I Am DB

March 14, 2010

Oscars 2009: What Went Down

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 4:49 pm
Tags: , ,

Complete List of Winners

It’s been a week since Oscar night, and I’ve finally had a chance to put my thoughts down in writing…just in time for nobody to give a shit anymore. But so be it. I need to get it out of my system. As usual, I needed to watch the whole thing again during the week so I could pick up on all the stuff I missed entirely or just didn’t take in fully amidst the commotion and distractions of an Oscar party. I know the idea of watching the entire three-and-a-half hour show a second time right away probably seems like torture to most of you, but I like going through it and hearing all the speeches and whatnot. Yes, my movie and Oscar geekhood runs that deep…deeper than the Tree of Souls that Avatar‘s Na’vi worship and revere. So with that, a final dip into the 2009 Oscar pool…

BEST PICTURE
All season long it shaped up as an Avatar vs. Hurt Locker showdown. In the end, the Iraq drama took the big two prizes, proving that when it comes to winning Best Picture, nobody cares about how much a movie made at the box office. It irritated me that in the first few days after the show, articles kept popping up trying to explain why Avatar lost, as if it had been universally deemed the heavy favorite and suffered a stunning upset. Why do people feel a need to justify the loss? This wasn’t a Crash/Brokeback Mountain scenario. I’ll tell you right now why Avatar lost: because The Hurt Locker won. Why didn’t I see articles last year asking why Frost/Nixon or Benjamin Button lost to Slumdog Millionaire? Everyone has a theory about Avatar, and I’ll bet if you asked enough Academy members who didn’t place the movie high in their list, each theory would be heard. There’s no big mystery here, so stop trying to prolong the drama. The majority of Academy members felt The Hurt Locker was a better movie than Avatar. The end.

THE ACTING AWARDS
The opening of the show, with the lead acting nominees paraded out onstage and forced to stand there like beauty pageant contestants while the announcer said their names, was awkward and unnecessary. And why were only the lead actors singled out?

The presentation of Best Actor and Best Actress borrowed from last year’s show by having someone directly address each of the nominees. It’s still a good idea, but it didn’t work nearly as well this time. Last year, a former winner in each category spoke to a current nominee. This year, friends and co-stars of each nominee did the talking. So far so good, except that whereas last year’s presentations were short and sweet, this year’s rambled on as the speakers tried to cover not just the performances, but what wonderful people the nominees all are. Again, nice idea…but it went on too long. Producers Adam Shankman and Bill Mechanic said they took the idea from what Robert DeNiro said last year about Sean Penn. In that instance, the former winner was also speaking to a personal friend. But DeNiro’s speech covered Penn the man and his  performance more succinctly than the speeches this time. The highlight was Tim Robbins’ salute to Morgan Freeman, and it was nice to see Michelle Pfeiffer there for Jeff Bridges 20 years after The Fabulous Baker Boys, but overall the execution was not great. One improvement was that clips of the nominated work was shown, which I always think is an important part of the acting awards. And seriously, what was with the bitchslap to the supporting acting nominees this year? They didn’t get included in the opening (yeah, I said the idea was stupid, but I didn’t like seeing the supporting actors given second-class treatment), they didn’t get the friend/co-star tribute…the supporting actors got treated with the lack of respect that actors are supposed to reserve for the winners in the technical categories!
x
As for the winners themselves? No surprises in Waltz, Mo’Nique or Bridges. I know some have criticized Mo’Nique’s speech, but I thought hers was one of the best of the night, beginning with her thanking the Academy for “showing that it can be about the performance and not the politics.” After all the flak she took for not campaigning, not showing up at every press or promotional event, etc. I cheered her for calling out all the idiots who thought she should be denied for not playing the game. By the way, does her husband ever smile? I’ve seen her win four different awards, and each time he sits there blankfaced, not looking moved, happy, proud or anything. Your wife just won an Oscar, dude. Look alive! (Okay, a Google Image search has revealed lots of pictures of him smiling. Apparently he just doesn’t do it when she wins anything.)
And then there’s Sandra Bullock. Her win will go down in Oscar history as one of the Academy’s more ill-advised selections (see Roberto Benigni), but as I have made my feelings clear, I’ll finish the season on a positive note. Over the years, there’s been a pattern in which winners who I didn’t think deserved their gold managed to soften the blow by giving great acceptance speeches (I’m thinking Michael Caine for The Cider House Rules, Russell Crowe for Gladiator and Adrien Brody for The Pianist). Bullock, at least, continued that tradition. She was funny, humble and classy – it was an A+ speech all the way (her moment comes at about the 8:25 mark). And if there’s an upside to her win, maybe it’s that she will now have access to better material – and will make better choices – that match the talent I do think she has, even if it wasn’t on display in The Blind Side to the degree that should merit an Academy Award nomination and win.

Also, in the spirit of really praising Bullock, I have to say that her showing up at the Golden Razzies ceremony the night before the Oscars to personally pick up her Worst Actress prize for All About Steve was pretty damn cool, and further showed why people love her so much. She really is about as down to earth as a movie star can be. Her Razzie speech is definitely worth checking out (skip ahead to the 1:26 point for her entrance).

THE WRITING AWARDS
The biggest surprise of the night was the Best Adapted Screenplay win for Precious, which made Geoffrey Fletcher the first African-American to win a writing Oscar. I loved Precious, so I can’t complain about this win, but I think Up in the Air deserved that prize. I was disappointed to see it go home empty-handed. But Jason Reitman seemed to be enjoying himself all night, and hey: the guy is 32 years old and is coming off his second Best Picture/Best Director nomination in three years. He’ll be back.

The Hurt Locker‘s win for Original Screenplay was a mild surprise. While everything starts with the script obviously, I think that Hurt Locker‘s biggest strengths came in other areas, whereas Inglourious Basterds was, in my mind, a stronger achievement in screenwriting. Still, Tarantino’s got one writing Oscar on the shelf, and Waltz’s Supporting Actor win kept Basterds from going 0 for 8.

THE SPEECHES
-Costume design winner Sandy Powell didn’t come off so well, beginning her speech by saying in a rather blasé way that this was her third win. Here’s a hint to future award winners: don’t get up on stage and highlight that you’ve won the award before. It doesn’t exactly endear you to anyone, particularly your fellow nominees watching from their seats. Powell went on to try and pay tribute to the talented, hardworking costume designers on low-budget and contemporary films who don’t get the award recognition they deserve because these categories favor period pieces. It was a nice sentiment, but she somehow made it come off like an insult. Let’s hope she does a little better if and when she wins Oscar #4.

-One of the things that happens when I go back through and watch the show a second time is I can hear all the speeches that get drowned out by the din at the party. Sometimes those speeches have some of the funniest or most touching tributes of the ceremony, like Hurt Locker screenwriter Mark Boal thanking his father, who died a month ago. Or one of Avatar‘s art directors, who said that fifteen years ago he was diagnosed with a fatal condition that he obviously beat. I liked that Avatar‘s visual effects winner Joe Letteri thanked the actors for trusting the VFX artists with their performances. “I know that couldn’t have been easy,” he said. Original Score winner Michael Giacchino eschewed reading a list of names and instead spoke about the importance of supporting children’s creativity, thanking his parents for doing so with him. Nice moments, all.

-And then there was the WTF moment of the night, which came when Documentary Short winner Roger Ross Williams was interrupted by a crazy lady who turned out to be his fellow recipient, Elinor Burkett. There have been numerous accounts of the personal drama that was playing out in front of the world at that moment, but this short article from Salon is the most complete one I’ve seen. Obviously Williams and Burkett each have a different take on what happened – both in the making of their film and on the Kodak stage – but from what the video shows (the clip is embedded in the article) they both could have handled the situation a little more professionally. Still, it made for a great Oscar moment!

THE HOSTS
Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin did well, but I feel like they could have done more. The monologue was funny, but the entire thing consisted of acknowledging members of the audience and having fun with them. Nothing wrong with that; it’s always a component of the host’s monologue. But this year it wasn’t a component; it was all they did. Still, it generated some great jokes. The best of the night may have been when Martin said, “In Inglourious Basterds, Christoph Waltz plays a Nazi obsessed with finding Jews.” Then, spreading his arms wide to indicate the entire room, “Well Christoph? The motherload!”

It would have been great to see these two guys do more bits. The Paranormal Activity moment was funny, and I liked that they parodied that movie at the Oscars, but think about how much funnier it could have been. As it was, the camera caught the two hosts moving into awkward positions in their sleep, with Martin eventually getting up, standing over Baldwin and punching him in the head. But why not have Martin wake up in the middle of the night and start marching across the room playing a trombone? Then he gets back into bed and a little while later Baldwin gets up and starts trying to assemble an IKEA bookcase. They could have aired snippets all throughout the show, with each gag becoming progressively more elaborate.

That’s pretty much how it went for the whole show. They were good, they were funny, but I can’t help thinking there were a lot of missed opportunities.

THE SHOW
Good show or bad, I always love the Oscars. That said, I think Shankman and Mechanic’s production was lacking in a lot of areas, especially after the great show put on last year.

-The ongoing belief that Oscar ceremonies must have dance numbers resulted in a decent by time-wasting opening number featuring Neil Patrick Harris. It’s hard not to like him, so he saved the number. Unfortunately, the second dance-a-thon of the evening fared less well. Pairing up dancers and excerpts from the nominated film scores wasn’t a first, but the mix was awkward. The dancers were talented, but the numbers just didn’t fit with the music. To be fair, it’s a challenge trying to do a meaningful dance to The Hurt Locker‘s score. But it was a challenge that, in terms of the choreography, they were unable to meet.

-There were also some odd things happening with the set. It looked good enough at the beginning and end of the show, but there were head-scratching sections in the middle where the backdrop was a big rack of miscellaneous lampshades. I thought I was looking at the back wall of a Pottery Barn. When that disappeared, it was replaced by what looked like a giant empty, bookcase. Or maybe it was a honeycomb. All I know is that it was bizarre and ugly. Not sure what the designers were thinking…

-The tribute to horror films was a good idea, but as it was the only such piece in the show, it felt out of place and didn’t connect to anything else that was going on. Introducing the clip, Kristen Stewart said, “It’s been 37 years since horror had a place on this show, when The Exorcist picked up two Academy Awards.” That’s great…except the montage that followed began with footage from Jaws, which was nominated for Best Picture and won three Oscars two years after The Exorcist. The reel went on to include plenty of horror films that have earned Oscars since The Exorcist, including Aliens, Misery, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, The Silence of the Lambs (which won Picture, Director, Actor, Actress and Adapted Screenplay) and The Sixth Sense, which won nothing but garnered six nominations. And in what universe are Beetlejuice and Edward Scissorhands considered horror films?

-The “37 years” bit was just one piece of misinformation delivered throughout the night. Some may have just been bad teleprompter reading, but I suspect they were the result of sloppy writing. Alec Baldwin introduced Robert Downey Jr. as an Oscar winning actor, but in fact Downey has never won the award. Samuel L. Jackson said that Up was only the second film to be nominated for Best Picture and Best Animated Film…but that’s not really true, since there was no Best Animated Film category when Beauty and the Beast was nominated for Best Picture. And when Charlize Theron introduced Best Picture nominee Precious, she said that it had earned four nominations when it actually earned six. Note to the Academy: You need to get your friggin’ facts straight, and I’m happy to offer my services next year to make sure you do.

-The John Hughes tribute fared much better than the Horror presentation, and was a wonderful gesture on the part of the Academy given that while Hughes’ films had a strong impact on a generation of filmgoers, they were never the kind of movies embraced by the Academy. For them to single him out for special tribute was damn cool, and the montage did his career justice, working in footage not just from the teen angst films that we immediately associate with Hughes, but also comedy gems like Planes, Trains and Automobiles, Mr. Mom and Vacation. Having so many of his stars there added to the presentation, even if Jon Cryer, Anthony Michael Hall, Ally Sheedy, Judd Nelson and Macaulay Culkin got trotted out only to say one sentence each.

-For the second year in a row, the In Memoriam montage was accompanied by a live song performance rather than a piece of canned score, and it was once again a nice way to go. There was plenty of talk afterwards about the omission of Farrah Fawcett, which Academy executive director Bruce Davis attributed to her career consisting primarily of television, rather than feature films. I actually think it’s a fair point, until people rightly point out that Michael Jackson was included. Davis’ justification for that is pretty weak in my opinion, and his last comment is flat out insulting.

-It jumped out at me that presenters were all saying, “And the winner is” instead of the more traditional, “And the Oscar goes to.” Shankman told Entertainment Weekly, “I always thought it was overly polite. I wanted a sense of tension in the show. We thought of [the Oscars] as the most well-dressed reality competition show in the world.” Well, it didn’t add any tension, and Shankman’s status as a reality show judge doesn’t make this Dancing with the Stars. It also struck me that in nearly every category, presenters read the names of the nominees awfully quickly, barely giving the audience time to applaud. Tom Hanks came out to present Best Picture and didn’t even read the list of films one last time. I know I’m in the minority, but I’d rather let the nominees savor their brief moment than sit through a pointless dance number. Sorry Doogie.

-The Best Animated Feature introduction was clever, as newly created animation featured each film’s main character talking about what winning an Oscar would mean to them.

-Oh, and while the explanation of the two sound awards was a nice, helpful touch, using The Dark Knight as the example doesn’t make up for not nominating it for Best Picture last year.

-This year’s ceremony turned out to be the highest rated in five years, since The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King swept the accolades. Avatar‘s presence was probably the biggest factor, and the expanded Best Picture category – which also allowed for hits like District 9 and The Blind Side – probably helped. I’d guess the pairing of Martin and Baldwin was a draw as well. If 2010 sees a box office phenomenon make the Best Picture list, then perhaps we’ll be able to draw more likely conclusions. But the ceremony itself hardly re-wrote the book or did anything likely to excite new viewers. Even with the removal of song performances and honorary awards, the show still clocked in at three-and-a-half hours. So while Shankman and Mechanic are surely taking pride in the ratings boost, I think they should be thanking James Cameron and the Academy before they pat themselves on the back.

-Finally, I was pretty shocked that there wasn’t a single mention of the earthquakes in Chile or Haiti. Usually the liberal Hollywood crowd is all about calling attention to those kinds of disasters, but nary a word was heard or a ribbon displayed.

THE PRESENTERS
-Best in Show, Part I: Tina Fey and Robert Downey, Jr. They made for one of the night’s high points as Fey the Writer and Downey Jr. the Actor offered dueling perspectives on the importance of the screenplay. Fey scores two years in a row!

-Best in Show, Part II: Ben Stiller. Some people seem to think this gag was a misfire, but those people need their sense of humor checked. Stiller’s suit-wearing Na’vi made for yet another of his classic Oscar moments, which have included dressing as a bearded, rambling Joaquin Phoenix and a Lord of the Rings dwarf. I especially enjoyed the portion of his alien speech that was actually a Passover prayer in Hebrew.

-Poor Taylor Lautner, of Twilight and countless girls’ fantasy lives, looked out of his element in that room and was stiff as a board introducing the horror tribute. And his co-presenter Kristen Stewart proved once again that she doesn’t perform nearly as well on live stage as she does on film. These two were not the best representation of young Hollywood…though maybe they were the most accurate. At least Zac Efron showed some charisma when he came out later on.

But do Taylor Lautner and Miley Cyrus really belong at the Oscars? Mechanic told The Los Angeles Times, “The younger side of the audience has been drifting for years, so we’re more conscious of trying to build a youth element into the show.” Oh brother. First of all, I think I can tell you why the youth audience has been drifting for years: because most kids couldn’t give a shit about the Academy Awards. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think No Country For Old Men, Million Dollar Baby, The Last Emperor and The English Patient are big draws for the 12-17 demographic, and you’re kidding yourself if you think hordes of them are going to tune into the telecast waiting around for some tween star’s minute-and-a-half in the spotlight. Even in the years when a popular film like Titanic, Lord of the Rings or Avatar is nominated, the youth crowd is still unlikely to be a significant part of the audience. Plus, the awards begin at 8:30 on the east coast, so a big chunk of the youth audience you’re courting could very well be in bed. So please, future producers: stop trying to win teenage viewers by throwing pretty faces with no real accomplishments onto Oscar’s stage. If you want to spotlight younger actors, try some like Dakota Fanning or Saoirse Ronan, who’ve actually done some real work (and to be fair, Kristen Stewart, Amanda Seyfried and arguably Zac Efron do fit that bill). But putting Cyrus and Lautner on the Oscars is just cheap pandering.

– I would like to suggest to the Academy that next time you invite Jennifer Lopez to be  presenter, go out on a limb and let her present in a category that doesn’t have anything to do with music. I’ll bet she can handle it.

-Sean Penn is one of our best actors, but he often finds it difficult to string together a coherent thought. A few nights before the Oscars, he was on Real Time with Bill Maher talking about his humanitarian work, and I’m pretty sure half of what he said didn’t really make any sense. His comments on Oscar night seemed headed for the same place, although upon second viewing I think he was trying to apologize to his ex-wife Robin Wright for not thanking her when he won last year, while also chiding the Academy for not nominating her this year for The Private Lives of Pippa Lee. Sean, you might be best sticking to the script.

-I liked that most of the Best Picture clips were presented by people who had an association with the filmmaker – Keanu Reeves, for example, saluting The Hurt Locker, which was helmed by his Point Break director Kathryn Bigelow (that’s right, the director of Point Break won an Oscar!), or Jeff “The Dude” Bridges introducing the Coen Brothers’ A Serious Man, etc. And it was kind of cool to have them do it on a raised platform in the middle of the auditorium, rather than on the main stage.

THE DRESSES
Being a fan of beautiful women, I’m as interested in the parade of dresses as any Sex and the City fan. I was largely underwhelmed by this year’s crop, but that’s not to say the ladies themselves weren’t looking good, so a shout-out to this year’s MVP’s: Penelope Cruz, Cameron Diaz, Tina Fey, Carey Mulligan, Zoe Saldana, Charlize Theron, Kristen Stewart, Demi Moore (still hot), Michelle Pfeiffer (also still hot, and really needing to make more movies), George Clooney’s date and of course, God love her, Kate Winslet.

THE HONORARY AWARDS
The switch to 10 Best Picture nominees was not the only big change the Academy instituted this year. In the past, honorary Oscars for lifetime achievement and such have been given out during the ceremony like any other, but this year a special, private ceremony was held to recognize those artists. I’m disappointed about this, since I enjoy seeing these presentations as much as any other, and I like that they get the high profile recognition that comes with appearing in the broadcast. On the other hand though, rather than having to be be squeezed into a 5-10 minute slot amidst the three-hour telecast, they can be feted more intimately and more time can be devoted to celebrating their careers. This year’s honorees were Lauren Bacall; Roger Corman, the king of low-budget B-movies, who launched the careers of Jack Nicholson, Ron Howard, Francis Ford Coppola, James Cameron and many others; and Gordon Willis, whose extraordinary cinematography was seen in such films as The Godfather trilogy, All The President’s Men and each of Woody Allen’s movies from Annie Hall to The Purple Rose of Cairo. The Irving G. Thalberg Award, which is given to producers with a lasting body of work, was presented to John Calley, whose credits include The Cincinnati Kid, Postcards from the Edge, The Remains of the Day and Closer. If you’re like me and like to see these presentations, click here for video clips, photos and more.

THE INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS
As usual, the Oscars tend to cast a shadow over the other award show that always takes place the same weekend, The Independent Spirit Awards. It’s always a fun show – certainly more casual and looser than the Oscars, and always good for some quality laughs. One of the things I always like about the Spirit Awards is that there’s a palpable sense of community. At the Oscars, the camera often catches stars in the front row looking bored or not bothering to applaud while the winner in a “lesser” category is heading to the stage or delivering a speech. The stars are just as big at the Spirit Awards, but the atmosphere feels much more embracing. Winners aren’t played off stage after 45 seconds, but are allowed to say what they want, as long as it takes. Once again I’m sure I’m in the minority here, but I like that.

Precious was the big winner, taking Best Feature, Director, Actress, Supporting Actress and First Screenplay. Jeff Bridges also won, and as he finished his speech, he held the award up to his wife and told her it was really gonna tie the room together. Nice, Dude. Very nice.

Ben Stiller was on hand as well, and once again was a highlight of the ceremony as he presented Best Feature…

And so another award season comes to and end. Though later than I would have hoped, I’m putting together a list of the movies I’m most looking forward to this year, so we’ll see how many of them show up in next year’s Oscar race. Now then…I think I have a Lost write-up to go work on. Farewell, sweet Kate.

February 11, 2010

Oscars 2009: And The Nominees Are…

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 11:36 pm
Tags: , , , ,

 

Complete List of Nominees

It’s been over a week since the nominations were announced and I can’t believe it’s taken me this long to shoot off my reactions. I’ve been too busy writing about Lost. And running my meth lab. So for those who might care, here are my thoughts – where I have some – on what made the cut.

BEST PICTURE/BEST DIRECTOR
So the highly anticipated “10 Best Picture nominees” cat is out of the bag, and all in all I’d say it’s a good list. Like a lot of people – most people, probably – the nomination for The Blind Side caught me way off guard. When the trailers for this movie ran last fall, I thought it looked sentimental and cheesy, and even if it was a true story I was still turned off by a movie about rich white people coming to the rescue of a poor black boy. Which is weird, ’cause I loved me some Diff’rent Strokes back in the 80s. Anyway, it didn’t surprise me that people turned out in droves. When Sandra Bullock started winning awards, I finally broke down and saw it. And I’ll admit that it was better than I thought it would be. I give credit to writer/director John Lee Hancock for showing restraint with a story that could so easily have gone down the road I was expecting based on those trailers. But that said, there is no way this film should be singled out as one of the year’s best. It is a nice, “heartwarming” movie, but completely ordinary. With movies like Where the Wild Things Are, The Road, A Single Man, Fantastic Mr. Fox, The Messenger and In the Loop all in the mix, a nomination for The Blind Side is a joke.

Other than that, the list went pretty much as expected. Consensus is that Avatar, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious and Up in the Air would have been the five nominees if the category hadn’t been expanded, so it’s interesting that those films’ directors all earned nominations. Usually one or two of those people would have missed. But James Cameron, Kathryn Bigelow, Quentin Tarantino, Lee Daniels and Jason Reitman is a great list to represent 2009 (he had no chance, but I wish Spike Jonze had been recognized for Where the Wild Things Are).

My only other comment here is that as I’ve followed the award season since it began in early December, one of the most pleasant surprises has been how well Inglourious Basterds has done. Christoph Waltz was a shoo-in nominee from the moment the film’s first scene was over, and the screenplay was also a safe bet early on. But I honestly didn’t expect Tarantino’s gonzo revisionist take on World War II to fare so well across the board – critics’s awards, guild awards, ten best lists, etc. I would never have predicted it, but I’m happy that it came to pass, earning QT his second nominations for directing and screenwriting.  Bravo.

BEST ACTOR
No surprises here. Nice to see a young up-and-comer like Jeremy Renner hang in there with the big boys. He impressed me in North Country and The Assassination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford, so I’m happy for him and the opportunities that are sure to come his way as a result of this film.

I also have to take a moment and ask of the people who saw Invictus: do you think Freeman deserved to be nominated? I suppose there are some minor spoilers ahead, so continue at your own risk…

I was so excited about him in this role. Freeman is one of my favorites, and the thought of him playing Nelson Mandela was full of such promise. It’s too bad he blew it on this movie. It’s not that Invictus is bad or that Freeman isn’t good in it. It’s just…this is basically a sports underdog movie. It’s Hoosiers. Remember the Titans. Hell, it’s Major League. It’s the familiar story of a sports team rising above low expectations to win big, and maybe learning some important life lessons along the way. There’s nothing wrong with that per se, but here you have one of the great actors of our time playing one of the great lives of our time, and this is the story he chooses to tell? Freeman does well, but the script doesn’t allow him to dig into the character at all. There are a few moments that hint at what he could have done and where he could have gone had he chosen to do a film that was really about Mandela. But this one – he’s hardly even in the second half/last third of the movie. There’s so little depth for him to play that the film wound up being a pretty big disappointment for me. Freeman delivers as best he can with what’s there, but when you think about how much more he could have done? It makes me sad to say so, but I don’t think he should have been nominated. Viggo Mortensen (The Road), Matt Damon (The Informant!), Ben Foster (The Messenger), Joaquin Phoenix (Two Lovers) and Sam Rockwell (Moon) all had the chance to do much more in their films than Freeman got to do in Invictus, and I wish that Academy members had recognized one of them instead of doing the obvious thing and nominating Freeman for a performance that, through no fault of his own, failed to meet expectations.


BEST ACTRESS
Sandra Bullock’s nomination was no surprise by this point in the season, but it shocks me that she has moved up to take frontrunner status alongside Meryl Streep. She just doesn’t belong here. I’ve always liked Sandra Bullock; she has great comedic timing and her small role in Crash was, for me, one of the film’s highlights. But she has chosen bad movies almost exclusively throughout her career; it’s almost like a gift she has. The Blind Side is better than most of the films on her resume, but there is nothing about this performance that calls for award talk. Bullock can do sassy, she can do tough, she can do sweet – these are not stretches for her, nor does this particular character leap off the screen. I enjoyed her, but at the end of the day it was Erin Brockovich Lite. So what is this nomination for? Is it for finally picking a decent movie? For having a good year? Okay, I get that between the huge box office success of this film and last summer’s The Proposal, Bullock is having a Moment (though everyone apparently chose to ignore that her third film – All About Steve – was widely considered one of the year’s worst). But does making two adequate movies that become commercial hits merit an Oscar nomination? No, especially not when Saoirse Ronan (The Lovely Bones), Emily Blunt (The Young Victoria), Abbie Cornish (Bright Star) and even Maya Rudolph (Away We Go) are sitting the race out. Does it merit a Golden Globe win over Precious‘ Gabourey Sidibe? No way. A SAG award over Sidibe and Meryl Streep? Seriously, no way. This performance isn’t in the same league as her competition. Sorry Sandra. I can only hope the voters come to their senses by the time they mark their ballots.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Matt Damon has proven to be a great and versatile actor, and it’s surprising that this nomination is his first since Good Will Hunting. But it’s like Academy members filled out their ballots on auto-pilot. “Hmm, Clint Eastwood movie, Morgan as Mandela, important subject matter, scene where he gives an inspirational speech…I think by some Academy bylaw we’re required to nominate this.” Snore. Like Freeman, Damon is good in the film, don’t get me wrong. But also like Freeman, the role doesn’t ask much of him. And like Bullock, Damon finds himself in this race without really doing anything that special. Matt Damon did give a nomination-worthy performance this year; it just wasn’t in this movie. I really don’t get it. There had to be a significant number of people who listed Damon as their first choice – their favorite Supporting Actor of the year – in order for him to score a nomination. I can’t fathom that, even in such an unusually weak year for this category.

The rest of it looks good. It’s nice to see Christopher Plummer earn his first nomination after so many years of excellent work, and Stanley Tucci too. He doesn’t have Plummer’s years under his belt, but he’s been playing the game well for a long time. And it’s great to see Harrelson back in the field. He’s done some terrific work these last several years.

Too bad they’re all gonna lose to Christoph Waltz.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Last year’s winner Penelope Cruz scored her second consecutive nomination, and while I would have singled out Marion Cotillard from Nine‘s ensemble, Cruz was good and probably caught voters’ attention with one of the film’s more comedic performances, as well as general hotness. I think Maggie Gyllenhaal benefitted from an all-around appreciation for Crazy Heart. There were stronger performances to choose from – I’d have gone with The Messenger‘s Samantha Morton – and Gyllenhaal’s been overlooked for performances more interesting than this one, but I can’t begrudge her finally getting some recognition. And seeing Up in the Air‘s ladies is no surprise; each is deserving.

Too bad they’re all gonna lose to Mo’Nique.

BEST ORIGINAL/ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
I was off by one in my predictions for both of these categories, but I was happy that in both cases the movie I failed to predict correctly was on my list of personal choices. I thought The Messenger‘s chances were slim given that the Writer’s Guild failed to nominate it even when other sure-thing contenders like Up and Basterds were ruled ineligible, so kudos to the Academy’s writer’s branch for acknowledging this small gem. And major kudos for including In the Loop in the adapted race. Without a doubt one of the best scripts of the year – smart, tight, topical and hilarious. I thought the movie might get overshadowed by something higher profile, but it totally deserves the nomination. Rent this movie NOW.


BEST ANIMATED FILM
What the hell is The Secret of Kells? Whatever it is, I was just glad that for the first time since 2002 there were enough eligible films to have five nominees instead of three. It’s a testament to how much great animation there is these days that any one of these would totally deserve the prize….this Kells thing notwithstanding, since I haven’t seen it.

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Once again, I scored with one of my personal picks even though I didn’t predict it would make the cut. The nomination for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince took a lot of the pundits by surprise, but they must have forgotten how beautifully photographed the film is and how frequently the cinematography was mentioned in reviews. Great to see it recognized.

BEST MAKEUP
Another snub for The Road. Dirt, grime and muck may never have been so artfully applied as they were in this movie. I have no idea what Il Divo is, so no comment on that one, but The Young Victoria?! Over The Road?!? Are you kidding me?? For what? I can’t wait for this category to come up on the show so I can see exactly what sketches, behind the scenes footage and finished clip will highlight how this could possibly have taken a spot. Ed Helms’ missing tooth in The Hangover would have been more nomination-worthy than anything I can think of in The Young Victoria. And Star Trek was nominated? Maybe I’m forgetting something, but that seems to be a nomination for pointy ears and some tattoos on Eric Bana’s head. Big deal. I suppose someone else would look at The Road and say, “It’s just dirt. Big deal.” But of course, they would be wrong. How about something for Zombieland or District 9 in lieu of Trek and Victoria?

As there were no other huge surprises or snubs like last year’s Dark Knight/Bruce Springsteen omissions, that’s all I really have to say about the nominees until it’s time to predict the winners in a few weeks. Prepare to be schooled….in boredom and obsessive movie awards analysis.

February 1, 2010

Oscar ’09: Nomination Eve

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 1:49 pm
Tags: , , , ,
x
Another year, another impending Oscar announcement. But his year’s about-to-begin race is made more interesting by the 10-slot Best Picture factor. Choosing the 10 films I think are most likely to get nominated is tricky; there are a handful of obvious choices (and I think it’s clear what the big five would be if the category hadn’t been expanded this year), but two or three slots are up for grabs. I’m less certain than I was a few months ago that something all-out popular like The Hangover or Star Trek won’t make it in (Avatar‘s spot is of course secured). Hangover and Trek aren’t included on my final list of guesses, but whatever happens, there is a unique curiosity attached to this year’s announcement.

I’ll have to see how it shakes out after a couple years worth of evidence, but for now I’m open to the 10 nominee race. If it brings recognition to a few more small films and helps some smart, well-crafted popular hits earn some respect, I’m all for it. I know one of the chief arguments against the change is that the expansion dilutes the significance, making a nomination less meaningful, but I really don’t buy that. We’ve always had a system in which critics celebrate the year’s best through top 10 lists, and I’ve never heard anyone complain about that, so why shouldn’t the same number apply to the Oscars?

And to those who say they can’t find 10 movies worth nominating? Obviously some years are stronger than others, but anyone who claims to be a movie fan yet can’t find 10 films a year that mean something to them and are worthy of honoring probably don’t deserve their Academy membership. 274 films are eligible for this year’s Best Picture Oscar. You really can’t pick 10? Out of 274? (And as this article about tabulating the nominations illustrates, filling out all 10 is important; your vote might not get counted if you don’t, and by completing all 10 lines you might just be helping one of your lower-ranked choices make the cut.)

Anyway, I’ll get on with it. Here are my predictions, along with occasional commentary and my personal picks for each category. Can’t wait to see how it all goes down early (so painfully early) Tuesday morning when Anne Hathaway and Academy president Tom Sherak announce the nominees…

BEST PICTURE
An Education
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Invictus
Precious
A Serious Man
Up
Up in the Air

Personal: Avatar, District 9, The Hurt Locker, In the Loop, Inglourious Basterds, Precious, The Road, Up, Up in the Air, Where the Wild Things Are

BEST DIRECTOR
James Cameron – Avatar
Kathryn Bigelow – The Hurt Locker
Quentin Tarantino – Inglourious Basterds
Lee Daniels – Precious
Jason Reitman – Up in the Air

These five picks line-up exactly with the Director’s Guild nominees, and though there are usually differences between the DGA’s list and the Academy’s, I can’t really see it going any other way.

Personal: Cameron, Bigelow, Tarantino, Daniels, Spike Jonze (Where the Wild Things Are),

BEST ACTOR
Jeff Bridges – Crazy Heart
George Clooney – Up in the Air
Colin Firth – A Single Man
Morgan Freeman – Invictus
Jeremy Renner – The Hurt Locker

I’m still not sold 100% on Renner’s chances. He did get a SAG nomination, and some other high-profile nominations along the way, but I still wonder if the performance is too subtle or internalized for voters to appreciate it. He’ll probably make it, but if anyone here is vulnerable, I’d say it’s him.

Personal: Bridges, Clooney, Matt Damon (The Informant!), Firth, Viggo Mortensen (The Road)

BEST ACTRESS
Sandra Bullock – The Blind Side
Helen Mirren – The Last Station
Carey Mulligan – An Education
Gabourey Sidibe – Precious
Meryl Streep – Julie & Julia

Personal: Mirren, Mulligan, Saoirse Ronan (The Lovely Bones), Sidibe, Streep

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Matt Damon – Invictus
Woody Harrelson – The Messenger
Christian McKay – Me and Orson Welles
Stanley Tucci – The Lovely Bones
Christoph Waltz – Inglourious Basterds

I’m admittedly going out on a long limb with McKay. Christopher Plummer is probably the better bet; he received SAG and Golden Globe nominations, had a busy year with Doctor Parnassus, Up and 9, and has never been nominated despite a long career full of terrific work. But despite all that, did people really love this performance so much as to call it out as one of their five favorites?

The other common prediction out there is Alfred Molina for An Education. Some Oscar pundits have been talking him up since the movie came out in October, but he has been almost entirely overlooked by other organizations (the Broadcast Film Critics nominated him; Golden Globes and SAG didn’t). That doesn’t necessarily mean he’s out; Michael Shannon managed to sneak in last year for Revolutionary Road without having earned high-profile pre-recognition. And like Plummer, Molina is another respected veteran who has never been nominated (and should have been, for Frida). Still, I don’t feel the momentum.

Not that McKay exactly has momentum or has fared much better than Molina in the run-up, but he has earned a few notices here and there from some of the small, regional critics groups. And he gives a magnetic performance that dominates the film. The question is whether enough people saw it.

Whatever happens, the one certainty is that this year’s Supporting Actor field is one of the weakest I can recall. This is usually one of the most competitive categories; this time it’s a struggle to find five strong contenders.

Personal: Robert Duvall (The Road), Harrelson, McKay, Tucci, Waltz

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Vera Farmiga – Up in the Air
Anna Kendrick – Up in the Air
Mo’Nique – Precious
Julianne Moore – A Single Man
Samantha Morton – The Messenger

While I’d love to see Morton get nominated, I’m not confident in that guess. I almost went with Penelope Cruz or Marion Cotillard for Nine, but I’m deferring to what I keep reading from Oscar writers in the field, which is that Nine just hasn’t connected with voters and has faded from their radar (at least in terms of top categories; I’m still counting on several below-the-line nominations).

Personal: Farmiga, Kendrick, Melanie Laurent (Inglourious Basterds), Mo’Nique, Morton

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
(500) Days of Summer
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
A Serious Man
Up

Personal: (500) Days, Hurt Locker, Basterds, The Messenger, Moon

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
An Education
District 9
Fantastic Mr. Fox
Precious
Up in the Air

Personal: In the Loop, Precious, The Road, Up in the Air, Where the Wild Things Are

BEST ANIMATED FILM
Coraline
Fantastic Mr. Fox
Ponyo
The Princess and the Frog
Up

Personal (w/o seeing Ponyo yet): 9, Coraline, Mr. Fox, Princess and the Frog, Up

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
A Serious Man

Personal: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Basterds, The Lovely Bones, Nine, A Serious Man

BEST FILM EDITING
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Nine
Up in the Air

Personal: Same

BEST ART DIRECTION
Avatar
District 9
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
Inglourious Basterds
A Serious Man

Personal: Avatar, Coraline, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Parnassus, The Road

BEST COSTUME DESIGN
Bright Star
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
The Young Victoria

Personal: Bright Star, The Brothers Bloom, Parnassus, Nine, A Single Man

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
Avatar
The Informant!
A Serious Man
A Single Man
Up

Personal: The Brothers Bloom, Moon, The Road, A Serious Man, Up

BEST ORIGINAL SONG
Almost There – The Princess and the Frog*
Cinema Italiano – Nine*
I See You – Avatar
Somebody Else – Crazy Heart
The Weary Kind – Crazy Heart*

Last year, there were only three nominees, rather than the usual five. Not sure why that was, but my asteriks indicate the three I think will make it if that happens again.

Personal: Dove Of Peace (Bruno), Be Italian (Nine), Cinema Italiano, Friends on the Other Side (The Princess and the Frog), The Weary Kind

BEST MAKE-UP
District 9
The Road
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

Personal: Same

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
Avatar
Star Trek
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

I’m uncertain on Transformers. I was really close to putting down District 9, which may well make it. I didn’t see the new Transformers, but I figure the effects are at least as good as in the first one, and those were great. Maybe there isn’t anything new and groundbreaking since the original, but that doesn’t make them any less impressive. The first film lost this award but should have won; even if this is more of the same, sequels get nominated all the time for building on the work of their predecessor.

On the other hand, nobody likes this movie except for 13 year-old boys and Michael Bay, so that might hurt its chances, paving the way for District 9.

Personal: Avatar, District 9, Where the Wild Things Are

BEST SOUND MIXING
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Star Trek
Up

Personal: 9, Avatar, District 9, The Hurt Locker, Star Trek

BEST SOUND EFFECTS EDITING
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Up

Personal: 9, Avatar, District 9, The Hurt Locker, Star Trek (same as above, since I know nothing about sound to begin with)

xx xx

March 2, 2009

Oscar 2008: What Went Down

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 7:58 am
Tags: , ,

So another Oscar night has come and gone, and as I won $60 and saw most of my personal preferences emerge victorious, I was happy. But what of the show itself? Behold my musings.

Okay, I know its been a week and you probably don’t care anymore, but this is how long it took me to get some comments together, and by the Power of Grayskull, I will be heard! Or at the very least, I will send this to people, thus giving me the illusion that I am being heard. So then…

I thought it was a pretty great show, overall. The new producers did a nice job and brought some real inventiveness to a familiar formula.

THE LOOK
The production design was great. It was a nice move, shifting the orchestra onto the stage and bringing the proscenium right out to the audience with that small, round extension and having the nominees and presenters arranged in a semi-circle. It looked good, and made it appear more intimate for the nominees.

I also liked the way the stage changed to reflect the awards being given, from the soundstage look of the pre-production awards (Art Direction, Costume Design, Makeup) to the camera equipment signaling Best Cinematography to the multiple, Matrix-y screens decorating the post-production awards/Will Smith Show (Visual Effects, the two Sound awards and Editing). And on a related note, I liked he idea of the awards being presented in the order of when in the process they happen. It gave a nice flow to the presentation.

THE OPENING
Hugh Jackman wasted little time before moving into a song, which was a clever jab at the Academy’s claim of toning down the excess to reflect the struggling economy. It was a fun number using boards of card and chalk, and while the song itself wasn’t as memorable as some of Billy Crystal’s numbers, the low-budget gimmick was creative and made the bit work. And kudos to Anne Hathaway for a great cameo.

THE WRITING AWARDS
This segment kicked off with a great intro, as the screen presented a script describing the arrival of Steve Martin and Tina Fey. It was a pleasant surprise to see Fey there; I think of her as a TV actress, but I guess with the success of Baby Mama she now has legit movie cred. She and Steve Martin were aces, and Milk winner Dustin Lance Black gave a moving speech.

Next year, I want Mel Brooks and Gene Wilder to present these awards. I already have the whole bit worked out, and I’ve got 11 months to get it to the Academy!

THE ANIMATION AWARDS
First off, I gotta ask: did the movie Space Chimps actually get some play at the Academy Awards? Seriously?

These were presented by Jack Black and Jennifer Aniston, and l must address the entertainment media fucktards who insist on creating drama that doesn’t exist. It is true that twice during Black and Aniston’s banter, the cameras cut to Angelina Jolie. The next day, everyone was talking about it. Ooooh, it’s shocking because Jen used to be married to Brad!  Ohhhh, it’s controversial because now he’s married to Angie. Awkward!

Let me explain this to you like the soft-headed infants that you are. Jack Black made two jokes referencing his voice work in Dreamworks’ animated films. After these two jokes, the camera cut to Angelina Jolie…because she did voice work in the same movies. Do you get it? Did that even occur to you? No, of course not. Why would your job actually depend on knowing something about the fucking industry you’re “covering?”

But wait, there’s more! While I’m addressing the buffoons of the entertainment media, can I point out this article, suggesting that Mickey Rourke is now going to drift back into obscurity because he didn’t win the Oscar? What friggin’ planet are these people on? Rourke is fielding offers left and right, including a major role in Iron Man 2 (though Marvel appears to be skimping on the budget, which could cost them Rourke and several other good actors). Everybody in town wants a piece of Rourke, and he seems determined to make good on his comeback and the industry’s renewed faith in him. So to the writers of these articles: step away from the keyboard until you have a clue about the field you’re reporting on. Just because you’re covering show business doesn’t mean you have to be utterly vapid and uninformed.

Douchenozzles.

THE DOCUMENTARY AWARDS
I love that Bill Maher was there to present these, partly because of the irony stemming from how much contempt he likely has for most of the people in that room (well, for most of the actors, anyway), and partly because Bill Maher has balls. His balls got him fired from his show on ABC some years ago (no, he didn’t actually show them on TV, although that might have gone over better than the comment that did cost him the job), but he made a welcome return to the network on Oscar night.

Maher couldn’t resist shamelessly plugging his own, non-nominated documentary Religulous, nor the chance afforded by that reference to quickly and sharply express his opinion about God and religion. Even through the TV you could feel the discomfort that drifted around the Kodak at that moment, but I applaud him for saying it. I also thought he paid respectful tribute to the work of documentary filmmakers, and the producers made a nice move this year by spotlighting the documentarians on camera in the audience when their names were being read. We had already glimpsed them in the Documentary 2008 tribute reel that preceded the award, but acknowledging them in the room was a nice gesture that should be done more often.

Oh and friend of the blog Grantland G. is right – Man on Wire‘s Philippe Petit balancing the Oscar on his chin was an instant classic that will be part of all future Oscar highlight reels – like Jack Palance doing one-armed-push-ups, the streaker behind David Niven, etc. Also, tell me when he walked up on stage and glanced upwards around the room that he wasn’t asking himself what feat of high-wiring he could do in that theater. Maybe at next year’s ceremony…

THE MUSIC
The Baz Luhrmann movie musical tribute number was a mixed bag. It was well staged, infused with old fashioned movie musical pizazz. But the medley-style, blending all the various songs together, didn’t work that well for me; the presence of Zac Efron, Vanessa Hudgens, Amanda Seyfried and Dominic Cooper seemed like an unnecessary afterthought distracting from Jackman and Beyonce; and let’s face it – Oscar musical numbers are inherently kinda hokey. Yes, Jackman helped by framing it as a “the musical is back” celebration, which gave it some relevance and kept it from being taken too seriously. But when you look back at some of the big production numbers from Oscars past – I’m looking at you, 1970’s and 80’s – they’re pretty cheesy, and this one was sort of in the same vein. It wasn’t a disaster by any stretch, so I’m okay with it, but let’s hope the musical isn’t that back.

The Best Song nominees presentation was decent. The Slumdog songs don’t work as well out of the movie, but they made for an energetic sequence. And all respect to John Legend, but it was too bad Peter Gabriel declined to perform his tune from Wall-E, as his voice does particular justice to that song. The blending of “Down to Earth” and “Jai Ho” wasn’t ideal, but they made it work well enough. If only this segment had been as good as, say, oh, I dunno…Bruce Springsteen’s halftime show at the Super Bowl.

Maybe if they had nominated him, it could have been. Morons.

One musical number I did like was Queen Latifah’s live performance to the In Memoriam reel. I thought that was a nice change from the usual instrumental presentation. I also liked how several screens, large and small, hung down and displayed the work of the individuals. But on the downside, the desire to showcase the staging often made it difficult for the TV viewer to read the name of the deceased. Still, it was a nice tribute overall, and it ended the only way it should have: with a rousing round of applause for Paul Newman.

I still can’t believe he’s gone.

THE ACTING AWARDS
The presentation of Best Supporting Actress at the beginning of the show kicked off one of the best surprises of the night: the presence of five former winners coming together to anoint their next companion. These were well staged, and while I wish clips had still been shown (they’re the best way to hook uninformed viewers into performances and films they might not have seen) the personalization of a former winner directly addressing a nominee was really nice. It seemed to make the experience more special for all the nominees, and for the winners it did give the sense of joining the ranks of a pretty cool club.

But where were last year’s male winners, Javier Bardem and Daniel Day-Lewis? Joel Grey even mentioned Javier in his remarks to Josh Brolin. Great to see Joel Grey there, but wouldn’t that bit have been better coming from Javier himself? Also, Christopher Walken addressing Michael Shannon – how perfect was that? If Hollywood has any brains, there’s a screenwriter out there right now devising a movie in which these two play a creepy father-and-son duo. As for Kevin Kline, I love any and all reminders that he won an Oscar for A Fish Called Wanda, so I was glad to see him there.

I was really glad that Heath Ledger’s family was there to accept his award. He’s won a bunch leading up to this, and his director or co-stars have accepted for him. But this is the Oscars, and it was great to see his family there to honor him. I wish the camera had cut to the audience a bit more to give us a read of the room during their touching acceptance. Good on ya, Heath. You deserved it.

Kate Winslet’s dad whistling (and looking eerily like Inauguration Day Dick Cheney) was a good moment, as was her whole speech. She’s taken some flack throughout the awards season for being too emotional, but each time she’s taken the stage she has been grateful and effusive toward the people she’s worked with and loves. I appreciated her tributes to her early supporters Peter Jackson and Emma Thompson, to The Reader‘s late producers Anthony Minghella and Sydney Pollack, and to her fellow nominees. She should have thanked Nicole Kidman too, for getting pregnant and having to drop out of the film.

THE COMEDY
As a host, Jackman did well. He’s a great showman and he’s got a good sense of humor, but I did miss the presence of a comedian and the run of jokes they would typically employ to help keep the show moving. There were funny bits throughout – like Judd Apatow’s hilarious Comedy 2008 tribute with Seth Rogen and James Franco reprising their Pineapple Express roles, or Natalie Portman’s presentation with a Joaquin Phoenix-ized Ben Stiller – but it would have been nice to have a comedian’s touch guiding the ship. Oh, and Portman had one of the best jokes of the night when she described Ben Stiller as looking like a “Hasidic meth addict.”

THE BEAUTIFUL WOMEN
Just because I’m a guy doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate Oscar gowns. I like seeing what the ladies are wearing as much as anybody, to appreciate both the craftsmanship of a beautiful dress and the craftsmanship of the woman inside it. So I’d like to give a shout-out to the hottest stars of Oscar night: Penelope Cruz, Natalie Portman, Angelina Jolie, Marion Cotillard, Freida Pinto (who gets the gold star for the season, having looked gorgeous in every dress at every event she’s been to), Angelina Jolie and of course, Kate Winslet.

Ladies, I salute you, and to paraphrase my favorite TV weatherman Brick Tamland, I cordially invite you to the afterparty in my pants.

THE INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS
Just a few quick comments on the other awards show of Oscar weekend, the always entertaining Independent Spirit Awards:

-Penelope Cruz – Another win, another opportunity to look super hot, this time in a casual, simple brown dress. What a stunner she is…

-Robin Wright Penn – This woman deserves a shout-out, because she’s totally underappreciated – for her acting and her beauty. She presented an award, and reminded me how awesome she is.

-Mickey Rourke – He won the Best Actor award, and took full advantage of IFC’s uncensored ceremony, dropping F-bombs left and right and showing his gratitude in a long, hilarious speech. Way to go, Mickey.

-Christian Bale and Joaquin Phoenix – This one must speak for itself. Check it out, but not in the office…

THE END
And so the 2008 awards season draws to a close. In the interest of trying to follow all the advice I’ve been getting lately about starting a blog, stand by for a taste of what I’m looking forward to in ’09.

Thanks for reading…

January 27, 2009

Oscars 2008: And The Nominees Are…

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 7:54 am
Tags: , , , ,

Complete List of Nominees

Every time I think that the Academy is coming around to embrace bolder choices, they manage to find some shocking way to prove me wrong. Every time I think that the older, more conservative forces are dying off in favor of younger, more embracing members, they manage to show how out of touch they are. When they awarded an Oscar to Eminem in 2002 for his song from 8 Mile, I thought it was a great sign. When they chose another rap song in 2005 – “It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp” from Hustle & Flow – I felt it again. Then they ended that night by choosing Crash for Best Picture over Brokeback Mountain, and the feeling faded.

But hey, what’s this? The next two years saw the Academy choose The Departed and No Country For Old Men as Best Picture winners, an embrace of the kind of dark and violent films that they had typically shunned. Once again, I thought maybe the tide had turned.

And then came Thursday morning. Yes, to the Academy’s credit they made some good selections that it was easy to imagine them overlooking, but these were scattered among  some pretty big “what the fuck?” omissions.

BEST PICTURE
I’m massively disappointed that The Dark Knight wasn’t nominated for Picture, Director or Screenplay. More so than any other movie, that’s the one that defined 2008 (with Slumdog just trailing it). Huge box office, great reviews that held on at year’s end when critics did their awards and ten best lists, guild award nominations, an undeniable impact on pop culture…how do they not nominate that movie and expect to be taken even remotely seriously as an institution that celebrates the best in mainstream film? Unbelievable.

And for the record, I loved The Reader. And I like all the nominated films. But I would certainly sacrifice Benjamin Button and Frost/Nixon for The Dark Knight.

DIRECTOR
Stephen Daldry took Christopher Nolan’s spot, making him a three for three nominee: The Reader is his third film and this is his third Best Director nomination. The other interesting thing about the category is that the five nominees match up with the Best Picture contenders; usually there’s a discrepancy or two.

BEST ACTOR

Really happy that the great Richard Jenkins made it through the fire, all the way back from last Spring. I’ve been a fan of his for years, so to see him get a lead role in The Visitor and receive this nomination warms the heart. And I’m glad Clint Eastwood didn’t bump him out. I maintain that Eastwood’s performance in Gran Torino, while entertaining, was over-the-top and not worthy of a nomination. I’m glad they didn’t give it to him just because he’s Clint. Also, I could have done without Brad Pitt’s nomination – not that I didn’t like him in Benjamin Button, but it’s a passive role and not one I’d single out for recognition.

BEST ACTRESS
I thought the Academy’s history of Mike Leigh love would benefit Sally Hawkins, who won a bunch of critics awards for Happy-Go-Lucky. I’m okay with her not being here, but it did catch me off guard. And though I haven’t seen Frozen River yet, I’m really happy that Melissa Leo made it. From everything I’ve heard, she was excellent and it’s always an uphill battle for those small little movies to get this level of recognition. I’ve liked her going way back to Homicide: Life on the Streets, and there was some Supporting Actress buzz for her a few years back for 21 Grams. Nice to see her here.

The other surprise was Kate Winslet being nominated as a lead for The Reader, rather than Revolutionary Road. She should be considered a lead in the film, but the studio had campaigned her for Supporting Actress, probably to allow the opportunity for two nominations. Interesting that voters disregarded the campaign and voted this way. That doesn’t happen too often, but it’s clear that the Academy members responded to The Reader…much more so than Revolutionary Road.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Speaking of which, the surprise here is that Road‘s Michael Shannon got in. He was a longshot to begin with, and his nomination is all the more surprising given that the movie was shut out of all other top categories. The lack of lead acting, directing or screenwriting nominations shows that the movie wasn’t a favorite for people, so for an up-and-coming actor like Shannon to be named, and for a small role, is unexpected.

I thought Brolin and Downey would make it, but I’ll still say I’m glad to see them here. Brolin’s been on an amazing roll these past couple of years, and has done good work more intermittently all the way back to The Goonies (remember him paired with Richard Jenkins as romantically-involved ATF agents in Flirting with Disaster?) He didn’t earn any nominations for No Country for Old Men last year, but he earned a lot of respect and goodwill which probably helped propel him to a nomination for his terrific work in Milk. And Downey? What can I say? Last March the first still photos of Tropic Thunder were released, with more details about the plot than had been revealed previously, including an explanation of Downey’s character. And when I looked at that picture and read about his role, I called it: if the movie was well received and the joke worked, he would get an Oscar nomination. So I’m happy that it came to pass; he totally deserves the recognition. No matter how silly the movie might be, he committed to it full-on with a great performance. Now let’s hope that the clip they show for him is the one where he talks to Ben Stiller about not winning awards if you go “full retard.”

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Good performances from everyone in this category, but the absence of Kate Winslet definitely changes the dynamic of the race. Great to see Viola Davis doing so well this awards season. Like Richard Jenkins, she’s a great character actor who is known and respected by filmmakers and has always done solid work. With a nomination for two powerful scenes in Doubt, her profile will hopefully rise.

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
This was a tough category to predict, with so many strong contenders (and some not-so-strong but still in-the-running) and a lack of clarity in the field. The only sure thing seemed to be Milk. Frozen River‘s inclusion is another triumph for this small, critically-admired indie. I don’t think too many people thought it had a shot.

I always get a little annoyed when Mike Leigh gets screenplay nominations, since his movies are largely improvised. I’d rather have seen The Wrestler or The Visitor in that slot. But I’m really happy to see that In Bruges made it. The movie came out in February and didn’t seem to make much of an impact, but it got a lot of unexpected attention from the critics in their year-end prizes, and when I finally rented it, I could see why. Really entertaining movie, and definitely a good script. The writer, Martin McDonagh, won the Live Action Short Film Oscar in 2005 for a film that also featured Brendan Gleeson and a blend of black comedy, violence and characters dealing with tragedy. McDonagh owes a nod to Tarantino and the Coens, but he does have his own style.

MUSIC
Wow, what is wrong with voters in this branch? For years, the Documentary branch has come under harsh criticism for consistently failing to nominate films that everybody else in the documentary-watching world seems to agree are the best. With some of the boneheaded decisions of the past few years, the Music branch now seems to be drinking the same water as the doc voters. They ignored the score for The Two Towers in 2002, as well as the haunting “Gollum’s Song” that closed the film. In 2004, they failed to nominate Mick Jagger and Dave Stewart for the song “Old Habits Die Hard” from Alfie, as well as any of the brilliantly funny and musically solid tunes from Team America: World Police. Last year, they disqualified Jonny Greenwood’s amazing score for There Will Be Blood, and then didn’t nominate a single one of Eddie Vedder’s songs from Into the Wild, while giving three nominations to the Disney musical Enchanted.

The head-scratching continued this year with the presumptive (and deserving) winner of Best Original Song, Bruce Springsteen’s sorrowful title ballad from The Wrestler, not receiving a nomination. For some reason, only three songs were selected this year, out of 49 that were eligible. The three that were chosen are deserving, but how could the voters ignore “The Wrestler,” such an obvious pick? Given how many crappy, sentimental songs they’ve nominated in the past, the absence of Springsteen’s track is inexcusable.

It’s beyond my comprehension; as absurd as The Dark Knight being ignored in the top races.

And speaking of The Dark Knight, where is the score nomination? Composed by Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard, it had initially been disqualified for some inane reason, but that ruling was later revoked and the score was deemed eligible. It should definitely have made it; not having it here is another slap in the face to The Dark Knight and another chunk torn from the music branch’s credibility, and the overall Academy’s by extension.

I was pleased to see I did reasonably well with my predictions, especially in the below-the-line categories that are harder to pin down. But when it comes to The Dark Knight and The Boss…I just don’t get it.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.