I Am DB

July 17, 2012

100 Great Film Performances of the Last 25(ish) Years: Part II

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 12:00 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Okay, we’re off and running. Let’s continue…

KATHY BATES – MISERY (1990)
Annie Wilkes
Bates was mostly known for theatre work when director Rob Reiner smartly cast her in the starring role of this taut Stephen King adaptation. She’s dynamite as the frumpy, possibly bipolar, definitely psychotic “number one fan” of author Paul Sheldon (James Caan), whom she rescues from near-death when his car goes off an icy road in the remotes of Colorado. Pleasant enough at first, Annie’s dark side emerges when Paul’s newest book comes out and she learns that he has killed off the main character of her favorite series. As she holds Paul prisoner, forcing him to write the character’s resurrection, Bates slowly reveals Annie’s layers of insanity. She transitions from affable to frightening with slippery ease, and presents a chilling portrait of obsession.

X

SEAN CONNERY – THE UNTOUCHABLES (1987)
Jimmy Malone
As a veteran Chicago cop who joins FBI agent Eliot Ness on a crusade to bring down Al Capone, Sean Connery kicked off a career revival – winning an Oscar, becoming an A-list star all over again and proving there was life long after James Bond. Connery’s Malone brings the calming voice of experience to Ness’ small crew, and the actor fills the role in much the same way with his younger co-stars, his looseness and humor playing strongly off Kevin Costner’s straight-arrow Fed and Andy Garcia’s novice cop. Like many mentors of film and literature, this one has to take his leave in order for the hero to fulfill his destiny, and Connery makes the most of Malone’s final moments with an unforgettable farewell.

X

JACK BLACK – SCHOOL OF ROCK (2003)
Dewey Finn
School of Rock is an absolute perfect marriage of star and vehicle. The movie could not exist without Jack Black, and it’s the movie he was born to make. As a wannabe rock star who poses as a substitute teacher at an elite private elementary school and uses his musically talented students to fulfill his dreams of rocking, Black’s trademark goofball energy serves a story that couldn’t be more apt for the Tenacious D frontman. His interaction with his young co-stars, all great in their own right, is terrific fun to watch. This movie makes me smile beginning to end, thanks largely to Black hitting every note.

X

TILDA SWINTON – MICHAEL CLAYTON (2007)
Karen Crowder
Tilda Swinton is one of our most unique and original actresses, yet in Michael Clayton, it is her ordinariness that becomes so captivating. She plays a corporate attorney so desperate to save her case, her firm and her career that she sells her soul to do it…but like everything in Michael Clayton, this scenario plays out in a stripped down, un-heightened manner. Swinton digs deep as an average person who surprises and frightens herself upon discovering the evil she is capable of when backed into a corner. Whether sitting in a bathroom stall or standing on a New York street, Swinton’s Karen Crowder always looks trapped, and her attempts at humor or appearing relaxed are mere masks under which her anxiety stews. Her Oscar winning performance is mundanely chilling.

X

EDWARD NORTON – PRIMAL FEAR (1996)
Aaron Stampler
Norton’s Oscar-nominated debut performance was so impressive that his audition tape alone became Hollywood legend, landing him major roles in films by Woody Allen and Milos Forman before Primal Fear even arrived in theaters. As a shy alter boy accused of savagely murdering a powerful and respected Chicago Archbishop, Norton is mesmerizing from the moment he opens his mouth. His agile performance – with that particularly killer mid-film scene in the interrogation room with Richard Gere – left no doubt upon Primal Fear‘s release that a huge new talent had arrived.

X

PAUL NEWMAN – NOBODY’S FOOL (1994)
Donald “Sully” Sullivan
To watch Paul Newman’s sublime performance in Nobody’s Fool is to see one of the finest actors of all time at his assured best. Warm, witty and wry, Newman’s beautifully nuanced work seems entirely effortless. Though he had a few more stellar turns to give, Nobody’s Fool felt like the culmination of a career brimming with charming rogues. His command of the screen brings out the best in his co-stars, and his comfort with the material makes the film feel like a glimpse into the life of a real man in a real town with a real history. It’s a simple film offering simple pleasures, and for any movie fan, few things are more pleasurable than watching Paul Newman at the top of his game.

X

BILLY BOB THORNTON – SLING BLADE (1996)
Karl Childers
Though he had an extensive background as a TV supporting actor and motion picture bit player, Billy Bob Thornton seemed to appear out of nowhere with one of the most stunning performances I’ve ever seen. Working from his own script and under his own direction, Thornton is nothing short of hypnotic as the gentle but deadly ex-convict who befriends a lonely, fatherless boy after being “turned loose” from a state mental hospital. With his guttural voice, nervous hand rubbing and scrunched neck, Thornton wholly disappeared into one of the most original characters in film history. That few people were familiar enough with him at the time to realize the extent of that disappearance didn’t matter. We would not soon forget Billy Bob Thornton.

X

DENZEL WASHINGTON – GLORY (1989)
Trip
Playing a freed slave who enlists in the first regiment of black soldiers in the Civil War, Washington created a searing portrait of a man whose pride and anger run deep. Though Trip is initially confrontational with his fellow soldiers, Washington takes him further, eventually peeling back the front of bravado to reveal the insecurity and fear of a man coming to terms with the freedom he has so long craved, as well as the anger he can’t let go of. Washington steals every scene he’s in, and the look on his face during the whipping – a scene that on its own would have merited the Oscar he won – is eternally burned in my mind.

X

FELICITY HUFFMAN – TRANSAMERICA (2005)
Bree
A well-respected actress on stage and television, Felicity Huffman proved with Transamerica that she could carry a film. In the days leading up to a long awaited gender reassignment operation that will complete her transformation from man to woman, Huffman’s Bree discovers that she has a 17 year-old son who is in serious need of some positive guidance. What follows is a lovely road movie charting both the development of their relationship on a cross country drive, and a journey of self-discovery for Bree. Neither the movie nor Huffman’s performance dwell on the transgender issue, and Huffman’s work is no stunt. The script provides a rich and original character, whom Huffman brings to life with affection and authenticity. Makeup helps to sell the illusion of a woman in physical transit, but cosmetics are only skin-deep. True transformation comes from within, and Huffman’s dry humor and big heart make Bree an immensely appealing protagonist.

X

KEVIN BACON – MURDER IN THE FIRST (1994)
Henri Young
Kevin Bacon has been around for a long time and done consistently fine work in countless films, but he does his finest in this underseen courtroom drama. In a performance unlike any he’s given before or since, Bacon is sensational as an Alcatraz prisoner subjected to excessive torture by the institution’s cruel associate warden. Terrified, skittish and darting to and fro like a cornered animal, Henri has a deeply tragic story to which Bacon does great justice (even if the film may be less than historically accurate). Having been in jail since boyhood, Henri is a virgin, so at one point his lawyer arranges a visit from a prostitute. In Bacon’s hands, the scene becomes one of such aching sadness that it could move you to tears. He makes that sexual experience of Henri’s into a lament for every instance of joy, pleasure and hope that his incarceration has denied him. Bacon received a Screen Actor’s Guild nomination, but how was this great piece of acting overlooked by the Academy?

X

PHILIP SEYMOUR HOFFMAN – CAPOTE (2005)
Truman Capote
A quarter of this list could easily be filled with performances by Hoffman, in roles both large (Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead, The Savages), small (Almost Famous, Boogie Nights, The Big Lebowski) and really small (Nobody’s Fool, Punch-Drunk Love). But his Oscar winning portrayal of Truman Capote’s self-destruction while writing In Cold Blood is a master class. Hoffman is fascinating in his delicacy as he shows Capote exploiting others to achieve his own ends, recognizing the cost of his manipulation but too exhilarated by the artistic possibilities to stop himself.

X

ANTHONY HOPKINS – THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS (1991)
Dr. Hannibal Lecter
There could be any number of ways to approach the role of the wickedly intelligent cannibal psychiatrist, and one can look at Brian Cox’s take on the character in Manhunter to see a much different approach. But Anthony Hopkins came up with an unforgettable interpretation, making Lecter somehow otherworldly – too human to be a monster, yet too alien to seem quite human. How does one come up with all the seemingly perfect ingredients to concoct such an eerie, original persona? With his approach to Lecter, Hopkins is a showcase in the mystery of great acting.

X

JODIE FOSTER – THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS (1991)
Clarice Starling
Hopkins’ eccentric character is more pop-culture friendly, but as far as craft of acting goes, Foster matches him move-for-move and then some as the bright, ambitious FBI trainee whose supposedly innocent interview with Lecter sets her on a path to finding serial killer Buffalo Bill. Starling is the center of the movie, and Foster imbues her with the perfect combination of strength, intelligence and openness, as well as an intriguing asexuality and an awkwardness as she tries to make her mark in a field dominated by men. The scene in which she tells Lecter of her childhood attempt to save a lamb from slaughter cuts to the bone.

X

EMILE HIRSCH – INTO THE WILD (2007)
Christopher McCandless
The role of Christopher McCandless is tremendously demanding – physically and emotionally – but Emile Hirsch rises to the challenge in a revelatory performance, throwing himself body and soul into the part of the real-life adventurer. However you feel about the choices McCandless made, Hirsch makes sure you are deeply invested in his journey. In his interactions with the various people he meets along the way (embodied by an ensemble of actors giving terrific performances of their own), he projects an intelligence, mystery and magnetism that makes you understand why people were so drawn to him. The film finds beauty in many places, but perhaps nowhere more so than in Hirsch’s soulful performance.

X

TOM HANKS – FORREST GUMP (1994)
Forrest Gump
As the simpleton hero of an odyssey through latter 20th century American history and culture, Hanks created an iconic character that goes further and deeper than the “stupid is as stupid does” or “life is like a box of chocolates” catchphrases that permeated the zeitgeist. The film’s Forrest-stumbles-through-famous-incidents gimmick is amusing but less interesting as the years pass. What endures is Hanks’ beautiful performance, always grounded and heartfelt even when the film tips toward sentimentality. He does particularly wondrous work with co-stars Robin Wright and Gary Sinise, as well as in Forrest’s moments of solitude and stillness.

X

JEFF DANIELS – THE SQUID AND THE WHALE (2005)
Bernard Berkman
Writer/director Noah Baumbach’s observant story about a Brooklyn couple’s divorce and its impact on their teenage sons gives Jeff Daniels perhaps the richest role of his long, diverse career; it’s the fillet of his filmography, as his character might say. Bernard is insufferably haughty, vainglorious and emotionally stunted, and it is to Daniels’ credit that we still feel for him and find him engaging despite his numerous flaws and questionable parenting skills. The character may possess some ugly qualities, but Daniels’ willingness to embrace them results in a performance of comic beauty and raw vulnerability.

X

NICOLE KIDMAN – MARGOT AT THE WEDDING (2007)
Margot
In Baumbach’s follow-up to The Squid and The Whale, Kidman seizes the titular role and delivers a vivid performance that ranks among her best. Margot is a variation on Squid’s Bernard, just as narcissistic as her forebear but even gloomier and more petulant. And perhaps even more so than Bernard, she has some misguided and inappropriate ways of expressing love for her child. Kidman brews all the elements together and makes Margot seem like the authentic result of a life that has been steeped in complicated experiences and relationships. It may be the most natural work she’s ever done.  You may not want to know Margot in person, but Kidman makes her fascinating to observe.

X

DENNIS HOPPER – BLUE VELVET (1986)
Frank Booth
Newly sober from years of drug and alcohol addiction, 1986 saw Hopper in top form. He earned an Oscar nomination for his supporting role in Hoosiers, but made an even more lasting impression playing Frank Booth, a truly sick twist of the kind that only David Lynch could conceive. Hopper’s oxygen-sucking, psychosexual freakshow holds the key to a mystery that intoxicates an amateur sleuth, and the actor’s portrayal of homicidal lunacy is scarily unsettling.

X

ROBIN WILLIAMS – ALADDIN (1992)
Genie
One could go to any number of Robin Williams performances on a list like this – Good Morning Vietnam, The Fisher King, Dead Poet’s Society, Good Will Hunting…but they all have one common drawback: they’re live action. Animation proved the only visual medium capable of keeping pace with Williams’ speed-of-light mind, and the Genie is the ideal vessel for his brilliance, as the character can shapeshift into whatever Williams can imagine, from a buzzing bee to William F. Buckley. Williams meets his match in the ink and paint of Disney’s animators, and gives the performance of his life without ever appearing onscreen.

X

DANIEL DAY-LEWIS – THERE WILL BE BLOOD (2007)
Daniel Plainview
Ladies and gentlemen, if I say Daniel Day-Lewis belongs on this list, you will agree. And how could you not? The actor is monumental as the power-hungry oil baron around whom Paul Thomas Anderson constructs his singularly visionary epic. The film begins with Daniel Plainview as a simple man working for his keep; by the time it ends, his complexities are strewn violently across the screen as he seethes with rage, a dark soul cocooned in his misanthropy and megalomania. It’s a remarkable journey that finds Day-Lewis plunging into the psyche of a deeply flawed, larger-than-life, self-destructive figure in the great cinematic tradition of Welles’ Charles Foster Kane and DeNiro’s Jake LaMotta.

X

Come back tomorrow for the next 20, including an English monarch, an intense Vietnam veteran and a colorful comic book villain.

Updated with Full Series Links:
Preamble
Part I
Part III
Part IV
Part V

July 16, 2012

100 Great Film Performances of the Last 25(ish) Years: Part I

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 12:00 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Okay, hopefully if you’re here, you read the preamble from yesterday, so you know what this is all about. With all the background out of the way, let’s get to it….

CHRISTOPHER LLOYD – BACK TO THE FUTURE (1985)
“Doc” Emmett Brown

From Taxi to The Addams Family films, Christopher Lloyd has always been one of our most inventive and underrated character actors. In Back to the Future, he put his incomparable spin on the “mad scientist” archetype and came up with something riotous and touching. Lloyd’s originality is visible in every wild gesture and bug-eyed reaction, but he can also dial it back to play the quieter moments of the genuine friendship he shares with Marty McFly. The third film in the trilogy offered him a chance to deepen the character, but nothing could top the off-kilter zaniness he brought to the original.

X

SEAN PENN – CARLITO’S WAY (1993)
David Kleinfeld
After a few years away from the spotlight, Carlito’s Way saw Penn return to mainstream film with a vengeance. Almost unrecognizable behind glasses and beneath a red Jew-fro, Penn is riveting as a slick lawyer who gets his gangster friend/client released from a 30 year jail sentence after only five served. But while Carlito (Al Pacino) tries to go straight, Kleinfeld’s path becomes increasingly crooked. The tension created as a result of his actions propels the film’s nail-biting second half, and Kleinfeld’s descent allows Penn to fly high.

X

KEVIN SPACEY – THE USUAL SUSPECTS (1995)
Verbal Kint
It’s entertaining enough to watch Spacey’s wormy con man the first time around, but only with repeated viewings is it possible to appreciate the full depth and exquisite nuance of his performance, which earned him a well-deserved Academy Award. What Spacey does here ranks among the best magic tricks I’ve seen at the movies, and he requires no CGI to create the illusion. He does it all with just his voice, his expressions, his posture and his roaming eyes.

X

PAUL GIAMATTI – AMERICAN SPLENDOR (2003)
Harvey Pekar
Paul Giamatti has made the rare transition from supporting to leading roles, emerging over the last decade as one of movies’ unlikeliest stars, and American Splendor was a key film in that transition. It also happens to feature some of his best work, as real-life comic writer and curmudgeon Harvey Pekar. He dials into the man’s eccentricities and bleak viewpoint to create a portrait that eschews mimicry in favor of inspired interpretation. Earning heavy laughs without missing that Pekar is a lonely guy swimming against the stream, Giamatti shines in this splendidly untraditional biopic.

X

CHRIS COOPER – ADAPTATION (2002)
John LaRoche
Whoever is responsible for the inspiration of putting Chris Cooper in this role deserves an Oscar to match the one earned by the actor. It’s an unexpected choice that paid off in spades, with Cooper stealing the show as the idiosyncratic flower enthusiast who changes the lives of two lonely writers. As flat-out funny as Cooper is, what makes the performance truly great are the serious touches. LaRoche could have been played merely for laughs, but writer Charlie Kaufman created something more dimensional, and Cooper identifies the man’s grief as much as his offbeat enthusiasms. Watch him as he crouches down and surveys the damage done to his greenhouse by a hurricane, and marvel at an actor’s ability to register on his face an absolute perfect expression of pain, loss and humility.

X

SIGOURNEY WEAVER – ALIENS (1986)
Ellen Ripley
James Cameron’s respectful yet distinctive follow-up to Ridley Scott’s 1979 Alien was a gift to Sigourney Weaver. She kicks asses both human and xenomorph as the haunted lone survivor of a freighter that played host to the galaxy’s most terrifying extra-terrestrial. Reluctantly back in action and given new purpose by the discovery of a young girl, herself the sole survivor of a similar incident, Ripley remains as tough and practical as when we first met her. But Weaver gets to deepen her as well, and in doing so she cemented Ripley’s status as one of the greatest heroines in movie history. Weaver gives her the strength and confidence of a warrior and the warmth of a protective mother, overcoming the “limitations” of the film’s genre to earn a Best Actress Oscar nomination.

X

JOHN MALKOVICH – BEING JOHN MALKOVICH (1999)
John Malkovich
What I wouldn’t give to have been a fly on the wall witnessing the moment John Malkovich was first pitched this story. The actor has a field day parodying his own mystique in the incomparable story of a trio of misfits who become obsessed with a portal that takes them inside the thespian’s head for 15-minute intervals. The last third of the film, in which John Cusack’s puppeteer fully takes over Malkovich’s body, shows the versatile actor at his most brilliant. Malkovich performing Cusack performing Malkovich is a stunning example of razor-sharp comedic acting that continues to offer rewards with repeated viewings.

X

MORGAN FREEMAN – SEVEN (1995)
William Somerset
There are many great performances Freeman could be cited for, but I’m going with one of his most underrated. As a veteran detective on the brink of retirement who finds himself reluctantly drawn into a gruesome serial killing investigation with a gung-ho new partner, Freeman is at his subtle best. He captures the heart of a man consumed by solitude and cynicism, and imbues the character with simmering intelligence. Somerset’s terse exterior is a necessary shell to protect what remains of his humanity, worn away by too many years dealing with the underside of a grim metropolis, and Freeman goes a long way toward suggesting what Somerset has endured in those years. There are no specifics, but Freeman shows us how much more there is to Somerset then what we’ll be allowed to see. If you can extricate yourself from the intensity of the plot enough to really pay attention to Freeman’s work, you’ll see a heartbreaking turn by a master actor.

X

NAOMI WATTS – MULHOLLAND DRIVE (2001)
Betty/Diane
Like most of the cast in this David Lynch film, Naomi Watts was unknown when Mulholland Drive arrived in theaters. That would quickly change, thanks to her thoroughly captivating work as the goody-goody aspiring actress Betty, who follows her dreams to Hollywood and encounters an amnesiac brunette beauty who alters the course of her life in a way that can only be described as Lynchian. At first, Betty is so impossibly perfect and perky that Watts might appear to be overdoing it. But both the actress and the director know exactly what they’re playing at. If you aren’t onboard with Watts by the time her “audition” scene rolls around, prepare for a jaw-dropper. But she’s not done with us yet. We also meet Betty’s alter ego Diane, and Watts drives it all home as the troubled girl whose Hollywood dreams have disintegrated into nightmares.

X

AL PACINO – DONNIE BRASCO (1997)
Ben “Lefty” Ruggiero
Pacino’s masterful performance in this absorbing character drama ranks with the finest work of his career, worthy of mention in the same breath as titles like The Godfather, Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon. He plays a mid-level mobster teased by his buddies, ignored by the bosses and seduced by the friendship of a neighborhood jeweler who is actually an undercover FBI agent. Lefty comes to regard Donnie (Johnny Depp) as a surrogate son, and the mutual bond between the two makes the inevitable fallout all the more painful. In an era when Pacino sometimes goes big and loud, his work here, while vivid, is also wonderfully subtle, blending bravado with wounded pride.

X

MIKE MYERS – AUSTIN POWERS: INTERNATIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY (1997)
Dr. Evil
Though physically inspired by Ernst Blofeld, the James Bond villain played by Donald Pleasance in You Only Live Twice, Dr. Evil is as original a character as they come, springing purely from the genius of Mike Myers. Though the actor is no slouch in the title role, it’s his performance as Dr. Evil that steals the movie at every turn. Whether threatening to hold the world ransom for one miiiiiillliiionnn dollars, trying desperately to relate to his teenage son or even just sitting and stroking his cat, Dr. Evil is Myers’ most inspired and hysterical creation.

X

TIM ROBBINS – MYSTIC RIVER (2003)
Dave Boyle
A young boy is tricked into getting in a car with men he believes to be police officers, and over the course of four days, he is kept locked up and sexually abused. What would happen to that boy when he grew up? Tim Robbins answered that question in this outstanding, unshakable performance. Tentative in his gait, his speech and his relationships, Robbins plays Boyle like a walking open wound. He is too haunted by his past to help himself in the present, and we can only watch helplessly as his tragedy plays out. Robbins is a tall guy, but he makes us see the boy who has never been able to overcome what happened when he got into the wrong car.

X

NICOLE KIDMAN – TO DIE FOR (1995)
Suzanne Stone
Kidman took her first big step out of then-husband Tom Cruise’s shadow with this wickedly sly turn as a small-town girl who believes that “you’re not anybody in America unless you’re on TV.” The film gave Kidman the most fully developed role she’d had since crossing over to Hollywood, and she displayed acute comedic skills alongside a calculating coldness and manipulative sexiness, flawlessly demonstrating that it takes an actor of depth to create a believably shallow character.

X

KATE HUDSON – ALMOST FAMOUS (2000)
Penny Lane
I recall reading an interview with Cameron Crowe in which he said that in casting Penny Lane, he needed an actress who could light up a room. When his first choice, Sarah Polley, didn’t feel she could deliver that, Hudson – who had already been cast in the smaller role of the protagonist’s rebellious sister – asked to audition. With Hudson, Crowe got his wish and then some. Her shining turn as the seasoned Band-Aid whose wit, warmth and free spirit entrances a young journalist and a golden God of rock on a 1974 cross-country tour is the heart of the movie. She more than fulfills Crowe’s desire with her joyful performance. The movie is great from start to finish, but it’s at its best when Hudson is onscreen.

X

LEONARDO DICAPRIO – WHAT’S EATING GILBERT GRAPE (1993)
Arnie Grape
1993 was DiCaprio’s breakthrough year, beginning when he appeared opposite Robert DeNiro in This Boy’s Life. Later came What’s Eating Gilbert Grape, and a performance so authentic that the part seemed to be played by someone who really was developmentally disabled. Not a single moment Arnie is onscreen feels rehearsed or acted. While still in his teens, DiCaprio delivered an astonishing piece of work that is nearly incomprehensible in its simple power and effectiveness. Long before Romeo & Juliet and Titanic turned him into a heartthrob, Gilbert Grape proved DiCaprio was an actor of remarkable intelligence, sensitivity and depth.

X

JOHNNY DEPP – PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: THE CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL (2003)
Captain Jack Sparrow
After three inferior sequels and Captain Jack Sparrow’s pop culture saturation, it would be easy to take Johnny Depp’s work for granted or dismiss just how good he is, and how much fun it was this first time out. That’s a mistake I’ll not be making. Everything about this movie was a pleasant surprise, beginning with Depp’s inspired creation of Captain Jack, which seemed to wake up the movie industry to the presence of an actor who had been doing phenomenal work for over a decade. It’s amazing what a little box office success will do. Depp’s originality and ingenuity have never been more evident than they are here, and watching him sashay and swashbuckle his way through the movie offers endless delights. The actor earned his first Oscar nomination – overdue but certainly deserved – playing, as one of the film’s characters observed, “the best pirate I’ve ever seen.” 

X

GEOFFREY RUSH – PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: THE CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL (2003)
Captain Barbossa
Geoffrey Rush is an actor who feels at home in any genre, and while I initially intended to cite his excellent work in Quills, I couldn’t resist his treacherous seafarer from Pirates of the Caribbean. Haunted by an ancient curse that holds him captive between two worlds, Barbossa nonetheless possesses a wickedly sarcastic sense of humor and insatiable lust for life, gold and mouthwatering apples. Rush can barely contain the fun he’s having bringing these various facets of Barbossa to life, and like his co-star, he brings a credibility and pedigree to the film that can’t help but make it better. Depp got the lion’s share of the attention, but overlooking Rush’s contribution would be a grave disservice to the film’s success.

X

SALLY FIELD – SOAPDISH (1991)
Celeste Talbert
Sally Field’s reputation may be as a dramatic actress, but she has a deft hand for comedy as well, and those skills are on full, glorious display in Soapdish, a sorely underrated movie that goes behind the scenes of a popular daytime drama and reveals the lives of the cast and crew to be more outrageous than their television storylines. Field is the show’s long-reigning star and resident diva who faces threats from all sides. In her manic portrayal of an aging celebrity coming undone, she offers one priceless bit after another – one of my favorites being an attempt to apply eyeshadow with hands that can’t stop shaking from stress. Field’s performance is big and over-the-top, but in the best way possible and perfectly in tune with the film’s overall tone.

X

HEATH LEDGER – BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN (2005)
Ennis Del Mar
Ledger’s performance in Brokeback Mountain is one of striking economy. His chin drawn into his chest, his words seemingly fighting to escape from his mouth, his movements tight and deliberate, Ledger’s Ennis is like a clenched fist. A great actor working with rich material might be fortunate enough to deliver one, maybe two emotionally powerhouse scenes in a given film. Ledger has at least four in Brokeback. Sure, the material is there for him to play, but the raw vulnerability he brings makes your heart ache. Ledger had impressed in earlier films, but nothing he’d done previously could prepare us for the astounding work he does here.

X

BILL MURRAY – GHOSTBUSTERS (1984)
Peter Venkman
Ghostbusters finds Murray at his deadpan, wiseass best and deserves to be counted among his finest efforts. The movie has such legendary status that it’s hard to pull back far enough to acknowledge what an odd film it is, and how easily it could have failed to work. One of the reasons it does work is Murray and the way he fully commits to the character and the concept. The jokes aren’t typical and the lines aren’t always hilarious in and of themselves, but Murray puts a spin on them that absolutely kills. The whole ensemble is great, but when co-stars Dan Aykroyd and Harold Ramis wrote the script (or should I say re-wrote it, as the Venkman role was originally intended for John Belushi), they wisely saved the best role for their old friend. He came, he saw, he kicked its ass.

X

That’ll do it for today. Back tomorrow with 20 more, including a committed teacher, a compromised author and a well-dressed man.

 

Updated with Full Series Links:
Preamble
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V

July 15, 2012

100 Great Film Performances of the Last 25(ish) Years: Preamble

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 12:00 pm

This little project has been a long time in the making, and because I’m always over-explaining things, I’ll begin at the beginning. Four years ago, in late June 2008, Entertainment Weekly published its 1,000th issue. The theme they chose was “The New Classics”: the 1,000 greatest pieces of pop culture from the preceding 25 years. They named their picks for the 100 best movies since 1983, the 100 best TV shows, albums, books and so on. Anyone who reads Entertainment Weekly, or looks at EW.com, knows that they love their lists. We can debate the point of such lists ad nauseam, but let’s face it: they’re fun. From Rolling Stone counting down the 500 greatest albums of all time to the American Film Institute naming the 100 best films ever to Roger Ebert naming his ten best films of the year, we who consume pop culture like these lists. They provoke debate and discussion amongst fans, and they point the unaware toward work they might have overlooked. Even those who decry them probably have a few of their own they’d like to share.

EW’s list of the 100 best movies from 1983-2008 was pretty good. I was pleased with many of their choices and the placements they received, while certain omissions made me shake my head and ask what they were thinking. A few weeks later, when they published reader feedback to the list, I was happy to see that I was not alone in noting the most glaring omissions. There were four movies whose absence stunned me, and all four were listed among the five cited most frequently by other readers: The Princess Bride, The Shawshank Redemption, The Usual Suspects and Seven. Seriously. They left those movies off the list, yet included Speed, Napoleon Dynamite, Spider-Man 2 and Shrek. I like those movies a lot, but c’mon…over The Princess Bride?!? (The fifth most-mentioned title that didn’t make the magazine’s list was Jurassic Park). But that kind of reaction is just the thing about these lists. Why does it matter to me that a magazine made a list like this and left off a few movies that seem like obvious inclusions? I don’t know why. It just does.

Anyway, being that I like to read about, think about and write about movies, I started considering what my own list of the best movies since 1983 would look like. And to be fair to the folks at EW who undertook this task, it’s daunting. (But I’m sorry, The Princess Bride is a no-brainer.) And then I thought, what if I were to branch off the EW idea by coming up with a list of my 100 favorite performances of the last 25 years and writing briefly about each one? The idea had barely entered my head before I had to start typing out all the names that came spewing forth. For the next several days, it was all I could think about. In the shower, in the car, making dinner, falling asleep…I was defenseless against the tide. And what began as a casual game turned into a year-plus writing exercise (and movie-watching exercise).

The first thing I need to stress is that this is not a “Best” list. I can’t tell you what the best anything is. I can only tell you what speaks to me. So I didn’t call this The 100 Best Film Performances of the Last 25 Years, but rather, 100 Great Film Performances of the Last 25 Years. I didn’t even want to use the word “favorite” because there are just too many that I was forced to leave off.

In order to keep things from sprawling too out of control in other ways, I imposed a few rules on myself:

  • I would follow the magazine’s parameters and only go back as far as 1983. A 25 year span was plenty challenging to work within. Still, just a year earlier would have given me Dustin Hoffman in Tootsie, Ricardo Montalban in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Kahn (hell yeah, he’d have made the list) and the puppet from E.T. (“I’ll…be…right…here.”)
  • There are movies that I’d never seen when I started this, but knew enough by reputation to suspect that if I had seen them, they would feature performances I might want to include. Early on, I thought I would watch those movies and see if that was the case, but I decided against it. I stuck with stuff that I was already familiar with, even if it was outrageous for someone who calls himself a movie fan to never have gotten around to certain films with universally praised performances. My apologies to Daniel Day-Lewis in My Left Foot and Robert DeNiro in The King of Comedy (both of which I’ve seen since).
  • Similarly, if I had a performance in mind but didn’t remember it well, then I didn’t re-watch it to see if I should include it. Part of me felt that, for example, Laura Linney should be on my list for You Can Count on Me…but it had been a long time since I’d seen it and I couldn’t recall much about it. My ruling in that case was that it didn’t belong here. If it wasn’t a performance that was already in my heart and head, then it was out. Sorry Laura. I still love you.
  • There were a number of performances I considered citing until I decided that I’d be celebrating the character more so than the acting, if that makes any sense…though this whole thing is so arbitrary that I’m not sure I was entirely consistent with that policy. Nevertheless, early contenders like Rodney Dangerfield in Back to School, Rick Moranis in Spaceballs and Leslie Nielsen in The Naked Gun went out the window. Hmm….all comedic performances…
  • I wouldn’t include someone just because I felt obligated. There are some brilliant actors that I love, but who didn’t make the list if there wasn’t a particular performance that rose to the top.
  • I couldn’t possibly limit myself to only one mention of each actor, but I capped it at three. There are only a few people who are on the list three times, while several appear twice. In many other cases I could have cited someone more than once, but I decided to spread my affection around as best I could.

Why has this exercise has taken so long? Soon after I started writing, I realized that I needed to see many of the movies again in order to figure out what I wanted to say. My home movie viewing for much of 2008-2009 was almost exclusively dedicated to this project. It’s sort of stupid, I admit, but it was also kinda cool to have an ongoing movie-watching/writing endeavor. And there proved to be some cases where I had strong memories of something from the first time I’d seen it, but decided not to include it after re-watching. Then of course, I had basically written it all and had no place to put it. Knowing by then that I’d be starting a blog sooner or later, I just tucked it away until the right time came. Seeing as it was exactly this week four years ago that I started, it seemed like the right time was now. (I remember the timing because it was the week The Dark Knight opened, and I was back east on vacation. Now here we are, with The Dark Knight Rises opening on Friday.) Maybe I should have readjusted the 25 year period to be up-to-date and include post-2008 movies, but I decided to keep the list intact as I’d conceived it. Hence the “Last 25(ish)” moniker.

So anyway…that’s the genesis of the list. I decided it would be way too overwhelming for one post, so I’m spreading it out over the next week. Five days, 20 performances per post, beginning tomorrow. But don’t expect a ranked countdown; the order is random. And for what it’s worth, there’s nothing here wildly outside the mainstream. 24 of these performances won Academy Awards, and another 30 were nominated, so it’s not like I’m trying to champion underseen or obscure work. I’m just paying tribute to some of my favorites, even if every other movie watcher in the world would name some of them as favorites too. On that point, please, don’t be shy with the comments. You’ll have to wait until the last day, when the full list is revealed, to take me to task for any omissions. But throw me some bones by jumping in along the way and letting me know which selections you have thoughts of your own on, positive or negative.

Okay…back tomorrow with the initial 20, including a couple of eccentric scientists, a weary detective and a haunted space traveler.

Updated with Full Series Links:

Part I
Part II
Part III
Part IV
Part V

July 1, 2012

An Underrated Classic Turns 25

“Nuclear weapons, Jack. They mean nothing. Everybody’s got ’em, nobody has the balls to use ’em. Am I right? Space, you say. Space is a flop. Didn’t you know that? An endless junkyard of orbiting debris. Ahhh…..but….miniaturization, Jack. That’s the ticket. That’s the edge that everybody’s been looking for. Who will have that edge, Jack? What country will control miniaturization? Frankly, I don’t give a shit. I’m only in this for the money.”

I can’t say why exactly, but that has always been one of my favorite pieces of film dialogue. You’ll never find it alongside universally regarded Classic Movie Lines/Speeches like Humphrey Bogart’s final words to Ingrid Bergman in Casablanca or Marlon Brando’s “The horror” passage from Apocalypse Now, but I hold it in comparable esteem. And I’m guessing that only about three potential readers of this post might recognize it. The line comes from Innerspace, one of my all-time favorite movies, which was released 25 years ago today – part of my seminal summer of 1987 that I wrote about in May as the time when I fell fatally in love with the movies. Lots of films are celebrated when they reach milestone anniversaries, but I figured that little attention would be lavished on Innerspace. Today, I’m here to speak for it.

Innerspace is a forgotten 80’s classic. There were so many great movies in the 80’s that some of them are bound to be neglected. But like many of the decade’s best movies, this one was executive produced by Steven Spielberg, putting it on a list that includes Poltergeist, Back to the Future, The Goonies, Who Framed Roger Rabbit and Gremlins. These are all movies that are discussed fondly and frequently in circles of movie geeks who came of age during that decade, yet despite being firmly in the same wheelhouse as these classics, Innerspace is seldom mentioned. It was even directed by Gremlins helmer Joe Dante, whose 80’s output also included The Howling, Explorers, The ‘Burbs and a great segment in Twilight Zone: The Movie. So where’s the love? A few months ago, a fellow WordPress blogger and mega movie enthusiast who runs a site called “Fogs’ Movie Reviews” put a question to his readers: What Are Your Favorite Films From the 1980’s? The topic elicited a wealth of responses. Some titles, like The Empire Strikes Back, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Ghostbusters, Aliens, The Princess Bride, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off and Back to the Future, were mentioned frequently, while many others were championed only here or there. I was sad to see only one person cite Innerspace…though to be fair, some people – myself included – didn’t want to repeat titles that others had already named. Still, I’d hoped Innerspace might come up a few times.

I wrote in my summer of ’87 piece that Innerspace was the first movie my friends and I went to see without any parental accompaniment, which lends it special significance for me. Being old enough to go the movies ourselves was a key rite of passage. Innerspace is one of those movies that I will always associate with a certain place and time. I even remember seeing commercials on HBO heralding its impending pay cable premiere; to this day, certain shots will pop as I watch the movie because I remember them being in those commercials. But I promise, my enduring love for the movie is no mere byproduct of nostalgia. And the movie isn’t one of those that I loved as a kid only to discover as an adult that it doesn’t hold up. Innerspace totally holds up. I have such affection for this movie, which I don’t deny is expressly tied to being 10 years old when I first saw it. This particular blend of sci-fi and comedy was perfect for me at a time when I was really getting into movies, I loved special effects and my sense of humor was taking shape. Dante is a huge Looney Tunes fan, and the comedic influence of those classic cartoons is often reflected in his work. It certainly was here, and as a Looney Tunes lover myself, it surely helped explain my appreciation for the movie. (Legendary Looney Tunes director Chuck Jones has a cameo in the film, as he did in Gremlins.)  I was also getting familiar with Saturday Night Live‘s legacy at that time – watching classic sketches in rerun, and marveling that Chevy Chase, Bill Murray, Eddie Murphy, Dan Aykroyd, John Belushi, Billy Crystal and Martin Short all had that show in common…though of course for Short, the legacy really dates back to SCTV. (My family’s traditional Christmas Day movie in ’86 was Three Amigos, which also helped me understand the influence and importance of SNL.)

If you’re unfamiliar with the movie, I should probably give you the lowdown. Set in and around San Francisco, it’s a sci-fi comedy starring Dennis Quaid as a military test pilot with the improbably macho name Tuck Pendleton, who agrees to participate in a top-secret experiment in which, manning a tightly confined flying capsule, he will be miniaturized and injected into a laboratory rabbit to run a series of experiments. Unfortunately, a case of poorly timed international espionage disrupts the procedure, and Pendleton winds up injected into a somewhat nerdy grocery clerk named Jack Putter (Martin Short), who also happens to be the world’s biggest hypochondriac. He’s a stressed out Nervous Nellie, and according to his doctor, the last thing he needs is excitement or danger. Wanna guess how that’s gonna work out? Once Pendleton establishes contact with his host, the duo have no choice but to work together and try to get the shrunken man out before his oxygen expires or other nefarious forces interfere. It’s essentially a buddy movie…in which one buddy is flying around inside the other buddy’s body. (The movie’s stellar visual effects were created by Industrial Light & Magic, and went on to win an Oscar the following year. In fact, the first Oscar prediction I ever made was that Innerspace would beat Predator for Best Visual Effects. Little did I know how deep that rabbit hole would go.) Meg Ryan, in one of her earliest film performances, also stars as Pendleton’s estranged girlfriend Lydia, a journalist who Tuck and Jack enlist for help. Without spoiling how it all turns out, I’ll say that as a kid, I always hoped there would be a sequel, as the final scene totally sets up the story to continue. But there was never any real intent to make a follow-up; it’s just meant to be a fun finale. I suppose it’s better that no sequel was made. I’m sure it wouldn’t have been as good. (Though maybe Dante could have pulled it off; he certainly did with Gremlins 2: The New Batch.)

The role of Pendleton was originally intended for an older actor, maybe in his forties. But the filmmakers met with Quaid, who was only 32 at the time (I can’t believe that!), and felt that he was a great fit for the part. Although he and Short wouldn’t share any substantial screentime together, the buddy dynamic still had to work just as well as it does in, say, Lethal Weapon, so the part of Jack Putter was cast with that in mind. They hadn’t really thought about someone as out-and-out comedic as Martin Short, but when they met with him, and then put him together with Quaid, the chemistry was clear. I don’t know what they had in mind for Putter initially, but Short seems like ideal casting when you consider that co-writer Jeffrey Boam (who also penned Lethal Weapon 2 and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade) envisioned the movie as a Dean Martin/Jerry Lewis comedy; what would happen if Dean was trapped inside Jerry’s body? It’s a pretty interesting relationship to create from a technical standpoint, because Tuck can see Jack’s point of view on his capsule monitor, and they can talk to each other. In order to preserve the spontaneity and improvisation that comes out of two actors working together in the moment, Quaid and Short were always on set during the filming of each other’s scenes, feeding lines to the other through a microphone. In addition, many of Short’s scenes had to be filmed twice: once with the camera on him, and once with him wearing a helmet-cam in order to capture his POV for Tuck’s monitor. Both actors are so great in the movie, and Quaid especially deserves credit for making his character so engaging when he’s stuck sitting in a tiny cockpit for nearly the full two-hour duration.

The rest of the cast is great too. Ryan was excellent, and clearly bound for stardom. Many of the smaller parts, meanwhile, were populated by actors frequently featured in Dante’s work. Wendy Schall plays a co-worker of Jack’s, and has a moment in her first scene that spun me into a fit of uncontrollable giddy laughter when I first noticed it (it took me a few viewings of the movie before I caught what she did). She only has a few scenes, and while they’re all intended to be funny, she actually manages to add an unexpected bit of depth to the character that makes her kind of sad. Another actor worth mentioning wasn’t really an actor at all. The scientist at the lab in charge of the experiment, Ozzie, is played by John Hora, who was the cinematographer for all of Dante’s previous films. When describing the slightly absent-minded professor quality they wanted for the character, Hora was named as an inspiration, so Spielberg suggested they cast the man himself. Again, it’s a small part, but he  plays it really well – funny, and like Schall, a little sad. Dante’s gallery of recurring actors are all so great I could spend time talking about each one – Robert Picardo as the bizarre stolen goods trafficker The Cowboy, Kevin McCarthy as refined villain Victor Scrimshaw – but I’ll resist the urge to mention them all. I suspect that at this point I’ve already alienated the few people who might have cared about this post to begin with. Just trust me when I say it’s a colorful gallery of characters.

I miss seeing movies by Joe Dante. He’s only directed two features since 2000, and one of the those – 2009’s The Hole – has yet to receive U.S. distribution. (Actually, news just broke a few days ago that it’s apparently heading to DVD on September 25th.) Point is, Dante was responsible for some damn fun movies back in the day. They were skillfully made and had a distinct sense of humor. I’m not sure if his limited output of late is a personal choice, or an inability to get his desired projects funded, but whatever is stopping him, I consider it a shame. He notes in the DVD commentary for Innerspace that after the box office failure of his previous film, Explorers, he wanted to do something with more mainstream appeal. The sweetness and romantic comedy aspects of Innerspace were supposed to satisfy that desire, but he jokes that the finished product still comes off as another wacky Joe Dante movie. Which is just fine by me.

So if you’re a child of the 80’s who is passing on the decade’s cultural legacy to your own children, or nieces and nephews, or cousins, or kids you’ve kidnapped, or whatever, don’t forget to include this gem amongst the more expected fare. It’s a guaranteed happy-fun time, and if even a couple of people who’ve never seen it check it out as a result of reading this, I’ll be pleased.

Happy 25th, Innerspace.

June 18, 2012

Bringing Out the Dead

Filed under: Music,Real Life — DB @ 4:27 pm

Maybe because fear and anxiety about death are so hard-wired into the human brain, we find ourselves fascinated by the concept of life after death. If so, it might explain our culture’s obsession with vampires and zombies (not that the latter really constitutes life after death, but that’s irrelevant for now). The last several years have found us particularly attached to these creatures. True Blood, The Vampire Diaries, Twilight (books and films) and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter (book and imminent film) have sucked in scores of enthusiasts, while Zombieland, Left 4 Dead, The Walking Dead (comics and TV show) and Pride and Prejudice and Zombies have frenetically dashed or raggedly ambled their way into our hearts…and intestines. These movies, TV shows, video games and books that I mention barely scratch the surface of the surface of the offerings available to sate our cravings for bloodsuckers and brain-munchers.

Lately though, things seem to be taking a turn for the bizarre. Vampires remain safely confined to fiction, but a recent slate of disturbing incidents make a compelling argument that we are at the beginning of a zombie plague. In response to the rise of these occurrences, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement denying the advent of a zombie apocalypse…though what they actually say is that they aren’t aware of any “virus or condition that would reanimate the dead (or one that would present zombie-like symptoms).” Just cause they aren’t aware of it doesn’t mean it can’t be real. But for now, I’m going to accept the CDC’s declaration that these chilling acts are unrelated, and not indicative of the impending end of days.

There is, however, one upsetting example of the dead rising from the grave that has been gaining a lot of attention recently as well, and unfortunately this one is all too real. I’m talking about the holographic resurrection of deceased entertainers.

It started in April at the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival, when Tupac Shakur took the stage in hologram form and sang with Dr. Dre and Snoop Dogg. You might remember Tupac from his hit songs including “Keep Ya Head Up,” “Me Against the World” and “Dear Mama,” or from films such as Poetic Justice, or from his September 1996 death after being shot in Las Vegas. Yes, the man died 16 years ago, but the world couldn’t let go. Songs and albums continued to be released years after his demise, and now the hologram has kicked things up to a new level of creepy. Dr. Dre oversaw the resurrection, which was constructed by the visual effects company Digital Domain and staged at the concert by AV Concepts. It was the first time that such an effect was accomplished without using old or repurposed footage. This was a newly created, original performance by Tupac. How his vocals were achieved remains a mystery.

It’s not like we haven’t seen forms of this before. Fred Astaire was brought back to dance with a vacuum cleaner in a Dirt Devil commercial, John Wayne was worked into an ad for Coors Beer, Natalie Cole sang a duet of “Unforgettable” with her late father Nat King Cole, and Celine Dion sang with Elvis Presley on a 2007 episode of American Idol.  But in each of these cases, previously existing footage (or recordings, in the case of Cole) was used. Tupac’s performance was brand new. And it has kicked off an alarming trend. Setting their sights higher than just projecting old footage, CORE Media Group – which owns the branding rights to Elvis – is partnering with Digital Domain to bring him back for newly created performances. Apparently they envision Elvis returning for new concerts, TV shows and movies. In addition, holographic versions of Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison and Marilyn Monroe might be on the way, and Michael Jackson’s siblings seem to like the idea of bringing Michael back for a big tour.

Yeah, I’ll bet they do. Cause the world is clamoring to see just Tito, Jermaine and the others in concert again.

Haven’t we already seen what happens when Michael Jackson returns from the dead?

Sure, it’s all smooth moves and funky choreography until he chases you into a spooky house with all his friends and eats your innards.

We may be in the 21st century, but old-fashioned hucksterism is alive and well. The fact that these efforts amount to insensitive cash grabs are the least troubling thing about them. The responsible parties can talk all they want about bringing thrilling new experiences to audiences and how magical it will be, but the magic they’re espousing is of the dark variety, and anyone who’s played around with voodoo or horcruxes can tell you that dark magic doesn’t end well. The artists in question have no say in how their likenesses are being used, but even more crucial is that they aren’t responsible for their own performances. When Elvis, or Tupac, or Hendrix were alive and performing in concerts, they were engaging with their audiences, feeding off real energy and giving it back in return. If Presley thrust his hips, it wasn’t because a computer program told him to do it. He did it because he decided, “I’m going to thrust my hips now. And then I’m going to walk over here and bend down and sing directly to this girl in the blue T-shirt, and now I’m going to cross over to the other side of the stage and fall on my knees and sing to the rafters.” He decided to do those things in the moment, because he was feeling the song and the vibe in the room. Hendrix didn’t smash his guitar, light it on fire or play it behind his head because he was being manipulated by a puppet master. He did those things because he was Jimi fucking Hendrix and that’s what he wanted to do.

Those experiences can not be replicated. A hologram has no soul. It’s a cheat. Tupac’s Coachella stint can be viewed in isolation as “a moment,” but in the end it was just an impressive lightshow. You can’t take a gimmick and turn it into an industry. Or hey, maybe you can…Hollywood seems to be doing it with 3D. But a gimmick is a gimmick, and it doesn’t provide or replace an authentic experience. Tupac, Elvis, Hendrix, Morrison, Marilyn, Janis, Michael, Whitney…they’re dead. They all died too young, with more to contribute to their art, but they’re dead, and for any of us who loved any of them, their deaths became part of our relationship with them. The mourning and the memories became as important a part of the way we relate to them as the concert we saw them perform during their lifetime. And if we never got to see them perform, a hologram will give us no more truthful an experience than we would get from an impersonator. It will just cost a lot more money. And where does this digital-age grave robbery stop? Will performers like Astaire and Wayne be brought back to “act” in movies again? Will politicians resurrect late party champions like Reagan or Kennedy to speak at their conventions and endorse a current candidate? It’s not hard to imagine this getting quickly out of hand.

Look, I’ve got nothing against a good hologram. But let’s use them appropriately. Here are some acceptable uses for holograms:

1. Intergalactic government agent/construction worker killing his enemies


2. Imprisoned princess recording plea for help

3. Humanoid alien communicating with dead parents


4. Starship crew members escaping the rigors of space exploration and hostile encounters with Ferengi by enjoying a little R&R in simulated 19th century London


5. Actors participating in theme park rides based on their movies


6. Backup band for glam rocker Jem


7. Whatever Bill Murray wants (as long as he’s still alive and directly responsible for the usage)

Bill-Murray-hologram

Elvis, Tupac, Marilyn…the legacies of these stars have endured for years after their deaths. There is no lack of interest in their work or awareness of their lives, and that seems to be going just fine. This line doesn’t need to be crossed. Bringing someone back in hologram form and placing them into whatever venue some promoter or greedy estate manager decides is not only a shallow act of self-interest, but completely disrespectful to the artist. Death is a natural part of one’s life, and carrying the memory of the dead is a natural part of life for those left behind, whether it’s the deceased’s intimates or legions of admirers. So I’m hoping that soon enough, all his Tupac-inspired enthusiasm for rock star holograms will die down and that logic and sense will prevail.

But it probably won’t. This is show business, after all.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.