I Am DB

February 11, 2010

Oscars 2009: And The Nominees Are…

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 11:36 pm
Tags: , , , ,

 

Complete List of Nominees

It’s been over a week since the nominations were announced and I can’t believe it’s taken me this long to shoot off my reactions. I’ve been too busy writing about Lost. And running my meth lab. So for those who might care, here are my thoughts – where I have some – on what made the cut.

BEST PICTURE/BEST DIRECTOR
So the highly anticipated “10 Best Picture nominees” cat is out of the bag, and all in all I’d say it’s a good list. Like a lot of people – most people, probably – the nomination for The Blind Side caught me way off guard. When the trailers for this movie ran last fall, I thought it looked sentimental and cheesy, and even if it was a true story I was still turned off by a movie about rich white people coming to the rescue of a poor black boy. Which is weird, ’cause I loved me some Diff’rent Strokes back in the 80s. Anyway, it didn’t surprise me that people turned out in droves. When Sandra Bullock started winning awards, I finally broke down and saw it. And I’ll admit that it was better than I thought it would be. I give credit to writer/director John Lee Hancock for showing restraint with a story that could so easily have gone down the road I was expecting based on those trailers. But that said, there is no way this film should be singled out as one of the year’s best. It is a nice, “heartwarming” movie, but completely ordinary. With movies like Where the Wild Things Are, The Road, A Single Man, Fantastic Mr. Fox, The Messenger and In the Loop all in the mix, a nomination for The Blind Side is a joke.

Other than that, the list went pretty much as expected. Consensus is that Avatar, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious and Up in the Air would have been the five nominees if the category hadn’t been expanded, so it’s interesting that those films’ directors all earned nominations. Usually one or two of those people would have missed. But James Cameron, Kathryn Bigelow, Quentin Tarantino, Lee Daniels and Jason Reitman is a great list to represent 2009 (he had no chance, but I wish Spike Jonze had been recognized for Where the Wild Things Are).

My only other comment here is that as I’ve followed the award season since it began in early December, one of the most pleasant surprises has been how well Inglourious Basterds has done. Christoph Waltz was a shoo-in nominee from the moment the film’s first scene was over, and the screenplay was also a safe bet early on. But I honestly didn’t expect Tarantino’s gonzo revisionist take on World War II to fare so well across the board – critics’s awards, guild awards, ten best lists, etc. I would never have predicted it, but I’m happy that it came to pass, earning QT his second nominations for directing and screenwriting.  Bravo.

BEST ACTOR
No surprises here. Nice to see a young up-and-comer like Jeremy Renner hang in there with the big boys. He impressed me in North Country and The Assassination of Jesse James By the Coward Robert Ford, so I’m happy for him and the opportunities that are sure to come his way as a result of this film.

I also have to take a moment and ask of the people who saw Invictus: do you think Freeman deserved to be nominated? I suppose there are some minor spoilers ahead, so continue at your own risk…

I was so excited about him in this role. Freeman is one of my favorites, and the thought of him playing Nelson Mandela was full of such promise. It’s too bad he blew it on this movie. It’s not that Invictus is bad or that Freeman isn’t good in it. It’s just…this is basically a sports underdog movie. It’s Hoosiers. Remember the Titans. Hell, it’s Major League. It’s the familiar story of a sports team rising above low expectations to win big, and maybe learning some important life lessons along the way. There’s nothing wrong with that per se, but here you have one of the great actors of our time playing one of the great lives of our time, and this is the story he chooses to tell? Freeman does well, but the script doesn’t allow him to dig into the character at all. There are a few moments that hint at what he could have done and where he could have gone had he chosen to do a film that was really about Mandela. But this one – he’s hardly even in the second half/last third of the movie. There’s so little depth for him to play that the film wound up being a pretty big disappointment for me. Freeman delivers as best he can with what’s there, but when you think about how much more he could have done? It makes me sad to say so, but I don’t think he should have been nominated. Viggo Mortensen (The Road), Matt Damon (The Informant!), Ben Foster (The Messenger), Joaquin Phoenix (Two Lovers) and Sam Rockwell (Moon) all had the chance to do much more in their films than Freeman got to do in Invictus, and I wish that Academy members had recognized one of them instead of doing the obvious thing and nominating Freeman for a performance that, through no fault of his own, failed to meet expectations.


BEST ACTRESS
Sandra Bullock’s nomination was no surprise by this point in the season, but it shocks me that she has moved up to take frontrunner status alongside Meryl Streep. She just doesn’t belong here. I’ve always liked Sandra Bullock; she has great comedic timing and her small role in Crash was, for me, one of the film’s highlights. But she has chosen bad movies almost exclusively throughout her career; it’s almost like a gift she has. The Blind Side is better than most of the films on her resume, but there is nothing about this performance that calls for award talk. Bullock can do sassy, she can do tough, she can do sweet – these are not stretches for her, nor does this particular character leap off the screen. I enjoyed her, but at the end of the day it was Erin Brockovich Lite. So what is this nomination for? Is it for finally picking a decent movie? For having a good year? Okay, I get that between the huge box office success of this film and last summer’s The Proposal, Bullock is having a Moment (though everyone apparently chose to ignore that her third film – All About Steve – was widely considered one of the year’s worst). But does making two adequate movies that become commercial hits merit an Oscar nomination? No, especially not when Saoirse Ronan (The Lovely Bones), Emily Blunt (The Young Victoria), Abbie Cornish (Bright Star) and even Maya Rudolph (Away We Go) are sitting the race out. Does it merit a Golden Globe win over Precious‘ Gabourey Sidibe? No way. A SAG award over Sidibe and Meryl Streep? Seriously, no way. This performance isn’t in the same league as her competition. Sorry Sandra. I can only hope the voters come to their senses by the time they mark their ballots.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Matt Damon has proven to be a great and versatile actor, and it’s surprising that this nomination is his first since Good Will Hunting. But it’s like Academy members filled out their ballots on auto-pilot. “Hmm, Clint Eastwood movie, Morgan as Mandela, important subject matter, scene where he gives an inspirational speech…I think by some Academy bylaw we’re required to nominate this.” Snore. Like Freeman, Damon is good in the film, don’t get me wrong. But also like Freeman, the role doesn’t ask much of him. And like Bullock, Damon finds himself in this race without really doing anything that special. Matt Damon did give a nomination-worthy performance this year; it just wasn’t in this movie. I really don’t get it. There had to be a significant number of people who listed Damon as their first choice – their favorite Supporting Actor of the year – in order for him to score a nomination. I can’t fathom that, even in such an unusually weak year for this category.

The rest of it looks good. It’s nice to see Christopher Plummer earn his first nomination after so many years of excellent work, and Stanley Tucci too. He doesn’t have Plummer’s years under his belt, but he’s been playing the game well for a long time. And it’s great to see Harrelson back in the field. He’s done some terrific work these last several years.

Too bad they’re all gonna lose to Christoph Waltz.

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Last year’s winner Penelope Cruz scored her second consecutive nomination, and while I would have singled out Marion Cotillard from Nine‘s ensemble, Cruz was good and probably caught voters’ attention with one of the film’s more comedic performances, as well as general hotness. I think Maggie Gyllenhaal benefitted from an all-around appreciation for Crazy Heart. There were stronger performances to choose from – I’d have gone with The Messenger‘s Samantha Morton – and Gyllenhaal’s been overlooked for performances more interesting than this one, but I can’t begrudge her finally getting some recognition. And seeing Up in the Air‘s ladies is no surprise; each is deserving.

Too bad they’re all gonna lose to Mo’Nique.

BEST ORIGINAL/ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
I was off by one in my predictions for both of these categories, but I was happy that in both cases the movie I failed to predict correctly was on my list of personal choices. I thought The Messenger‘s chances were slim given that the Writer’s Guild failed to nominate it even when other sure-thing contenders like Up and Basterds were ruled ineligible, so kudos to the Academy’s writer’s branch for acknowledging this small gem. And major kudos for including In the Loop in the adapted race. Without a doubt one of the best scripts of the year – smart, tight, topical and hilarious. I thought the movie might get overshadowed by something higher profile, but it totally deserves the nomination. Rent this movie NOW.


BEST ANIMATED FILM
What the hell is The Secret of Kells? Whatever it is, I was just glad that for the first time since 2002 there were enough eligible films to have five nominees instead of three. It’s a testament to how much great animation there is these days that any one of these would totally deserve the prize….this Kells thing notwithstanding, since I haven’t seen it.

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Once again, I scored with one of my personal picks even though I didn’t predict it would make the cut. The nomination for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince took a lot of the pundits by surprise, but they must have forgotten how beautifully photographed the film is and how frequently the cinematography was mentioned in reviews. Great to see it recognized.

BEST MAKEUP
Another snub for The Road. Dirt, grime and muck may never have been so artfully applied as they were in this movie. I have no idea what Il Divo is, so no comment on that one, but The Young Victoria?! Over The Road?!? Are you kidding me?? For what? I can’t wait for this category to come up on the show so I can see exactly what sketches, behind the scenes footage and finished clip will highlight how this could possibly have taken a spot. Ed Helms’ missing tooth in The Hangover would have been more nomination-worthy than anything I can think of in The Young Victoria. And Star Trek was nominated? Maybe I’m forgetting something, but that seems to be a nomination for pointy ears and some tattoos on Eric Bana’s head. Big deal. I suppose someone else would look at The Road and say, “It’s just dirt. Big deal.” But of course, they would be wrong. How about something for Zombieland or District 9 in lieu of Trek and Victoria?

As there were no other huge surprises or snubs like last year’s Dark Knight/Bruce Springsteen omissions, that’s all I really have to say about the nominees until it’s time to predict the winners in a few weeks. Prepare to be schooled….in boredom and obsessive movie awards analysis.

February 1, 2010

Oscar ’09: Nomination Eve

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 1:49 pm
Tags: , , , ,
x
Another year, another impending Oscar announcement. But his year’s about-to-begin race is made more interesting by the 10-slot Best Picture factor. Choosing the 10 films I think are most likely to get nominated is tricky; there are a handful of obvious choices (and I think it’s clear what the big five would be if the category hadn’t been expanded this year), but two or three slots are up for grabs. I’m less certain than I was a few months ago that something all-out popular like The Hangover or Star Trek won’t make it in (Avatar‘s spot is of course secured). Hangover and Trek aren’t included on my final list of guesses, but whatever happens, there is a unique curiosity attached to this year’s announcement.

I’ll have to see how it shakes out after a couple years worth of evidence, but for now I’m open to the 10 nominee race. If it brings recognition to a few more small films and helps some smart, well-crafted popular hits earn some respect, I’m all for it. I know one of the chief arguments against the change is that the expansion dilutes the significance, making a nomination less meaningful, but I really don’t buy that. We’ve always had a system in which critics celebrate the year’s best through top 10 lists, and I’ve never heard anyone complain about that, so why shouldn’t the same number apply to the Oscars?

And to those who say they can’t find 10 movies worth nominating? Obviously some years are stronger than others, but anyone who claims to be a movie fan yet can’t find 10 films a year that mean something to them and are worthy of honoring probably don’t deserve their Academy membership. 274 films are eligible for this year’s Best Picture Oscar. You really can’t pick 10? Out of 274? (And as this article about tabulating the nominations illustrates, filling out all 10 is important; your vote might not get counted if you don’t, and by completing all 10 lines you might just be helping one of your lower-ranked choices make the cut.)

Anyway, I’ll get on with it. Here are my predictions, along with occasional commentary and my personal picks for each category. Can’t wait to see how it all goes down early (so painfully early) Tuesday morning when Anne Hathaway and Academy president Tom Sherak announce the nominees…

BEST PICTURE
An Education
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Invictus
Precious
A Serious Man
Up
Up in the Air

Personal: Avatar, District 9, The Hurt Locker, In the Loop, Inglourious Basterds, Precious, The Road, Up, Up in the Air, Where the Wild Things Are

BEST DIRECTOR
James Cameron – Avatar
Kathryn Bigelow – The Hurt Locker
Quentin Tarantino – Inglourious Basterds
Lee Daniels – Precious
Jason Reitman – Up in the Air

These five picks line-up exactly with the Director’s Guild nominees, and though there are usually differences between the DGA’s list and the Academy’s, I can’t really see it going any other way.

Personal: Cameron, Bigelow, Tarantino, Daniels, Spike Jonze (Where the Wild Things Are),

BEST ACTOR
Jeff Bridges – Crazy Heart
George Clooney – Up in the Air
Colin Firth – A Single Man
Morgan Freeman – Invictus
Jeremy Renner – The Hurt Locker

I’m still not sold 100% on Renner’s chances. He did get a SAG nomination, and some other high-profile nominations along the way, but I still wonder if the performance is too subtle or internalized for voters to appreciate it. He’ll probably make it, but if anyone here is vulnerable, I’d say it’s him.

Personal: Bridges, Clooney, Matt Damon (The Informant!), Firth, Viggo Mortensen (The Road)

BEST ACTRESS
Sandra Bullock – The Blind Side
Helen Mirren – The Last Station
Carey Mulligan – An Education
Gabourey Sidibe – Precious
Meryl Streep – Julie & Julia

Personal: Mirren, Mulligan, Saoirse Ronan (The Lovely Bones), Sidibe, Streep

BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Matt Damon – Invictus
Woody Harrelson – The Messenger
Christian McKay – Me and Orson Welles
Stanley Tucci – The Lovely Bones
Christoph Waltz – Inglourious Basterds

I’m admittedly going out on a long limb with McKay. Christopher Plummer is probably the better bet; he received SAG and Golden Globe nominations, had a busy year with Doctor Parnassus, Up and 9, and has never been nominated despite a long career full of terrific work. But despite all that, did people really love this performance so much as to call it out as one of their five favorites?

The other common prediction out there is Alfred Molina for An Education. Some Oscar pundits have been talking him up since the movie came out in October, but he has been almost entirely overlooked by other organizations (the Broadcast Film Critics nominated him; Golden Globes and SAG didn’t). That doesn’t necessarily mean he’s out; Michael Shannon managed to sneak in last year for Revolutionary Road without having earned high-profile pre-recognition. And like Plummer, Molina is another respected veteran who has never been nominated (and should have been, for Frida). Still, I don’t feel the momentum.

Not that McKay exactly has momentum or has fared much better than Molina in the run-up, but he has earned a few notices here and there from some of the small, regional critics groups. And he gives a magnetic performance that dominates the film. The question is whether enough people saw it.

Whatever happens, the one certainty is that this year’s Supporting Actor field is one of the weakest I can recall. This is usually one of the most competitive categories; this time it’s a struggle to find five strong contenders.

Personal: Robert Duvall (The Road), Harrelson, McKay, Tucci, Waltz

BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Vera Farmiga – Up in the Air
Anna Kendrick – Up in the Air
Mo’Nique – Precious
Julianne Moore – A Single Man
Samantha Morton – The Messenger

While I’d love to see Morton get nominated, I’m not confident in that guess. I almost went with Penelope Cruz or Marion Cotillard for Nine, but I’m deferring to what I keep reading from Oscar writers in the field, which is that Nine just hasn’t connected with voters and has faded from their radar (at least in terms of top categories; I’m still counting on several below-the-line nominations).

Personal: Farmiga, Kendrick, Melanie Laurent (Inglourious Basterds), Mo’Nique, Morton

BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
(500) Days of Summer
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
A Serious Man
Up

Personal: (500) Days, Hurt Locker, Basterds, The Messenger, Moon

BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
An Education
District 9
Fantastic Mr. Fox
Precious
Up in the Air

Personal: In the Loop, Precious, The Road, Up in the Air, Where the Wild Things Are

BEST ANIMATED FILM
Coraline
Fantastic Mr. Fox
Ponyo
The Princess and the Frog
Up

Personal (w/o seeing Ponyo yet): 9, Coraline, Mr. Fox, Princess and the Frog, Up

BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Avatar
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
A Serious Man

Personal: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, Basterds, The Lovely Bones, Nine, A Serious Man

BEST FILM EDITING
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Nine
Up in the Air

Personal: Same

BEST ART DIRECTION
Avatar
District 9
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
Inglourious Basterds
A Serious Man

Personal: Avatar, Coraline, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Parnassus, The Road

BEST COSTUME DESIGN
Bright Star
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
Inglourious Basterds
Nine
The Young Victoria

Personal: Bright Star, The Brothers Bloom, Parnassus, Nine, A Single Man

BEST ORIGINAL SCORE
Avatar
The Informant!
A Serious Man
A Single Man
Up

Personal: The Brothers Bloom, Moon, The Road, A Serious Man, Up

BEST ORIGINAL SONG
Almost There – The Princess and the Frog*
Cinema Italiano – Nine*
I See You – Avatar
Somebody Else – Crazy Heart
The Weary Kind – Crazy Heart*

Last year, there were only three nominees, rather than the usual five. Not sure why that was, but my asteriks indicate the three I think will make it if that happens again.

Personal: Dove Of Peace (Bruno), Be Italian (Nine), Cinema Italiano, Friends on the Other Side (The Princess and the Frog), The Weary Kind

BEST MAKE-UP
District 9
The Road
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

Personal: Same

BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
Avatar
Star Trek
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

I’m uncertain on Transformers. I was really close to putting down District 9, which may well make it. I didn’t see the new Transformers, but I figure the effects are at least as good as in the first one, and those were great. Maybe there isn’t anything new and groundbreaking since the original, but that doesn’t make them any less impressive. The first film lost this award but should have won; even if this is more of the same, sequels get nominated all the time for building on the work of their predecessor.

On the other hand, nobody likes this movie except for 13 year-old boys and Michael Bay, so that might hurt its chances, paving the way for District 9.

Personal: Avatar, District 9, Where the Wild Things Are

BEST SOUND MIXING
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Star Trek
Up

Personal: 9, Avatar, District 9, The Hurt Locker, Star Trek

BEST SOUND EFFECTS EDITING
Avatar
District 9
The Hurt Locker
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
Up

Personal: 9, Avatar, District 9, The Hurt Locker, Star Trek (same as above, since I know nothing about sound to begin with)

xx xx

December 23, 2009

The Decade in Film, Part I: 2000-2003

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 5:19 pm
Tags: ,

So we’re about to pass into a new decade, and how could any self-respecting, list-prone movie junkie not reflect on their favorite movies of the past ten years?

Right off the bat, let’s be clear that this was never intended to be a top ten list. Anyone expecting me to limit my best of the decade list to a mere top ten doesn’t know me at all. We’re going way beyond that. What follows are comments on about 80 movies that have endured for me. If that sounds stupidly long, well, of course it is. And with such a long list, it surely seems like I’m just refusing to make some tough choices. But the idea is to cover the movies that meant the most to me. There were hundreds of movies released since 2000, and I don’t think spotlighting less than 100 of those is a crime against humanity. A crime against listmaking perhaps, but I’ll take my chances on that score. I did draw a line, believe it or not, and have left off many more films that I really, really enjoy. Some of my favorite performances or scenes of the decade are contained in movies not featured on this list. But what follows are the movies that, in their entirety, live in my heart. These are the movies I’m compelled to return to, and the ones I expect I’ll be returning to for years. There are so many others not included here which I think are great and which I might be in the mood to see now and again, or will stop and watch if I come across them on TV. But I’m not drawn to proactively come back to them time and again.

Now that I’ve offered a lame defense for the length of the list, we can get down to business. I’m splitting the list into two posts. The other will follow in a couple of days. Also, despite the title indicating a decade in film, there’s actually nothing on this list from 2009. This year’s movies are too fresh, and I’d need at least a year’s perspective to determine what would earn a spot on a list of favorites for the decade. Plus, I still have a few more year-end releases to catch, so my 2009 list won’t even be ready for a while yet.

So here we go. My single favorite movie of the decade (which should already be apparent from the image above), followed by a year-by-year breakdown.

THE LORD OF THE RINGS  (2001-2003)
Call me a cheater if you want, but for the purpose of a list like this it’s pointless to separate the three movies out. It’s the nine-hour-plus achievement that I celebrate here (and for what it’s worth, I consider the extended cuts to be the definitive versions). There was no debating, no consideration, no question which movie would top my list of the decade’s best. It was a no-brainer. Peter Jackson’s adaptation of the J.R.R. Tolkien tome is epic filmmaking in every sense, in front of and behind the camera. These movies are everything movies can be. I can’t sum it up any more succinctly than that…though that won’t stop me from rambling on for several more paragraphs to profess my love. But that’s what it all boils down to. Whatever you go to the movies to experience, The Lord of the Rings delivers it. It’s thrilling adventure and intimate character drama, as strong a showcase for visual grandeur as it is for performances and music. It evokes mystery, sadness, humor, tragedy; it celebrates friendship, courage, honor, loyalty; it depicts heroism, villainy and all the grey areas in between. There’s a reason the final film took home every one of the 11 Academy Awards for which it was nominated. It was recognition for the trilogy in totality. The acting, directing, writing, art direction, costumes, cinematography, editing, sound, make-up, music, visual effects, practical effects, stunts, casting – every tool in the chest was expertly deployed on these films, while the varied beauty of New Zealand provided a naturally breathtaking environment.

Right from the beginning of The Fellowship of the Ring, it was clear we were in good hands. The perfect realizations of the Shire and Bag End, of the size differences between Hobbits and humans (and soon enough, dwarves), of the wicked Ringwraiths – Tolkien’s world had clearly found its way into the hands of a gifted filmmaking team who revered it, yet knew how to make it work onscreen.

The Two Towers presented new challenges, as the fellowship that singularly drove the first film’s momentum forward was now fractured, leaving Jackson multiple storylines to juggle and a slate of new characters to weave in. After a thrilling and unexpected opening sequence, little time was wasted in presenting the figure that every fan of the books was dying to see onscreen: the tortured creature Gollum. The achievement was masterful, a combination of superb acting by Andy Serkis and groundbreaking visual effects by Weta Digital. The movie also offered one of the best battles I’ve ever seen depicted on film: the spectacular Helm’s Deep sequence.

Jackson and company brought it all home with The Return of the King, the powerful conclusion in which nearly every character is tested, their individual struggles playing out against the massive backdrop of the ultimate battle for Middle Earth. The excitement comes not just from the action, but from seeing some characters fulfill their destiny while others discover in themselves the power to rise to the most daunting challenges. By the time we reach the emotional final scenes, we’ve gone on a journey of our own as audience members and have experienced a cinematic achievement unlike any attempted before and that may never be rivaled again.

Jackson’s mandate to his cast and crew, which they all carried forward with unswerving dedication, was that The Lord of the Rings was not fantasy; it was history. Tolkien’s initial motivation in writing the books was to meld his love of mythology and linguistics into an imagined history of England, believing that the Norman invasion of 1066 had erased whatever rich cultural history his country may have had at one time. So taking their cue from Tolkien, the filmmakers approached their job as if they too had been tasked with bringing history to life. They had a responsibility to capture that history accurately and to honor those who had lived it. And because of that, the movies carry a weight and gravitas that sets them apart from other works of fantasy. The wardrobes, sets and music reflect the centuries of culture around each race, while the language has a Shakespearean elevation. Moreover, Jackson takes the time required to tell the story properly and to put the viewer alongside the characters for their demanding odysseys. Just as Lawrence of Arabia makes you feel the effort of crossing the unforgiving desert, so too does The Lord of the Rings place you on the arduous road to Mordor traveled by Frodo and Sam.

The musical score by Howard Shore is an opus unto itself, so strong in its motifs, instrumentation and vocal performances that it transcends the movie and takes on a transportive power all its own. It’s as though the themes have always existed and were just waiting to be plucked out of the air and recorded. (Again, I think of Lawrence of Arabia and how Maurice Jarre’s swelling theme simply is the sound of desert beauty and rolling dunes.) Melodies will appear once in the first film, then return at a key moment in the third to highlight how far the characters have come. And the score spans a wide array of styles, from dissonant battle music to delicate vocal solos. “The Bridge of Khazad Dum” track from The Fellowship of the Ring embodies this range, as it goes from intense, pounding percussion to a choral lament that pierces the heart.

And what can be said about this flawless cast? I have to resist the temptation to name every main actor and what they bring to the whole. I feel as though not doing so is a betrayal. I’ll single out Elijah Wood, Ian McKellan, Viggo Mortensen, Sean Bean, Cate Blanchett, Andy Serkis…see, here we go…I can’t help it. The already familiar actors like Wood and McKellan inhabited their characters without any baggage of past performances, while newcomers like Dominic Monaghan, Billy Boyd and Orlando Bloom quickly forged lasting bonds with audiences. Mortensen’s deep commitment is felt in every movement he makes, and even in his stillness; Christopher Lee wears the white robes of Saruman with commanding stature; Liv Tyler exhibits luminescent grace as Arwen; David Wenham’s Faramir is quietly heartbreaking as a man of honor who strives to impress a father who shows him no love (and whose own weakness blinds him to his son’s strength, thank you John Noble); as Sam, Sean Astin embodies a pure and ordinary heroism that is no easy sell in such cynical times. Again, I could go on..every single member of the ensemble shines.

I’ve made it a tradition to watch the trilogy every year during the holiday season, and they lose none of their impact from year to year. I still get shivers up and down my spine at multiple points throughout: the reactions of Frodo and Aragorn when Gandalf falls in Moria; the arrival of the elf army at Helm’s Deep; the Nazgul astride their Fell Beasts, swooping down over the ivory city of Minas Tirith, or the violent eruption of sinister emerald light from its sister city Minas Morgul that precedes the siege of Gondor; Theoden inspiring his troops before they charge Pelennor Fields, riding the length of the front line and clanging swords…and so on. Even now if I have the opportunity to see the movies in a theater, moments such as Aragorn’s decapitation of Lurtz or Eowyn’s slaying of the Witch King still earn enthusiastic applause from the crowd. I still well up with tears when the Fellowship emerges from Moria and takes in their incomprehensible loss; when Sam charges out into the water, determined to accompany Frodo on his quest; when all who are gathered at the king’s coronation bow down before the Hobbits; and when that quartet have their final moments together.

From the opening seconds of Fellowship in which Galadriel speaks over a black screen, through the closing credits of The Return of the King which pay tribute to the cast by featuring sketches of each character when the actor’s name appears, all while Annie Lennox movingly serenades the song, “Into the West” –  The Lord of the Rings is simply unparalleled.

All that said, the ending decade had a few other decent movies too…

2000

ALMOST FAMOUS
Cameron Crowe’s masterpiece is the semi-autobiographical story of his experiences as a teenager writing for Rolling Stone. His surrogate William Miller (played with great appeal by Patrick Fugit) is sent on tour with the fictional up-and-coming band Stillwater, and experiences a crash course in coming-of-age as he falls in love, becomes enmeshed in the band’s inner turmoil and tries to hang onto his integrity in a business that doesn’t exactly emphasize that virtue. Crowe’s Oscar-winning script is funny and affectionate, and he fills his movie with unforgettable musical moments, as well as a slew of great performances from the likes of Kate Hudson, Frances McDormand (both Oscar nominated), Billy Crudup, Jason Lee, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Zooey Deschanel, Fairuza Balk and Jimmy Fallon. Seek out the director’s cut, which actually goes by the name Untitled. It runs over a half hour longer and, among other things, presents a deeper portrait of the tension between Crudup’s star guitarist Russell Hammond and Lee’s frontman Jeff Bebe.

x

BEST IN SHOW
If evaluating the collection of mockumentaries directed by Christopher Guest, all would deserve a ribbon, but only one is Best in Show. Guest and his wonderful company of actors and improvisors take on competitive dog shows, creating a gallery of vivid, quirky characters without ever condescending to them or laughing at the expense of those who really populate the showdog subculture. In fact, part of Guest’s accomplishment is that he manages to poke fun at this community while displaying great affection for it. The featured dogs are beautiful and lend their own personalities to the movie, as well as a bit of suspense as we wait to learn which one will win.

x

BILLY ELLIOT
Billy is an 11-year old boy living with his bitter, widowed father, angry older brother and aging grandmother in an English coal mining town. Set in 1984 against the backdrop of a real-life mining strike that brings additional tension into the Elliot home (both father and brother work in the mine), the story follows Billy as he abandons his weekly boxing lessons and instead takes up ballet, demonstrating a raw talent that catches the attention of the strict but kind teacher (Julie Walters) and opens the possibility to a richer life beyond the confines of his hometown. The film marked auspicious debuts for director Stephen Daldry (already a veteran of theater) and actor Jamie Bell. Original, funny, heartbreaking.

x

GLADIATOR
It may have won a few Oscars I don’t think it deserved (Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Visual Effects), but that doesn’t mean I don’t love Ridley Scott’s smart and stirring epic or Russell Crowe’s vigorous performance as the beloved general Maximus, who is betrayed by the emperor’s jealous son (Joaquin Phoenix) and winds up a slave who rises to prominence once again as a warrior in the arenas of Rome. Supporting performances by Richard Harris, Oliver Reed (who died during production), Djimon Hounsou and Connie Nielsen add plenty of flavor, and Phoenix pretty much steals the movie with a knockout turn as the succeeding leader of the empire.

x

HIGH FIDELITY
One of John Cusack’s career highlights and a breakout movie for Jack Black, High Fidelity follows music lover and indie record store owner Rob Gordon as he examines his relationship history in the immediate aftermath of being left by his live-in girlfriend Laura (played by Danish actress Iben Hjejle, who strikes a great, natural chemistry with Cusack). Rob spends much of the movie talking to the audience, inviting us to share in the universal truths of breakups and dealing with the thoughts and feelings stirred up as a result. It’s also a movie for and about people for whom pop culture – in the case of Rob and his friends, music specifically – is as essential as food, clothing, shelter and oxygen. When Rob and his employees Dick (Todd Louiso) and Barry (Black) aren’t arguing, they’re tossing out “top five” lists – Top Five Songs About Death, Top Five Side Ones Track Ones, etc. No wonder I can relate.

x

TRAFFIC
An ideal vehicle for Steven Soderbergh to show off his directing prowess, Traffic felt like the culmination of the work he’d been doing during the previous few years (Out of Sight, The Limey and Erin Brockovich). Following multiple storylines and a large cast of characters, the movie examines the drug war between the U.S. and Mexico from all angles, introducing us to dealers, users, cops, politicians and those caught in-between. A compelling examination of an impossible problem, with standout performances from Benicio del Toro, Erika Christensen, Tomas Milian, Don Cheadle and Catherine Zeta-Jones. Soderbergh’s direction, del Toro’s performance, Stephen Gaghan’s layered script and Stephen Mirrione’s editing all earned Oscars.

x

WONDER BOYS
When I heard the basic plot of Wonder Boys and saw the talent involved, I knew it was going to be a winner. Sometimes you can just tell. Curtis Hanson is a great director of actors, and here he had Michael Douglas, Frances McDormand, Robert Downey, Jr. and Tobey Maguire. All are sublime in this dryly funny story – adapted by Steve Kloves from a novel by Michael Chabon – of a whirlwind weekend in the life of Grady Tripp, writing professor at a small liberal arts college in Pennsylvania. During the brief period we spend with him, he contends with a crumbling marriage, a complicated affair, a gifted but morose student, his visiting editor, the advances of his attractive tenant and the legacy of his years-old novel, a modern classic whose follow-up he can’t seem to finish. A terrific tale brimming with colorful characters.

2001

A BEAUTIFUL MIND
This is a movie that seems to get knocked down by people, and I’m not sure why. The story of troubled mathematician John Nash (Russell Crowe)  may be inherently sentimental, but the same could be said of plenty of movies that don’t get the bad rap this one does. As far as I’m concerned, any tears you might shed are well earned. Ron Howard’s direction finds simple but clever ways to take the viewer inside Nash’s fragile yet visionary point of view, and the film has some swell tricks up its sleeves which Howard reveals carefully and to great effect. Russell Crowe, Jennifer Connelly, Ed Harris and Paul Bettany are all superb, as is James Horner’s score. Screw the haters. This is great, old fashioned Hollywood drama.

x
GOSFORD PARK

Robert Altman’s engrossing film is a both a study of class differences and a nifty whodunit, set at a manor in the English countryside in 1932. The camera prowls through the drawing rooms and parlors of the wealthy guests gathered by Sir William McCordle (Michael Gambon), and lurks in the corridors and kitchens of the servants as they prepare meals and tend to their employers’ needs. We drift in and out of conversations and find ourselves privy to plenty of gossip and drama even before the gathering is interrupted by a murder. Altman, ever the master of telling stories with sprawling ensemble casts, assembles a stunning roster of English actors including Maggie Smith, Helen Mirren, Eileen Atkins, Clive Owen, Kelly Macdonald, Kristen Scott Thomas, Emily Watson, Derek Jacobi…the list goes on, and each player is nothing short of top notch.

x

MEMENTO
The second feature film from Christopher Nolan, Memento heralded the arrival of the man who would arguably go on to be the decade’s most consistently exciting mainstream filmmaker. His clever breakthrough film revolves around Leonard Shelby (Guy Pearce, terrific as always), a brain trauma victim attempting to track down his wife’s killers despite the loss of his short-term memory. Relying on tattoos and Polaroids with scribbled notes as his clues, Leonard must not only contend with his own “condition,” but with Teddy (Joe Pantoliano) and Natalie (Carrie-Anne Moss), his guides through the murky waters of his own memory, each of whom has their own motivations for helping him. To keep the viewer as off-balance as Leonard, the story unfolds backwards, with short scenes each beginning where the next one will end. It’s no gimmick, but rather the expression of a bold directorial point-of-view that Nolan continued to display over the next decade. Ten years later, I still look at this movie and marvel at its construction.

x

MONSTERS, INC.
I sometimes forget how laugh-out-loud funny Pixar’s movies are. Monsters, Inc., in particular, is one that for some reason I never remember being as funny as it is, yet every time I watch it I’m completely slayed. It takes place in the city of Monstropolis, which is sort of like an old steel town in that the entire economy seems centered around Monsters, Inc., the energy plant that powers the city by sending monsters into children’s bedrooms all over the world, harvesting their screams and converting them into power. But most of these monsters are cheerful, affable folks who aren’t really scary at all. The plot turns on the potentially disastrous incident of a little girl who finds her way into the monster world and is concealed by the furry blue James P. “Sully” Sullivan (voiced by John Goodman) and his roommate/best friend/assistant Mike Wazowski (Billy Crystal), a little green blob with arms, legs and a single eye. The resulting adventure, aside from being packed with laughs, is one of Pixar’s most imaginative outings, highlighted by a climax involving a chase through, in and around the thousands of closet doors used by Monsters, Inc. The voice cast also includes James Coburn, Jennifer Tilly and Steve Buscemi as one of my favorite Pixar characters: a sneaky, jealous chameleon named Randall Boggs. (Off-topic, let me just say that I hope sometime during the production of this movie, some animator lifted dialogue from The Big Lebowski and created a joke moment in which Goodman’s Sully says to Buscemi’s Randall, “Shut the fuck up, Donny!”)

x

MULHOLLAND DRIVE
For a long time after seeing David Lynch’s hypnotic journey into the underbelly of Los Angeles, I couldn’t stop thinking about it, looking for clues, puzzling over it and trying to make sense of it. Finally I told myself,  “Silencio. Just go with it.” I may not always know what Lynch is saying, but I’ve accepted that I don’t need to. I love the atmosphere and the texture of his dark and mysterious stories, and there’s a thrill in surrendering to his unique and inscrutable vision and just letting the magic carpet whisk you away. The film, which came together from the ashes of a TV pilot that never made it to series, has some pieces that don’t quite seem to fit the whole, yet even those odds and ends enhance the mystique of Lynch’s nod to old school L.A. noir. The plot concerns a perky aspiring actress, an amnesiac brunette bombshell, an up-and-coming film director, a midget in a wheelchair, a creepy cowboy, an evil presence behind a dumpster in the parking lot of a pancake house…yeah, it gets weird. But in Lynch we trust.

x

THE ROYAL TENENBAUMS
Wes Anderson has many gifts as a filmmaker, but one of his gifts as a storyteller is for finding the humor in the lives of unhappy people. He did it before this in Rushmore and he’d do it after this in The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou and The Darjeeling Limited. In The Royal Tenenbaums, unhappiness affects the lives of nearly every character in the titular family. Gene Hackman, retired from acting since 2004, had his last great role as the self-involved, neglectful patriarch seeking to reconnect with his estranged family. Luke Wilson, Ben Stiller and Gwyneth Paltrow excel as his grown children – all once full of promise, all now fallen from grace and seeking shelter in their childhood home, where their mother (Anjelica Huston) is being courted by a new suitor (Danny Glover). Anderson remains one of the most distinctive voices in American cinema. This was the movie that cemented it.

x

SHREK
Okay, so the animation isn’t the most sophisticated. And the pop culture-centric humor might date the movie for future generations, which robs it of the timeless quality we tend to expect from animation. But I’m not from a future generation. I’m from this one, and years from now the jokes will still work for me. So I happily proclaim my love for this cleverly fractured fairy tale. The bitter ogre, chatty donkey and strong-willed princess voiced by Mike Myers, Eddie Murphy and Cameron Diaz, respectively, create a winning trio, while John Lithgow’s vertically-challenged villain Lord Farquaad is an inspired antagonist.

x

ZOOLANDER
A great entry in the sub-genre (which I may have created for my own personal sense of classifications) of smart dumb comedies (see Airplane!, The Naked Gun for further examples), Zoolander comes courtesy of co-writer, director and star Ben Stiller. He plays male fashion model Derek Zoolander, for whom the word “vapid” may suggest too much intelligence. When a cabal of fashion designers plot to assassinate the Malaysian Prime Minister, Derek is selected as the unknowing pawn who will be brainwashed to carry out the deed. The movie is utterly absurd fun, with brilliant cameos featured throughout, and with great supporting turns from Owen Wilson, Milla Jovovich, David Duchovny, Jerry Stiller and Will Ferrell. Just the scene with Derek and his fellow model roommates (including a pre-True Blood Alexander Skarsgaard) at the gas station earns Zoolander a place in contemporary comedy’s hall of fame. 

x

2002

8 MILE
Eminem’s film debut may be cut from the familiar Rocky cloth, but that doesn’t make it any less engrossing or entertaining. The artist formerly known as Marshall Mathers displays a magnetic onscreen presence as Jimmy “Rabbit” Smith, a factory worker trying to use his rap skills to break out of his dead-end life in Detroit. The story echoes the star’s own, but he isn’t just playing himself. Director Curtis Hanson guides him to a strong performance and stages a series of rap battles between Rabbit and his rivals as dramatic as any of the Italian Stallion’s boxing matches. This isn’t another glamour project for a musician who wants to act. This is a legit piece of dramatic filmmaking from a director who knows how to tell a compelling story. And for what it’s worth, it features my favorite song of the decade: Eminem’s kick-ass (and Oscar winning!) motivational anthem, “Lose Yourself.”

x

ADAPTATION
Leave it to Charlie Kaufman, the genius screenwriter behind Being John Malkovich, to turn an assignment adapting Susan Orlean’s nonfiction book The Orchid Thief into this brilliant, self-reflexive comedy-drama in which Orlean herself becomes a character alongside the main subject of her book: idiosyncratic orchid collector John LaRoche. Kaufman fictionalizes himself as well, not only becoming the central character but creating a twin brother for himself (and crediting the screenplay to both of them). That’s just the beginning. Kaufman’s cinematic kindred spirit Spike Jonze directs, as he did with Malkovich, and together they craft a movie that is original and sensational even when embracing the very clichés that the character Kaufman insists on avoiding. Nicolas Cage, Meryl Streep and Chris Cooper are at their best (all were Oscar nominated; Cooper won) and the movie contains brief but wonderful turns by Brian Cox, Tilda Swinton, Ron Livingston and Judy Greer.

x

CATCH ME IF YOU CAN
Steven Spielberg did some fine work over these last ten years, but this was his best film on the whole. Leonardo DiCaprio does a great job of playing the mingled confidence and fear of Frank Abagnale, Jr., a teenager who conned his way across the country and beyond by posing as a doctor, a pilot and a lawyer while forging checks and incurring the dogged pursuit of FBI agent Carl Hanratty (Tom Hanks). The movie is superbly-crafted fun, with excellent period art direction and a notably touching performance by Christopher Walken as Frank’s father.

x

CHICAGO
After years of languishing in development hell, with names such as Madonna, Goldie Hawn, Liza Minnelli and Charlize Theron attached at various times, Chicago finally made it from the Great White Way to the big screen on the inspired vision of director and choreographer Rob Marshall. At the time the movie came out, I had access to frequent free movie screenings, and there was a week when – I kid you not – I watched it four nights in a row. And at that point, I’d already seen it twice. That’s how addictive I found the brilliant array of songs by John Kander and Fred Ebb, which were all new to me even though the musical had debuted on Broadway in 1975. There’s not a song in the bunch that doesn’t kill, nor a staging of any one of them that doesn’t pop with imagination. Marshall’s conceit that each musical number is a fantasy playing out in the head of protagonist Roxie Hart (Renee Zellweger, who knew?) lends the film adaptation a distinct personality, and the performances by Zellweger, Catherine-Zeta Jones, Richard Gere, John C. Reilly and Queen Latifah add up to some damn fine razzle dazzle.

x

IGBY GOES DOWN
Kieran Culkin is rock star cool as Igby Slocombe, a rebellious son from a wealthy, WASP-ish New York family from which he is desperate to escape. There’s one misguided plot turn that shouldn’t have happened, but writer/director Burr Steers (the stoner on the couch who is casually shot by Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction) tells the story in an authentic voice, and the movie is magnificently cast. Ryan Phillippe, Susan Sarandon, Claire Danes, Jeff Goldblum, Amanda Peet, Jared Harris, Bill Pullman…it’s not just a collection of good performers, but an achievement of remarkable harmony between actors and characters.

x

NICHOLAS NICKLEBY
I’ve never read the Charles Dickens novel, which I understand has been dramatically condensed in this screen version, but I was totally charmed by the adaptation. Charlie Hunnam embodies the title character’s decency, kindness and nobility so fully that any cynicism I might have felt in the face of such purity was wiped away. Jim Broadbent and Juliet Stevenson are priceless as the wicked proprietors of Dotheboys Hall, and Jamie Bell is greatly affecting as the crippled Smike. The friendship between Smike and Nicholas is the movie’s beating heart, and the two actors play it out beautifully. The large ensemble also includes fine work from Christopher Plummer, Tom Courtenay, Kevin McKidd and Romola Garai among others. Rachel Portman’s light, lovely score does much to enhance the mood.

x

ROAD TO PERDITION
Sam Mendes’ follow-up to American Beauty remains tragically underrated. Set in Illinois during the reign of Al Capone, the story concerns gangster Michael Sullivan (Tom Hanks, impressive in a change-of-pace performance), who must flee his hometown with his older son after an attempt on his life at the hands of a reckless colleague. There’s gripping work from Paul Newman, Daniel Craig, Jude Law, Stanley Tucci and newcomer Tyler Hoechlin as Sullivan’s son, who regards his taciturn father with fear and wonderment. It’s part road movie, part revenge movie and part family drama, with Mendes applying a mythic grandeur to the exploration of the often complex relationships between fathers and sons. This is a flat-out great movie, further highlighted by Thomas Newman’s wonderful score and stunningly beautiful cinematography from Conrad L. Hall (it was his last film, and won him a posthumous Academy Award).

x

SPIRITED AWAY
One of my favorite movies when I was a kid, and one I still love today, is The Secret of NIMH. I think one of the reasons was the idea of a magical world just beyond the reach of our own, or contained within our own but hidden just out of sight. It’s the same reason – or again, one of them – that I love this movie from Japanese animation master Hayao Miyazaki. It follows Chihiro, a timid little girl who does a lot of maturing when she becomes lost in a bathhouse that caters to gods and spirits. A gorgeously animated and truly bewitching movie that never fails to transport me.

2003

FINDING NEMO
With their fifth movie, Pixar achieved their best-yet balance of humor and heart, and that’s saying something.  The story concerns Marlin, an overprotective clown fish dad desperately seeking his only son, who’s been caught by a fisherman. Ellen DeGeneres gives an unforgettable vocal performance as Dory, a blue tang fish with short-term memory loss who becomes Marlin’s companion in the search and makes for a perfect, peppy foil to his curmudgeonly clown (voiced by Albert Brooks). While they make their way across a breathtakingly colorful seascape, there’s just as much to enjoy in the dentist office fish tank where little Nemo now resides, unwittingly inspiring his tank mates (led by Willem Dafoe’s scarred Gil) to plan an elaborate escape. Beautiful filmmaking across the board.

x

HOUSE OF SAND AND FOG
Jennifer Connelly plays Kathy, a young woman drowning in sadness who loses her family home after failing to take timely action in correcting a mistake involving property taxes. Ben Kinglsey is Behrani, a former Iranian colonel who fled the country with his family and who purchases the house cheap, intending to make a profit selling it. For Kathy, the house represents a happier past. For Behrani, it’s the promise of a brighter future. Both are fierce in their determination. Caught in the middle are a married sheriff’s deputy (Ron Eldard) who falls in love with Kathy, and Behrani’s wife (Shohreh Aghdashloo), who speaks little English and feels isolated in their new American life. Based on a book by Andre Dubus III, the story is a tragedy of Greek and Shakespearean proportions. Combined. But there is beauty in tragedy, and here it comes not only from the outstanding performances (Kingsley and Aghdashloo were Oscar nominated; Connelly should have been), but from the richly drawn characters who demonstrate as much capacity for generosity as they do for damning stubbornness.

x

IN AMERICA
Beware: if you don’t have kids, this movie might make you want them. Directed by Jim Sheridan, who co-wrote the script with his daughters Naomi and Kirsten, the movie follows a family that leaves Ireland to start a new life in New York after the death of their son. We experience their story largely through the eyes of the young daughters, played by real-life sisters Emma and Sarah Bolger. Emma, the younger, plays Ariel – inquisitive, sweet and impossibly adorable. Sarah plays Kristie – wiser, more introspective and constantly armed with a camcorder to capture life unfolding around her. These girls are so natural, honest and fun that falling in love with them is inevitable. As the parents, Samantha Morton and Paddy Considine create an easy intimacy with each other and the girls, while Djimon Hounsou lends strong support as a neighbor facing his own struggles. It’s a joyous movie about a loving family trying to climb out from under the tragedy hanging over them, holding on to each other with everything they have and opening themselves up to the promise of a new life in a new country.

x

KILL BILL (2003-2004)
After a seven-year post-Jackie Brown hiatus, Quentin Tarantino’s return was well worth the wait. Kill Bill, an audacious and brutal two-part revenge epic, finds Uma Thurman delivering a literally kick-ass performance as The Bride, a one-time assassin who awakens from a four-year coma and sets out to kill her five former cohorts who murdered her wedding party and left her for dead. Vol. 1 emphasizes action while Vol. 2 is the talkier installment, but each offers the usual pleasures (and indulgences) that Tarantino fans are used to, while displaying his continued growth as a director. Kill Bill was his most action-oriented film up to that point, as well as his most visually dynamic. The swordfight between Thurman’s Bride and Lucy Liu’s Yakuza boss O-Ren Ishii is a marvelously executed sequence, unfolding in near-silence in a beatific Japanese garden against a deep blue sky and light steady snowfall. As usual, Tarantino’s cast is eclectic and uniformly excellent, with Daryl Hannah’s vicious killer Elle Driver and David Carradine’s hugely charismatic Bill particularly deserving of mention.

x

LOST IN TRANSLATION
Sofia Coppola’s ethereal drama about two lonely Americans who make a special connection while battling insomnia in a Tokyo hotel is a delicate masterpiece of observation. Bill Murray is achingly good as an American movie star in town shooting a commercial, his mind stuck on his indifferent wife back home. Scarlett Johansson is lovely as the young wife of a celebrity photographer, left mostly on her own to explore the country and wallow in worry for her future while he’s off working. Their isolation and inability to sleep lead them into a friendship that ends up running deep, despite their short time together. Coppola marvelously conveys the disorientating effect Tokyo can have on visitors, and has the confidence as a filmmaker to let this character-driven story unfold quietly, patiently, gracefully and with a risky but note-perfect ending.

x

PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: THE CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL
On paper, it sounded like a disaster. Walt Disney Pictures developing live-action movies based on their theme park rides? Was this the best Hollywood could do? Then Johnny Depp and Geoffrey Rush signed on and I thought, “Why are these great actors doing this stupid movie?” Then a friend with a connection at Disney read the script and told me it was actually pretty good. Still I was skeptical. Then I saw the trailer and thought, “Hmm…it kinda looks good.” Turns out it was better than good. It was a total blast, an unexpected joyride with top-tier production values and excellent, moderately-employed visual effects that served a fun, cleverly plotted story. Depp’s inspired creation of Captain Jack Sparrow deservedly achieved iconic status, and Geoffrey Rush matched him with gleeful villainy. Disney keeps churning out sequels, but the original can’t be beat.

x

SCHOOL OF ROCK
The movie Jack Black was born to make. Director Richard Linklater and writer Mike White brought their indie credibility and more importantly, their indie sensibility, to this most mainstream of comedies. It could have gone soft by the end, but it never does. Black plays Dewey Finn, a selfish, slothful rock star wannabe posing as a substitute teacher at an elite private school and secretly enlisting his students to join him in a Battle of the Bands competition. Yes, he learns the requisite lessons and comes out a better person in the end, but there’s no Afterschool Special corniness about it. Linklater, White and Black keep it real, and it doesn’t hurt that Linklater and casting director Ilene Starger assembled a talented and appealing group of kids to fill the classroom. Additionally, Joan Cusack shines as the school’s uptight principal, and she nearly accomplishes the difficult task of stealing scenes from Black. By the end of the movie, my face hurt from non-stop smiling. Gold stars all around.

x

SHATTERED GLASS
If Star Wars prequels Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith left you dubious about the acting prowess of Hayden Christensen (and if you didn’t see him in 2001’s Life as a House), look no further than this compelling docudrama for proof that he has some skills. Christensen plays Stephen Glass, a star writer for The New Republic who turns out to be a fraud, having invented huge portions of over a dozen stories published in the esteemed magazine. The film tracks the revelation by focusing on a particular article whose authenticity is called into question by staffers at a rival online publication. When they start digging, Stephen and his editor Chuck Lane (Peter Sarsgaard) go on the defensive, with Chuck soon realizing that something is indeed amiss. The movie is tightly written and directed by Billy Ray, who sets up the story with lean precision: the magazine’s youthful, energetic and tightly-knit writing staff; the awkward position Chuck finds himself in when the beloved editor is fired and he’s asked to take over, alienating a staff intensely loyal to his dismissed predecessor; and Stephen’s contradictory persona (he’s socially awkward and needy, yet loved and admired by colleagues for his supportive nature and storytelling acumen). Christensen creates a fascinating character, nailing the childish desperation as Stephen’s unraveling lies bring about increasingly pathetic and manipulative behavior. And Sarsgaard is phenomenal in the trickier role: less colorful, more internalized, but no less gripping as the truth and its larger implications dawn on him. One of my single favorite scenes of the decade is a late-film confrontation between Chuck and Caitlin (Chloe Sevigny), one of the magazine’s writers, who can’t accept that Stephen has duped them all. It’s a short scene – two minutes, maybe – in which Chuck attempts to drive home the significance of what’s transpired. It’s a superb moment – cathartic for the characters and thrilling for the simple pleasure of great writing and great acting coming together.

x

THE STATION AGENT
This was definitely one of the most surprising movies of the decade for me, in that I usually know something about the movie I’m walking into, and here I knew almost nothing. What a treat I had in store. I’d never seen Peter Dinklage in anything, but he quickly won me over as Finbar McBride, a lonely train enthusiast who moves into an abandoned train depot in rural New Jersey and finds himself drawn into the lives of some of the locals, including Patricia Clarkson’s grieving artist, Bobby Cannavale’s outgoing snack truck vendor and Michelle Williams’ gentle librarian. It’s a movie that celebrates the importance of friendship, and by the end I’m always sort of sad that I don’t get to hang out with this unlikely circle of characters.

x

Run for the hills or stay tuned for 2004-2008

March 15, 2009

Twenty Films I’m Looking Forward to in 2009

Filed under: Movies — DB @ 1:35 pm
Tags: , ,

Here’s your chance to join me for a game that will be both fun and educational. What follows is a list of the 20 movies I’m most excited about this year, mainly based on the talents involved. They may turn out golden or they may underwhelm; right now, the point is that they have potential.

Obviously I don’t know every movie that’s coming this year, and who can predict the small, indie surprises that will rise out of the festivals or grow from humble beginnings. No one was talking about Slumdog Millionaire this time last year, or Juno this time the year before. But of the films I know about and expect to arrive in theaters this year, here’s what I’m waiting for most eagerly. Play along at home by keeping this list as a handy scorecard you can use throughout the year as I rate the results, and learn about the movies you should be excited to see based on me telling you to be.

At the end of the year, we’ll reconvene to see how many of these made my list of favorites for ’09.

Ready to play?

20. THE ROAD – Originally scheduled for release in November of ‘08, this adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s Pulitzer Prize winner was pushed to this year. I have yet to read the book, but I get excited about any movie that promises a compelling lead role for Viggo Mortensen. Let’s hope director John Hillecoat adapts this novel half as skillfully as The Coen Brothers adapted McCarthy’s No Country for Old Men. (Release Date: TBD)

19. LOVE RANCH – Aside from a brief cameo in The Good Shepherd, Joe Pesci hasn’t been in a movie since 1998. I have no idea what led to his hiatus; it’s over, and that’s all that matters. The movie follows the couple that opened Nevada’s first legal brothel, and Pesci stars with Helen Mirren, making for an odd but no doubt combustible combo. I’m eager to see the movie that lured him back. (TBD)

18. NEW YORK, I LOVE YOU – In 2007, there was a great little movie called Paris Je T‘aime (which for you non-French speakers out there… like me…means Paris, I Love You). It’s an anthology film, comprised of 18 shorts, each set in a different Parisian neighborhood and telling stories of love in all its forms, from romantic to familial, blooming to fading. It featured an array of international talent both in front of the camera (including Natalie Portman, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Elijah Wood, Nick Nolte, Bob Hoskins, Steve Buscemi and Juliette Binoche) and behind it (Alfonso Cuaron, Alexander Payne, Walter Salles, and The Coen Brothers). Some segments were better than others, but overall it was a charming exercise. Now the producers are bringing the premise to New York, with another stellar line up of talent. Actors on hand include Robin Wright Penn, Chris Cooper, Julie Christie, Orlando Bloom, James Caan and Shia LeBeouf, with directors Zach Braff, Shekhar Kapur, Mira Nair and Scarlett Johansson among the contributors behind the camera. (April)

17. THE TREE OF LIFE – Terrence Malick is one of the most enigmatic filmmakers in the mainstream, and his long, slow movies are not for everyone. But those who saw beauty and poetry in The Thin Red Line and The New World can’t help but be curious when they hear he’s got something new coming out. All I know about his latest is that it features Brad Pitt and Sean Penn. Their presence bodes well, but I just want to see what Malick has up his sleeve. (TBD)

16. THE HUMAN FACTOR – In their third collaboration, Clint Eastwood directs Morgan Freeman as Nelson Mandela. Well, I guess we know who one of next year’s Best Actor nominees will be. Matt Damon co-stars…which can only help. (December)

15. A SERIOUS MAN – Joel and Ethan Coen return with a small, personal film with no stars (save for the rubbery-faced character actor Richard Kind). Their break from big name actors and high-concept stories can’t help but excite their true fans. Here’s hoping it’s great. (October)

14. WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE – This adaptation of the classic children’s book has had a troubled road to film, with reports last year of a disappointing test screening and a number of re-shoots. However Being John Malkovich and Adaptation director Spike Jonze is at the helm, meaning that even if it ultimately fails, it will probably fascinate. (October)

13. TAKING WOODSTOCK – You may notice that my anticipation for many of these films stems from the director. That’s the case here, as Ang Lee follows up Brokeback Mountain with the story of how 1969’s legendary summer music festival came to be. In an intruging piece of casting, offbeat comedian Demetri Martin plays the lead role, alongside Emile Hirsch, Paul Dano, Liev Schreiber, Eugene Levy and Imelda Staunton. (August 14)

12. THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS – Heath Ledger’s final film is not locked in for release this year, but my hope is that it will arrive in the fall. Director Terry Gilliam’s fantastical story about a mysterious theater troupe was in the middle of production when Ledger died, and in order to finish it and honor the his work, Gilliam recruited three actors to play different incarnations of Ledger’s character: Johnny Depp, Jude Law and Colin Farrell. This unusual casting aspect, and the fact that it will be the final piece of Ledger’s screen legacy, are enough to get me excited. But a new fantasy film from Terry Gilliam? Sign me up now. (TBD)

11. AWAY WE GO – The first time British director Sam Mendes stepped behind a film camera, he leveled his lens at contemporary suburbia and led American Beauty to five Oscar wins. His most recent trip in the director’s chair saw him revisiting suburbia, this time in the 1950’s, with the dark deconstruction Revolutionary Road. This year he’ll once again bring his insightful eye to a tale of life in America, with a story chronicling a young couple’s cross country journey as they seek the perfect place to settle down and start a family. Novelist Dave Eggers and his wife co-wrote the script, and John Krasinski (The Office’s Jim) and Maya Rudolph play the couple. But as always, Mendes is the biggest draw. (June)

10. THIS SIDE OF THE TRUTH – Ricky Gervais co-wrote, co-directs and stars in this comedy about a world where no one has ever lied. Gervais acting in his own material is enough to peak my interest; add in co-stars like Tina Fey, Christopher Guest, Jonah Hill, Jason Bateman and Jeffrey Tambor and I’m crossing my fingers for a comedy classic. (TBD)

9. UP – Is there a more trustworthy brand name in America today than Pixar? The trailers for the studio’s latest feature haven’t excited me terribly, but oddly, Pixar’s trailers never do. Whereas most previews seem to give all the good stuff away, Pixar manages to save the best for the actual movies. Just another of their consistent miracles, I guess. (May 29)

8. THE FANTASTIC MR. FOX – On the heels of Spike Jonze making Where the Wild Things Are, another indie auteur takes on another children’s tale: Wes Anderson is tackling a stop-motion animated adaptation of the Roald Dahl story. From Bottle Rocket to The Darjeeling Limited, all of Anderson’s previous films exist in a common (and live-action) universe. This will be a major diversion for him, and I’m dying to see what he comes up with. Voice cast includes George Clooney and previous Anderson collaborators Cate Blanchett, Jason Schwartzman and Bill Murray. Meryl Streep might lend her voice as well. (November)

7. HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF-BLOOD PRINCE – Do I really need to explain?  (July 17)

6. FUNNY PEOPLE – Though he seems to never stop producing, Judd Apatow has only directed two films: The 40 Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up. Praise the Lord, here comes number three. Set in the world of stand-up comedy, this one stars Adam Sandler, Seth Rogan, Jonah Hill, Leslie Mann, Jason Schwartzman and Eric Bana. Apatow is one of the few filmmakers out there who understands a raunchy comedy can also be sweet, sincere and unschmaltzy. If his previous films are any indication, this one is bound for glory. (July 31)

5. PUBLIC ENEMIES – Johnny Depp and Christian Bale, directed by Michael Mann. With that trio, the details are insignificant. But if you must know something, Depp plays John Dillinger and Bale is the FBI agent on his trail. With Mann at the reins, the stage is set for the best period gangster flick since The Untouchables. (July 1)

4. INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS – Quentin Tarantino has long been talking about his desire to make this WWII film. After years of holding only a mythical, “dream project” status, he’s finally doing it. Brad Pitt heads an eclectic cast that includes horror director Eli Roth, The Office’s B.J. Novak, a bunch of European actors I don’t know and in a small but key role, Mike Myers. He doesn’t always hit Pulp Fiction heights, but Tarantino has yet to let me down. (August 21)

3. THE LOVELY BONES – Peter Jackson adapts the best-seller about a murdered young girl who watches over her family and her killer from Heaven. The novel was a sensation, and while the plot seems stupid to me, I have great confidence in what Jackson will do with it. Atonement’s Saorise Ronan stars, along with Mark Wahlberg, Rachel Weisz, Susan Sarandon, Stanley Tucci and Michael Imperioli. (December)

2. SHUTTER ISLAND – Martin Scorsese returns with his first feature since The Departed. Working with Leonardo DiCaprio again, Scorsese is the latest to take on a novel by Dennis Lehane, whose last two books to come to the screen were Mystic River and Gone Baby Gone. Not a bad track record, and it’s hard to imagine Scorsese will disappoint, especially with an absolutely killer supporting cast that features Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Patricia Clarkson, Jackie Earle Haley, Michelle Williams, Max von Sydow, Elias Koteas, and Emily Mortimer. Wow. (October)

1. AVATAR – Aside from a couple of IMAX documentaries, James Cameron hasn’t directed a movie since Titanic. 12 years in the waiting, Avatar will arrive with the promise of taking 3-D not just to the next level, but to three or four levels beyond that. Actors on hand include newcomer Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldana, Michelle Rodriguez and Cameron’s Aliens leading lady Sigourney Weaver. As for the story, it concerns a soldier who becomes involved in a war between mankind and an alien race. Really though, who cares what it concerns? Cameron is back, busting down technological barriers, re-writing the rules of visual effects and guranteed to deliver something that, by all early accounts, will blow our minds out the back of our heads. (December 18…if he can finish it on time)

March 2, 2009

Oscar 2008: What Went Down

Filed under: Movies,Oscars — DB @ 7:58 am
Tags: , ,

So another Oscar night has come and gone, and as I won $60 and saw most of my personal preferences emerge victorious, I was happy. But what of the show itself? Behold my musings.

Okay, I know its been a week and you probably don’t care anymore, but this is how long it took me to get some comments together, and by the Power of Grayskull, I will be heard! Or at the very least, I will send this to people, thus giving me the illusion that I am being heard. So then…

I thought it was a pretty great show, overall. The new producers did a nice job and brought some real inventiveness to a familiar formula.

THE LOOK
The production design was great. It was a nice move, shifting the orchestra onto the stage and bringing the proscenium right out to the audience with that small, round extension and having the nominees and presenters arranged in a semi-circle. It looked good, and made it appear more intimate for the nominees.

I also liked the way the stage changed to reflect the awards being given, from the soundstage look of the pre-production awards (Art Direction, Costume Design, Makeup) to the camera equipment signaling Best Cinematography to the multiple, Matrix-y screens decorating the post-production awards/Will Smith Show (Visual Effects, the two Sound awards and Editing). And on a related note, I liked he idea of the awards being presented in the order of when in the process they happen. It gave a nice flow to the presentation.

THE OPENING
Hugh Jackman wasted little time before moving into a song, which was a clever jab at the Academy’s claim of toning down the excess to reflect the struggling economy. It was a fun number using boards of card and chalk, and while the song itself wasn’t as memorable as some of Billy Crystal’s numbers, the low-budget gimmick was creative and made the bit work. And kudos to Anne Hathaway for a great cameo.

THE WRITING AWARDS
This segment kicked off with a great intro, as the screen presented a script describing the arrival of Steve Martin and Tina Fey. It was a pleasant surprise to see Fey there; I think of her as a TV actress, but I guess with the success of Baby Mama she now has legit movie cred. She and Steve Martin were aces, and Milk winner Dustin Lance Black gave a moving speech.

Next year, I want Mel Brooks and Gene Wilder to present these awards. I already have the whole bit worked out, and I’ve got 11 months to get it to the Academy!

THE ANIMATION AWARDS
First off, I gotta ask: did the movie Space Chimps actually get some play at the Academy Awards? Seriously?

These were presented by Jack Black and Jennifer Aniston, and l must address the entertainment media fucktards who insist on creating drama that doesn’t exist. It is true that twice during Black and Aniston’s banter, the cameras cut to Angelina Jolie. The next day, everyone was talking about it. Ooooh, it’s shocking because Jen used to be married to Brad!  Ohhhh, it’s controversial because now he’s married to Angie. Awkward!

Let me explain this to you like the soft-headed infants that you are. Jack Black made two jokes referencing his voice work in Dreamworks’ animated films. After these two jokes, the camera cut to Angelina Jolie…because she did voice work in the same movies. Do you get it? Did that even occur to you? No, of course not. Why would your job actually depend on knowing something about the fucking industry you’re “covering?”

But wait, there’s more! While I’m addressing the buffoons of the entertainment media, can I point out this article, suggesting that Mickey Rourke is now going to drift back into obscurity because he didn’t win the Oscar? What friggin’ planet are these people on? Rourke is fielding offers left and right, including a major role in Iron Man 2 (though Marvel appears to be skimping on the budget, which could cost them Rourke and several other good actors). Everybody in town wants a piece of Rourke, and he seems determined to make good on his comeback and the industry’s renewed faith in him. So to the writers of these articles: step away from the keyboard until you have a clue about the field you’re reporting on. Just because you’re covering show business doesn’t mean you have to be utterly vapid and uninformed.

Douchenozzles.

THE DOCUMENTARY AWARDS
I love that Bill Maher was there to present these, partly because of the irony stemming from how much contempt he likely has for most of the people in that room (well, for most of the actors, anyway), and partly because Bill Maher has balls. His balls got him fired from his show on ABC some years ago (no, he didn’t actually show them on TV, although that might have gone over better than the comment that did cost him the job), but he made a welcome return to the network on Oscar night.

Maher couldn’t resist shamelessly plugging his own, non-nominated documentary Religulous, nor the chance afforded by that reference to quickly and sharply express his opinion about God and religion. Even through the TV you could feel the discomfort that drifted around the Kodak at that moment, but I applaud him for saying it. I also thought he paid respectful tribute to the work of documentary filmmakers, and the producers made a nice move this year by spotlighting the documentarians on camera in the audience when their names were being read. We had already glimpsed them in the Documentary 2008 tribute reel that preceded the award, but acknowledging them in the room was a nice gesture that should be done more often.

Oh and friend of the blog Grantland G. is right – Man on Wire‘s Philippe Petit balancing the Oscar on his chin was an instant classic that will be part of all future Oscar highlight reels – like Jack Palance doing one-armed-push-ups, the streaker behind David Niven, etc. Also, tell me when he walked up on stage and glanced upwards around the room that he wasn’t asking himself what feat of high-wiring he could do in that theater. Maybe at next year’s ceremony…

THE MUSIC
The Baz Luhrmann movie musical tribute number was a mixed bag. It was well staged, infused with old fashioned movie musical pizazz. But the medley-style, blending all the various songs together, didn’t work that well for me; the presence of Zac Efron, Vanessa Hudgens, Amanda Seyfried and Dominic Cooper seemed like an unnecessary afterthought distracting from Jackman and Beyonce; and let’s face it – Oscar musical numbers are inherently kinda hokey. Yes, Jackman helped by framing it as a “the musical is back” celebration, which gave it some relevance and kept it from being taken too seriously. But when you look back at some of the big production numbers from Oscars past – I’m looking at you, 1970’s and 80’s – they’re pretty cheesy, and this one was sort of in the same vein. It wasn’t a disaster by any stretch, so I’m okay with it, but let’s hope the musical isn’t that back.

The Best Song nominees presentation was decent. The Slumdog songs don’t work as well out of the movie, but they made for an energetic sequence. And all respect to John Legend, but it was too bad Peter Gabriel declined to perform his tune from Wall-E, as his voice does particular justice to that song. The blending of “Down to Earth” and “Jai Ho” wasn’t ideal, but they made it work well enough. If only this segment had been as good as, say, oh, I dunno…Bruce Springsteen’s halftime show at the Super Bowl.

Maybe if they had nominated him, it could have been. Morons.

One musical number I did like was Queen Latifah’s live performance to the In Memoriam reel. I thought that was a nice change from the usual instrumental presentation. I also liked how several screens, large and small, hung down and displayed the work of the individuals. But on the downside, the desire to showcase the staging often made it difficult for the TV viewer to read the name of the deceased. Still, it was a nice tribute overall, and it ended the only way it should have: with a rousing round of applause for Paul Newman.

I still can’t believe he’s gone.

THE ACTING AWARDS
The presentation of Best Supporting Actress at the beginning of the show kicked off one of the best surprises of the night: the presence of five former winners coming together to anoint their next companion. These were well staged, and while I wish clips had still been shown (they’re the best way to hook uninformed viewers into performances and films they might not have seen) the personalization of a former winner directly addressing a nominee was really nice. It seemed to make the experience more special for all the nominees, and for the winners it did give the sense of joining the ranks of a pretty cool club.

But where were last year’s male winners, Javier Bardem and Daniel Day-Lewis? Joel Grey even mentioned Javier in his remarks to Josh Brolin. Great to see Joel Grey there, but wouldn’t that bit have been better coming from Javier himself? Also, Christopher Walken addressing Michael Shannon – how perfect was that? If Hollywood has any brains, there’s a screenwriter out there right now devising a movie in which these two play a creepy father-and-son duo. As for Kevin Kline, I love any and all reminders that he won an Oscar for A Fish Called Wanda, so I was glad to see him there.

I was really glad that Heath Ledger’s family was there to accept his award. He’s won a bunch leading up to this, and his director or co-stars have accepted for him. But this is the Oscars, and it was great to see his family there to honor him. I wish the camera had cut to the audience a bit more to give us a read of the room during their touching acceptance. Good on ya, Heath. You deserved it.

Kate Winslet’s dad whistling (and looking eerily like Inauguration Day Dick Cheney) was a good moment, as was her whole speech. She’s taken some flack throughout the awards season for being too emotional, but each time she’s taken the stage she has been grateful and effusive toward the people she’s worked with and loves. I appreciated her tributes to her early supporters Peter Jackson and Emma Thompson, to The Reader‘s late producers Anthony Minghella and Sydney Pollack, and to her fellow nominees. She should have thanked Nicole Kidman too, for getting pregnant and having to drop out of the film.

THE COMEDY
As a host, Jackman did well. He’s a great showman and he’s got a good sense of humor, but I did miss the presence of a comedian and the run of jokes they would typically employ to help keep the show moving. There were funny bits throughout – like Judd Apatow’s hilarious Comedy 2008 tribute with Seth Rogen and James Franco reprising their Pineapple Express roles, or Natalie Portman’s presentation with a Joaquin Phoenix-ized Ben Stiller – but it would have been nice to have a comedian’s touch guiding the ship. Oh, and Portman had one of the best jokes of the night when she described Ben Stiller as looking like a “Hasidic meth addict.”

THE BEAUTIFUL WOMEN
Just because I’m a guy doesn’t mean I can’t appreciate Oscar gowns. I like seeing what the ladies are wearing as much as anybody, to appreciate both the craftsmanship of a beautiful dress and the craftsmanship of the woman inside it. So I’d like to give a shout-out to the hottest stars of Oscar night: Penelope Cruz, Natalie Portman, Angelina Jolie, Marion Cotillard, Freida Pinto (who gets the gold star for the season, having looked gorgeous in every dress at every event she’s been to), Angelina Jolie and of course, Kate Winslet.

Ladies, I salute you, and to paraphrase my favorite TV weatherman Brick Tamland, I cordially invite you to the afterparty in my pants.

THE INDEPENDENT SPIRIT AWARDS
Just a few quick comments on the other awards show of Oscar weekend, the always entertaining Independent Spirit Awards:

-Penelope Cruz – Another win, another opportunity to look super hot, this time in a casual, simple brown dress. What a stunner she is…

-Robin Wright Penn – This woman deserves a shout-out, because she’s totally underappreciated – for her acting and her beauty. She presented an award, and reminded me how awesome she is.

-Mickey Rourke – He won the Best Actor award, and took full advantage of IFC’s uncensored ceremony, dropping F-bombs left and right and showing his gratitude in a long, hilarious speech. Way to go, Mickey.

-Christian Bale and Joaquin Phoenix – This one must speak for itself. Check it out, but not in the office…

THE END
And so the 2008 awards season draws to a close. In the interest of trying to follow all the advice I’ve been getting lately about starting a blog, stand by for a taste of what I’m looking forward to in ’09.

Thanks for reading…
« Previous PageNext Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.