Pixar’s movies find themselves in this category almost every time, and they never win. I think most people will use the Best Animated Feature category to honor Wall-E. Happy-Go-Lucky is just along for the ride, and while Frozen River and In Bruges both have definite upset potential, Milk – written by Dustin Lance Black – is the one to beat.

Personal Choice: In Bruges

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
A note to the writers of Benjamin Button, Frost/Nixon, Doubt and The Reader: see Best Picture/Best Director above. Simon Beaufoy, nominated 11 years ago for writing The Full Monty, returns and wins for Slumdog Millionaire.

Personal Choice: Slumdog Millionaire

BEST ANIMATED FILM
If Waltz With Bashir had been nominated (and how come it wasn’t?!?) then there might be a short discussion to have here. As it is, the clever dog and the warrior panda will lose to a robot in love.

Personal Choice: Wall-E

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
I was surprised The Reader was nominated for this. I don’t remember thinking that the photography was particularly noteworthy (thought it was partially shot by the great, great, great Roger Deakins, who has yet to win an Oscar, unbelievable as that is). Benjamin Button‘s camerawork was simply gorgeous and The Dark Knight‘s was deep and rich. But I expect they’ll all (along with Changeling) be trumped by the energetic work that propels Slumdog Millionaire.

Personal Choice: Slumdog Millionaire

BEST ART DIRECTION
This one comes down to The Dark Knight and Benjamin Button. Both have a legitimate chance, but I think voters will favor the pretty, painterly Button over Knight‘s urban jungle.

Personal Choice: Benjamin Button

BEST COSTUME DESIGN
It’s hard to imagine Australia, Revolutionary Road or Milk (seriously? Milk? For Best Costume Design?) beating the elaborate frocks of The Duchess. Big, bold and outlandish tends to dominate in this category – think recent winners Elizabeth: The Golden Age and Marie Antoinette. Benjamin Button has a shot, but history favors The Duchess.

Personal Choice: The Duchess

BEST FILM EDITING
There’s good work in all these films. Milk does a nice job of blending in documentary footage with the new material, and The Dark Knight‘s cutting is crisp and effective. But the gold will go to Slumdog for the editing’s role in unspooling the story so imaginatively.

Personal Choice: Slumdog Millionaire

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
There’s some fine music among the nominees, but none hold a candle to Slumdog.

Personal Choice: Slumdog Millionaire

BEST ORIGINAL SONG
I wish I could say that Bruce Springsteen would win on a write-in vote, but I think that would be an Oscar first. Tell me again how his title track from The Wrestler failed to get a nomination? This article offers a little explanation…but not much. What a joke.

Any of these three nominees could win. If the two Slumdog songs split the vote, Peter Gabriel and Thomas Newman will swoop in with their fine song from Wall-E. But I think Slumdog will earn another trophy here, and “Jai Ho” (the song that plays over the end credits) is the more likely victor.

Personal Choice: Bruce Springsteen – The Wrestler (If I must stick to the nominees, I choose Jai Ho).

BEST MAKE-UP
Aging make-up seems to be a staple by now, so normally I’d say the more fantastical work in The Dark Knight or Hellboy II would break through here. But the subtle gradations of Brad Pitt’s de-aging, combined with most voters’ likely inability to distinguish Button‘s make-up from its visual effects, will probably lead it to the win.

Personal Choice: The Dark Knight

BEST SOUND MIXING/SOUND EDITING
As I say every year, the two sound categories are the ones I’m least capable of judging…which puts me in the same frame of mind as pretty much every Academy member who is not in the Sound branch. I would think that Wall-E would and should take at least one of the two, as Ben Burtt’s sound work was widely praised and most of the movie is essentially silent save for its multitude of sound effects. It would deserve an award even if the only sounds in the whole movie were Wall-E and EVE saying each others name. But will it win both categories? If it only gets one, I’d say the overall sensory onslaught of Slumdog Millionaire or the action-packed soundscapes of The Dark Knight or Iron Man will take the other. I can’t distinguish between the two types of work, so in my Oscar pool these categories are interchangeable. I’m going with Wall-E for one and Slumdog for the other…but I say that with little confidence.

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
There’s excellent work in all three of these nominees. The Dark Knight will probably earn the fewest votes, as it features the least obvious effects of the bunch. Iron Man‘s work is elegant and excellent, but also fairly traditional as visual effects go. The only one that really feels like it’s breaking new ground is Benjamin Button, so I’m going with that. But voters have often proven to be astoundingly stupid when voting in this category, so you never can tell.

Personal Choice: Benjamin Button

BEST FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
The secret to this category is knowing that only Academy members who have attended screenings of all five nominees can vote for the winner. Most Academy voters are working filmmakers with families, and probably don’t have the time to go see all five nominees in a theater. Those who do have the time are probably older, retired, more conservative. Which is why more fanciful or edgier movies like Pan’s Labyrinth or Amelie – both of which were breakthrough hits commercially and critically and were widely expected to win this award in their respective years – wound up losing to more traditional films grounded in reality.  At least, that’s my theory. The problem is that it doesn’t necessarily help determine this year’s winner.

The favorite going in, having largely dominated the previous awards, is Waltz With Bashir, Israel’s unique, animated documentary examining soldiers’ experiences in the Lebanon war. On one hand, the animation makes it a little trippy. Will the old folks respond? On the other hand, it’s a documentary, which lends it additional gravitas, and it’s a powerful film about a (generally) relevant subject. With all of that in its favor, I’m predicting it will triumph. But if it’s just too out-there for those old fogies, the winner will be The Class, France’s entry which has also been well received and won top honors at last year’s Cannes Film Festival.

Personal Choice: Waltz With Bashir…but it’s the only one I’ve seen.

BEST DOCUMENTARY
Man on Wire has dominated nearly every documentary award given this season, so it would stand to reason that an Oscar win would follow suit. However this category is notorious for failing to recognize what everyone else seems to consider foregone conclusions, so nothing is certain. If Man on Wire gets tripped up, word is it would most likely be in favor of the Katrina-themed Trouble the Water. But I haven’t seen any of them, so I don’t know. (Once again, where is Waltz With Bashir? No Animation or Documentary nomination? WTF?)

Sorry, if you’re trying to fill out your ballot and win the pool, and are for some reason going by my picks, you’re on your own for the Documentary, Live Action and Animated shorts. Haven’t seen ’em (except for Pixar’s pre-Wall-E short Presto!), don’t know anything about ’em.

The final mystery is how the show itself will be. They seem to be trying all kinds of different things this year. Hugh Jackman is a great song-and-dance man, and he is funny – but he’s not a comedian, which has traditionally been the obvious way to go. (Anybody who blames Jon Stewart, Ellen DeGeneres or any other host for Oscar’s declining ratings needs to wake up. It ain’t their fault.)

Usually, the list of presenters is revealed ahead of time, but this year it’s been kept under wraps to preserve some secrecy. I read that presenters have even been asked not to walk the red carpet, but rather come in through a private entrance. I’m not sure how that will fly, given the red carpet opportunity for showing off dresses…although one positive result will be fewer opportunities for the vapid, awful, cringe-inducing interviews from the entertainment “reporters.”

I’ve read rumors – supposedly leaked from people in the know – that High School Musical stars Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens will present, as well as Twilight‘s Robert Pattinson. Beyonce is also rumored to be performing a number with Jackman. The Beyonce thing is probably true – after all, she’s performed at the Oscars twice before and this year’s show producers are Bill Condon and Laurence Mark – the writer/director and producer, respectively, of Dreamgirls (Condon was also an Oscar nominee for the Chicago screenplay and an Oscar winner for writing Gods and Monsters). I just hope they aren’t trying to boost ratings by throwing a bunch of hot young stars up there. That would just be crass. (I guess the Oscars are already kind of crass, but…in a classy way). I’m just saying, this isn’t the People’s Choice Awards or the MTV Awards. We expect to see a certain caliber of actor presenting at the Oscars. Occasional softballs like Efron, Hudgens and Pattinson are fine, but if the whole show skews in that direction I’m gonna be pretty damn disappointed.

On a more promising note, I read that Judd Apatow and Bennett Miller (director of Capote) are preparing special material for the show. Don’t know what that means exactly, but I love all things Apatow.

We’ll see how it all goes. Enjoy the show…

February 18, 2009

LOST S5E5: This Place Is Death

Filed under: Lost,TV — DB @ 3:30 pm

There’s a LOT to say about this episode, so hold your calls, cancel your dinner plans and let your kid walk home from soccer practice; it’s only five miles. We’re gonna be here a while.

SMOKEHOUSE
On the island, Jin is trying to wrap his head around his introduction to a young, pregnant Rousseau, who tells him that her ship sailed in November 1988. Jin wants to look for his camp, but agrees to help lead the French crew to the island’s radio tower, since he doesn’t know where his camp is from their current location. (Though I’m not sure how he knows where the radio tower is, from there or anywhere. The only time we’ve seen the radio tower was when Jack led the bulk of the crash survivors there to call the freighter for help. But Jin wasn’t with them. He stayed on the beach with Sayid and Bernard to spring a trap on the Others. Captain Continuity, at your service…)

Early in their journey through the jungle, shit starts to go down. One of the French crew, Nadine, disappears. As they look for her, we hear the ominous chirping/flapping sounds that precede the classic appearances of an old, familiar friend. You know him, you love him…give it up ladies and gentlemen for the Smoke Monster!! [Insert sound of applauding crowd.]

Yes, Smokey starts doing his uprooting-trees-from-the-ground act, and drops a dead Nadine down from above. He/she/it circles around and grabs Montand, dragging him through the jungle while the others give chase. They arrive at an old building, with a large opening in the ground where two corners meet. The smoke starts to pull him down, so they all jump and grab his arm, forming a chain to try and pull him back. The tug-of-war results in his arm being torn off as he is yanked below.

Ehh, good riddance. That guy was a prick from the get-go. But moments later, they hear him calling from the depths, crying out that he’s hurt, that the smoke is gone and that he needs help. Despite Jin’s objections, the others start to go in. Rousseau tries to follow, but Jin stops her, indicating her baby. As they wait, another flash occurs. Jin buckles, holding his hands to his ears. But Rousseau just looks at him, already freaked out, and asks what’s wrong. It seems as if she doesn’t see the flash and is not affected by it.

I had questioned this in an earlier episode; I haven’t been able to tell if only those moving through time can see the effects of the flash or if others can see it too. When Daniel approached Desmond at the hatch, Desmond seemed to take note, but maybe that’s just because of Desmond’s own time-tripping experiences. Richard didn’t seem to notice it when he was mending Locke’s gunshot wound, though he was expecting it. 1950’s Richard didn’t seem to notice it either when Locke came to the Others’ camp to ask him about getting off the island.

That’s just one of the questions this scene leaves. How about the fact that way back in the Season One finale, the smoke grabbed hold of Locke and tried to drag him into a hole in the ground (though not the same hole). In that instance, Jack grabbed Locke’s arms and was able to hang on long enough for Kate to retrieve a stick of dynamite and drop it down the hole.  Yet now, in less time than Jack was able to hold onto Locke alone, four people fail to overcome the smoke’s strength, which is so intense that the dude’s arm rips off. So why did Locke fare better? Was Smokey not trying as hard? Maybe as some kind of extension of the island’s consciousness, it knew that Locke was too important to harm? Maybe it was just luck, and Locke was only seconds away from losing his arm too. Or perhaps Smokey’s heart just wasn’t in it that day, lucky Locke.

Another important question, which reader David E. raised, was what would have happened if Jin wasn’t there? There was a time when Rousseau and her people arrived on the island and didn’t meet Jin. That Rousseau would be the same one we eventually came to meet after the plane crash. Did that Rousseau follow her companions into the hole? If so, does whatever happened to her down there partly account for her fragile mental state sixteen years later? Or is the behavior we’ve always observed purely the result of being isolated in the jungle for sixteen years, watching her crew go crazy, killing them and having her daughter stolen? Seems like that would be enough to do it. So did she follow them down the first time? If she did, then Jin has altered the future by stopping her. What will be the consequences of that?

AND THEN THERE WAS ONE
Jin is alone now, and we get a better look at the building above Smokey’s nest. It looks like stone, and has carvings all over it – which resemble the same hieroglyphic-like marks we saw in Ben’s secret room last season. Remember? He disappeared behind a similarly marked door and came back having apparently summoned Herr Smokey. The markings also look like the ones that started flashing when the 108 minute countdown in the hatch expired and the alarm went off.

I wondered if this structure where Jin is now standing might be The Temple, where Ben directed Alex, Rousseau and Karl before Keamy invaded. If it was, Rousseau showed no sign of recognizing it on the map as the place where she had once been. (And speaking of which, I sure hope Ben’s sooty chamber wasn’t a secret passage directly to The Temple, because if it was, why didn’t he just send Alex, Karl and Rousseau that way?)

Jin notices Le Prick’s severed arm still on the ground – rotting, but not yet fully decomposed. There’s still flesh on the hand, so it must be relatively soon after the arm was torn. Making his way to the beach, he finds two of the Frenchmen shot dead, and then he sees Rousseau, still pregnant, pointing a rifle at her lover Robert. He pleads with her to lower the gun and stop what she’s doing, but she yells, “You’re not Robert. You’re someone else. That thing changed you. You’re not Robert. You’re sick. That monster made you sick.”

“It’s not a monster,” he tells her. “It’s a security system guarding that temple.” He convinces her that he doesn’t want anything to happen to her or their baby, but when she lowers her weapon, he raises his and fires. Unfortunately for him, the gun either jams or is empty. Either way, she shoots him dead. Jin runs over, but she turns the gun on him, shouting that he disappeared and that he’s sick too. She starts shooting, so he runs into jungle, where the next flash occurs and reunites him almost immediately with Sawyer and Co.

Before we get to that, what are we to make of the comment about the security system? We’ve heard Smokey described that way before – by Rousseau, in fact, back in the Season One finale when she was leading Jack, Kate, Locke, Hurley and Dr. Arzt to the Black Rock for explosives. When Jack asked her what the system was protecting, she simply answered, “The island.”  So that’s as much as we know about the smoke; what does Robert know about it? What did happen down beneath The Temple? What led Robert to pull his gun on Rousseau? (I thought my suspicion from a few scenes earlier was confirmed by Robert’s line about the temple. But then I wasn’t sure, as I feel like older Rousseau, who knows the island so well, would have registered this when journeying there with Alex and Karl. So I don’t know if the place is The Temple or a just a temple.)

By the way, here’s another interesting reference, which I stumbled across on Lostpedia: on that Season One journey to the Black Rock, when Rousseau and company enter the Dark Territory, she tells them, “This is where it all began; where my team got infected; where Montand lost his arm.”

I had forgotten about that. Did I mention that I love this show?

ORCHID BOUND
Though Jin’s English skills are coming along mystically well, he still can’t quite grasp everything Sawyer is explaining about the time warps. He asks Charlotte to translate…which makes her a bit uncomfortable, as if she was deliberately concealing her ability to speak Korean. They do all seem surprised when she translates. Jin wants to know how Locke is sure that Sun is off the island. When she explains to Jin that Locke is attempting to leave so that he can bring Sun and the rest back, Jin can’t figure out why he’d do that. “Because,” Locke says, “she never should have left.”

As they continue their trek to the Orchid, Charlotte asks Daniel if Locke’s plan will work. “It does make empirical sense that if this started at the Orchid then that’s where it’s gonna stop,” he tells her. “But as far as bringing back the people who left in order to stop these temporal shifts, that’s where we leave science behind.”

Two more flashes occur, one right after the other, and everyone is feeling the effects – only Daniel and Locke have yet to suffer nosebleeds, and Charlotte collapses after the second flash. When she comes to and sees Jin standing over her, she speaks to him urgently in Korean, then switches to English to implore, “Don’t let them bring her back! No matter what! Don’t let them bring her back! This place is death!”

As Charlotte seems to trip in an out of the present, talking like a little girl one moment and addressing the group the next, Locke knows they have to get to The Orchid as soon as possible and that Charlotte will slow them down. Daniel refuses to leave her, and finally – after yet another flash – agrees to stay with her while the others go. I wonder if his decision to stay with her is somewhat prompted by guilt over abandoning his perhaps-one-time-girlfriend Teresa, given both women’s common symptoms. Is he looking to Charlotte to provide him with redemption?

As the others prepare to move on, Sawyer asks Locke what happens if the Orchid is not there yet/anymore when they arrive? Casually, Charlotte answers “Look for the well. You’ll find it at the well.” The well, eh? This seems reasonable, considering the shape of the hole Ben descended into from The Orchid to turn the wheel. That space seemed well-like. Hmm…

Something else I want to mention. Did you notice that in this episode, the flashes looked significantly different? They were much more violent and jagged then in previous episodes – less sci-fi, more horror. Was this just a different director introducing his own style (the director of the episode hasn’t directed any others yet this season)? Or was it a deliberate attempt to make the flashes seem more dangerous and aggressive?

REDHEAD REVISITED
Locke, Sawyer, Juliet, Miles and Jin arrive at the Orchid…only to have it disappear in another flash almost instantly. But just through the leaves, Locke discovers Charlotte’s well. It’s surrounded by three or four stone pillars, giving the whole site a sort of ancient look. I wonder if these stone columns and the well might have been built by the same people who created Smokey’s temple…and perhaps a certain four-toed statue that we haven’t seen in a while. Don’t they all look like they could be the work of the same group?

Miles asks the question on all their minds: “How the hell did Charlotte know this was here?” (An interesting question coming from Miles, who told Charlotte last season while Daniel was ferrying people to the freighter that he was surprised she would want to leave the island after trying for so long to get back there. Charlotte played dumb, but Miles clearly knew that Charlotte had a history with this place.)

Regardless, the question is valid, and we get a hint of the answer when we return to her and Daniel and she reveals that she grew up on the island but left with her mother when she was young, only to spend the rest of her life searching for a way back. Her confession takes a turn for the creepy when she says, “When I was little, living here, there was this man…this crazy man, he really scared me. And he told me that I had to leave the island and never ever come back. He told me that if I came back I would die. Daniel…I think that man was you.”

There really is nothing like having the woman you love tell you that when you traveled back in time, you met her as a little girl and scared the Christ out of her. But Charlotte’s story makes sense; we’ve already seen Daniel appear in the good old Dharma days, when The Orchid was under construction. If Charlotte was on the island as a girl, with the Dharma Initiative, it stands to reason that she could have crossed paths with Daniel. But there’s that whole circular thing of time travel that plays taunting games with my mind. I’m attempting to recall my Doc Brown lessons from Back to the Future Part II, but Lost‘s time travel rules may be different. Charlotte telling Daniel that this incident in her childhood happened seems to ensure that it will happen, because Daniel hasn’t actually made that trip back in time yet. Now when he does, he’ll most likely find the younger her and warn her not to come back. But that act will create a new timeline that runs parallel to the one we’re witnessing; an alternate reality (a concept which the show’s producers have already dismissed, but stay with me anyway!). For the Charlotte existing at this moment, that encounter with Daniel shouldn’t have happened at all, because it would take her telling him about it to make it happen. Damnit, I can’t explain myself without a chalkboard!!! Trust me, I know what I’m trying to say even if I can’t really say it without illustrations. It’s the same thing I was saying earlier about Jin and Rousseau (again, credit to reader David E.): in the timeline of older, now-deceased Rousseau, Jin was not there to stop her from going into the hole. So when he stopped her, an alternate timeline was created. Right?  Am I crazy?!?

Don’t answer that. Let’s just move on. You wouldn’t want my brain to explode before I finish this write-up, would you?

Would you?

Daniel tells Charlotte that he spoke to Desmond about tracking down his mother, who can help. But he doesn’t get to explain any more. Charlotte briefly goes back to a little girl voice…and then dies.

Now I don’t think there’s any doubt we’ll see Charlotte again. The question is, will we only see her in a younger form, or will we see her as played by Rebecca Mader again? Is that really it for Charlotte as we’ve known her? If so, it seems like she never quite got to fulfill her character’s potential. What purpose did she really serve? And why (I know, I know…I ask this every week) was she chosen by Matthew Abbadon to go to the island? I guess we’ll have to see what the show has in store for her. The story she told Daniel about her childhood didn’t mention what happened to her father, or her two younger sisters. (We know about them from early last season, when Ben rhymed off a list of facts about Charlotte to prove he had information about the people on the freighter – information that included her getting her Ph.D at Oxford. Might she have crossed paths with Daniel pre-island?) And why do I think that Charlotte might have some connection to Annie, Ben’s childhood gal pal from the Dharma Initiative?

JOHN LOCKE’S FANTASTIC ISLAND
Anyone remember the Looney Tunes compilation flick Daffy Duck’s Movie: Fantastic Island, in which Daffy and Speedy Gonzales shipwreck on a remote island and discover a magical wishing well? I’m not saying that the movie holds the key to Lost‘s mysteries. I’m just saying…I love me some Looney Tunes.  Anyway, where were we?

Oh right, back to the well, thanks to Charlotte’s tipoff. And by the way, even if she spent time on the island, how would she know about the well and where it led?

A rope descends into blackness, and Locke is about to climb down. He tells them he’ll be back as soon as he can, but Jin stops him and says not to bring Sun back. He grabs Locke’s machete and threatens to cut the rope, insisting that the island is bad and Locke is not to bring Sun back. After Locke finally promises, he says, “I won’t go to Sun, Jin, but she might find me. If she does, what do I tell her?” Jin answers, “Tell her I’m dead. You say I wash up. You buried me.” He gives Locke his wedding ring for proof.

John says his farewells and climbs down the rope. But just after he disappears into darkness, the next flash comes, and the now-familiar blinding white light seems to emanate from deep within the well itself. He falls and crashes onto rocky, uneven ground. Far above, Sawyer is left holding a rope that leads into the dirt. There’s no well, no Orchid. For all Sawyer knows, he has just lost yet another companion.

Underground, Locke is in excruciating pain – a sharp rock or some such object has violently pierced his leg. And then a figure approaches from around the corner. Enter Christian Shephard. “I’m here to help you the rest of the way,” he says. Christian explains to Locke,  “When you came to see me in the cabin, you asked me how to save the island and I told you you had to move it. I said that you had to move it, John.”

Locke: Ben said he knew how to do it. He told me that I had to stay here and lead his people.
Christian: And since when did listening to him get you anywhere worth a damn?

Explaining what Locke must do, Christian goes on, “There’s a woman living in Los Angeles. Once you get all your friends together – and it must be all of them; everyone who left – once you’ve persuaded them to join you, this woman will tell you exactly how to come back. Her name is Eloise Hawking.” When Locke says that Richard told him he would die, Christian says, “I suppose that’s why they call it a sacrifice.” Locke takes this in, and then says he’s ready.

I gotta say: anyone who says Lost has become mired in sci-fi wackiness at the expense of it’s tradition for rich character explorations can put this whole sequence in their pipe and smoke it. Here is a true character moment 4.5 seasons in the making – John Locke accepting his fate, doing something monumentally important even knowing that it will result in his death (a noble sacrifice that follows in Charlie’s footsteps). The Man of Faith is on the cusp of taking the ultimate leap and fulfilling his destiny, and the show has been preparing us for that since the fourth episode of Season One, when we saw his first flashback. Terry O’Quinn is terrific in these scenes, conveying the full weight of what Locke is taking on and showing us his fear mingled with his excitement. When he is about to climb down the rope, Sawyer asks if he wants them to lower him down. “Where’s the fun in that?” he says, nervous but smiling warmly.

Christian tells John what he needs to do, and we see the wheel sticking out of the wall – “off its axis,” loose, moving back and forth on its own, green light emitting from the crack in the wall. When Locke echoes Ben’s actions by moving the wheel, the white light starts to fill the room. Christian tells John to say hello to his son. “Who’s your son?” Locke asks, but it’s too late. He’s gone. (I wonder if, when Locke visits Jack, he’ll realize that Christian is Jack’s father and will tell Jack that his father is on the island. Maybe that’s what prompts Jack’s sudden change in attitude toward returning.)

Some thoughts after this sequence:

1) Locke moving the wheel caused yet another flash, so wherever Sawyer and the rest wind up next will be a result of Locke’s act. But is his turning of the wheel going to stop the flashes? Or will they continue until the Oceanic Six return? I’ve been assuming that the need for the Oceanic Six to return is about much bigger issues that stopping the time-jumps, which I’ve considered to be an unwelcome side effect of Ben’s exit. The island could stop moving after Locke leaves, but still face dangers that require the return of Jack and Co. If Locke’s departure does stop the island’s time jumping, my guess is that those up above will find themselves smack in the middle of the Dharma era, giving Daniel plenty of time to explore, and setting the stage for Sawyer, Juliet, Jin, Miles (and somewhere Rose and Bernard) to experience their own taste of the Dharma Initiative. Will we see them interact with any familiar faces? Dr. Chang perhaps? Or a young boy named Benjamin Linus?

2) When Locke leaves the island, will he land in the Sahara, like Ben did? And more importantly, when will he land? When Ben left the island, he wound up about eight months in the future. But Jack and the rest are three years in the future from when the island is supposed to be. We don’t know what year they had moved to when Locke turned the wheel. And what’s with the Sahara connection, anyway? Charlotte excavated a Dharma polar bear skeleton there once, so we know the magic wheel was turned at least once before Ben came along and made his little desert drop-in. Why the Sahara?

3) Christian says that Locke, and only Locke, was supposed to move the island. But if everything bad happening on the island is happening because Jack and the rest left, what difference does it make who turned the wheel? If Locke had done it instead, would the island not be in trouble? Would the Oceanic Six not need to come back? How does the fact that Ben moved the island instead of Locke affect what is happening and what’s to come?

4) An injured Locke asks Christian if he can help him up, but Christian just looks at him and says, “No. I’m sorry, I can’t.” He might have said that because he wanted Locke to pick himself up, the way a parent might withhold their support to encourage the child to find their own way. But I had a different interpretation, or at least I wondered about another possibility. Remember Field of Dreams, and how Shoeless Joe Jackson couldn’t cross the line of rocks at the edge of the field? There has been much speculation – and rightly so – about what is going on with Christian Shephard. Is he alive? Dead? Or perhaps somewhere in between? If one of the latter two is true, then he might be literally, physically unable to interact with Locke because he – Christian – is not quite of this world. But then I thought no, that can’t be it, because last year Claire woke up to find Christian holding Aaron.

But then I thought (I really have to stop thinking) that maybe Aaron is special. We have been told that Aaron is meant to play an important role in the endgame of Lost. If the theories about Christian being not-quite-alive are true, what if Aaron is somehow a bridge between the world of the living and the world of the dead? I’m not sure how that would play out exactly, though another theory I once came across online suggested that Jacob was some sort of spirit in search of a new body, which is why Ben has been trying to stop pregnant women from dying on the island – so that Jacob could have a baby to be born into. (Very Ghostbusters II, isn’t it?) This theory purported that Aaron was to be that body. Then again, Christian – who supposedly represents Jacob – made sure that when he and Claire went off in the jungle, they left Aaron behind, so that wouldn’t seem to make sense. I also wonder, assuming there’s some truth to this theory, if Jacob has been in search of a body for so long that Ben kidnapped baby Alex from Rousseau intending to use her as Jacob’s vessel, only to decide to keep her as his daughter instead and leaving Jacob in perpetual limbo…waiting for a new baby to be born on the island or to arrive there by some other means.

Yes, all of that comes from me wondering about the line, “No. I’m sorry, I can’t.”

5) Christian told Locke in the cabin last season that he can speak for Jacob. But can he? Is Christian really Jacob’s errand boy, or could it be that Christian represents some other force on the island that is in opposition with Jacob? After all, Ben is supposed to have been in Jacob’s service, but Christian asks Locke where listening to Ben has ever gotten him.

Then again, if the theory from #4 is true and Ben has in fact failed Jacob by not providing a baby (or failed him in any way, really; it doesn’t have to fit with the Jacob-needs-a-body theory) then maybe Jacob is done with Ben and looking for someone new to aid him. After all, when Ben first took Locke to Jacob’s cabin in Season Three, Jacob wasn’t so happy to see Ben, and croaked the words, “Help me” to Locke. So maybe Christian does represent Jacob, and his line about Ben just goes to show that Ben has let Jacob down.

Whew…man, we haven’t even dealt with what’s happening off the island yet. Time to do that. Luckily there’s not much to cover. We might get out of here before midnight.

THE FELLOWSHIP IS BROKEN
Ben, Kate, Jack and Sayid are meeting on the pier when Sun suddenly comes marching up with a gun and tells Kate to move away from Ben. As Kate runs to Sun’s car to get Aaron, Sun tells Ben that he is responsible for Jin’s death. (I’ve asked this before, but how does she come to blame Ben? Locke must tell her that Ben killed Keamy, resulting in the freighter exploding. I’m not sure how she’d arrive at that belief any other way.) Ben tells her that Jin is still alive, and he can prove it. Needless to say, this startles her.

Ben: There’s someone, someone here in Los Angeles…let me take you to them and I’ll show you the proof.

Sun: Someone? Who?

Ben: The same person who’s going to show us how to get back to the island.

Kate: Is that what this is about? You knew about this, and that’s why you’re pretending to care about Aaron, to convince me to go back…

Jack: I wasn’t pretending anything…

Kate: This is insane, you guys are crazy.

Kate, with Aaron now in her car, starts to drive off, resisting Jack’s attempts to stop her. Sayid walks away too, saying, “I don’t want any part of this.” He looks to Jack first, then Ben, and says, “And if I see you, or him again, it will be extremely unpleasant for all of us.” (Why you gotta be hatin’ on Jack, Sayid? He didn’t bring you here. All he did was revive you from a horse-tranquilizer injury! How about a thank you?)

It’s just Ben, Jack and Sun now. Ben says that if she comes with him, in 30 minutes she can have proof that Jin is alive. Or she can shoot him and never know. Poor Jack just looks like a kid watching mom and dad have a blow-out. Sun agrees to go, and during the ride, Jack apologizes to her for leaving Jin. She asks why he’s telling her that now, and if he’s going to ask her not to kill Ben if he turns out to be lying. Jack says that for what Ben did to Kate – trying to make her think Aaron was being taken away – he’ll kill him if she doesn’t. Ben looks irritated as he listens to the exchange, and at Jack’s statement he slams on the brakes. “What are you doing? Jack yells. Ben gives it right back, to both of them. “What I’m doing is helping you! And if you had any idea what I’ve had to do to keep you safe, to keep your friends safe, you’d never stop thanking me. You wanna shoot me then shoot me, but let’s get on with it. What’s it gonna be?”

It’s a great moment, and Ben makes his case with such apparent sincerity that we want to believe him. Ben has a finely honed skill for convincing people that he means what he says at any given moment, but we never really know, and he usually turns out be manipulating something. Maybe he has helped them all and gone to great lengths to keep them safe, but to what end? As Sayid told Jack in the hospital during the previous episode, “The only side he’s on is his own.”

The trio arrives outside a church, where Ben pulls out Jin’s ring and hands it to Sun. He tells her he got it from Locke, who got it from Jin before he left the island. Sun asks why Locke didn’t tell her this himself. “I don’t know,” Ben says. “Maybe he never had a chance before he died. I’m sorry I had to bring you here before I gave it to you Sun, but all those people back on the island, Jin included, need our help. There is a woman in this church and she can tell us how to get back to your husband, but we’re running out of time, Sun. So I need you to decide right now: will you come with me?”

She agrees. When Ben mentions that Locke is dead, a look of surprise crosses Sun’s face. Given how quickly everything has happened and the fact that she’s only been in Los Angeles for a few days, is it possible she is just hearing of this for the first time? And did Locke even go to see her, breaking his promise to Jin?

Just after Sun says she’ll go, Desmond walks onto the scene, asking what they’re all doing there. No one quite knows what to make of his arrival, and the look on Ben’s face is particularly ambiguous. Does the sight of Desmond lead Ben to suspect that Penny – who he has threatened to kill – may be nearby? When Ben says he assumes they’re there for the same reason he is, Desmond says, “You’re looking for Faraday’s mother too?” Again, Ben’s face is impossible to read, but Desmond’s words have some kind of impact. Ben finally turns and walks into the church, with the others close behind. A woman inside is lighting candles. “Hello Eloise,” Ben says. The name Eloise gets Desmond’s attention, as he knows that is the name of Faraday’s lab rat. When the woman turns around and he sees who she is…well, I can’t wait to see what happens when they start talking to each other. When she looks at all of them, she makes no sign of recognizing Desmond, so their reactions to one another will have to wait.

“Hello Benjamin,” she says, scanning the small group. “I thought I said all of them.” When Ben says this was the best he could do on short notice, she says, “Well, I suppose it will have to do for now. Alright…let’s get started.” (That’s an awfully low-key reaction considering that her answer to Ben’s earlier question about would happen if he couldn’t bring everybody with him was, “God help us all.”)

FOOD FOR THOUGHT
-So we now know, officially, that Eloise Hawking is Daniel Faraday’s mother. More details about that will surely follow. The next theory in the wings, which I failed to arrive at myself but which I’m certain is correct, is that Eloise Hawking is Ellie, the young Other who marched Daniel, Charlotte and Miles into Richard’s 1950’s camp site and then led Daniel to the H-bomb. And if that proves true, then Eloise interacted with her grown son when she was a young woman. What are the implications of that? Is she his biological mother, or adopted? And if older Eloise Hawking is indeed young Ellie, that would mean she served as an Other with Charles Widmore (who eventually funds Daniel’s work). Yet here she is, assisting Widmore’s sworn enemy, Benjamin Linus. So what is Mrs. Hawking’s role and interest in all of this? Where do her loyalties lie? And how is it that she knows how and when the island can be located?

-It seems that Ben is doing everything that Locke is supposed to be doing, right? Locke was supposed to move the island, but Ben did it instead. Locke is told he must leave the island, reassemble those who left and bring them back. Now Ben is attempting to do that. Are these deliberate actions on Ben’s part, meant to undermine Locke and restore himself to a place of power on the island?

-This has nothing to do with this episode, but it’s a question that suddenly struck me last week, and I couldn’t believe it hadn’t occurred to me before. When Ben turned the wheel and set off the first flash, Locke was sitting with Richard and all the other Others. But when the flash happened, they all disappeared? But why is that? Locke wasn’t with them in the past or the future; he was with them in the present, so shouldn’t they have moved with him? My shaky theory in this is that although Richard and the gang were there with Locke in his present, they were actually from another time period. What if Richard and the Others traveled through time at some point and made a secret base on the island where they remained…meaning that at any time, there might actually be two Richard Alperts on the island at the same time?

Remember last season when Ben, Locke and Hurley were on their way to the Orchid, and Ben dug up a box with old Saltines, binoculars and a mirror? He held the mirror up to a high batch of trees, reflected the sun to make a signal, and then saw a reflection in return. Later in the episode, Richard and the Others show up and, together with Sayid and Kate, rescue Ben from Keamy and the freighter mercenaries. There’s an odd moment between Ben and Richard, where Ben thanks him for coming, as if he wasn’t sure Richard would have shown up. Richard, in return, tells Ben he’s welcome…but doesn’t look too thrilled to see him. What if that Richard and those Others were of a different era and were hiding out in those trees? If there isn’t some truth to this idea, then I don’t understand why Richard and the Others weren’t still there with Locke when the flashes started.

-Okay, after writing this entire message, including the bullet point above, I came across two things that deal with several of my curiosities. First, a line from this season’s premiere, which I forgot about. When Richard is mending Locke’s leg wound and telling him to bring his people back to the island, Locke asks Richard where he and the Others went when the sky lit up. Richard answered, “I didn’t go anywhere, John; you did.”

Second, I found this Doc Jensen article from Entertainment Weekly, which was posted last week prior to the airing of this episode. It addresses some of the things I question in this message, so check it out if you’re so inclined. It starts to go on a tangent during the “Zero Point” section, but there’s some helpful stuff before that.

FINAL THOUGHTS
I thought last week’s episode might qualify as a Hall of Famer. This one came even closer. I loved it like Robert Duvall loves the smell of napalm in the morning.

LINE OF THE NIGHT
“He’s Korean; I’m from Encino.” – Miles

Tonight’s Episode: 316

« Previous PageNext Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.